Assignment 1
Assignment 1
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
WORD COUNT:
Page |2
INTRODUCTION
Professor Sujeewa Amarasena was the vice chancellor of the University of Ruhuna. He
graduated from the same university with MBBS in pediatrics in 1985. He was removed from
his possession by the Minister of Education, Higher Education and Vocational Education on
the 24th of November 2024. The university students with all academic and non-academic staff
trade unions had started a strike for demanding the immediate removal of the vice chancellor,
Professor Sujeewa Amarasena from 19th of November. Therefore there was a discussion with
the Prime Minister, Harini Amarasuriya and The University Trade Union Joint Committee,
The Federation of University Teachers’ Trade Union and the representatives of the students
regarding this issue and after that the vice chancellor was removed from his possession.
the competent authority of the possession to keep the stability of the university. Punishing
students unfairly, giving false allegations, and try to suppress students who worked against
his decision using his people, financial mismanagement and abuse of power were the reasons
for starting the strike.However He has rejected all of those allegations against him raised by
the Student Union and the non-academic people and the other people who joined with the
strike.
When inquired by Ada Derana, Senior Prof. Amarasena maintained his innocence, stating,
“I have informed the Minister of Education, the Secretary, and the University Grants
Commission that I categorically deny all allegations against me and have no intention of
stepping down. Multiple investigations have been conducted regarding these claims, and I
believe that sufficient evidence has not been come out to confirm the allegations. If the
allegations had merit, I believe the government would have already taken action against
me.”1
1
“Ruhuna Uni. VC Denies Allegations, Refuses to Resign amid Strike” <http://adaderana.lk/news.php?
nid=103636> accessed by 22 December 2024
Page |3
ILLEGALITY
The issue is whether the minister decision of removing Professor Sujeewa Amarasena was
illegal. The Vice Chancellor was removed by the minister according to the Section 20(4) (b)
20. (4) Where the Minister is satisfied that, due to any strike or lockout or any other cause,
the work or administration of any Higher Educational Institution has been seriously
dislocated and that the Authorities of such Higher Educational Institution have failed to
restore normal conditions, the Minister may take all such measures as may be necessary to
ensure the restoration of normal conditions in such Higher Educational Institution. Pending
the restoration of normal conditions, the Minister may, by Order published in the Gazette,
make all such provisions as he may deem necessary in respect of all or any of the following
matters relating to such Higher Educational Institution:- (b) the appointment of any
performing or discharging, in lieu of any officer, Authority or other body of such Higher
Educational Institution, any power, duty or function under this Act or any appropriate
Instrument2
According to that, the Minister has acted within the power granted by the University Grant
Commission under the University Act No. 16 of 1978. Because it’s a minister duty to control
the situation of the educational institute. The strike was going to be bad and it effected to the
Illegality means acting ultra vires. If any action exceed the limit of the powers it is not
appropriate. When come into this situation there is no any violation of this matter. Because
2
Universities Act, No. 16 of 1978 (Sri Lanka), s 20(4) (b).
Page |4
‘Audi Alteram Partem’ means that, everyone has the right to be informed about any decision
that affect to their rights or interests. They have a right to give the response to allegations or
evidence. ‘Nemo Judex in Causa Sua’ means the person who make the decision has to be
If any person affected by any decision, it can be justified by this principle. So that person has
the opportunity to bring his case to the impartial authority for justifying. Therefore the rights
2) Exceptions
3) Procedural protection
Page |5
REFERENCES
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Universities Act, No. 16 of 1978 (Sri Lanka)