0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views16 pages

Satellite Imaging, Machine Learning, Agriculture

The document discusses the integration of satellite imaging and machine learning in agriculture for the forecasting of pests and diseases, highlighting its importance for enhancing crop yield and food security. It details various types of satellite imagery, machine learning techniques, and successful case studies, while also addressing challenges such as data availability and model scalability. The combination of these technologies is positioned as a transformative approach to modern agricultural management, enabling timely interventions and sustainable practices.

Uploaded by

Ullas Perla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views16 pages

Satellite Imaging, Machine Learning, Agriculture

The document discusses the integration of satellite imaging and machine learning in agriculture for the forecasting of pests and diseases, highlighting its importance for enhancing crop yield and food security. It details various types of satellite imagery, machine learning techniques, and successful case studies, while also addressing challenges such as data availability and model scalability. The combination of these technologies is positioned as a transformative approach to modern agricultural management, enabling timely interventions and sustainable practices.

Uploaded by

Ullas Perla
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Satellite Imaging and Machine Learning for Forecasting Pests

and Diseases in Agriculture


1. Introduction
The management of pests and diseases constitutes a critical aspect of modern
agriculture, directly influencing crop yield and quality, and consequently impacting
global food security.1 The substantial losses caused by these biotic stresses
necessitate the implementation of effective and timely detection and forecasting
strategies.1 Traditional methods employed for pest and disease monitoring, often
relying on manual inspection and reactive chemical treatments, present limitations in
terms of efficiency, scale, and environmental sustainability.4 The increasing global
population and the corresponding rise in food demand underscore the paramount
importance of enhancing agricultural productivity through advanced and sustainable
methodologies.

In response to the challenges posed by conventional approaches, the integration of


satellite imaging and machine learning technologies has emerged as a transformative
paradigm in agricultural management.6 Satellite imaging offers a unique vantage point,
providing a synoptic and non-destructive means of observing vast agricultural
landscapes and collecting invaluable data that were previously unattainable.6
Simultaneously, machine learning algorithms furnish the analytical capabilities to
process and interpret these extensive datasets, enabling the detection of subtle
patterns, the prediction of pest and disease outbreaks, and the facilitation of timely
and targeted interventions.7 The synergistic combination of these technologies holds
immense potential for revolutionizing agricultural practices, fostering sustainability,
and ensuring food security through more efficient and data-driven approaches.6 This
report delves into the principles, applications, challenges, and future directions of
utilizing satellite imaging and machine learning for the forecasting of pests and
diseases in agriculture.

2. Satellite Imaging in Agriculture: Principles and Types


Remote sensing, the fundamental principle underpinning satellite imaging, involves
the acquisition of information about an object or phenomenon without establishing
direct physical contact.10 In the context of agriculture, satellites equipped with
specialized sensors capture the energy reflected or emitted from the Earth's surface
across various wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum.9 The health status of
vegetation, including instances of stress, pest infestation, or disease, manifests as
alterations in the plants' spectral signatures. These changes in the way plants absorb
and reflect light energy are detectable by satellite-borne sensors.7 Consequently,
understanding the spectral characteristics of healthy and stressed vegetation forms
the bedrock of employing satellite imagery for the identification and monitoring of
agricultural pests and diseases.

Various types of satellite imagery are utilized for agricultural monitoring, each offering
unique spectral, spatial, and temporal resolutions tailored to specific applications:

2.1 Multispectral Imagery


Multispectral imagery captures data across several discrete spectral bands, typically
spanning the visible, near-infrared (NIR), and shortwave infrared (SWIR) portions of
the electromagnetic spectrum.7 This type of imagery is particularly valuable for
assessing general vegetation health, quantifying chlorophyll content through indices
like the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and identifying areas
exhibiting stress.6 Prominent examples of multispectral satellite platforms include
Sentinel-2 and Landsat, which provide freely available data suitable for a wide range
of agricultural monitoring applications.7 Multispectral imagery serves as an efficient
tool for gaining a broad overview of vegetation conditions and highlighting regions
that may warrant more detailed investigation.

