Global Englishes Textbook Analysis and Teachers P
Global Englishes Textbook Analysis and Teachers P
9; 2023
ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
Received: July 19, 2023 Accepted: August 17, 2023 Online Published: August 18, 2023
doi: 10.5539/elt.v16n9p64 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n9p64
Abstract
This study investigated the manifestation of Global Englishes features in three English textbooks commonly
used in the lower secondary schools of eastern Thailand. It further explored whether the teachers who used the
textbooks were aware of the Global Englishes features manifested in the textbooks. The data revealed that
Global Englishes features were primarily taken for granted when designing the three English textbooks. In
contrast to the Global Englishes paradigm, the three English textbooks mainly represented the target
interlocutors, ownership of English, and norms of English from ‘native’ English-speaking (NES) countries. Even
though attempts were made to include some diversity regarding the target interlocutors, it was unbalanced
distribution. However, cultural content in reading materials is found to be diversely represented. When exploring
teachers’ perceptions of Global Englishes in the textbooks, it was revealed that they lacked knowledge about
Global Englishes. They were aware of cultural diversities in the readings but did not try to discuss them with the
students since they perceived reading skills as more important than cultural content. Implications for teacher
professional development are discussed.
Keywords: Global Englishes, textbook analysis, teacher’s perception of Global Englishes
1. Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
Global Englishes is a research area that receives tremendous interest from many researchers worldwide and
continues to expand in different directions (Rose, McKinley, & Galloway, 2021). Global Englishes consolidated
implications from interrelated paradigms in applied linguistics, including World Englishes (WE), English as a
Lingua Franca (ELF), English as an International Language (EIL), and translanguaging in the multilingual turn
in Second Language Acquisition (SLA) research (Rose & Galloway, 2019). Even though these terms emerged
from different traditions, they are more likely similar in their overarching attempts to appreciate English plurality
and legitimacy and challenge the monolingual ideology prevalent in the dominant culture (Prabjandee & Fang,
2022). Global Englishes was developed to unite these interrelated paradigms and put forward an agenda to
reevaluate current English Language Teaching (ELT) practices, considering the pluricentric English in the
globalized world (Rose & Galloway, 2019).
Since its development, Global Englishes has taken clear directions toward pedagogical concerns (Rose et al.,
2021). Several researchers (e.g., Boonsuk, Ambele, & McKinley, 2021; Fang & Ren, 2018; Galloway & Rose,
2014, 2018; Jindapitak, Teo, & Savski, 2022; Rosenhan & Galloway, 2019) have attempted to investigate the
benefits of implementing Global Englishes in the classrooms. In their edited volume, Selvi and Yazan (2021)
showcased practical examples of how Global Englishes was implemented in language teacher education. As a
result, Global Englishes is now conceptualized as an ELT paradigm that draws implications from the global
spread of English (Galloway & Rose, 2015). Global Englishes aimed to prepare students to use English with
English users by acknowledging that the target interlocutors become unpredictable, and the interaction between
English users becomes more complex (Prabjandee & Fang, 2020). Thus, preparing students to conform to native
speaker norms, such as achieving native-like proficiency, may not support using English outside the classroom.
Instead, teachers are responsible for preparing students to use English in global contexts where English users are
increasingly diverse (Prabjandee, 2020). Similarly, Syrbe and Rose (2018) addressed the need to raise students’
awareness of English varieties and acquaint them with the language norms of diverse communities.
However, implementing Global Englishes in the classrooms requires teachers to embrace new ways of thinking
about English and ELT (Matsuda, 2017). This recommendation is achieved slowly because many English
teachers have formed entrenched beliefs and attitudes toward English and ELT in their teacher education
experiences (Prabjandee, 2020). Additionally, because a lack of materials has been identified as a significant
64
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
barrier to Global Englishes implementation (Galloway & Rose, 2015), teachers, who may want to present a
global depiction of English use and users to their students, may be constrained by a practical need to rely on
commercial materials. As a result, whether Global Englishes is manifested in English textbooks is an essential
question since textbooks have a vital role in language learning (Syrbe & Rose, 2018). Despite technological
advancements, textbooks remain English teachers’ primary instructional material (Keles, Mansouri, & Yazan,
2023).
