Q1: When a user signs up on a platform, the system must:

1. Create a new user record in the database.

2. Send a welcome email.
3. Create a default user profile document in NoSQL DB.
4. Notify analytics service about the signup event.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q2: When a blog post is published, the system must:

1. Update the post status in the CMS database.
2. Invalidate relevant cache entries.
3. Notify subscribers via email or push notification.
4. Trigger indexing service for search availability.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q3: When a ride is booked on a ride-sharing app, the system must:

1. Match the rider with the nearest driver.
2. Reserve the ride details in the database.
3. Send notification to the driver app.
4. Push event to analytics service for tracking.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q4: When a product is added to the catalog by a seller, the system must:
1. Store product information in product catalog database.
2. Update search index to make it discoverable.
3. Notify moderation system for review.
4. Send confirmation message to the seller.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q5: When a video is uploaded to a video-sharing platform, the system must:

1. Store the video in object storage.
2. Trigger video encoding service.
3. Update video metadata in database.
4. Notify the user when encoding is complete.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q6: When a support ticket is created, the system must:

1. Store ticket details in the support database.
2. Send confirmation email to the customer.
3. Notify support agent or routing system.
4. Log the event in the audit system.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q7: When a user resets their password, the system must:
1. Validate and update the password in the user store.
2. Invalidate existing sessions.
3. Send confirmation email to the user.
4. Log the action in the security audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q8: When a scheduled report is generated, the system must:

1. Query data from OLAP database.
2. Generate report file (PDF/CSV).
3. Upload the report to a document store.
4. Notify user with report download link.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q9: When a product is purchased, the system must:

1. Deduct inventory.
2. Generate invoice and save it.
3. Notify fulfillment system.
4. Send email confirmation to buyer.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q10: When an ad campaign is launched, the system must:

1. Validate budget and targeting criteria.
2. Store campaign data in the ad server.
3. Trigger bidding engine activation.
4. Notify advertiser with campaign status.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q11: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 1-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 1-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 1-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 1-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q12: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 2-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 2-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 2-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 2-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q13: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 3-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 3-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 3-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 3-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q14: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 4-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 4-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 4-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 4-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q15: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 5-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 5-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 5-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 5-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q16: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 6-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 6-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 6-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 6-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q17: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 7-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 7-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 7-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 7-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q18: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 8-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 8-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 8-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 8-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q19: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 9-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 9-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 9-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 9-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q20: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 10-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 10-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 10-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 10-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q21: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 11-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 11-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 11-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 11-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q22: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 12-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 12-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 12-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 12-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q23: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 13-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 13-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 13-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 13-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q24: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 14-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 14-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 14-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 14-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q25: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 15-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 15-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 15-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 15-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q26: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 16-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 16-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 16-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 16-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q27: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 17-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 17-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 17-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 17-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q28: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 18-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 18-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 18-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 18-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q29: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 19-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 19-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 19-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 19-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q30: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 20-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 20-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 20-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 20-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q31: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 21-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 21-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 21-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 21-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q32: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 22-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 22-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 22-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 22-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q33: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 23-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 23-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 23-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 23-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q34: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 24-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 24-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 24-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 24-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q35: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 25-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 25-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 25-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 25-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q36: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 26-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 26-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 26-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 26-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q37: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 27-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 27-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 27-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 27-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q38: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 28-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 28-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 28-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 28-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q39: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 29-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 29-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 29-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 29-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q40: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 30-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 30-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 30-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 30-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q41: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 31-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 31-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 31-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 31-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q42: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 32-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 32-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 32-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 32-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q43: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 33-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 33-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 33-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 33-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q44: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 34-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 34-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 34-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 34-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q45: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 35-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 35-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 35-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 35-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q46: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 36-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 36-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 36-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 36-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q47: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 37-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 37-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 37-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 37-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q48: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 38-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 38-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 38-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 38-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q49: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 39-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 39-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 39-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 39-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q50: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 40-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 40-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 40-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 40-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q51: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 41-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 41-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 41-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 41-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q52: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 42-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 42-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 42-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 42-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q53: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 43-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 43-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 43-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 43-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q54: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 44-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 44-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 44-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 44-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q55: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 45-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 45-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 45-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 45-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q56: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 46-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 46-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 46-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 46-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q57: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 47-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 47-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 47-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 47-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q58: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 48-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 48-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 48-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 48-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q59: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 49-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 49-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 49-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 49-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q60: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 50-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 50-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 50-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 50-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q61: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 51-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 51-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 51-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 51-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q62: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 52-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 52-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 52-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 52-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q63: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 53-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 53-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 53-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 53-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q64: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 54-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 54-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 54-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 54-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q65: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 55-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 55-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 55-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 55-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q66: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 56-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 56-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 56-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 56-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q67: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 57-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 57-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 57-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 57-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q68: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 58-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 58-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 58-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 58-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q69: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 59-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 59-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 59-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 59-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q70: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 60-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 60-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 60-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 60-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q71: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 61-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 61-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 61-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 61-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q72: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 62-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 62-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 62-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 62-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q73: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 63-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 63-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 63-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 63-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q74: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 64-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 64-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 64-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 64-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q75: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 65-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 65-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 65-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 65-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q76: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 66-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 66-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 66-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 66-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q77: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 67-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 67-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 67-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 67-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q78: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 68-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 68-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 68-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 68-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q79: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 69-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 69-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 69-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 69-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q80: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 70-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 70-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 70-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 70-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q81: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 71-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 71-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 71-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 71-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q82: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 72-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 72-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 72-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 72-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q83: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 73-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 73-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 73-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 73-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q84: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 74-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 74-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 74-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 74-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q85: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 75-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 75-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 75-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 75-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q86: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 76-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 76-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 76-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 76-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q87: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 77-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 77-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 77-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 77-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q88: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 78-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 78-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 78-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 78-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q89: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 79-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 79-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 79-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 79-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q90: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 80-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 80-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 80-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 80-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q91: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 81-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 81-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 81-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 81-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q92: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 82-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 82-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 82-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 82-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q93: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 83-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 83-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 83-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 83-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q94: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 84-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 84-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 84-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 84-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q95: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 85-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 85-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 85-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 85-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q96: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 86-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 86-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 86-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 86-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?
Q97: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 87-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 87-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 87-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 87-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q98: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 88-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 88-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 88-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 88-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q99: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 89-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 89-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 89-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 89-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?

Q100: When an event (e.g., newsletter subscription, transaction update, etc.) is triggered, the system must:
1. Step 90-1: Process the event in the core service.
2. Step 90-2: Persist related data in a transactional database.
3. Step 90-3: Notify other services through a message queue.
4. Step 90-4: Log the entire operation to an audit service.
If any of these can fail, how would you design the logic to ensure resilience?