Political Development
Political Development
Introduction
The concept of political development has been heavily debated among scholars, with various
theories offering different perspectives. Early theories of political development were primarily
rooted in modernization theory, which posited that development in the political sphere followed a
linear trajectory from traditional to modern political systems. According to this view, economic
modernization, along with social and cultural changes, would inevitably lead to more democratic
and stable political systems.
However, by the mid-20th century, critics of modernization theory, particularly scholars from the
global south, began to question the universality of this developmental path. They argued that
political development could not be understood solely through the lens of Western experiences
and that the political trajectories of countries were influenced by historical, cultural, and social
factors unique to each nation.
In the 1970s, dependency theory emerged, arguing that political development in former colonies
could not be understood without accounting for the neocolonial relationships that continued to
shape political and economic systems. This theory highlighted how external forces, such as
multinational corporations and international financial institutions, influenced domestic politics
and limited the political autonomy of developing countries.
Another key theory in the study of political development is the “state-building” perspective,
which emphasizes the creation and strengthening of state institutions as crucial for achieving
political stability. This theory posits that the development of a strong, capable state apparatus is
essential for fostering social order, enforcing the rule of law, and providing public goods.
Scholars such as James C. Scott and Michael Mann have further explored how the development
of state power is intertwined with patterns of violence, coercion, and social control.
Moreover, international influences, such as foreign aid, trade agreements, and the actions of
multinational corporations, can have profound effects on political development in the Global
South. The impact of global forces must be considered alongside domestic factors in order to
understand the political trajectories of these countries.
Conclusion