Nevertheless, limited research has used Global Englishes as an analytical framework to analyze the
manifestation of Global Englishes (Syrbe & Rose, 2018). Moreover, prior research on textbook analysis has not
taken steps further by exploring teachers’ perceptions about its existence in textbooks. This study attempts to fill
this considerable gap by interviewing English teachers who use textbooks with Global Englishes features to
determine whether they know them. This line of inquiry is essential because it takes a research area on textbook
analysis further to explore how teachers use textbooks. This study aimed to bridge these two lines of research to
unite a more comprehensive understanding of textbook analysis and implementation. Hopefully, the findings will
illuminate how teachers used the English textbooks, reflecting their classroom practices. The following research
questions were used to guide the pursuit of knowledge in this study:
(1) To what extent do English textbooks at the lower secondary school level contain Global Englishes features?
(2) What are teachers’ perceptions of Global Englishes features in English textbooks?
2. Literature Review
2.1 Global Englishes
Global Englishes was initially conceptualized as a linguistic phenomenon illustrating the global expansion of
English into international territories (e.g., Canagarajah, 2013; Jenkins, 2016; Pennycook, 2007). Pennycook
(2007) defines Global Englishes as the spread and use of multiple kinds of English spurred by immigration and
globalization. The notion of Global Englishes recognizes the fluid and hybrid nature of English in an era of
increased globalization and transcultural and linguistic fluxes (Jenkins, 2015). Since its development, Global
Englishes research has expanded to a pedagogical focus, defining it as an ELT paradigm that prepares students to
use English with diverse English users (Rose & Galloway, 2019).
Situated in the Global Englishes paradigm, the Global Englishes for Language Teaching (GELT) framework,
popularized by Rose and Galloway (2019), depicted the target interlocutors as all English users – ‘native’
English speakers (NES) or ‘non-native’ English speakers (NNES). Instead, Prabjandee (2020) used the term
“unpredictable target interlocutors” to describe the instability of using English in the globalized world. From the
GELT perspective, English textbooks should position the target interlocutors as socio-culturally diverse rather
than from ‘native’-speaker nations only (Syrbe & Rose, 2018). Since English is used globally, it is crucial to
reconceptualize its ownership from NES's property to global ownership. GELT argues that everyone can claim
ownership of English (Prabjandee & Fang, 2022). In textbook analysis research, ownership of English can be
examined by examining how dialogues (spoken and written) are represented – whether the dialogues’ characters
are diverse (Syrbe & Rose, 2018). Apart from representing English as global ownership, the target cultures for
learning English should be fluid or diverse rather than fixed or stable. This can be examined through the content
of reading materials (Syrbe & Rose, 2018). Based on real-life English use, GELT acknowledges that English
norms are flexible depending on contexts. The norm depends on moment-to-moment of English use rather than a
pre-determined set of rules.
2.2 English Textbook Analysis and Global Englishes
An extensive literature review found that prior research has paid limited attention to using Global Englishes as
an analytical framework to analyze English textbooks even though it continues to be relevant to ELT in today’s
globalized world. Some related studies are available in the literature. For example, Syrbe and Rose (2018)
analyzed three series of English textbooks in Germany in terms of ownership representation, users, models, and
target interlocutors. It was found that the textbooks were over-reliant on UK models, and they represented
English users and cultures as fixed and static. Similarly, Joo, Chik, and Djonov (2020) analyzed Grade 3 English
textbooks approved by the South Korean government regarding English user representations. The results
indicated that textbook characters’ interactions suggest Western dominance and support native speakerism
ideology. In addition, Liu (2017) analyzed a textbook series used in the Jiangsu province of China for
intermediate-level senior high school students. It was found that diverse cultural contents and linguistic strategies
were incorporated into the English textbooks. However, there is limited exposure to how English was used in a
dynamic lingua franca manner. In Thailand, where this study was conducted, Juntanee (2019) analyzed 12
English textbooks approved by the Thai government to be used at the secondary school level. It was found that
the Global Englishes features were manifested with varying degrees in the textbooks in terms of diverse cultural
representations and depictions of the target interlocutors.
