Ors Maddaragy « , QST IM het Logie S crovnap spidey 8 Recsonin arguments th Cenrvitneyog der to & whet Ou Ube § of Logic tts dered oc Leek word “ LO@08” mh “te Antauing Of Lege ing reefs ,. ave Gecel, | Word, and as0n hogizc isa sents that deal wh vale veagonin Or auqunrents, lagi us app eel le eee ise pet. uy hog TC dees ot niean td Fyty Couvinte or U ovtunde Hb poue (Sstererg. OY Tee ia ogic las spread tu all ce £ of (9 and wll ie of s b €€ lac deules mnelfon hie Gann ln phe and fg Suee the ker logo of- ope teste evsfente- ‘| OT. es bir one 0 exe len Ideas henely gud pec rse, Ch a Clear Manes)" al (€ also: bet? us fo [ it, od oe { ; Some ny 0 do 4 detive cetve (te Z., oe us Ww st errors Ww espe) en pe ae 0 deskiy ud het Gomeeth thet ts ° god ond somckly at <9 bad- ous | | 5(4 us on ' bal ) Iden bn cy ihm aie He 76 Alt de $ bean Vide: ley» | LE the freme-is crreog +t, Conel ib 7p . als be ? Covrect, and LE The pre The (onc lusty mie us 1S aleo Petty Poel Tan “Dae , Ir Tee” Premize ‘These ane The dea ek ove obj Gire Whoek, Oe truer zc Felse Premiee,’ are [deas la ‘ave “Sale W-Nakuwe whised eure pes-bg Guy Q hare begs WG) ex ‘heel is felte u Subj J). OAL men one eporel (a9 objecthy <)' \ 2)AU wien ave [mmovte (Coubjece) { al dog < have fo) lege (‘Subjeasee) Conlusion cont is drowy fron The two prope tions OF con ager =—All: dogs hoveifoc@) begt 0 —L5! fens ay Bu noe ef Prembe. Win + i iw A ud Conclusion Veca ad on thee prone 2 Me Bye Wiens: oe Cc ou =I y Conclusion Us There \ ae Same glvuse “fee Dingo have Poo begs) 4 [a USE iy Conetesioy are —¥ \ Iberefort, thus, So, eres HK Conc bs\ov, alep cl:s: is the Ast plvase: Ac ume Arenas ded wit, Convin ced, ts the loyieet arrangement aud pres evtstion of Ideas, Some of the to le used, Some, most, Some of thee police of] cev clo ateert bribe, not all: Alt ved eyes eople ore bad Lemper Loaie ts Sketch Connected Gevbes of StatensenE dd ete stm: —* seen ae oP boo or a preposition otharwrise Us called cir arguement? y >, Couchasioy, bd wor! pend ow Mejor j fremre, WbLIel, rence Le Trak The argument = - sheps a proethe a . J ’ Me bo te rm aaa . om 7 © = undergo - bore of (dea fiom peemite 2 Fee Seller JoS paste define loft clk" esScholes SS define Inference we Sect Lo, [now fre © avidve of other The distinne feu | au luferente 1% & proces by whee Some yeas, ae Cobia nin ow Ls the transite» Lom te ny vembse tp the Conclution: tls lsd a process of werten Covclasion: da SOME CaBC,0ur Juference are Scalby concel, Whee Same ave not logically correct ‘ ere blictimenDin ecto 5e Slogpivg coengleX Therefove, lee need a qu to go tothe shop — The man tt blind SS Therefore (re wed a Jeg. to te 9? 