2.2 Hyperspectral Imagery


Hyperspectral imagery goes beyond multispectral data by capturing information in
hundreds of narrow and contiguous spectral bands, effectively providing a detailed
spectral signature for each pixel.3 This fine-grained spectral resolution holds
significant potential for detecting subtle physiological changes in plants that may be
indicative of early-stage pest infestations or disease onset, often before any visual
symptoms become apparent.9 Current and forthcoming hyperspectral satellite
missions, such as PRISMA, EnMAP, ESA’s Copernicus Hyperspectral Imaging Mission
for the Environment (CHIME), and NASA’s Surface Biology and Geology (SBG), are
poised to revolutionize the availability of such detailed data for agricultural
applications.3 The enhanced spectral information offered by hyperspectral imagery
allows for a more nuanced understanding of plant health and the potential for
distinguishing between different types of biotic stresses.

2.3 Thermal Imagery


Thermal imagery operates in the thermal infrared region of the spectrum, measuring
the temperature of crops and soil by detecting the emitted infrared radiation.8 This
type of data is particularly useful for identifying water stress in plants, as changes in
leaf temperature due to altered transpiration rates can be detected.8 Additionally,
thermal anomalies can sometimes be associated with pest infestations or diseases
that cause metabolic changes or heat generation within the plant.8 Thermal sensors
can reveal physiological responses to stress even before visual symptoms manifest,
providing an early warning system for potential problems.17

2.4 Other Imagery and Sensors


Beyond the primary types, other satellite-based sensors contribute valuable data for
agricultural monitoring. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) utilizes microwave radiation to
acquire images, enabling data collection regardless of weather conditions and
providing information on soil moisture and vegetation structure.8 Light Detection and
Ranging (LiDAR) offers detailed insights into the three-dimensional structure of the
plant canopy, which can be affected by insect feeding or disease-induced
morphological changes.17 Furthermore, high spatial resolution satellites, such as
WorldView and Pleiades Neo, provide very detailed imagery with fine pixel sizes,
allowing for the precise identification of individual plants that may be infested or
diseased.9 The integration of data from these diverse sensor types can lead to a more
comprehensive and robust understanding of plant health and stress conditions in
agricultural environments.

3. Machine Learning for Pest and Disease Forecasting


Machine learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence, involves the development of
algorithms that enable computer systems to learn from data without being explicitly
programmed.5 In agriculture, machine learning techniques are increasingly employed
to analyze large datasets, identify complex patterns, predict future outcomes, and
automate various tasks, including crop identification, acreage estimation, yield
prediction, and, crucially, pest and disease detection.7 The ability of machine learning
to extract meaningful insights from the vast amounts of data generated by satellite
imagery makes it an indispensable tool for advancing agricultural monitoring
capabilities.

Several categories of machine learning algorithms are applied to the analysis of


satellite imagery for the purpose of forecasting pests and diseases:

3.1 Classification Techniques


Classification algorithms are used to categorize different areas within a satellite image
based on their spectral characteristics, assigning labels such as "healthy crop" or
"infested with specific pest/disease".7 Commonly employed classification techniques
in this domain include Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs).1 CNNs, a type of deep learning model, have
proven particularly effective for image-based pest and disease detection by analyzing
the visual symptoms present in the satellite imagery.1 The output of classification
algorithms often takes the form of thematic maps, visually depicting the spatial
distribution of healthy and infested areas across agricultural fields.

3.2 Regression Techniques


Regression algorithms can be utilized to predict continuous variables, such as the
severity of a pest infestation or the extent of disease damage within a crop.18 This
often involves analyzing vegetation indices derived from satellite imagery and
correlating them with ground-based measurements of pest or disease levels.
Regression models can provide quantitative estimates of the impact of biotic stresses,
aiding in informed decision-making regarding the intensity and timing of intervention
strategies.