65
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
These studies (Joo et al., 2020; Juntanee, 2019; Liu, 2017; Syrbe & Rose, 2018) showed that English textbooks
mainly represented English use with NES, and the norms largely depended on NES. Even though diverse
cultural content was incorporated into the textbooks, the incorporation was unbalanced between NES and NNES
cultures. It should be noted that prior research on textbook analysis did not take a step further into investigating
whether the teachers who use the textbooks were aware of Global Englishes features in the textbooks or not. The
findings could provide valuable insights for preparing teachers to implement Global Englishes in the classrooms
by exploring how teachers used the textbooks or their perceptions of textbook contents.
3. Method
Guided by qualitative research traditions, this study was designed into two phases. The first phase aimed to
analyze English textbooks commonly used in lower secondary schools in an eastern province of Thailand by
using Global Englishes as an analytical framework. The second phase explored teachers’ perceptions of Global
Englishes features in their textbooks. The details of each stage are presented below.
3.1 Phase 1: Analyzing English Textbooks
To obtain the English textbooks for analysis, the first author used a simple, short survey to ask English teachers
in an eastern province of Thailand. The survey was created using a Google form and sent electronically to
potential English teachers in the area through a personal social network. The survey asked for their demographic
backgrounds, including gender, age, years of teaching experience, and classes they are teaching. After the
demographic data, the survey asked: What textbooks do you use for the lower secondary level in your school?
In total, 40 English teachers responded to the survey. Of these teachers, 16 used the same textbooks: Spark 1, 2,
and 3. These English textbooks were different from Juntanee’s study (2019). For the analytical framework, we
adapted Syrbe and Rose’s (2018) framework, as illustrated in Table 1.
Table 1. Description of Global Englishes Analytical Framework (Syrbe & Rose, 2018)
Target interlocutors (Who was positioned as the The target interlocutors are all English users,
target interlocutors in the English textbooks?) who are linguistically and culturally diverse.
Norms (What models and norms were used in The model of English was fluid, diverse and
the books and audio materials?) flexible in the context.
The first author analyzed the English textbooks using the qualitative content analysis method articulated by Selvi
(2020) to examine which Global Englishes features manifested in English textbooks. The analysis started with
the immersion step. The first author comprehensively familiarized himself with each textbook by reviewing the
textbooks, page by page, and the audio files of the three selected English textbooks (Spark 1, 2, and 3). After that,
the first author developed a coding frame based on the Global Englishes framework (Syrbe & Rose, 2018). As
illustrated in Table 1, the coding frame in this study was created broadly, consisting of a guiding question and a
description for each aspect of Global Englishes-oriented features: target interlocutors, ownership of English,
target culture, norms of English, and orientation. The coding frame was applied flexibly because we wanted to be
open in our approach to textbook analysis. After that, the first author conducted the thematic segmentation
(focusing on content) using deductive and inductive approaches. To elaborate, each textbook was segmented by
units to ensure systematic data management. When analyzing the textbooks deductively, the first author
attempted to answer the guiding question and filtered segments through the coding frame. Simultaneously, when
finding the data beyond the coding frame, the first author separated them for categorization later. However, no
data were beyond the coding frame. To maximize the trustworthiness of the textbook analysis, intra-rater
reliability was used, in which the first author conducted the data analysis several times until the analysis was
saturated. Finally, the second and third authors reexamined the analysis to enhance trustworthiness.
66
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
67
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
Out of 40 future scenarios for using English, the analysis revealed that most scenarios positioned the target
interlocutor from the NES countries (n = 33), followed by some English users from the NNES countries (n = 7).
This unbalanced distribution indicated that NES was positioned to be the main target interlocutor. Figures 1 – 3
illustrate some examples from English textbooks.
68
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
Apart from positioning NES as the target interlocutors, some scenarios positioned the target interlocutors from
various countries. As illustrated in Figure 3, the diversity of names, nationalities, and cities from both the NES
and NNES were found. The students could make a dialogue to ask and answer from this information. They could
see the diversity of personal data in many countries.
(2) Writing Tasks
From the three textbooks, a total of 37 writing tasks were prevalent. Out of these tasks, there are 11 writing tasks
in Spark 1, 13 in Spark 2, and 13 in Spark 3, as illustrated in Table 3.
