Scribd
Upload
12 views3 pages

IEA - 1st IPET

The document outlines key concepts and provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, including types of facts, standards of proof, and rules regarding admissions and confessions. It also addresses the relevance of facts, the burden of proof in criminal cases, and the admissibility of electronic records. Additionally, it covers specific sections related to presumptions of death and legitimacy of children.

Uploaded by

Shivam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
12 views3 pages

IEA - 1st IPET

The document outlines key concepts and provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, including types of facts, standards of proof, and rules regarding admissions and confessions. It also addresses the relevance of facts, the burden of proof in criminal cases, and the admissibility of electronic records. Additionally, it covers specific sections related to presumptions of death and legitimacy of children.

Uploaded by

Shivam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872

1. Facts can be
(a) physical facts
(b) psychological facts
(c) both are correct
(d) none of the above

2. Standard of proof in
(a) civil and criminal cases is the same
(b) criminal cases is much more higher than in civil cases
(c) criminal case is lower than in civil cases
(d) none of the above

3. Presumptions under the law of evidence are


(a) presumption of facts
(b) presumptions of law
(c) both (a) & (b)
(d) none of the above

4. The facts which form part of the same transaction are relevant under section 6. This
principle is known as
(a) Res Gestae
(b) Plea of Alibi
(c) none of the above
(d) burden of proof

5. Admissions
(a) must be in writing
(b) must be oral
(c) either oral or in writing
(d) only in writing & not oral

6. A confession made to a police officer is


(a) Inadmissible
(b) Admissible
(c) None of the above
(d) Valid if made in custody.

7. A confession made while in police custody is admissible under section 26 of Evidence


Act
(a) if made in the presence of a doctor
(b) if made in the presence of a captain of a vessel
(c) if made in the presence of a Magistrate
(d) all the above.

8. Section 27 applies to
(a) discovery of some fact which the police had not previously learnt from other sources and
was first derived from the information given by the accused
(b) discovery of some fact which the police had previously learnt from other sources
(c) discovery of some fact which the police had previously learnt from other sources and the
accused has also given information regarding the same
(d) all the above
9. Section 27 of Evidence Act applies
(a) when the person giving information is an accused but not in police custody
(b) when the person giving information is an accused and is in police custody
(c) when the person is neither in police custody nor an accused
(d) none of the above

10. Oral evidence under section 60 of Evidence Act may be


(a) direct only
(b) hearsay
(c) both (a) & (b)
(d) either (a) or (b).

11. Contents of a document under section 59 of Evidence Act


(a) can be proved by oral evidence
(b) cannot be proved by oral evidence
(c) may or may not be proved by oral evidence
(d) none of the above

12. Contents of a document may be proved under section 61 of Evidence Act


(a) by primary evidence
(b) by secondary evidence
(c) both a & b
(d) none of the above

13. Secondary evidence is admissible


(a) where the non-production of primary evidence has not been accounted for
(b) where the non-production of primary evidence has been accounted for
(c) irrespective of whether the non- production of primary evidence has been accounted for or
not
(d) both (a) & (c) are correct.

14. Admissibility of electronic record has been prescribed under


(a) section 60 of Evidence Act
(b) section 65A of Evidence Act
(c) section 65B of Evidence Act
(d) section 67 of Evidence Act.

15. In criminal proceedings, the burden of proof is


(a) on the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused
(b) on the accused to prove his innocence
(c) on both the parties
(d) none of the above

16. For presumption under section 107 of Evidence Act, the person is to be shown to be
alive
(a) within 5 years
(b) within 10 years
(c) within 15 years
(d) within 30 years
17. For presumption of death under section 108 of Evidence Act, the person is shown to
be not heard for a period of
(a) 35 years
(b) 7 years
(c) 14 years
(d) 21 years

18. In cases a child is born within 280 days of dissolution of marriage, the mother
remaining unmarried the presumption of legitimacy of child under section 112 of
Evidence Act arises
(a) if the father is alive on the day the child is born
(b) if the father is not alive on the day the child is born
(c) irrespective of whether the father is alive or dead on the day the child is born
(d) either in (a) or (b).

19. Relevancy of facts are dealt in which provisions of Evidence Act.


(a) Section 5-55
(b) Section 101-114
(c) Section 167
(d) Section 166
20. Prosecution claims that A killed B and in defence, A produces evidence that A was
somewhere else at the time of incident. It is known as
(a) Plea of Alibi
(b) Plea bargaining
(c) Either a or b
(d) None of the above

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy