Internet Addiction Test Manual
Internet Addiction Test Manual
Name
Male Female
Age Years Online Do you use the Internet for work? Yes No
This questionnaire consists of 20 statements. After reading each statement carefully, based upon
the 5-point Likert scale, please select the response (0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5) which best describes you. If
two choices seem to apply equally well, circle the choice that best represents how you are most
of the time during the past month. Be sure to read all the statements carefully before making
your choice. The statements refer to offline situations or actions unless otherwise specified.
0 = Not Applicable
1 = Rarely
2 = Occasionally
3 = Frequently
4 = Often
5 = Always
1. How often do you find that you stay 11. How often do you find yourself
online longer than you intended? anticipating when you will go online again?
2. How often do you neglect household 12. How often do you fear that life without
chores to spend more time online? the Internet would be boring, empty, and
3. How often do you prefer the excitement joyless?
of the Internet to intimacy with your 13. How often do you snap, yell, or act
partner? annoyed if someone bothers you while you
4. How often do you form new are online?
relationships with fellow online users? 14. How often do you lose sleep due to
5. How often do others in your life being online?
complain to you about the amount of time 15. How often do you feel preoccupied with
you spend online? the Internet when off-line, or fantasize about
6. How often do your grades or school being online?
work suffer because of the amount of time 16. How often do you find yourself saying
you spend online? "just a few more minutes" when online?
7. How often do you check your email 17. How often do you try to cut down the
before something else that you need to do? amount of time you spend online and fail?
8. How often does your job performance or 18. How often do you try to hide how long
productivity suffer because of the Internet? you've been online?
9. How often do you become defensive or 19. How often do you choose to spend more
secretive when anyone asks you what you time online over going out with others?
do online? 20. How often do you feel depressed,
10. How often do you block out disturbing moody, or nervous when you are off-line,
thoughts about your life with soothing which goes away once you are back online?
thoughts of the Internet?
The IAT total score is the sum of the ratings given by the examinee for the 20 item responses.
Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 5. The maximum score is 100 points. The
higher the score is, the higher is the severity of your problem. Total scores that range from 0 to
30 points are considered to reflect a normal level of Internet usage; scores of 31 to 49 indicate
the presence of a mild level of Internet addiction; 50 to 79 reflect the presence of a moderate
level; and scores of 80 to 100 indicate a severe dependence upon the Internet.
If you have any queries or doubts related to this scale or your responses, you can email us on
counselor@iitk.ac.in
The author and publisher have intended to be as accurate as possible in information provided
throughout this product. However, it may be possible that, due to human error, mistakes exist
within. Neither the author nor publisher extends any warranty about information contained
within this product. Users of this product are expected to have the appropriate qualifications and
training and use clinical judgment when using this product.
Care has been taken to maintain the confidentiality of individuals described within. Any similarity
to actual persons is not intentional.
1. Development............................................................................................................................................8
Appropriate Uses...................................................................................................................................10
Examiner Qualifications.........................................................................................................................10
2. Adminstration .........................................................................................................................................12
Administration Time...............................................................................................................................12
Self-Administration ...............................................................................................................................12
Oral Administration................................................................................................................................13
Questions..............................................................................................................................................14
3. Scoring...................................................................................................................................................16
Guidelines..............................................................................................................................................16
Interpretation ........................................................................................................................................16
4. Validation................................................................................................................................................18
Studies...................................................................................................................................................23
Dr. Young has testified for the Child Online Protection Act Congressional Committee and she
has been a keynote speaker at the European Union of Health and Medicine, the International
Conference on Digital Culture in Seoul, Korea, the US Army War College in Pennsylvania, and
the First International Congress on Internet Addiction Disorders in Milan, Italy, and served on the
National Academy of Sciences for the Digital Media and Developing Minds colloquia.
