Larr Act, 2013
Larr Act, 2013
1
livelihoods for that particular land, in the cases of rent, com-
mercial buildings and agricultural land.
Besides this, the rates paid for the lands acquired were as
per government rates and not market rates, which would
eventually result in a loss for the landowners. The process
was also devoid of transparency. There was no minimum re-
quirement of consent mandated by the act, along with terms
like ‘public purpose’ bearing broad interpretation, which
would often lead to land acquisitions for private projects un-
der the guise of public interest.
2
The major changes of the Act include the consent of 80% of
families involved in the acquisition made by private compa-
nies. For public-private partnerships (PPPs), the consent of
70% of the families is required as a mandate.
The Act also includes the feature of ‘solatium’, or extra com-
pensation of 100% amount that is due to be paid to the af-
fected families. There are now multiple checks placed on the
acquisition process itself, including social impact assess-
ments and expert group clearances, bearing in mind impor-
tant factors like livelihood, environmental factors, and the
essentiality of the plan itself.