The document outlines the political philosophies of various thinkers from different centuries, detailing their views on human nature, ideal political systems, and their responses to contemporary contexts. It highlights the evolution of political thought from ancient philosophers like Plato and Aristotle to modern theorists such as Fukuyama and Huntington. Each entry provides insights into how these ideas remain relevant in today's political discourse.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views4 pages
Political Philosophy - Table
The document outlines the political philosophies of various thinkers from different centuries, detailing their views on human nature, ideal political systems, and their responses to contemporary contexts. It highlights the evolution of political thought from ancient philosophers like Plato and Aristotle to modern theorists such as Fukuyama and Huntington. Each entry provides insights into how these ideas remain relevant in today's political discourse.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
Thinker Century Ideal Political View on Responding To Context Modern
System Human Relevance
Nature Plato 5th-4th Philosopher- Rational soul Sophists, Saw Modern elitism, c. BC King Rule should Athenian democracy kill rule by experts dominate democracy Socrates; (technocracy) wanted wisdom to rule Aristotle 4th c. Mixed Humans are Plato Focused on Modern BC government political virtue, balance, constitutionalism, (monarchy, animals and teleology virtue ethics aristocracy, polity) Cicero 1st c. Republic with Humans have Roman Advocated Republicanism, BC checks and duties to state instability, natural law rule of law balances and law tyranny and civic debates virtue St. 4th-5th City of God Humans are Fall of Rome, Integrated Christian Augustine c. (theocratic sinful, need pagan critiques Christian conservatism, vision) divine order theology with role of religion in politics politics Aquinas 13th c. Hierarchical Humans are Aristotelian Synthesized Natural law monarchy with rational but thought, faith & reason, theory, religious natural law require divine Catholic defended conservatism guidance doctrine natural law John 15th c. Constitutional Humans need Absolutism, English British Fortescue Monarchy law and divine right medieval constitutionalism, tradition theories governance common law foundations Machiavelli 15th- Strong ruler Humans are Classical Writing in Realpolitik, 16th c. (Republic or selfish and idealism (esp. unstable authoritarianism Prince) power-hungry Plato) Renaissance Italy Jean Bodin 16th c. Sovereignty- Humans need Civil wars in Developed the Modern ideas of based monarchy a strong ruler France, theory of state authority, for order Machiavelli sovereignty centralization Althusius 16th- Federalism Humans form Absolutism, Protestant Modern 17th c. communities centralization resistance federalism, naturally theory subsidiarity in governance Hobbes 17th c. Absolute Humans are English Civil Wanted order Justifications for Monarchy selfish, need War above all else strong state strong control power (COVID- 19, security measures) Locke 17th c. Constitutional Humans have Hobbes Influenced by Basis of liberal Government reason & Glorious democracy, natural rights Revolution human rights Pufendorf 17th c. Natural Law- Humans are Hobbes, Early German International law, based monarchy social but religious wars Enlightenment, moral duties of or republic require laws peace theories states Montesquieu 18th c. Separation of Humans need Absolutism, Advocated U.S. Powers (mixed institutional centralized checks and Constitution, government) balance power balances modern democracy Rousseau 18th c. Direct Humans are Locke, Critiqued Social justice Democracy naturally Enlightenment inequality, movements, good but wrote in pre- participatory corrupted by revolutionary democracy society France Burke 18th c. Constitutional Humans are French Defended Modern Monarchy & flawed, need Revolution, tradition & conservatism, Tradition institutions Rousseau gradual change critique of radical change Kant 18th c. Republic based Humans have Despotism, lack Wrote during Human rights, on moral dignity & of freedom Enlightenment moral basis of autonomy rationality law Vico 18th c. Cyclical view Humans are Enlightenment Challenged Postmodern of political shaped by rationalism linear progress critiques of evolution history and views progress, cultural culture studies Herder 18th- Cultural Humans Enlightenment German National identity, 19th c. nationalism belong to universalism Romanticism, multiculturalism