The document discusses global governance and the Bretton Woods system, highlighting the evolution of institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and WTO since their inception in 1944. It outlines the aims and critiques of these institutions, particularly focusing on their roles in economic stability, development, and trade, while also addressing the challenges and disparities they have created. The document concludes with a call for reform in light of the 2007-09 financial crisis and ongoing neoliberal dominance.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as KEY, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views19 pages
Global Economic Institutions
The document discusses global governance and the Bretton Woods system, highlighting the evolution of institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and WTO since their inception in 1944. It outlines the aims and critiques of these institutions, particularly focusing on their roles in economic stability, development, and trade, while also addressing the challenges and disparities they have created. The document concludes with a call for reform in light of the 2007-09 financial crisis and ongoing neoliberal dominance.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as KEY, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19
GLOBAL
GOVERNANCE AND THE BRETTON WOODS SYTEM Aspects of Global Governance
A broad process of interactive decision-making at
the global level. It hovers between Westphalian state-system and the idea of world government.
Although there are binding rules and norms, these
aren’t enforced by a supranational authority
Liberal theorists argue that is a definite trend in
favour of global governance, reflecting growing interdependence
The trend towards global governance has been
particularly prominent in the economic sphere The Evolution of Bretton Woods Institutions
Delegates at the 1944 conference in Bretton Woods,
The Evolution of Bretton Woods Institutions
Since 1945, emergence of global economic
governance through a web of multilateral agreements, formal institutions and informal networks. Bretton Woods agreement was executed just before World War II. The aim was not to return to the economic instability and chaos of the interwar period. In Aug. 1944, the USA, the UK and 42 other states met at UN Monetary and Financial Conference at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. To formulate the institutionalarchitecture for the postwar international financial and monetary system. The Evolution of Bretton Woods Institutions
John Maynard Keynes (centre) played a leading role in the
formulation of the Bretton Woods agreements and instrumental in the establishment of the IMF. The Evolution of Bretton Woods Institutions
India's delegation, led by Jeremy Raisman, included notable figures such as
CD Deshmukh, AD Shroff, RK Shanmukham Chetty, BK Madan, and Theodore Gregory. The Bretton Woods System
The Bretton Woods system relates to the postwar
institutional architecture of the financial and monetary system It was based on three bodies: the IMF, the World Bank, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trades (GATT). It initially supervised the world economy largely through the maintenance of stable exchange rates The system broke down in the early 1970s as floating exchange rates replaced fixed exchange rates. The Bretton Woods System: New Monetary Order IMF: sought to maintain stable exchange rates. Fixing all currencies to the value of US dollar. WB: provide loans for countries and development. GATT: multilateral agreement sought to advance the cause of free trade by bringing down tariff levels. Faith in liberal economic theories, virtues of open and competitive international economy. Bretton woods was shaped by the fear that an unregulated international economy is inherently unstable and crisis prone. Eg. The Great Depression. Bretton woods reflectedan attempt to establish a Keynesian-style regulative framework for the international economy. The Bretton Woods System: IMF The Bretton Woods System: IMF
Encourage international monetary cooperation by:
- Removing foreign exchange restrictions - Stabilizing exchange rates - Facilitating multilateral payment systems among member countries- Bretton Woods established a system of fixed exchange rates based on the gold exchange standard, with the US dollar as the anchor.- International business would thrive in stable conditions, free from currency fluctuation fears affecting import and export values.- IMF increasingly focused on lending to: - Developing countries - Post-communist states (transition countries) after the Cold War. IMF: A Critique
From the 1980s, IMF loan conditions aligned with the
Washington Consensus, requiring recipient countries to implement ‘structural adjustment’ programs based on market fundamentalism. This involved removing trade barriers, allowing free capital flow, liberalizing banks, cutting government spending (except on debt), and privatizing sellable assets for foreign investors. Structural adjustment programmes destabilized economy; impact of ‘shock therapy’ market reforms by reducing government spending and rolling back welfare provision, increased poverty and unemployment. Economic openness exposed fragile economies to intensified foreign competition and expanded the influence of foreign banking and corporate interests. IMF has followed the dictates of USA. The Bretton Woods System: World Bank
It is a partner organization of IMF; postwar recovery
in Europe, 1970s onwards, focused on the developing world and after the collapse of communism, transition countries. It provides low-interest loans to support major investment projects, as well as by providing technical assistance. McNamara Phase (1968): WB shifted its priorities towards basic needs underlying causes of poverty, population control, education and human rights. A.W. Clausen Phase (1980): WB towards structural adjustment programmes: emphasis on deregulation, privatization, stress on export-led growth rather than protectionism. World Bank: A Critique
Development disparities grew; structural
imbalance in a trade; developed countries to grow rich by selling high-price, capital-intensive goods, often in highly volatile markets. WB led to a substantial transfer of wealth from peripheral areas of the world economy to its industrialized core. The World Trade Organization
WTO was formed in 1995 as a replacement for GATT that
was established in 1947. GATT only emerged as the basis of the postwar international trading order as a result of the failure to establish the International Trade Organization (ITO). ITO was proposed in 1945 by the UN Economic and Social Council. Its implementation was abandoned once President Truman failed to submit its founding treaty, the Havana Charter (1948), to the US Senate for approval, fearingthat the Senate would regard the organization as threat to US sovereignty. GATT was an agreement amongst member countries to apply the multilateral principle of non-discrimination and reciprocity to matters of trade. Each country had to concede most favoured nation status to all trading partners. Limitations of GATT
GATT existed only as a set of norms and rules,
acquiring the semblance of an institutional character only with the establishment in 1960 of GATT council. Its focus was restricted to the reduction of tariff barriers against imported manufactured goods. GATT had limited influence over agriculture and growing service sector of the economy. GATT procedures for settling disputes between trading partners were also weak. During 5th, 6th, 7th rounds of Negotiation in Kennedy round, Tokyo round and Uruguay rounds – tariffs on manufactured goods were brought down. From 40 % tariff rate on manufactured goods in 1947, the rates were brought down to about 3 % in Transition from GATT to WTO
In Uruguay round (1993); establish WTO; changing
international trading system in the 1980s; neoliberalism and acceleration of globalization. Advance the cause of free trade through a more powerful trade organization with broader responsibilities. WTO was extended to incorporate a renegotiated GATT 1994, agreements on the trade in services (GATS) and on the protection of intellectual property rights (TRIPS). Under GATT, settlements of disputes required the agreement of all members of a disputes panel. WTO, settlement judgments only be rejected if opposed by all members of the Dispute Settlement Body. WTO – New Responsibilities
It also included agriculture and textiles within
WTO responsibilities as a concession to developing countries. WTO appeared to be more democratic body than IMF or the World Bank. Decisions were made within the WTO on a ‘country, one vote’s basis, and usually require only a simple majority. This was in favour of developing countries, which constitute more than two-thirds of the WTO members. Total member countries: 164 Reforming The Bretton Woods System? Supporters argue that the IMF, the World Bank, and the WTO have contributed to a remarkable expansion of the global economy
Critics claim that they have deepened global
disparities and helped to produce an unstable financial order
The 2007-09 financial crisis raised concerns about
the effectiveness of global economic governance
There are major obstacles to reform, not least the
continuing dominance of neoliberal principles in many countries, and the more diffuse location of global power