Fundamental Rights
Fundamental Rights
Rights in the US Constitution. The Fundamental Rights are named so because they are guaranteed and
protected by the Constitution, which is the fundamental law of the land. They are ‘fundamental’ also in the
sense that they are most essential for the all-round development of the individuals.
Features
● They are not absolute but qualified. The state can impose reasonable restrictions on them. Thus, they
strike a balance between individual liberty and social control.
● Some of them are negative in character, that is, place limitations on the authority of the State, while
others are positive in nature, conferring certain privileges on the persons.
● They are justiciable and guaranteed by the Supreme Court.
● They are not permanent and can be amended or repealed by a constitutional amendment, provided it
does not alter the Constitution's basic structure.
● Their scope of operation is limited by Article 31A (saving of laws providing for acquisition of estates,
etc.), Article 31B (validation of certain acts and regulations included in the 9th Schedule) and Article
31C (saving of laws giving effect to certain directive principles).
● Most of them are directly enforceable (self-executory) while a few of them can be enforced on the basis
of a law made by the Parliament for giving effect to them (Article 35).
● They can be suspended during a National Emergency, except Articles 20 and 21. Their application can
be restricted for armed forces and other security services (Article 33) and under martial law (Article 34).
6. Right to constitutional remedies (Article 32): Dr. Ambedkar called Article 32 the soul and heart of the
Constitution. It grants every individual the right to move the SC for the enforcement of their fundamental rights.
Moreover, the SC has the power to issue directions or orders or writs for this enforcement. The writs issued
include Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari and Quo-Warranto.
7. Criticism
Excessive Limitations: FRs are heavily restricted with numerous exceptions and qualifications, leading critics
to argue that rights are granted with one hand and taken away with the other, making them seem conditional.
No Socio-economic Rights: The Constitution focuses mainly on political rights and lacks essential
socio-economic rights like social security, employment, and leisure, provided in advanced democracies.
No Clarity: The language used is vague and ambiguous, with terms like ‘public order’ and ‘reasonable
restriction’ undefined, making the rights complex and difficult for the common man to understand.
Suspension During Emergency: FRs (except Articles 20 and 21) can be suspended during a National
Emergency, threatening democratic principles and endangering citizens’ rights.
Preventive Detention: Article 22 allows preventive detention, granting the state arbitrary power and negating
individual liberty, which is uncommon in other democratic constitutions.
8. Conclusion
The Fundamental Rights are meant for promoting the ideal of political democracy. They prevent the
establishment of a despotic rule in the country, and protect the liberties of the people. In short, they aim at
establishing ‘a government of laws and not of men’.