3.3 Deep Learning Techniques


Deep learning, a more advanced branch of machine learning, utilizes artificial neural
networks with multiple layers to learn intricate patterns from complex data.1
Architectures such as CNNs, Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), and Long Short-Term
Memory (LSTM) networks are particularly well-suited for analyzing the high
dimensionality and spatiotemporal nature of satellite imagery.1 Deep learning models
excel at automated feature extraction, identifying relevant characteristics from the
raw satellite data without the need for manual pre-processing, and often achieve high
accuracy in pest and disease detection tasks.9 Furthermore, LSTM networks can
analyze temporal sequences of satellite images, enabling the forecasting of future
pest occurrences based on historical patterns and environmental conditions.20

3.4 Ensemble Learning Methods


Ensemble learning methods involve combining the predictions of multiple individual
machine learning models to achieve a more robust and accurate overall prediction.18
Random Forest, an example of an ensemble technique, is frequently used in pest and
disease detection due to its ability to handle complex datasets and reduce the risk of
overfitting.18 By leveraging the strengths of different models, ensemble methods can
enhance the reliability and accuracy of pest and disease forecasting.

The typical workflow for applying machine learning to satellite imagery for pest and
disease forecasting involves several key steps. First, satellite imagery undergoes data
collection and preprocessing, including atmospheric and geometric corrections.8
Subsequently, images are often annotated or labeled with information pertaining to
the presence and severity of pests and diseases, typically through ground-truthing
efforts.4 Feature extraction may then be performed, involving the calculation of
spectral indices or the identification of textural features, or alternatively, raw pixel
values may be directly used as input to the machine learning model.7 The next stage
involves selecting and training appropriate machine learning models using the labeled
data.4 The performance of the trained models is then rigorously validated and
evaluated using independent datasets.4 Finally, the deployed model can be applied to
new satellite imagery to forecast the occurrence and distribution of pests and
diseases.4 The availability of accurately labeled, high-quality datasets is a critical
prerequisite for training effective machine learning models in this domain.

4. Successful Applications and Case Studies


The integration of satellite imaging and machine learning has yielded numerous
successful applications in forecasting specific pests and diseases across diverse
crops and regions:

4.1 Examples of Forecasting Specific Pests and Diseases


One notable example is Omdena's Armyworm Detection and Assessment project,
which developed a machine learning model to detect and evaluate the damage
caused by armyworms in key crops like maize, sorghum, and millet using satellite
imagery. The system achieved an accuracy exceeding 90% in identifying armyworm
damage, demonstrating the potential for precise pest detection through this
approach.4 Research has also focused on the detection of Grapevine Downy Mildew
using high-resolution satellite imagery from PlanetScope and SkySat in vineyards in
New York, USA. This work explored the capacity of such platforms for season-long
disease detection and surveillance, highlighting the potential for early intervention in
high-value crops.3

Satellite imagery has proven invaluable for monitoring large-scale pest outbreaks,
such as locust swarms, which can devastate agricultural regions. Data from platforms
like AVHRR, SPOT-VGT, MODIS, and Landsat have been utilized to track the movement
and extent of locust infestations, aiding in timely control measures.7 In citrus orchards,
multispectral remote sensing has been employed to analyze infestations of black fly
and brown spot scale by detecting changes in the spectral reflectance of affected
trees.7 Similarly, the early stages of mite infestations in cotton fields have been
investigated by observing temporal changes in the appearance, color, and canopy
structure using multispectral satellite data.7 In wheat, multispectral imaging has
demonstrated effectiveness in detecting various diseases with high accuracy.24
Furthermore, research indicates that satellite-based systems can identify fungal
infections in wheat up to 10 days earlier than traditional visual inspection, providing a
critical window for intervention.11