Table 3. Summary of writing tasks constructions
Appear on page number
Writing Tasks Constructions
Spark 1 Spark 2 Spark 3
Email 17, 29, 41, 89, 101 26, 53, 65, 77, 101 41, 53, 89
Blog 53 17 -
Article 65 - 17, 101
Short paragraph 71 95 -
Complete paragraph 83 23, 71 -
Complete email - 35 23, 47, 83
Story - 41 29
Complete sentences 11 - -
Postcard 77 - -
Biography - 29 -
Survey report - 89 -
Portfolio - - 11
Essay - - 65, 77
Complete text - - 95
Total (37) 11 13 13
Out of 37 writing tasks, most writing tasks positioned the target interlocutor from the NES countries (n = 23),
followed by some English users from the NNES countries (n = 14). Figures 4 – 5 illustrate examples from
English textbooks.
69
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
70
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
71
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
72
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
73
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
complexion, and a “good” accent. Upon asking who NNEs are, she reported reluctantly, “Let me think about that.
I think there are a few countries I know of, like England and America. Is France a native speaker? I am not sure,
but I think France is a native speaker. I think they have good accents.” Similarly, Lisha knew that the British and
Americans were NES but lacked knowledge that Russia is NNES.
Additionally, upon asking whom they think could be a role model for learning English for students, the two
English teachers immediately described an English user with native-like English proficiency (correct, good
accent, etc.). Marie responded, “The role model of English users should be enthusiastic and use language
correctly. I think one of the English teachers in the school. Because she graduated with a doctoral degree, she
speaks correctly, and her accent is good. I like her accent when she uses English.”
However, upon asking if their students use English with an accent or incorrect grammar, Lisha and Marie stated
that they would not correct them while speaking. Instead, they would offer them corrections after they had
finished talking. Lisha reported, “I am not serious about making grammar mistakes while they are speaking. Just
dare to speak. I will not tell them that it was wrong after they finished talking. I will suggest to them, like, you
can try this instead of that one or use this phrase. Similarly, Marie narrated, “I am okay with the accents of Thai
people, but I prefer my students to sound native-like. I will suggest that they pronounce it correctly. I think it
should be simpler to communicate.”
4.2.2 Awareness of Diverse Cultural Contents, but Ignore Teaching Them
Even though the teachers had limited knowledge of Global Englishes, they knew the textbook readings included
cultural content from different countries. Upon checking whether they knew of cultural diversities in their
English textbooks, Marie reported, “In the textbooks, right? I know, yes. I know. The textbook showed cultures
from different nations. Similarly, Lisha reported, “Yes, different cultures are included in the reading parts. There
are a lot of other countries. It is not specific to one country.”
However, it is distressing to learn that the two teachers did not take the time to raise students’ awareness of
cultural differences in the readings, even though they were aware that comparing cultural differences is part of
the national curriculum. They reported that they mainly focused on reading comprehension, so they spent time
teaching vocabulary and reading skills rather than engaging students in discussing cultural differences. Upon
asking why they did not spend time discussing cultural differences, they reported that they did not have time and
thought the students did not have to learn about cultural differences during the lower secondary school level. The
teachers felt that reading skills were more important than cultural content.
5. Discussion and Implications
This study aimed to analyze the English textbooks commonly used in eastern Thailand to determine the extent of
Global Englishes features manifested in the textbooks and explore teachers’perception of the textbooks. For the
textbook analysis, the data showed that the textbooks contained Global Englishes features of varying degrees.
Regarding target interlocutors, ownership of English, and norms, the data revealed that activities involving future
scenarios of using English and writing tasks might prompt students to think they were more likely to use English
with NES than NNES. The findings in this study were consistent with previous studies (Joo et al., 2020; Juntanee,
2019; Liu, 2017; Syrbe & Rose, 2018). According to Syrbe and Rose (2018), Germans were likelier to use
English with other NNES at work, socialize, or travel. As a result, the students will communicate with the NNES
using English rather than NES. This is similar to the Thai context (Jantanee, 2019). In the actual situation, Thai
students will have more chances to use English with NNES. If the English textbooks do not prepare them to
understand the target interlocutors, Thai students may have narrow views of English use outside the classroom
and may not be ready to use English in the globalized world (Prabjandee & Fang, 2022). Regarding the target
culture, it is satisfactory that the cultural content in the three textbooks is diversely represented. This insight is
hopeful for future textbook design to continue incorporating diverse cultural content to benefit students.
