EE3011 - Multilevel Power Converters Full Notes
EE3011 - Multilevel Power Converters Full Notes
Introduction:
Introduction
▪ high-power applications.
Diode-clamped (DCMC)
In some topologies, like the DCMC, there exist some states for which
the voltage level is not determined by the converter, but depends on the
sign of the load current These states are defined as forbidden states and
should be avoided.
For example
The number of possible states increases more than the voltage levels, also
increasing the number of redundant states. So, the generalized topology
is useful to understand the operation of multilevel topologies.
Symmetric Topologies without a Common DC Link
Where s(2j–1) and s(2j) are the switching functions and VC is the
DC voltage source of the jth stage. Each stage offers three voltage levels, 0
and ±VC; a series connection of two stages gives five levels, 0, ±VC, and
±2VC, since the 0 levels of each stage do not sum a different level.
Continuing with this reasoning, (n – 1)/2 stages are required to obtain
an n-level leg voltage vio. Assuming that all stages have the same value of
DC voltage source VC, then vio is the sum of all the contributions of the
(n−1)/2 stages, resulting in
In this topology the leg voltage is the same as the load voltage
Asymmetric Topology
Introduction -H-Bridge Inverter, Bipolar Pulse Width Modulation, Unipolar Pulse Width
Modulation.
Multilevel Inverter Topologies, CHB Inverter with Equal DC Voltage, H-Bridges with
Unequal DC Voltages – PWM, Carrier-Based PWM Schemes, Phase-Shifted Multicarrier
Modulation, Level-Shifted Multicarrier Modulation, Comparison Between Phase- and
Level-Shifted PWM Schemes-Staircase Modulation
2.0.Introduction :
The symmetric cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter (SCMI) and asymmetric cascaded H-
bridge multilevel inverter (ACMI) topologies are very similar in regards to the power topology.
They present the same amount of transistor and the same amount of dc sources. The only
difference between these topologies is the value of the dc sources. While the SCMI uses dc
sources with equal value in each H-bridge, the ACMI uses dc sources with different values in
each H-bridge. Each H-bridge used in SCMI or ACMI is called a module.
Full bridge inverter is a topology of H-bridge inverter used for converting DC power into AC
power. The circuit of a full bridge inverter consists of 4 diodes and 4 controlled switches as
shown below
Positive input voltage will appear across the load by the operation of T1 and T2 for a half time
period. The polarity of voltage across load will be changed for the other half period by
operating T3 and T4.
Fig.2.2.Full Bridge Inverter Gate Pulses
If we assume all devices are ideal, ie no losses, then the table shows the condition of each case
Table :Difference of Ideal and non- ideal switches .Switches may be SCR, Diode or IGBT.
Fig.2.5.Unipolar Switch
• A bidirectional switch device must be highly adaptable to enable easy and quick
power conduction from both sides, that is across A to B and B to A.
• When used in DC application, a BPS must exhibit minimum on state resistance
(Ron) for improved voltage regulation of the load.
• A BPS system must be equipped with proper protection circuitry to withstand
sudden in rush current during a polarity change, or at relatively high ambient
temperature conditions
2.2.2. Bipolar PWM
During first conduction period S1 and S2 will be connecting .and for the second conduction
period S3 and S4 are conducting (like pair of switches S1,S2 & S3,S4-diagonal switches are
connecting)
PWM is a Comparative response of the a carrier and reference wave forms, Where the carrier
is triangular waveform and the reference wave form is DC .
𝑽𝑑𝑐∗𝒅 𝑻𝑠 +(−𝑽𝑑𝑐)(1−𝒅) 𝑻𝑠
̅̅̅̅ =
Average output voltage = Vo = 𝑉𝑜
𝑻𝑠
̅̅̅̅̅
𝑽𝑜 1
d= +
2𝑽𝑑𝑐 2
̂
𝑽𝑜
Modulation Index = 𝒎𝑎
𝑽𝑑𝑐
Idc component is DC ripple component and 2 nd harmonics also involved in this type of bipolar
PWM and is a disadvantage because the second harmonic is a much in lower frequency
harmonic, let us say suppose if you have 50Hz output and in the capacitor current there is
100Hz , Accordingly need to select the capacitor large enough to withstand the 100Hz
component in the dc bus.
2..2.3.Unipolar PWM
In this S1 and S3 are turned ON for the first stage and S2 and S4 are turned ON for the second
stage (not like bipolar ie, diagonal switched are turned ON)
S1 and S3 are conducting –
2.3.Cascaded h-bridge multilevel inverters :
The structure of the cascaded H-bridge (CHB) may consist of two or more H-bridge inverters.
The CHB inverter can be supplied by separated DC sources or a single DC source. The
structure of the CHB inverter with separated DC-sources is shown in Figure 1. This type of
inverter consists of two cells H bridge inverter hence employs 8 power electronic switches.
The modulation technique that applies to each cell of inverter may be the same or different. It
varies from fundamental switching frequency PWM, carrier based PWM or combination of the
two different PWM methods (known as mixed / hybrid PWM method).
2.3.2.Phase Shifted PWM (PS PWM) :Phase Shifted PWM applies several triangular carriers
that have the same frequency and same peak peak amplitude, but there is a phase shift between
any two adjacent carrier waves. For m voltage levels, (m-1) carrier signals are required and
they are phase shifted with an angle of θ = (360°/m-1). The gate signals are generated with
proper comparison of carriers and a modulating signal. The comparison of voltage reference
signal and triangular carriers and the respective gating signals for a five-level CHB inverter are
shown in Figure 3 and 4.
2.3.3.Level shifted PWM (LS PWM) :Level Shifted PWM also uses some carrier signals, but
they are arranged in different levels among the carriers. According to the disposition of carrier
waves, the LS PWM can be divided into three main types i.e (i) Phase disposition (PD), when
all the carrier signals are in phase, (ii) Phase opposition disposition (POD), when all the carrier
signals above zero reference are in phase but in opposition with those are below zero reference.
(iii) Alternate phase opposition disposition (APOD): when the modulating signal of each phase
is in opposition from each other. The gating signals are generated by comparing the carrier
waves and the modulating signal as shown in Figure 5 and 6.
2.3.4.Mixed Switching Frequency (MSF) PWM: Mixed multilevel inverters may need
different PWM strategies for the different stages composing them. For instance, a CHB inverter
composed by one GTOs stage and one IGBTs stage may require two different switching
frequencies, one for high-speed and one for low-speed devices. In this way, the output
waveform, being the sum of the single stage outputs, presents the two frequencies in its
harmonic content. The principle of a mixed switching frequency PWM of CHB inverter is
shown in Figure 7.
The modulation signal of the MSF PWM is obtained by subtracting the sinusoidal reference
signal and the output of the inverter that operates in FSF PWM. The gating signals for the
inverter switches are generated by comparing the modulation signal and the triangular carriers.
Figure 8 shows the modulation signal (bold line) along with the reference signal (dashed dot
line) and output voltage of inverter operates in the FSF PWM (dashed line)
A new reconfiguration module for asymmetrical multilevel inverters in which capacitors are
used as the dc links to create the levels for staircase waveforms. Fig. presents a single-phase
k-level ACMI with n modules. Each module has an isolated dc source. The module dc-link
The number of levels (kr) in the terminal voltage (vta) for the {1:2:6:…} ratio is given by
The number of levels in the terminal voltage (vta) for the {1:3:9:··· } ratio is given by
The terminal voltage is composed of the algebraic sum of each module terminal voltage. Fig.
3 presents the fundamental frequency diagram of the ACMI.
• Each H-Bridge Cell consists of four switches and four diodes as shown in the
picture.
• Like every H-Bridge, different combinations of switch positions determine
different voltages such as V+, V- and 0.
• Two switching combinations are present for 0 volts.
• S1 and S2 are connected to positive voltage and S3 and S4 are connected to negative
voltage.
2.4.1.Single Phase Multilevel Inverter
• The number of output levels from a multilevel inverter depends upon the number
of separate DC sources attached to it.
• The relation is m=2s+1
• All the outputs from H-Bridges should be quarter symmetric to generate a sin like
wave.
• No even harmonics are present.
2.4.2.Three-Phase Multilevel Inverter
In ideal cases the switching time is considered zero and the switching devices turn on and off
as soon as you command. But in real time application, switching time is an important
phenomenon. To avoid this Blanking time is introduced. The switch turns off just immediately,
but the other switch turns on after a certain delay.
2.4.4.Separate DC Source
One of the major issues with Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverters is that we need separate
DC sources with each leg. Well it might look that separate DC source will create a mess or
increase the components, but it is fairly necessary. Because same DC sources can give multiple
configurations that result in short circuit.
However this issue has also been resolved. Now lesser number of DC sources can be used and
SDC topology has also been proposed.
As the name suggests this multilevel inverter uses full H-Bridges connected is series to produce
inverted AC from separate DC sources. These DC sources can be any natural resource such as
sunlight or wind energy or anything.
As a counterpart, this configuration has no redundant states for the synthesis of the leg voltages,
which is the result of the high number of forbidden states. Besides these proper- ties, an important
problem that affects the diode-clamped multilevel converter (DCMC) is the DC bus voltage balance,
which arises in the general case when a multi tapped DC voltage source is not available. In this sense,
the high number of forbidden states and the nonexistence of redundant states for leg voltage synthesis
prevent their use to address voltage balance. In addition, the dynamical switching behaviour of the
diode-clamped multilevel converter also imposes particular constraints in order to ensure safe
operation of the power devices.
3.2.1.Voltage Clamping
The practical implementation of the DCMC derived from the generalized topology, is depicted
in Figure 3.3. It shows one leg of the five-level converter, which is composed of the active switching
Fig.3.3. Leg of the five-level DCMC, switching logic, and voltage clamping of
internal nodes
devices with their integrated freewheeling diodes, the clamping diodes, and the DC bus with its
intermediate nodes. The nodes between the active switches are labeled with the letters A to F in the
same figure 3.2. The capability of the DCMC topology to increase the output voltage beyond the
maximum blocking voltage of the individual switching devices lies on the voltage-limiting action that
the clamping diodes have on the internal nodes of the leg. Figure 3.1 shows this for clamping diodes
De2 and De3 and the corresponding nodes E and F. Considering that the switches S3 and S4 are in the
OFF state, it can be seen that the blocking voltage VCE4 cannot exceed the value VC since the anode
of De3 should have lower voltage than its cathode (voltage loop 1 in the figure). In this case the voltage
of node F and also VCE4 are directly clamped to the capacitor voltage, VC.In the same way, the voltage
of node E is clamped to 2VC due to the diode De2 (voltage loop 2). However, De2 does not ensure
VCE3 = VC unless VCE4 has been previously clamped to VC. This is true because voltage loop 2
states that 2VC – VCE3 – VCE4 = 0. This dependence of maximum blocking voltage over S3 is called
indirect clamping and applies to nodes B, C, D,and E, and generally to all inner active devices of an n-
level DCMC.
3.1.2.Switching Logic
Fig.3.3. shows the switching functions of a five-level DCMC .The forbidden and valid states are
respectively denoted as solid and hollow circles on each corner of the cubes, and the corresponding
leg voltages are specified. As it was mentioned, a great number of forbidden states are observed (11 in
total), while the allowed states are reduced to only five, which coincides with the number of converter
levels (this is general for the DCMC topology). Table 3.1 summarizes the leg output voltages as a
function of the gating signals where it can be seen that no redundancy exists, provided
that each output voltage level is synthesized by only one gating pattern. The black pin denotes that the
device is ON, while the gray pin indicates that the device is OFF.
Fig.3.4.Switching states
Switching converters needs continuous reference signal from a digital pulse train whose
average value coincides with the reference. It is achieved by a modulation of switching
converters. Several modulation techniques are available .These various techniques produce
different performances by the terms of losses, harmonic distortion, implementation
complexity, and flexibility for variable speed operation are achieved from various techniques
. Among the high-frequency switching strategies, the subharmonic modulation with shifted
carriers was the first extension to multilevel converters due to simplicity and ease of
implementation.