distinct nationalism cultural groups Hegel 19th c. Rational State Humans Kant, French Dialectics, Marxism, (constitutional progress Revolution influenced nationalism, state monarchy) through German power debates history idealism Tocqueville 19th c. Democracy Humans seek French Explored Warnings about with local equality but Revolution, democracy's mass democracy, institutions risk American strengths & centralization centralization democracy dangers Mill 19th c. Representative Humans are Tyranny of the Advocated free Liberalism, free Democracy rational but majority speech, liberty speech debates with Individual require Liberty education Marx 19th c. Communism Humans are Hegel, Analyzed Socialist (classless shaped by capitalism capitalism, movements, society) economic industrial critiques of structures revolution capitalism Nietzsche 19th c. Anti- Humans seek Christianity, Critiqued Postmodernism, democracy, power, morality moral values, elitism, critiques Übermensch morality is nihilism of equality (aristocratic subjective radicalism) Leo XIII 19th c. Christian Social Humans need Industrialization, Promoted Distributism, (Rerum Doctrine moral and socialism Catholic social social justice in Novarum) (balance of social teaching religion labor & capital) responsibility Constant 19th c. Constitutional Humans need Rousseau, Critiqued Modern liberal Liberalism liberty with French revolutionary democracy, civil stability Revolution radicalism liberties excesses Fichte 19th c. Nationalist state Humans Cosmopolitan German Nationalism, thrive in Enlightenment Idealism, state-building strong ideas Napoleonic theories national Wars communities Schmitt 20th c. Authoritarian Humans are Liberalism, Argued for Nationalism, State conflict- Weimar decisive populism, (friend/enemy driven Republic leadership executive power distinction) debates Weber 20th c. Bureaucratic Humans Marxism, Explored Bureaucratic rational state follow capitalism legitimacy, state governance, institutions rational legitimacy authority debates Antonio 20th c. Cultural Human Marx, Lenin Focused on Critical theory, Gramsci Hegemony consciousness cultural and ideological leading to shaped by intellectual battles Socialism culture struggle Hannah 20th c. Republic with Humans seek Totalitarian Studied Modern Arendt civic meaning, risk regimes authority, authoritarianism, participation totalitarianism (Nazism, power, and democracy Stalinism) mass society debates
Michael 20th c. Communitarian Humans form Rawls, Critiqued Multiculturalism,
Walzer democracy moral liberalism universalism in community- communities justice theory based justice Oakeshott 20th c. Conservative Humans are Rationalism, Advocated for Conservatism, Pragmatism unpredictable, central planning traditions over limited tradition abstract government matters theories Rawls 20th c. Liberal Humans seek Utilitarianism, Created “veil Modern social Democracy fairness inequality of ignorance” justice, welfare thought state experiment Nozick 20th c. Minimal State Humans have Rawls, Defended Libertarianism, (Libertarianism) natural rights redistribution individual free-market liberty over policies state intervention Carl Popper 20th c. Open Society Humans learn Totalitarianism, Criticized Science in (Democracy through trial historicism Marxism and politics, open with Scientific and error totalitarian debate culture Method) ideologies Benedict 20th c. Imagined Humans Nationalist Postcolonial Understanding Anderson communities as construct essentialism critique of modern national nations nationalism nationalism, foundation through identity politics shared culture Strauss 20th c. Classical Humans need Liberal Critiqued Influence on political order, relativism modern conservative philosophy hierarchy nihilism intellectual revival thought Alasdair 20th- Aristotelian Humans Liberal Criticized Revival of virtue MacIntyre 21st c. Virtue Ethics flourish individualism, moral ethics, through modern ethics fragmentation conservative traditions & moral philosophy communities Fukuyama 20th- Liberal Humans seek Collapse of Predicted Globalization, 21st c. Democracy as recognition communism liberal post-liberal End of History democracy's debates dominance Huntington 20th- Clash of Humans are Fukuyama, Cold Argued Geopolitics, 21st c. Civilizations shaped by War civilizations, nationalism, model cultural not ideologies, identity politics identities drive conflict Mouffe 21st c. Agonistic Humans need Liberal Critiqued post- Populism, radical democracy political consensus political democracy struggle for models neutrality debates progress