4.2 Regional Examples


The application of these technologies extends across various geographical contexts.
In India, researchers have developed models for predicting pest populations using
weather covariates and statistical machine learning techniques.25 Soybean farmers in
Brazil utilize satellite monitoring, coupled with machine learning, to detect outbreaks
of rust, enabling precise fungicide application.14 A collaborative project in Poland is
focused on developing a system for recognizing and analyzing satellite and aerial
photographs for agriculture, including the monitoring of key crops like rapeseed, corn,
wheat, and triticale, with the aim of predicting plant diseases and pests.26 In the
Czech Republic, satellite data is being used for the early detection of pests and
diseases in crops such as potatoes and rapeseed, allowing for timely and targeted
interventions.27

The following table summarizes some key case studies:

Pest/Dise Crop Region Satellite Machine Outcome Snippet(s


ase Data Learning )
Used Method(s
)

Armyworm Maize, Global Labeled Machine >90% 4

Sorghum, Satellite Learning accuracy


Millet Images Model in
identifying
damage

Downy Grapevine New York, PlanetSco Vegetation Investigati 3

Mildew USA pe (3m), Indices ng


SkySat capacity
(50cm) for
season-lo
ng
detection
and
surveillanc
e

Locusts Various Africa, AVHRR, AI and ML Monitorin 7

SPOT-VGT, g
Asia MODIS, models outbreaks
Landsat

Black Fly, Citrus Not Multispect Analysis of Monitorin 7

Brown Specified ral RS spectral g


Spot Scale changes infestation
s

Mites Cotton Not Multispect Observing Investigati 7

Specified ral RS changes ng


over time early-stag
e
infestation
s

Fungal Wheat Not Satellite Algorithm Detection 11

Infections Specified Imagery s up to 10


days
earlier
than visual
inspection

Rust Soybean Brazil Satellite Machine Early 14

Imagery Learning detection


for precise
fungicide
applicatio
n

Various Rapeseed, Poland Satellite Artificial Developin 26

Pests & Corn, and Aerial Intelligenc g system


Diseases Wheat, Imagery e for
Triticale recognitio
n and
analysis,
including
disease
prediction

Various Potatoes, Czech Multispect Not Early 27

Pests & Rapeseed Republic ral Specified detection


Diseases Satellite for timely
Imagery interventio
ns
These examples underscore the broad applicability and increasing success of utilizing
satellite imaging and machine learning for the early detection and forecasting of
agricultural pests and diseases across a diverse range of crops and geographical
locations.

5. Challenges and Limitations


Despite the significant advancements and promising applications of satellite imaging
and machine learning in forecasting agricultural pests and diseases, several
challenges and limitations warrant consideration. The availability of high-resolution
satellite imagery with sufficient temporal frequency can still be a limiting factor in
certain regions, although upcoming satellite missions are designed to improve this
aspect.3 Cloud cover poses a persistent challenge for optical satellite sensors, often
obscuring the view of agricultural fields and necessitating the use of
weather-independent sensors like SAR in cloud-prone areas.8 Furthermore, the
development of robust and accurate machine learning models heavily relies on the
availability of large, well-labeled datasets, which can be a significant bottleneck in
many agricultural contexts.4 Ensuring the consistent acquisition of high-quality
satellite data and the establishment of effective data labeling methodologies are
therefore critical challenges that need to be addressed.

The accuracy and reliability of pest and disease detection using these technologies
are influenced by various factors. The spatial resolution of the satellite imagery
dictates the level of detail that can be observed, and the complexity of agricultural
landscapes can sometimes make it difficult to isolate the spectral signatures of
specific pests or diseases, especially in their early stages.9 It is also important to
acknowledge that satellite-derived metrics may not always fully capture all the
intricate determinants of crop production and overall growth status.31 Ensuring the
reliability of the information extracted from satellite data necessitates the
implementation of rigorous validation procedures, often involving comparisons with
ground-based observations.31

Scalability and generalization represent another set of challenges. Machine learning


models trained on data from a specific region or crop may not perform equally well
when applied to different geographical areas or plant species due to variations in
agricultural practices, climatic conditions, and the characteristics of local pests and
diseases.5 Developing scalable systems that can be effectively deployed across large
and diverse agricultural regions remains a complex endeavor.3 This requires the use of
diverse training datasets that encompass the variability inherent in different
agricultural environments and careful consideration of regional specificities.