Fig.3.5.Multilevel modulators
It is classified as the level-shifted and the phase-shifted carrier modulations, which have found
application in different multilevel topologies.
3.2.1.level shifted carrier modulation
The level shifted carrier modulation was mainly applied to the DCMC converter is shown in
fig.3.6.
This modulation technique has been extensively studied, and it is demonstrated through
spectral analysis that the variant PD-PWM has the best harmonic performance because it places
harmonic energy in a common mode first-carrier component, which is cancelled in the line-to-
line voltages
3.2.2. Multilevel Space Vector Modulation:
It is a familiar method of modulation with high flexibility and widely used for two level VSC.
It is more opt for a fast dynamic response or variable frequency operation is required, for
example, high-performance drives and power conditioning systems. Also, it basically has a
high DC bus voltage utilization factor and can also be naturally implemented on digital
hardware . Redundant states of the three-phase converter can be explicitly exploited, allowing
us to calculate the line voltages independently of leg voltages. However, the extension of two-
level SVM to multilevel converters is a challenging task, mainly due to the existence
of a high number of switching states.
A widely accepted representation of the space vector is defined in terms of the phase voltages
vao, vbo, and vco. Generally, these are transformed to the three space vector components vα,
vβ, and v0 through a coordinate transformation Tαβ0, according to
This representation allows us to describe the converter switching states with one vector in α-
β-0 coordinates. Figure 3.8 a shows the simplified model of a standard two-level voltage source
converter. In this case,the leg voltage can assume only two values, m = 1 and m = 0, and
therefore six active vectors can be synthesized on the α-β plane, as shown in Figure 3.8.b.
where V1 and V2 are adjacent vectors that are directly identified from the phase of the
reference vector (θ), V3 is one zero vector, and d1, d2, and d3 are the corresponding duty cycles
for each vector. Figure 3.9 shows an averaging period, which is divided into the three activation
times corresponding to V1, V2, and V3.
When considering that the current is almost constant along the integration interval, the voltage
increment can be simplified to
The voltage deviation ΔVm is divided among all the capacitors of the DC bus, and the polarity
of the individual voltage deviation depends on the relative position of each capacitor with
respect to node m, that is, if it is above or below node m. Then, the capacitor Cj (j = 1, …, n –
1) will suffer a voltage variation ΔVCj, given by
A generalized expression for capacitor voltage variation that explicitly takes into account both
values of F can be summarized as
The total voltage deviation over each capacitor is calculated summing up the contributions of
the three line currents, that is, replacing ia, ib, and ic instead of im for the corresponding values
of ma, mb, and mc. The voltage variation on capacitor Cj due to the three phases results in
This equation indicates the necessity of selecting the most adequate switching combination in
order to minimize E[k + 1] and to steer the voltage vector toward the reference value VCref.
This selection can be achieved through the evaluation of a cost function that measures the
difference between VCref and VC. Such a function may be the norm of E[k + 1]:
From a sampling period to the next, this expression provides a way to evaluate the goodness
of any converter switching combination in order to force the capacitor voltages to their
reference values.
power factor (cos φ). Inside this domain, there is no modulation strategy that is able to
simultaneously synthesize a sinusoidal voltage waveform and preserve the voltage balance of
the DC bus capacitors.
3.6.Performance results.
The control algorithms are tested by means of computer simulations. A five-level DCMC is
connected to a three-phase distribution grid through a coupling inductor as shown in Figure
3.13. The DC bus voltage is set to 20 kV, while the coupling inductor is 5 mH, Cbus = 4700
μF, and the averaging period TS is set to 0.4 ms. The power system is rated to a line voltage
of 14 kV.The reference vector Vref is synchronized to the main voltage, and the current flowing
through the coupling inductor is set by means of the amplitude of the reference voltage vector.