Apart from analyzing the textbooks, this study takes a step further to explore teachers’ perceptions of Global
Englishes features in the English textbooks. This study is one of the first inquiries to integrate extant literature on
teachers’ perceptions of Global Englishes with textbook analysis. Based on the interview responses, it is safe to
conclude that the two teachers in this study lack knowledge of Global Englishes. They also had limited
worldviews about who English users are, as they could not differentiate between NES and NNES nations. In
addition, they perceived ELT classrooms as a site of learning about NES standards and norms as they articulated
their beliefs that they wanted their students to achieve native-like accents and correctly use English. The teachers
reported that they were aware of cultural differences in the textbooks. However, they did not teach those cultural
diversities because they did not have time and thought the students didn't need to learn at their age. The findings
called for the urgent need to prepare teachers to understand Global Englishes and equip them with the skills
74
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
necessary to implement it in classrooms. Some examples of teacher professional development programs were
found in the literature (e.g., Prabjandee, 2020; Prabjandee & Fang, 2022). Future research can engage in this line
of research by offering teacher professional development to help teachers implement the Global Englishes
paradigm in their classrooms.
6. Conclusion
Although this study focused on English textbooks used in eastern lower secondary schools, the knowledge
obtained was substantial. The study provides clear evidence that although the English textbooks commonly used
by English teachers in eastern Thailand contained varying degrees of Global Englishes features, the teachers in
this study were unaware of its features and did not spend time discussing with the students about them. The
findings call for urgent action to equip English teachers’ knowledge of the Global Englishes paradigm, so they
have appropriate tools to discuss with their students about the plurilithic and pluricentric nature of English.
It should be noted that the interpretation of this study should be conducted with caution. Given the limitation of
the qualitative research nature, we did not intend to claim universal generalization. We were aware that not all
English textbooks took for granted Global Englishes, and not all teachers in Thailand possessed limited
knowledge of Global Englishes, believed in standard ideology and NES norms, and did not take the time to
incorporate cultural content in ELT. Instead, we hoped that our study painted the urgent need to act. Our students
may be disadvantaged if we do not do something about these circumstances.
References
Boonsuk, Y., Ambele, E. A., & McKinley, J. (2021). Developing awareness of Global Englishes: Moving away
from “native standards” for Thai university ELT. System, 99, 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102511
Canagarajah. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073889
Fang, F., & Ren, W. (2018). Developing students’ awareness of Global Englishes. ELT Journal, 72(4), 384-394.
https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy012
Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2014). Using listening journals to raise awareness of Global Englishes in ELT. ELT
Journal, 68(4), 386-396. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu021
Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2015). Introducing global Englishes. Abingdon: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315734347
Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2018). Incorporating Global Englishes into the ELT classroom. ELT Journal, 72(1),
3-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx010
Jenkins, J. (2015). Global Englishes: A resource book for students. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761596
Joo, S., J., Chik, A., & Djonov, E. (2020). The construal of English as a global language in Korean EFL
textbooks for primary school children. Asian Englishes, 22(1), 64-68.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2019.1627636
Jindapitak, N., Teo, A., & Savski, K. (2022). Bringing global Englishes to the ELT classroom: English language
learners’ reflections. Asian Englishes, 24(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2022.2033910
Juntanee, J. (2019). Global Englishes orientation of English textbooks in Thailand. Unpublished master’s thesis.
Faculty of Education, Burapha University, Thailand.
Keles, U., Mansouri, B., & Yazan, B. (2023). Perpetuation of gender bias in New Headway: A multimodal
critical discourse analysis with a diachronic lens. Pedagogy, Culture, & Society, 31(3), 379-401.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1913442
Liu, Q. (2017). Evaluation of global Englishes oriented features in Chinese senior high school textbook.
Published master’s dissertation. The University of Edinburgh. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/35441
Matsuda, A. (2017). Preparing teachers to teach English as an international language. Multilingual Matters.
https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783097036
Prabjandee, D. (2020). Teacher professional development to implement Global Englishes language teaching.
Asian Englishes, 22(1), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2019.1624931
Prabjandee, D., & Fang, F. (2022). 'I was like, just wow!': Insight from Global Englishes Teacher professional
75
elt.ccsenet.org English Language Teaching Vol. 16, No. 9; 2023
Copyrights
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
76