The effective implementation of satellite imaging and machine learning in agriculture


also demands a certain level of technical expertise and infrastructure. Farmers and
agricultural professionals may lack the specialized skills in remote sensing, data
science, and information technology required to fully leverage these technologies.34
The complexity of data management and the initial costs associated with equipment
and software can also present barriers to adoption, particularly for small-scale
farmers.34 Bridging the gap between technological advancements and practical
on-farm application requires the development of user-friendly tools, accessible
training programs, and affordable infrastructure solutions.

Beyond these core challenges, other limitations include the design of robust
agricultural Big Data architectures capable of handling the ever-increasing volumes of
data 32, the lack of standardized data formats and interoperability across different
platforms and systems 33, concerns related to data privacy and security 6, and the
need for seamless integration with existing farm management systems.6 Addressing
these multifaceted challenges is crucial for realizing the full potential of satellite
imaging and machine learning in transforming agricultural pest and disease
management.

6. Advantages over Traditional Methods


The utilization of satellite imaging and machine learning for pest and disease
forecasting offers several significant advantages over traditional methods of
agricultural monitoring:

One of the most prominent benefits is the potential for early detection of pest
infestations and disease outbreaks.3 Satellite imagery can capture subtle changes in
crop health, often indicative of stress caused by pests or diseases, days or even
weeks before these symptoms become visible to the naked eye.3 This early warning
system allows for timely interventions, such as targeted pesticide applications or the
implementation of other control measures, thereby minimizing crop losses and
preventing the widespread dissemination of infestations.3 The ability to proactively
manage threats rather than react to already established problems represents a
fundamental improvement in agricultural practice.

Satellite imaging provides large area coverage and operates with remarkable
efficiency.6 Satellites can monitor vast agricultural landscapes simultaneously,
offering a comprehensive overview that is simply not feasible with traditional
ground-based scouting methods.6 This broad spatial perspective reduces the reliance
on time-consuming and labor-intensive manual inspections, freeing up valuable
resources and allowing for a more strategic allocation of monitoring efforts.4

The integration of these technologies also contributes to reduced pesticide use and
a lower environmental impact.6 By enabling early detection and precise
identification of affected areas, satellite imaging and machine learning facilitate
targeted interventions, minimizing the need for broad-spectrum pesticide applications
across entire fields.6 This precision agriculture approach not only reduces the amount
of chemicals released into the environment but also lowers operational costs for
farmers.

Furthermore, satellite imagery offers improved monitoring and decision-making


capabilities.6 Satellites provide regular updates on crop health and development
throughout the entire growing season, allowing for continuous monitoring of
vegetation conditions.6 This wealth of data, when analyzed using machine learning
techniques, empowers farmers to make more informed decisions regarding irrigation
scheduling, fertilizer application, and pest control strategies.6 The availability of
historical satellite data also enables the analysis of long-term trends and anomalies,
supporting the development of more effective and sustainable agricultural
management practices.9

Finally, while there may be initial investment costs associated with adopting these
technologies, satellite-based monitoring can prove to be more cost-effective in the
long run, particularly for large agricultural operations.4 The reduction in labor costs
associated with manual scouting and the potential savings from optimized pesticide
use contribute to the economic benefits of this approach.6

7. Future Trends and Potential Advancements


The field of satellite imaging and machine learning for agricultural pest and disease
management is dynamic and continues to evolve rapidly, with several promising future
trends and potential advancements on the horizon. Significant progress is expected in
satellite technology, with the development of smaller, more efficient sensors capable
of capturing even more frequent and detailed imagery.8 The launch of new satellite
missions will lead to an increased availability of high-resolution multispectral and,
particularly, hyperspectral data, providing richer spectral information for more
accurate analysis.3 Furthermore, revisit times are expected to improve, offering
near-real-time data that can be crucial for timely interventions.6