She is on the editorial board of the Journal of Behaviorial Addictions, the American Journal of
Family Therapy, Addicta: The Turkish Journal of Addiction, the International Journal of Cyber
Crime and Criminal Justice, and on the advisory board of CyberPsychology: Journal for Psycho-
social Research on Cyberspace, and a member of the American Psychological Association.
The Internet is a relatively new technology that has impacted the world and provided many
benefits to its users. At the same time, the Internet has had negative ramifications. Some people
are becoming preoccupied with the Internet, are unable to control their use of electronic devices,
and are jeopardizing school, employment, and relationships. The concept of “Internet addiction”
has been proposed as an explanation for uncontrollable, damaging use of technology to access
the Internet. Symptoms are compared to the criteria used to diagnose other addictions. The
literature has characterized Internet addiction as an impulse control disorder comparable to
pathological gambling because of overlapping diagnostic criteria and symptomatology.
Researchers have suggested various diagnostic criteria to examine Internet addiction from
a clinical perspective and over time. Consistencies in patterns that differentiate normal from
compulsive Internet use have emerged. Based on these studies, the IAT was constructed to
capture the problematic behavior associated with compulsive use of technology, including online
porn, Internet gambling, and compulsive use of online games and social media.
Studies on Internet addiction originated in the US. However, the problem of Internet addiction has
become a global problem. Studies have documented Internet addiction in a growing number of
countries such as Italy (Ferraro, Caci, D’Amico, & Di Blasi, 2007), Pakistan (Suhail & Bargees,
2006), and Czech Republic (Simkova & Cincera, 2004). Reports also indicate that Internet
addiction has become a serious public health concern in China (BBC, 2007), Korea (Hur, 2006),
and Taiwan (Leung, 2007). In the 1990s, studies attempting to define the prevalence of the
disorder vary in their estimates from 6% (Greenfield, 1999) among the general population of
Internet users to 14% among college-based populations (Scherer, 1998).
A nationwide study conducted by a team from Stanford University’s School of Medicine had
estimated that nearly one in eight Americans exhibited at least one possible sign of problematic
Internet use (Aboujaoude, Koran, Gamel, Large, & Serpe, 2006). The prevalence of Internet
addiction in the U.S. appears to be increasing as Internet use increases (Wen et. al., 2015). More
recent research has estimated that as many as 6 to 11% of individuals who use the Internet can
be considered to have an Internet addiction (Weinstein & Lejoyeux, 2010).
Beard and Wolf (2001) further modified Young’s Diagnosing Internet addiction is often complex.
diagnostic criteria, recommending that all of Unlike chemical dependency and substance
the first five criteria be required for diagnosis of abuse, the Internet offers several direct benefits,
Internet addiction, since these criteria could be as a technological advancement, to our society,
met without any impairment in the person’s daily not only as a device to be criticized as addictive.
functioning. It was also recommended that at least Individuals can conduct research, perform
one of the last three criteria (e.g., criteria 6, 7, and business transactions, access libraries, commu-
8) be required in diagnosing Internet addiction. nicate, and make vacation plans. Books have
The reason the last three were separated from been written outlining the psychological, as well
the others is because of the fact that these criteria as functional, benefits of the Internet in our lives.
impact the pathological Internet user’s ability By comparison, alcohol or drugs are not an
to cope and function (representing depressed, integral or necessary part of our personal and
anxious, and escaping problems respectively), and professional lives, nor do these substances offer
also impact interaction with others (e.g., significant any health benefit. With so many practical uses
relationships, jobs, being dishonest with others). of the Internet, signs of addiction can easily be
masked or justified. Further, clinical assessments
Shapiro et al., (2003) put forth a more compre- often assess for the presence of psychiatric and
hensive approach to diagnosing Internet addictive disorders. However, given its newness,
addiction under the general style of impulse symptoms of Internet addiction may not be
control disorders per the DSM-IV-TR that further revealed in an initial clinical interview. While
broadened the diagnostic criteria for problematic self-referrals for Internet addiction are becoming
Internet use. These criteria included: more common, often the client does not present
with complaints of computer addiction. People