0 the Slaappiing ©“Feet rt, tlle Tex , - 21202; Te 4, tte Betas Ti : Le deats Ww the abit © thier - hogSeally and olStep to EF ee J 4% ’ us Suet, teu tt] CAPER hina ng tn vol ves wring, reading coe abung and losbenriting « poe Avqord Crealthin ter is lrat wea and also can dew! folloctes ( bo deceive Somme Lod) * A good CePteal thinteey Can dssbinguisled tee abje ive ond Subbpeckire Shtemen€’ fs improve Cy Isat [bin ke 0) Berens dapat bilgoa lack Co -(rettent, $0 Should i be awnotded @ lntudb + The ala ley 40 undersfond sonrelteng without a Conus reasons Cs bioutel be ote) foefetbe tuter Lectual honerty 16 a ability to colve problems worn lee lias Should atee! bias) A creel Thin eer atrould ye howest a ‘ onest Which ove i ee (copy Someones bvork fac lete «). tl- Deception (is fo decrip Some cure of dacede -We beobing (7 — 25) 4 he process Suits OSkeg Ostente yf : JONI G8 Face Or rmsd Oxaminedor, 1 ackuow bed th dm “Ihe Menegennent], out "60! \V- ea ' Drealcing fhe Skopulated rule } r ose ee Y Orde ter you ty Certain pe voumnre « V- Sabo tage Ack of Stoping Pope to met he Nu Prope Professional Mits- conduct? (S process of Possiuy a Studen€ leased ov Seleclve. Problems Soluin As 2 Crdltcedthin per, rs Muck Gcewes problen © Thisk devésivy ( Reegon dleesioy ) { @ Routine decision \ LE (uvolves 4 lot of free Gkeps valve in Problem Splviv \- [dertipying curl opecdfyivg the prob wm \\- Au« 5e the Problen « We forntulate Pessrole Sp luton: We Evaluate Possible Solubion VE Choostvg a@ Solution (Lerten Cos bine 42 tak di cling fle” Zl Aso crblreer thinker, g try £0 delle dogo fx ovder do solve — ‘Crorfed a ey ae 1 the re55 Owing Process base j ou Se (aterest, Cavers Crevapred Unie = a ; é ng OS 6 CT) eB [scours Disa 16 a used of Lang t — : fing Wage: 0 ase = Pawt— | Cuber musage Or 6 long and cerlous Lycatmend) Use of leang vag ¢ 7) ‘pests Welting £0 produte Meanings Or 6 & So0dal Loundory That defines Whet Can be sabi, a par Studley taltecng: ro amdae : 18 aur trstrumewt used 40 spreed \deas’ ead 0 Pecuade tie lasteners or veadere: tL ts an thea ov stafemewt tint chowe felse| ex ergretel use Gf liorder be gain Support tO mabe ple tt deals with the way of Persucdsong people y to cocept yout Concept Or 4oteice beloeve with eur [ders Q Tyee of Propagandes ae Nowe = Callen onde te adtackes negebie tm poet Lp e person) Wee bo taentsh the image of bebeat- Indovduel a - a3 "Gqsteening Comnatiey Lnregoali is the ogpestte of raune- calling Propagat af [raasfer Fropagends. ‘ 7“K ms Paudine on Frop ainelais OF tagusser Roeye (T Pte), P Guy folks roPaqenda « Ls the One thet vce fetter foley melted 40 play that ris bre can or a PexS0n bo get Votes ord Sterking Fro, asnclos Showing baek Som~ ettiing and Lady (eee. 7 “ + TJestimouxl Propaganda 1 Commonly Tyoce of Dis towse l=: Soseu bific dts couse . 1S 4 Gystemabic observalQun> _ \- Observaltsn Coby & clamale Us change’) \We Testun ue yet Cenplanation of tte goten tdes) J We xplanatbn V — Crenevaltratdin _ a- literary Discowse |, (8 about style of oP Gg thengt Atret ave “Gudtets le to paredoulor words J Things 40 Cousider; |—Souete of the maakerdal I Autbors? Credente? le Reesovieg Of worPbing thee naatertaP ener:Qst ita.” dl 1204 ~ Proposstion 4 EB on argupatet. that Kalacs Hfiee he declaratOve fori" 19 yp!y5,] Peo os = dels ute Stuople ets. Con Shand on LL own bekwes yes |e Gursurer* Component of Prepositibu ) | © Q ven epfeer : Suleject berm —? Mein ting tutes 5 Sentente: & Qredreate Kevux “P Qualifbe? Subject berm: Copularg 7 Luks the subject vedtcate “fern $e Enq. A lia Lateo Bie et pe Some Souite rae re ee fe Corte Selleve ave ot Saot Lard Wor Beg AC Stendoid fone = = Uvavere) ofpinm proposition Puede fee “> Mowey Nijerun ladees “Sethe tog \ =O (NLUM) i 2p a O. Audvercal eet Proposition N mega Se awe'g| ie Pt @* ; 6) tf:@ X _ Po. cular | Rm puget we Lactaver OS Carraption, ; ames that ove currup PCL ne) @ Stes ree ebb a bed aneny” : wy, [- Plea oe 2 Sap, = (usvet o.fioaction Sig o= Paw ewler a fornia Ber Sep SS Uvdverel neqalre Sep, = = facbeeubr mages \tapou Lu llpg rst (6 our orguanert thet comp vises wf ele, (eee minor remit Tadd A! dodebision + | Nol orqunent 118 Sad to be ated bup vir Eve ot tks, ofruceuwe de y watt, cise oF «en gmert a Cia jerp24 rau, Structure MELB Sean “fore oP raul de went a Curguilreee ATLE hies | aagage bo tne reOMBes ond fonclusioy > a vf indy At our fs Ove Qe Corajoe) AML ove Re ove fe» Cueuor) S As ave Ds (CSudlusio) +: vy Aw? Mitn are porte} rah nor ) Bu™ Masloosy B mnarbad —> nde 2 MWS Matharesy 3 Par > GuclueDou P ® GOB > i ALL Magecaus ove Pet AcLrdcan © TR post! Al Cancbrvonvans owe Pigeons st tein Ove Notgte cans hese fis legs ee ts 2 4 (ugound tak Ade ig a tidy rats lave’ S Legs PS iy es gfe betas waits Ou GY Gu £@ be Soumd, Hee: Lennie bee vate J y . tice major md wae greniee wast be true! ®.a a efans Awe AP Dcaye ia a : ag O8veun Ores Or eK) led iy ’ Lesee! genus OPS os ( Ss f ( Q Vatu Souetes of Arguisants Why Glue Yudeemelee => ots is ® Obecivel f (fared SOW ak ie nobure ® Statereeal Facts. 7 Ol lective ¢ @ Histo Peak Peeks - na WU nebuve: Sources CH arguments (ax oly be fdentrese? fm she WMahor oremrs sep wedi: yo? 4) 09fos|aeay ‘Theve: ave log heiies Che Bho. gb = are Plylosopliers) EW Curpy efiives’ Ingie as the Si of me thods anne ri Caples for buc ® be catlid 6 lOgician , you must abee by the Study of anettedt, sound’ pducdetes * Most. 'pecpte feet ta wheisonigg Neco, lo to mot brave Method ff prinedple wf dens inns Loo ip sh tien eek kh . achive Ac fiver Logie O8 a adleynpe e wn The oivnlib of tadovintual’ ta auenpe fo mee a ack ff ynveril, Gtodorrventt tn Pag egg OT detween valid Saal riseqpom Coney” ke @® dmranry. eve (udovedual RBARR SEocd * Logie t 8 Ce truceures Cedbseal Tent ela pet to Leeedl Lith rath and Wtf decetion, 0m fw How 0 lurprove Crtbical thinking Precsoning: a) Pevoid Pra iadice Q Aved \neitdn ee ius op erendipity Arvo {rder leckuck [destiomesty : a Systematic Study OF proposition 1B ov Word thet coer frou, Le wo ca © Fallo” lk creas" | can deceived” fw error tu easoms me (tecd 0 be a N8chm ofteg Ty res lke fe [ene are bwo broad tyres of fallacy od Forel Where there is Shewrdberd Uefa @ i fa They are vBieeg fom Couctously ond Uncouciousl4 in prowess of Conservaoon }(dvemnud — Sal tg of Aly dbf Phecspavies Methods (F Deduesive ewetiods Cagetliy Luu, art Lints tu st @ luduchboe qvethods jafete @ \ndutve ovaloys JQ. ~ Fa