Parallel advancements in machine learning algorithms will further enhance the


capabilities in this field. Deep learning techniques are expected to become even more
sophisticated, leading to more accurate and robust detection and forecasting
models.5 The integration of explainable AI (XAI) will be crucial for increasing trust in
these models by providing insights into their decision-making processes.5 Future
models will likely incorporate a wider range of data sources, including weather
patterns, soil conditions, and historical pest and disease records, to develop more
comprehensive and accurate predictive capabilities.18

A key trend will be the increasing integration of multi-source data.8 Combining


satellite imagery with data from ground-based weather stations, soil sensors, and
drone imagery will provide a more holistic understanding of agricultural conditions.8
The fusion of multispectral and hyperspectral data will enable the detection of even
more subtle indicators of plant stress.8

Future research will likely see a greater focus on specific crop-pest/disease


systems.3 This will involve developing tailored solutions that are optimized for
particular crops and the specific pests and diseases that affect them. The creation of
spectral libraries for different plant diseases will aid in more accurate identification
and diagnosis.11

Finally, significant efforts will be directed towards improving accessibility and


user-friendliness.4 The development of intuitive software platforms and mobile
applications will make these advanced technologies more readily available to farmers
and agricultural professionals.4 Cloud-based processing and analysis will reduce the
need for extensive local computing infrastructure, further lowering the barriers to
adoption.18

8. Integration with Other Technologies


The effectiveness of satellite imaging and machine learning for forecasting
agricultural pests and diseases is further amplified through their integration with
other complementary technologies:

IoT Sensors: The deployment of Internet of Things (IoT) sensors in agricultural fields
allows for the collection of real-time, in-situ data on crucial parameters such as soil
moisture, temperature, humidity, and plant health.11 This ground-level information can
be integrated with the broad spatial coverage provided by satellite imagery, enabling a
more comprehensive and accurate assessment of field conditions.11 IoT data can also
serve as valuable ground truth for validating and calibrating satellite-derived
information.

Drones (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - UAVs): Drones equipped with a variety of


sensors, including multispectral, hyperspectral, and thermal cameras, offer a flexible
and high-resolution platform for aerial data acquisition at the field level.2 Drones
bridge the spatial and temporal gap between satellite observations and ground-based
measurements, providing detailed imagery on demand.2 Machine learning algorithms
can be applied to analyze drone-captured imagery for the detection and identification
of pests and diseases at a very granular level.1 Furthermore, the integration of
drone-derived data with satellite imagery can improve the accuracy of agricultural
biomass estimates and provide more detailed insights into crop health.22

The synergistic benefits of integrating satellite imaging, machine learning, IoT sensors,
and drones are substantial. This multi-layered approach enables more comprehensive
and accurate pest and disease forecasting, leading to the development of more
effective and targeted management strategies.5 Precision agriculture practices are
significantly enhanced through the data-driven insights derived from these integrated
technologies, optimizing the use of resources such as water, fertilizers, and pesticides,
and ultimately improving crop yields and promoting sustainable farming practices.6
The convergence of these advanced technologies paves the way for truly intelligent
and responsive agricultural management systems.

9. Conclusion
In conclusion, the integration of satellite imaging and machine learning represents a
significant paradigm shift in agricultural pest and disease forecasting. By leveraging
the broad spatial coverage and temporal frequency of satellite imagery, coupled with
the analytical power of machine learning algorithms, farmers and agricultural
professionals can achieve earlier, more accurate, and more efficient detection and
prediction of biotic stresses. This approach offers substantial advantages over
traditional methods, including early detection, large-scale monitoring capabilities,
reduced pesticide use, and improved decision-making, ultimately contributing to more
sustainable and productive agricultural practices. While challenges related to data
availability, accuracy, scalability, and technical expertise remain, ongoing
advancements in satellite technology, machine learning algorithms, and the
integration with other technologies like IoT sensors and drones promise to further
enhance the capabilities in this field. The transformative potential of satellite imaging
and machine learning to improve crop yields, reduce environmental impact, and
enhance global food security underscores the importance of continued research,
development, and adoption of these innovative technologies in the agricultural sector.