Figure 3.14 a shows one line voltage at the converter terminals. As it can be seen, it exhibits
single-step transitions over the complete trace featuring good harmonic performance. The
currents provided by the converter to the coupling inductor are shown in Figure 3.14b. The
three line currents that circulate through the coupling inductor have a large component
Fig. 3.13 Five-level DCMC connected to the power grid through a coupling
inductor.
at the fundamental frequency with a small switching frequency ripple. Figure 3.15 shows the
capacitor voltages that remain balanced at their reference value of 5 kV, with an approximate
ripple of 200 V peak to peak.
Fig. 3.14 (a) Converter line voltage. (b) Converter line currents
In order to test the balancing algorithm, a voltage unbalance is forced externally to the DC bus
capacitors. With a modulation index of M = 0.85,the unbalance is set at t = 100 ms. The
capacitor voltages are shown in Figure 3.15. The unbalancing condition is mitigated and the
balance is restored in approximately 100 ms. Figure 3.16 shows single jumps on leg voltages,
even at the disturbance instant. Finally, the modulation index is modified to M = 0.96 and the
same disturbance on capacitor voltages is introduced. It is observed that the required time for
balancing restoration is slightly extended (Figure 3.30) compared with the previous case
4.0.Introduction
The flying capacitor multilevel converter (FCMC) has been introduced by Meynard and
Foch. This topology was conceived to implement high-voltage converters without series
connection of the power switches. The FCMC has some advantages when compared to
the diode-clamped multilevel converter (DCMC). It is easy to increase the number of
voltage levels by simply adding basic cells in the load end of each leg. The main
disadvantage of this topology is that it requires a large number of capacitors since it
builds the voltage levels with flying capacitors in each leg of the converter. It is very
important that all the FCs reach a constant and stable voltage, so the net charge variation
on each of them should be null. There are two important reasons for this. The first is to
reduce the harmonic distortion on the output voltage. The second is to guarantee the
same blocking voltage of each power switch equals the same fraction of the total DC
bus voltage.
An n-level FCMC requires (n – 1)(n – 2)/2 flying capacitors in each leg of the
converter plus (n – 1) capacitors on the DC bus. This number can be reduced if the flying
capacitors withstand different voltages. Then, the (n – j) capacitors of each stage may
be replaced by a single capacitor, and each leg has only (n – 2) capacitors. Now each
capacitor works with an average voltage equal to
where j = 1 corresponds to the stage beside the load. In this example, Figure 4.2 shows
one leg of a four-level converter, the average voltages over the flying capacitors are
2/3VDC and 1/3VDC for the second and third stages, respectively.
While m is lower than unity, there exists a linear relationship between the
amplitude of the fundamental component of the leg voltage (Vin) and VDC.
The power devices of the FCMC switch at a frequency fS, while the leg voltage
(viN) commutates at a frequency equal to (n – 1).fS. Then, the harmonics spectrum of
the load voltage is shifted to higher frequencies, simplifying the design of the output
filter.
4.2.2. Charge Balance Using PSPWM
The PSPWM in an n-level FCMC naturally maintains the charge balance in all
the flying capacitors. This is done traveling along the redundant states in each
switching cycle. The same analysis procedure can be extended to an n-level converter.
The three-level FCMC converter requires two carriers with a phase shift equal to π .
Fig.4.4. PSPWM. Switching functions (s1i and s2i) for n = 3. (a) Switching
functions when the modulating signal is positive, (b) switching functions when the
modulating signal is negative, and (c) current and voltage on C2i.
The comparisons between the carrier waveforms and the modulating signal generate the
switching functions (s1i and s2i) that drive the power switches S1i and S2i, respectively.
Taking into account (4.2) for n = 3, when the modulating signal is positive, the output
voltage changes between VDC/2 and VDC. On the other hand, when the modulating signal
is negative, Vin changes between 0 and VDC/2.
