Design and Development of Tilted Single Axis and Azimuth-Altitude Dual Axis Solar Tracking Systems
Design and Development of Tilted Single Axis and Azimuth-Altitude Dual Axis Solar Tracking Systems
A. Mechanical Design
The complete Mechanical Design of Azimuth Altitude
Dual Axis Tracker is shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8 below,
Figure 10. Stopper2
Figure 7. Mechanical Design of Azimuth Altitude Dual Axis Solar Tracker The same mechanism is used for Stopper1, three metallic
contacts are used, one is fixed on one column and other two
The dimension of the lower base is about 15in × 15in. are on the lower rotating base.
The circular rotating base is of 12 inches diameter supported
by three caster wheels and a DC motor is mounted with the B. Tracking Controller Circuit
upper rotating base and shaft of this motor is rigidly coupled
with the lower base so when the motor shaft rotates, the whole The Figure 12 shows the complete circuit diagram of
upper base rotates with the motor because the shaft of the control circuit and the sensor. The components used in control
motor is coupled with the fixed lower base. circuit are same as those used in TSAT. The changes only are
enlisted below.
On the circular rotating base, two columns are made to
support the upper rotating base on which solar panel and sen- 1) Four LDR sensors are connected in series with the
sors are mounted. The axis of rotation of upper rotating base four potentiometers of resistance 10 Kohm each to
is perpendicular to the axis of rotation of lower rotating base. form four potential divider circuits.
depends on circuit requirements like noise immunity, working
frequency and voltage levels etc. The fabrication process of
the printed circuit board determines to a large extent the
price and reliability of the equipment. The layout of the PCB
incorporates all the information of the board.
The following steps were taken while preparing the circuit
1) PCB Designing:
2) Layout Design:
3) Etching Process:
4) Component Assembly:
5) Soldering:
After following the above described process, firstly the
PCBs for TSAT and AADAT were designed on the basis of
Figure 3 and Figure 12. Lastly all the required components
were mounted on the PCBs. The final PCBs of the control
Figure 12. Schematic Diagram of Azimuth-Altitude Dual Axis solar tracker
circuits of TSAT and AADAT are shown in Figure 14 and
Figure 15 respectively. These PCBs are fixed at the base of
2) R1 to R4 are pull down resistors and R6 is pull up both the tracking systems. The complete assembled views of
resistor. R5 is used for current limiting for LED. TSAT and AADAT are shown in Figure 16 and Figure 17.
3) Four tact switches SW 1 to SW 4 are used for the
stoppers.
4) Two DC motors are used, Motor1 for moving the
lower rotating base and Motor2 for the upper rotating
base.
The geometrical construction of the LDR sensors for
AADAT shown in Figure 13 is same as the LDR sensor of
TSAT. At first, the four analog voltage coming from four LDR
sensor’s are applied to the microcontroller. The inbuilt ADC
of microcontroller converts these analog voltages to four 10
bit digital value. These digital values are then analyzed and
compared and an appropriate command is given to the motor
driver to drive the two DC motors in such a manner that the Figure 14. Complete control circuit of the TSAT
solar panel remain perpendicular to the sun rays. The value of
output voltage can be adjusted by the potentiometer by rotating
its trimer by screw driver.
Figure 13. Sensor Design Figure 15. Complete control circuit of the AADAT
The programming codes of the microcontroller for TSAT Generally two types of solar tracker systems are available
and AADAT are written in C language. AVR Studio 4.0 is the in the market – single axis and dual axis trackers. Single axis
editor and compiler which is used to write C code and then trackers will track the sun from east to west on a single pivot
compile the C code to generate hex file for the microcontroller. point whereas dual axis trackers track east to west and tilt
Robokits Avr USB Programmer is the software which is used for north to south tracking using two pivot points. Dual axis
for burning the hex file generated by the AVR Studio 4.0 into trackers are more complex in design, as it uses additional
microcontroller using usb programmer. motors and sensors to track the sun whereas single axis tracker
are simple and effective in design. Dual axis trackers also use
The frame consisting of the bases and the columns are an eye sensor which visually follows the sun, while the single
made of plywood. After fitting all the mechanical parts, the axis tracker tracks the sun using a predictable pattern based
control circuit is designed on the PCB. The design of PCBs on the time of year. Less maintenance are required in single
VI. C ONCLUSION
The completion of this work has led to several conclusions
that can be made about this solar tracking system as well
as solar tracking systems in general. The Tilted Single Axis
tracking system designed and built in this project show a
tracking efficiency of 2.5 degree and it increases the efficiency
of solar panel upto 30%,whereas, the Azimuth Altitude Dual
Axis Solar Tracking system also show a tracking efficiency
of 2.5 degree but increases the efficiency of solar panel upto
40%. Furthermore, testing showed that the power used by the
tracking system built was much less than the power gained
by tracking the sun accurately. This means that if the tracking
system were to charge its own batteries, it would be entirely
Figure 16. Complete Side View of Tilted Single Axis Tracker self-sufficient except for the maintenance.