Works cited
1.​ A Research Paper on Crop Disease Detection Using Deep Learning Model,
accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.ijraset.com/research-paper/crop-disease-detection-using-deep-lear
ning-model
2.​ Intelligent agriculture: deep learning in UAV-based remote sensing imagery for
crop diseases and pests detection - Frontiers, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1435
016/full
3.​ Advancing Plant Pest and Disease Detection with Satellite EO - NASA Acres,
accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.nasaacres.org/our-project-archive/cornell-gold-jiang
4.​ Using Satellite Imagery to Detect and Assess the Damage of Armyworms in
Farming, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.omdena.com/blog/using-satellite-imagery-to-detect-and-assess-th
e-damage-of-armyworms-in-farming
5.​ (PDF) Machine Learning Applications in Agriculture for Pest and Disease
Detection, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389453153_Machine_Learning_Applicat
ions_in_Agriculture_for_Pest_and_Disease_Detection
6.​ Revolutionizing Agriculture: How Satellite Remote Sensing and ..., accessed on
April 2, 2025,
https://farmonaut.com/remote-sensing/revolutionizing-agriculture-how-satellite-
remote-sensing-and-precision-farming-boost-crop-yields-and-soil-health/
7.​ Remote sensing and artificial intelligence: revolutionizing pest management in
agriculture - Frontiers, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/sustainable-food-systems/articles/10.3389/fs
ufs.2025.1551460/full
8.​ Detecting Environmental Stress In Agriculture Using Satellite Imagery And
Spectral Indices, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/386090227_Detecting_Environmental_
Stress_In_Agriculture_Using_Satellite_Imagery_And_Spectral_Indices
9.​ What Can Satellites Teach Us About Plant Health? Satellite Remote Sensing for
Crop Disease Monitoring - Stella Project, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://stella-pss.eu/what-can-satellites-teach-us-about-plant-health-satellite-re
mote-sensing-for-crop-disease-monitoring/
10.​Benefits of Remote Sensing Tech on the Farm - Croptracker, accessed on April 2,
2025,
https://www.croptracker.com/blog/benefits-of-remote-sensing-tech-on-the-far
m.html
11.​ Using Satellite Imagery for Improved Modern Farm Management - Number
Analytics, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/using-satellite-imagery-farm-manageme
nt
12.​An advanced deep learning models-based plant disease detection: A review of
recent research - Frontiers, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.11589
33/full
13.​Importance of Remote Sensing in Agriculture - TraceX, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://tracextech.com/remote-sensing-in-agriculture/
14.​How to Utilize Satellite Imagery and Remote Sensing in Farm Management,
accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://agricbusiness.com.ng/how-to-utilize-satellite-imagery-and-remote-sensin
g-in-farm-management/
15.​Remote Sensing in Agriculture: Advantages and Disadvantages - Agri Planting,
accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://agriplanting.com/remote-sensing-in-agriculture-advantages-and-disadva
ntages/
16.​Agricultural Imaging | Satellite imagery for agriculture - Pixxel, accessed on April
2, 2025, https://www.pixxel.space/solutions/agriculture
17.​Remote Sensing Technologies Using UAVs for Pest and Disease Monitoring: A
Review Centered on Date Palm Trees - MDPI, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/23/4371
18.​The Role of Machine Learning in Pest and Disease Detection in Crops -
ResearchGate, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388530243_The_Role_of_Machine_Lear
ning_in_Pest_and_Disease_Detection_in_Crops
19.​11 benefits of machine learning in agriculture | Precision farming - Lumenalta,
accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://lumenalta.com/insights/11-benefits-of-machine-learning-in-agriculture
20.​Machine Learning for Detection and Prediction of Crop Diseases and Pests: A
Comprehensive Survey - MDPI, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1350
21.​A Review on UAV-Based Applications for Plant Disease Detection ..., accessed on
April 2, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/17/4273