the number of levels n) There exist two mechanisms through which these harmonics can
appear on the flying capacitors. In this way, the time of convergence to the steady state
depends on the load. The other method consists in generating the balancing harmonics
with passive networks tuned at the switching frequency. This network not only allows
the dynamic balance of flying capacitors,it can also fix the convergence time to the
steady state, through a proper design of the passive network. Dynamic Model It is better
to use a time domain model to analyze the dynamic behavior of the currents through the
flying capacitors The circuit presented in Figure is used, assuming that the switching
frequency is much higher than the modulating frequency; in this case, it is valid to
assume that the duty cycles of both switches are equal, since the current is almost
constant along one commutation period. The increment of the averaged voltage on
capacitor C2i is much slower than the voltage ripple generated by the switching
frequency These averaged voltage variations are denoted with the symbol ∼. A variation
of the averaged voltage across the capacitor implies that there is an average current
through it. Both are related by
is easy to see in fig that, for a given load current, the voltage vC i2 is controlled with the
duty cycles d1i and d2i. This requires a voltage control loop for the flying capacitor.
When using a PSPWM, both duty cycles are equal; so regardless of load current ii, the
voltage vC i2 will remain in its steady-state value.
Assuming that the voltage ripple is much smaller than its average value, the output leg
voltage viN equals the sum of the voltages across the switches S i1 and S i2 . Then,
Multilevel inverter with reduced switch count-structures, working principles and pulse
generation methods.
5.1. Introduction:
The dc-ac converter, also known as the inverter, converts dc power to ac power at desired
output voltage and frequency Multilevel inverters are cascaded H-bridges converter
with separate dc sources. Recently, multilevel inverters (MLI) have attracted more
attention in research and industry, as they are changing into a viable technology for
several applications. The concept of MLI was introduced for high power and
high/medium voltage applications as they can provide an effective interface with
renewable energy sources. which uses less number of switching components for
specified number of voltage output levels as compared to that of conventional multilevel
inverter topology. Developing reduced switch MLI topology has been a rapid research
topic since the past decade. These configurations are not only generating higher voltage
levels to improve the power quality but also to reduce the passive filter requirements.
Another aspect of MLI has been the selection of magnitude of dc voltage sources used
in the topology. Based on this, MLIs have been classified as symmetrical and
asymmetrical. Symmetrical MLIs uses identical dc voltage sources whereas
asymmetrical MLIs employs dc voltage sources having unequal magnitude.
Symmetrical MLIs have more redundant states i.e. more number of switching
combination are available to get same voltage level. This improves the performance of
MLI in terms of balancing the voltage across capacitors and fault tolerant capabilities.
However, at the same time symmetrical configured MLIs requires more number of
switches, gate driver circuits, and dc voltage links. This increases the inverter size, cost
and control complexity for a higher number of levels. Asymmetrical configuration
increases the number of levels generated at the output compares to the symmetrical
configuration using the same number of components and dc voltage sources. A higher
number of switches are required to generate a staircase multilevel waveform. Moreover,
even low rating switches require separate driver circuit along with necessary protective
circuitry which adds to the complexity of the system. The results presented show that
the number of IGBT required to realize a similar voltage level is lesser. Moreover, the
standing voltages are also lesser on the bidirectional switch. The topology of has also
been experimentally verified with a suitable design example.
The topology proposed in utilized novel multilevel inverters which contain five-level
sub-module architecture. The proposed topology has been realized in both the
asymmetrical and symmetrical mode of operation. The result shows the structure has
advantages in levels of voltage generated for a given number of switches. The normal
topology proposed in existing requires 12 switches to produce 5 level output. But the
same voltage level can be achieved by converter proposed later in with the lesser
standing voltage on the switching devices. The proposed application of topology
presented in includes D-STATCOM, hybrid electric vehicle, and PV system. This
system requires lesser installation space and cost because of the reduced number of
switching devices, switching and conduction losses and total standing voltage.
From the fig.5.1.the Input of DC supply ,the load resistor R is receiving the Alternating
voltage with the multi level topology.as per the MLI topology the number odf stages
frequired for 5 level inverter will be 4 and the number switches also around 8 .cause the
switching losses and economic issues also .In this reduced switching topology as seen
the required switches are only 5 for five level inverters .
Mode 1 for V0 = 0V
The total standing voltage (TSV) is an important factor for the selection of switches. TSV is
the addition of the maximum blocking voltage across each semiconductor device. The
voltage stress across each pair of the complementary switch will be the same. Therefore,