Perhaps the most important conclusion to be made from
this project is that:
1) The cost for TSAT is Rs 1500 (approx),whereas, the
cost for AADAT is Rs 2500 (approx).
2) The total cost for the both tracking systems is very
low ,that is, Rs 4000 (approx), this means that the
system can be built for a very low cost and most
importantly; this system would be within the financial
reach of many communities if built in large size.
3) No running cost is required, however, replacements
of components may be essential.
4) Since natural source is involved, it is perpetual.
5) No pollution of environment.
However, the control system has not been discussed that
could aim to maximize the output power while minimizing
the power consumption of the tracking system. This would be
Figure 17. Complete Side View of Azimuth-Altitude Dual Axis Tracker taken up as our future work, where the optimum sensitivity
range of the controlling system would be evaluated to deter-
mine when the solar tracker should operate to generate more
power or stay stand-still to save energy.
axis as compared to dual axis tracker. Single axis tracker have
minimal points of failure as compared to dual axis trackers R EFERENCES
which requires additional point of failure. Cost is lower in [1] “Solar cell types,” www.polarpowerinc.com/info/operation20/operation23.html.
single axis tracker as compared to dual axis tracker. On a [2] M. R. Patel, Wind and Solar Power Systems Design, Analysis and
cloudy day dual axis trackers are pointing all over the sky, Operations, 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group
while the single access tracker points directly only at the sun. Producing a PCB. n.d., 2006.
This eliminates any unnecessary tracking movements which [3] “Solar tracker,” www.wikipedia.org/wiki/solar tracker.
only result in additional wear and tear, and loss of power. [4] D. Appleyard, “Solar trackers: Facing the sun,”
Single axis tracker increase solar yields upto 34% whereas Renewable Energy World, vol. 12, no. 3, 2009,
dual axis tracker increase solar yields upto 37%. With the http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2009/06/solar-
trackers-facing-the-sun.
added cost of equipment, higher maintenance costs, and high
[5] N. Barsoum, “Fabrication of dual-axis solar tracking controller project,”
potential downtime, dual axis trackers may actually be less Intelligent Control and Automation, vol. 2, pp. 57–68, 2011.
productive in the long run. In order to study the effects of [6] “Solar tracker, sun path diagram image,”
the single axis and double axis trackers, in [9] the relations www.gaisma.com/en/location/miri.html.
between the solar components are extracted according to its [7] Solar Electricity Handbook, www.solarelectricityhandbook.com/
position in the sky. The results of the analysis show that the solar–angle–calculator.html.
average value of the energy received by the panel with single [8] S. P. Sukhatme and J. K. Nayak, SOLAR ENERGY:Principles of
axis tracker was 1.35 times greater than that of a fixed panel Thermal Collection and Storage, third edition ed. Tata McGraw-Hill,
system, while the double axis tracker system receives only 2008.
1.04 times the received energy of a single axis one. Hence, [9] S. Bazyari1, R. Keypour, S. Farhangi, A. Ghaedi, and K. Bazyari, “A
study on the effects of solar tracking systems on the performance of
low maintenance solar tracker, single axis trackers are the best photovoltaic power plants,” Journal of Power and Energy Engineering,
way to go. However, [10] state that both single-axis and dual- vol. 2, pp. 718–728, 2014, published Online April 2014 in SciRes.
axis are highly efficient in terms of the electrical energy output [10] S. Deepthi, A. Ponni, R. Ranjitha, and R. Dhanabal, “Comparison of
when compared to the fixed mount system an the efficiency of efficiencies of single-axis tracking system and dual-axis tracking system
dual-axis tracker system is higher when compared with single- with fixed mount,” International Journal of Engineering Science and
axis tracker system. Innovative Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 425–430, March 2013.