22.​Integration of Drone and Satellite Imagery Improves Agricultural Management
Agility - MDPI, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/24/4688
23.​Assessing the capacity of high-resolution commercial satellite imagery for
grapevine downy mildew detection and surveillance in New York state | bioRxiv,
accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.11.10.566469v1.full-text
24.​Sugarcane Health Monitoring With Satellite Spectroscopy and Machine Learning:
A Review - arXiv, accessed on April 2, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2404.16844v1
25.​Dynamic ensemble-based machine learning models for predicting pest
populations, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/applied-mathematics-and-statistics/articles/1
0.3389/fams.2024.1435517/full
26.​Revolution in agriculture – disease detection through satellite image analysis -
TUATARA, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://tuatara.pl/blog/revolution-in-agriculture/
27.​Revolutionizing Czech Agriculture: How Satellite Crop Monitoring Solves Field
Problems Before They Escalate - - Farmonaut, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://farmonaut.com/europe/revolutionizing-czech-agriculture-how-satellite-cr
op-monitoring-solves-field-problems-before-they-escalate/
28.​Smart Farming Using AI, IoT, and Remote Sensing - Spectroscopy Online,
accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/smart-farming-using-ai-iot-and-remo
te-sensing
29.​A systematic review of the use of Deep Learning in Satellite Imagery for
Agriculture - arXiv, accessed on April 2, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2210.01272v3
30.​Why Satellite Imagery is a Game-Changer for Agriculture - Arlula, accessed on
April 2, 2025,
https://www.arlula.com/why-satellite-imagery-is-a-game-changer-for-agricultur
e/
31.​Challenges and opportunities in remote sensing-based crop monitoring: a review,
accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article/10/4/nwac290/6939854
32.​Challenges to Use Machine Learning in Agricultural Big Data: A Systematic
Literature Review - ResearchGate, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359386300_Challenges_to_Use_Machi
ne_Learning_in_Agricultural_Big_Data_A_Systematic_Literature_Review
33.​Challenges to Use Machine Learning in Agricultural Big Data: A Systematic
Literature Review - MDPI, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/3/748
34.​Advances in Crop Science and Technology - Integration of Drones and Satellite
Imaging in Crop Monitoring and Precision Farming - OMICS International,
accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/integration-of-drones-and-satellite-im
aging-in-crop-monitoring-and-precision-farming-134122.html
35.​Revolutionizing Agriculture: How Satellite Imagery and AI Are Transforming
Precision Farming in North America - - Farmonaut, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://farmonaut.com/usa/revolutionizing-agriculture-how-satellite-imagery-and
-ai-are-transforming-precision-farming-in-north-america/
36.​www.21stcentech.com, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.21stcentech.com/satellite-monitoring-revolutionizes-21st-century-a
gricultural-practices/#:~:text=Early%20Detection%20and%20Monitoring,at%20di
fferent%20stages%20of%20growth.
37.​How Satellite Imagery is Changing Farm Management - KhetiBuddy Canada,
accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://khetibuddy.com/ca/blogs/how-satellite-imagery-is-changing-farm-manag
ement/
38.​Full article: Aerial multispectral imagery for plant disease detection: radiometric
calibration necessity assessment - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed on April 2,
2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/22797254.2019.1642143
39.​AI Drones in Agriculture: Transforming Crop Monitoring and Precision Farming -
Keymakr, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://keymakr.com/blog/ai-drones-in-agriculture-transforming-crop-monitorin
g-and-precision-farming/
40.​JOURNAL OF THE NACAA Integration of Smart Drones and AI into Agriculture – A
Review, accessed on April 2, 2025,
https://www.nacaa.com/file.ashx?id=24de847d-2a46-4815-a37c-ffc84451e339

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy