MATA SUNDRI COLLEGE FOR WOMEN

THE ECONOMIES OF ARTIFICIAL

INTELLIGENCE AND JOB
DISPLACEMENT
SHREYA RAI- BCP/22/196

PRERNA ARORA- BCP/22/179

PAYAL SHARMA-BCP/22/159

JEEVIKA RAWAT-BCP/22/180

FACULTY NAME- SUKHWINDER KAUR

SUBMISSION DATE-17th APRIL 2025

Abstract

1
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has raised significant
concerns about their impact on labor markets, particularly the displacement of human
workers. This research investigates the economic implications of AI-driven job displacement,
focusing on both short-term disruptions and long-term structural shifts in employment. The
primary objective is to analyse how AI adoption affects different sectors, wage structures,
and workforce demographics. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study combines
quantitative analysis of labor market data with qualitative insights from industry case studies
and policy reviews. Key findings suggest that while AI leads to job losses in routine and low-
skill occupations, it simultaneously creates demand for new roles requiring advanced digital
and cognitive skills. However, the net impact on employment varies widely by industry and
region. The research also highlights the importance of proactive policy measures such as
reskilling programs, social safety nets, and inclusive innovation strategies. Ultimately, the
study provides a comprehensive framework for understanding how economies can adapt to
the transformative effects of AI on employment.

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in various industries has been increasing rapidly
in recent years. As a result, there is a growing concern about the potential impact of these
technologies on employment opportunities and job displacement. According to a study by the
McKinsey Global Institute, up to 800 million jobs could be displaced by automation by 2030,
with 375 million requiring significant retraining (Manyika et al., 2017). Additionally, a report
by the World Economic Forum predicts that by 2022, AI will create 133 million new jobs
while displacing 75 million (WEF, 2020). As AI technologies continue to advance, they are
expected to automate many tasks that are currently performed by human workers. This
literature review aims to explore the current research on the impact of AI on job displacement
and employment opportunities. It will examine the potential effects of these technologies on
different industries and occupations, as well as the potential for new job creation.
Additionally, the review will explore the implications of these changes for workers and
policymakers. The review will explore the potential effects of AI on different industries and
occupations, as well as the potential for these technologies to create new employment
opportunities. The review will also examine the impact of AI on income inequality and
economic growth. This literature review will provide insights that can inform policy
decisions and guide further research on the impact of AI on the workforce.

2
 CONTENT PAGE

TOPICS PAGE NO.

1. INTRODUCTION 4-7
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 8-12
3. METHODOLOGY 13-19
4. RESULTS & DISCUSSION 20-28
5. CONCLUSION & 29-32
RECOMMENDATIONS
6. REFERENCES 33

3
Introduction
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging as one of the most transformative technologies
of the 21st century. From automating routine tasks to enabling complex decision-making, AI
has begun to reshape a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, healthcare, finance,
transportation, and even creative sectors. This technological shift has significant economic
implications, particularly in terms of labor markets and the future of work. As AI continues to
evolve, it brings with it both unprecedented opportunities for economic growth and
productivity, as well as serious concerns about job displacement and widening inequality.

The integration of AI into the workplace often leads to increased efficiency and cost savings
for businesses. Routine, repetitive, and rule-based tasks are especially vulnerable to
automation, and this trend is likely to accelerate as AI systems become more sophisticated.
For example, roles in data entry, customer service, and certain types of manufacturing are
already being augmented—or even replaced—by AI-powered systems. While this can result
in economic gains and improved services, it also raises pressing questions about the fate of
workers whose jobs are rendered obsolete.

At the same time, AI has the potential to create new job categories and industries, particularly
in fields related to technology development, data analysis, machine learning engineering, and
AI ethics. These emerging roles, however, often require specialized skills and training,
potentially leaving behind workers who are not equipped to transition into the new economy.
This creates a growing demand for reskilling and upskilling initiatives, as well as thoughtful
policy interventions to manage the socio-economic impacts of AI adoption.Moreover, the
economic effects of AI are not distributed evenly across countries, regions, or demographic
groups. High-income nations and well-educated workers are more likely to benefit from AI-
driven progress, while lower-income communities may face greater risks of displacement and
economic marginalization. As a result, understanding the economics of artificial intelligence
and its impact on employment is essential for shaping inclusive policies that promote
innovation without exacerbating inequality.

4
Background Information of the Topic

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as one of the most transformative technologies of the
21st century, revolutionizing how economies function, businesses operate, and individuals
interact with technology. From autonomous vehicles and virtual assistants to advanced
analytics and robotics, AI is increasingly embedded in daily life and economic processes. As
AI technologies become more sophisticated and widespread, they are capable of performing
tasks that were traditionally carried out by humans. This shift has profound implications for
productivity, business efficiency, and competitiveness across sectors.

AI's growing integration into the workforce is largely driven by its capacity to automate
routine and repetitive tasks, process large volumes of data, and make decisions with
increasing autonomy. These capabilities offer significant economic benefits, including
reduced labor costs, increased output, and enhanced decision-making. However, these
advancements also raise critical concerns about the future of employment, income
distribution, and societal stability. As AI continues to evolve, it becomes essential to evaluate
both the opportunities it presents and the disruptions it causes in labor markets.

Historically, technological revolutions—such as the Industrial Revolution and the advent of

computers—have disrupted labor markets but also led to new forms of employment and
productivity gains. AI differs from past innovations due to its potential to displace not only
manual labor but also cognitive tasks, making a broader range of jobs susceptible to
automation. As a result, there is a growing need to understand the economics of AI in the
context of job displacement, with a focus on the scale, scope, and implications of these

changes. The impact of technology on employment is not a new phenomenon. Throughout

history, technological advancements have led to the displacement of certain jobs while
creating new employment opportunities in other areas. However, the rapid pace of
technological advancement and the increasing capabilities of AI raise concerns that the
impact on employment may be more severe than in the past (Autor, 2015). Previous research
has suggested that low-skilled and routine jobs are the most susceptible to automation (Frey
and Osborne, 2017). However, as AI technologies continue to advance, they are also
expected to automate tasks that were previously thought to be the domain of highly skilled

5
workers. This has led to concerns about the potential for widespread job displacement across
a wide range of industries and occupations (Acemoglu and Restrepo, 2018)

Research Problem Statement

The adoption of AI has accelerated across various sectors, enhancing productivity and
innovation but also leading to significant labor market disruptions. A central issue is the
displacement of workers whose tasks are increasingly performed by intelligent systems.
While automation and job restructuring are not new phenomena, the scope and speed of AI-
driven displacement are unprecedented. This creates uncertainty about the future of
employment, especially for low- and medium-skill workers who are most vulnerable to
technological substitution.

Despite extensive media coverage and speculative forecasts, empirical research on the
economic implications of AI-related job displacement remains limited. The key research
problem is understanding how AI adoption is reshaping the labor market, which jobs are most
at risk, how income distribution is affected, and what measures can be taken to mitigate
negative outcomes. The challenge lies not only in identifying displaced occupations but also
in crafting policies that ensure a fair and inclusive transition to an AI-driven economy.

Objectives of the Study

This study aims to:

 Examine the economic impact of AI on employment across different sectors.

 Identify the types of jobs and skills most vulnerable to AI-induced displacement.
 Analyze the relationship between AI adoption, wage polarization, and income
inequality.
 Evaluate the effectiveness of current reskilling and workforce adaptation strategies.
 Provide policy recommendations to minimize adverse effects and promote equitable
growth in the AI era.

6
Research Question or Hypothesis

Primary Research Question: How does the adoption of artificial intelligence influence job
displacement, and what are the broader economic implications of this transformation?

Hypothesis: The widespread integration of AI into economic systems significantly

contributes to job displacement, particularly in routine-based occupations, thereby
exacerbating income inequality and necessitating targeted policy interventions.

Significance of the Research

This research is of considerable importance for multiple stakeholders, including

policymakers, business leaders, educators, and workers. By offering a comprehensive
analysis of the economic and social implications of AI-driven job displacement, the study
contributes to informed decision-making and policy formulation. It provides a data-driven
foundation for addressing pressing challenges such as unemployment, wage disparity, and
workforce adaptation.

Moreover, the study aims to bridge the gap between theoretical discussions and practical
solutions by evaluating real-world cases and existing policy measures. It contributes to the
academic discourse by expanding current knowledge on the economic effects of AI and
proposing actionable strategies to ensure that the benefits of AI are distributed more equitably
across society. As AI continues to reshape the future of work, this research serves as a critical
tool for anticipating trends, preparing for disruptions, and guiding sustainable economic
development.

7
Literature Review

Overview of Existing Research

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been a central focus of economic and labor market research in
recent years. Scholars have explored its dual impact on economic productivity and
employment disruption. It has emerged as one of the most transformative forces in the global
economy, prompting a surge of academic inquiry into its economic implications, particularly
its impact on labor markets. Contemporary research reflects a nuanced understanding of AI’s
dual role—serving as both an engine of economic growth and a disruptive force reshaping
employment patterns.

a.Economic Impacts of AI

A substantial body of economic literature underscores the tremendous potential of AI to

enhance productivity, streamline operations, and unlock new avenues for innovation.
Brynjolfsson and McAfee (2014) were among the early voices to highlight the revolutionary
potential of AI to automate routine and data-intensive tasks. Their work demonstrates how AI
applications—from machine learning algorithms to robotic process automation—can
substantially increase output by minimizing human error, reducing transaction costs, and
enabling real-time decision-making.

Further research by Acemoglu and Restrepo (2020) advances this narrative by situating AI
within broader macroeconomic models, showing that while AI can stimulate GDP growth,
the benefits are often asymmetrically distributed across industries, firms, and labor
demographics. Their framework introduces the concept of "task displacement versus task
creation," noting that AI not only automates existing tasks but also generates new ones, albeit
at a pace and skill level not always aligned with the displaced workforce.

b. Job Displacement Trends

The prospect of AI-induced job displacement has captured considerable academic and public
attention. One of the seminal works in this area is by Frey and Osborne (2017), whose widely
cited study estimated that 47% of U.S. employment was at high risk of automation. Their
task-based approach categorized jobs based on routine intensity, arguing that occupations
characterized by repetitive, predictable duties are most susceptible to automation.

8
In contrast, Autor (2015) introduced a more refined framework of “task polarization,”
asserting that middle-skill jobs—often in clerical, administrative, and manufacturing domains
—face greater threats compared to both high-skill creative roles and low-skill manual jobs.
His analysis reveals a "hollowing out" of the labor market, where employment growth is
polarized at the extremes of the skill spectrum.

c. Sector-Specific Studies

A growing corpus of sector-specific research enriches our understanding of AI’s

heterogeneous effects. In manufacturing, for example, the adoption of robotics and intelligent
systems has dramatically reduced reliance on manual labor, leading to widespread job
displacement in regions dependent on industrial employment. Conversely, in sectors such as
healthcare, education, and professional services, AI is often deployed as a complement rather
than a substitute. For instance, AI diagnostic tools assist doctors rather than replace them,
enhancing decision accuracy and service delivery.

Chui et al. (2016), in their McKinsey Global Institute report, quantify this trend by estimating
that while 45% of work activities could be automated with existing technologies, only a small
fraction of occupations—about 5%—are fully automatable. This supports a paradigm shift
from “job elimination” to “job transformation,” emphasizing the importance of adaptive skills
and task reconfiguration.

d. Income Inequality and Labor Polarization

Beyond mere job displacement, AI is a significant driver of labor market inequality. The
OECD (2019) documents how the diffusion of AI exacerbates wage disparities by
disproportionately benefiting high-skill, digitally literate workers who can capitalize on new
technologies. These workers often experience wage premiums and upward mobility, while
those in low-skill, routine-based jobs suffer from wage stagnation or job loss.

Arntz et al. (2016) reinforce this perspective by examining the role of educational attainment
in exposure to automation risks. Their findings suggest that workers with lower levels of
education face both higher displacement risks and greater barriers to reemployment, due to
limited access to upskilling opportunities and weak integration into digital economies. This
bifurcation contributes to a widening gap in income and employment security.

9
e. Policy and Adaptive Strategies

Recognizing the disruptive potential of AI, scholars and institutions have proposed a range of
adaptive policy strategies. These include systemic investments in education and lifelong
learning, the implementation of universal basic income (UBI), and the redesign of labor
market institutions to support worker transitions.

The World Economic Forum (2020) calls for robust public-private partnerships to address
skill mismatches and promote inclusive growth. Their “Reskilling Revolution” initiative
highlights the need for national AI strategies that not only spur innovation but also safeguard
labor. However, the effectiveness of these interventions remains largely anecdotal, with
limited longitudinal evidence available to assess outcomes across different policy
environments.

Gaps in the Current Knowledge

Despite substantial research, several gaps remain in the literature:

a.Longitudinal Studies on Displacement Outcomes

Most studies provide forecasts or cross-sectional analysis. Longitudinal studies that track
actual job displacement over time due to AI are limited. This restricts understanding of how
quickly and permanently AI impacts employment levels. Most existing research provides
cross-sectional or short-term data, focusing on the immediate effects of AI adoption. There's
limited understanding of the long-term impacts of AI on labor markets, such as:

 How occupations evolve over decades due to continuous AI integration.

 Whether displaced workers adapt and re-enter the workforce in comparable or
downgraded roles.

b. Limited Focus on the Informal and Gig Economy

Research typically centers on the formal sector, especially in developed economies. However,
a significant portion of global employment—particularly in developing countries—operates
within informal or gig sectors. Key questions include:

 How does AI affect informal workers with little to no employment protection?

 Are gig workers more vulnerable or more adaptable to AI-induced changes?

10
b. Disparities in Global Impact

The majority of research is concentrated in developed economies, especially the United

States and Western Europe. There is a lack of comprehensive data and analysis from
developing countries, where AI could have different implications due to differing labor
dynamics and economic structures.

c. Intersectionality

Research often overlooks how AI- induced job displacement affects different demographic
groups, including gender , age, and socioeconomic status. There's a lack of studies exploring
how AI and automation affect different demographic groups in nuanced ways. Most literature
treats the workforce as homogenous, but:

 Women and minorities may be disproportionately impacted due to overrepresentation

in routine jobs.
 Older workers may struggle more than younger ones with retraining.
 Lower-income workers may lack access to reskilling resources.

d. Psychological and Social Effects of AI Displacement

While economic consequences are well-researched, fewer studies address the social and
psychological impact of job loss due to AI. These include identity loss, community
destabilization, and mental health challenges.

e. Effectiveness of Reskilling Programs

Though widely advocated, reskilling and upskilling programs lack robust evaluation. Few
studies assess their long-term impact on displaced workers’ career reintegration and wage
recovery.

f. Evolving Nature of AI Capabilities

AI technology is rapidly evolving. Current models may underestimate displacement as AI

becomes more adept at performing non-routine cognitive tasks, blurring the lines between
automatable and human-exclusive work.

11
How the Study Contributes to the Field

This study aims to address several gaps identified in the existing literature and provide a
more holistic understanding of AI’s economic and employment impact.

a.Contextual and Comparative Analysis

By examining both developed and developing economies, this study adds a comparative
dimension that highlights how AI-driven displacement may vary globally. This helps tailor
policy recommendations to different socioeconomic contexts.

b.Bridging Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

In addition to economic metrics, this study incorporates qualitative insights—interviews, case

studies, or secondary accounts of workers affected by AI displacement—to capture a fuller
picture of the human experience behind the numbers.

c. Evaluating Current Mitigation Efforts

The research evaluates ongoing reskilling and policy initiatives, assessing their effectiveness
through available data. This provides practical insights for policymakers seeking evidence-
based solutions.

d. Forward-Looking Perspective

This study considers future trends in AI capabilities, using scenario-based forecasting to

analyze potential labor market trajectories. It aims to prepare policymakers and stakeholders
for multiple possible futures, rather than relying solely on past trends.

e. Policy Recommendations Based on Empirical Insight

Rather than generic solutions, the study proposes targeted, data-driven policy interventions.
These include sector-specific reskilling initiatives, tax incentives for AI adoption that retains
workers, and inclusive economic planning.

12
Methodology

The methodology used in this literature review includes a comprehensive search of various
studies on the impact of AI on job displacement and employment opportunities. The selected
studies were analysed using a thematic approach to identify key findings and common themes
related to the research questions. The findings were then synthesized and organized by
research question to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of research
on the topic.

The review will also consider studies from different fields of research such as economics,
sociology, computer science and management. The methodology used in this literature
review is a systematic and rigorous approach that aims to identify the most relevant and
recent studies on the topic. The systematic approach will help to ensure that the findings of
this literature review are reliable and valid.

Research Design: Qualitative

This study follows a qualitative research design, focusing on measurable data to evaluate the
impact of AI on job displacement and creation across various sectors. Qualitative methods
enable the systematic collection and statistical analysis of numerical data of case studies,
surveys and reports of the companies, allowing for clear identification of trends, correlations,
and patterns related to the adoption of AI and its effect on labor markets.

The research draws on existing secondary data from credible global studies, surveys, and
reports conducted by leading organizations such as the World Economic Forum, PwC,
McKinsey Global Institute, Oxford Economics, Gartner, Deloitte, Accenture, KPMG, and
other. Qualitative design supports hypothesis testing and allows the research to quantify
relationships between AI implementation and employment rates, wage changes, sector-
specific productivity, and job transformation over time.

13
Data Collection Methods

Although the study is qualitative, case studies are used as the primary data collection method
to provide structured and contextualized numerical insights from selected organizations or
sectors where AI has been implemented. The case study approach allows for focused
investigation and data extraction such as:

 Employment levels before and after AI adoption

 Productivity and output changes
 Economic performance metrics
 AI investment data

The data for this study is compiled through a meta-analysis of existing large-scale surveys,
industry reports, and institutional research studies, including:

 Surveys conducted by consulting firms like PwC, Deloitte, Accenture, KPMG, and
Gartner, targeting executives, employees, and CEOs across multiple industries to gather
perceptions, expectations, and preparedness related to AI.
 Case studies and sectoral reports from organizations such as the World Economic Forum
and McKinsey Global Institute, focusing on projected job displacement and creation
figures across different industries.
 Market data from the International Federation of Robotics on global robot sales,
reflecting automation trends in manufacturing.
 Labor market forecasts from institutions like Oxford Economics and McKinsey, which
analyze long-term workforce transformation due to AI and automation.

Sample Size and Selection Criteria

Since this is a secondary quantitative research study, the sample sizes correspond to those
reported in the original studies, which collectively reflect a broad and representative scope.
Key sample parameters include:

 World Economic Forum Reports: Based on data from employers representing 15

million workers in 20 economies.
 PwC Survey: Included global workforce and industry leaders, covering thousands of
jobs across sectors.

14
  McKinsey Study: Covered 375 million workers worldwide, projecting job transitions
across countries and job types.
 Gartner & Deloitte Executive Surveys: Sampled over 1,000 corporate executives and
decision-makers, focusing on AI adoption, implementation, and strategic planning.
 Oxford Economics Reports: Focused on labor market trends across U.S.
administrative, customer service, and financial roles, often citing millions of jobs.
 International Federation of Robotics: Quantitative data on 381,000 industrial robot
sales, covering manufacturing across several continents.

Selection criteria for the sources and sample include:

 Relevance to AI and job markets.

 Geographic diversity and global coverage.
 Quantitative rigor and statistical significance.
 Sectoral representation (e.g., retail, finance, healthcare, logistics).

Data Analysis Techniques

The collected quantitative data will be analyzed using a combination of the following
techniques:

1) Descriptive Statistics:

Aggregation of numerical data to present net job gains/losses (e.g., 75M jobs displaced vs.
133M created).Sector-specific breakdowns (e.g., 14.9M jobs lost in retail, 2.3M created in
healthcare).Frequency and percentage analysis of survey responses (e.g., 72% of executives
foresee major AI transformation).

2)Bar Graph:

To compare job displacement and creation across different sectors or time periods. This
visual tool makes it easy to compare values at a glance.

4)Pie Charts:

To illustrate the proportion of displaced vs. retained jobs, types of jobs most affected, or
sector-wise distribution of AI-related job changes.

15
5)Regression Analysis with scatter plots:

To examine the statistical relationship between AI implementation (independent variable) and

job displacement (dependent variable), controlling for other factors such as company size,
sector, and region. To identify trends, outliers, or correlations between two continuous
variables, such as AI investment and job reduction percentages. This helps visualize the
strength and direction of relationships.

Bar Graph – AI Impact Overview

Category Value Unit

Job Displacement 75 Million Jobs
Productivity Gain 6200 Million Hours
AI Revenue 2900 Billion USD
X axis represents category and Y axis represents value

16
Pie Chart – Sector-Wise Job Displacement

Sector Jobs Displaced (Million)

Retail 14.9
Customer Service 1.3
Admin Roles 1.7
Finance & Insurance 1.6
Transport & Logistics 2.1

17
Metric Pre-AI (2017–2019) Post-AI (2020–2025)
Time to Hire 30–60 days Reduced by 33%–75% (e.g.,
Unilever, Hilton)
Cost per Hire $4,000–$7,000 Decreased by up to 30%
(e.g., IBM)
Candidate Diversity Limited diversity due to Increased by 15%–30%
unconscious biases (e.g., Unilever, Accenture)
Recruiter Workload High manual workload Reduced manual tasks by up
to 50%
Quality of Hire Variable Improved by 40%–50%
(e.g., IBM, Uber)
Bias in Hiring High potential for bias Reduced bias through
anonymized assessments
Candidate Experience Inconsistent communication Enhanced engagement via
and feedback AI-driven interactions

18
Scatter Plot & Regression – AI Adoption vs Revenue Growth

AI Adoption Rate (%) Revenue Growth (%)

37.45 3.91

95.07 9.61

73.20 5.82

59.87 5.88

19
Results & Discussion

Presentation of Research Findings

This section presents the quantitative findings of the study using three main statistical
visualizations: a bar graph, a pie chart, and a scatter plot with regression analysis. These
visuals help to clearly interpret the economic impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on jobs,
productivity, and business performance.In this study, a range of data visualizations and
statistical techniques were employed to analyze the effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
adoption on job displacement, productivity, and economic output. The use of bar graphs, pie
charts, and regression analysis facilitated a comprehensive understanding of sectoral impacts
and organizational outcomes.

1)Bar Graph: AI’s Aggregate Economic Impact

Data Source: World Economic Forum, Gartner

A bar graph was used to compare three major metrics of AI influence: job displacement,
productivity recovery, and business value creation.

 Job Displacement: According to a report by the World Economic Forum,

approximately 75 million jobs were expected to be displaced globally by 2022 due to
the adoption of AI and automation technologies.
 Productivity Gains: Gartner estimated that AI augmentation would recover
approximately 6.2 billion hours of worker productivity.
 Revenue Generation: The same report projected that AI would contribute
approximately $2.9 trillion in global business value by 2021.

These findings illustrate that while AI introduces significant labor market disruptions, it
also drives remarkable gains in productivity and economic output. The disparity between
job losses and productivity/revenue gains highlights the dual nature of AI as both a
disruptive and transformative force.

20
2)Pie Chart: Sector-Wise Distribution of Job Displacement in the U.S.

Data Sources: Oxford Economics, sector-specific studies

A pie chart was constructed to illustrate the proportion of AI-induced job displacement across
various sectors in the U.S., based on projections for the year 2030.

 Retail Sector: Accounts for the largest portion, with 14.9 million jobs projected to be
impacted, reflecting the heavy automation of sales, inventory, and cashier roles.
 Administrative Roles: 1.7 million jobs, reflecting the automation of clerical and office
functions.
 Customer Service: 1.3 million roles, due to widespread adoption of AI chatbots and
self-service platforms.
 Finance and Insurance: 1.6 million roles at risk, with robo-advisors and AI-based
underwriting systems becoming mainstream.
 Transportation and Logistics: 2.1 million jobs, due to self-driving technology and
automated logistics chains.

This visualization underscores that job displacement is not uniform across sectors, with labor-
intensive and routine-task-heavy industries being the most vulnerable.

3)Scatter Plot with Regression Analysis: AI Adoption Rate vs Revenue Growth

Statistical Technique: Linear regression

A scatter plot with a linear regression line was used to analyze the relationship between AI
adoption rates and revenue growth across organizations.

 The dataset comprised simulated but realistic values reflecting AI adoption rates
(10%–90%) and corresponding revenue growth percentages.
 The regression line showed a strong positive correlation (r ≈ 0.7), indicating that
organizations with higher AI adoption tend to report higher revenue growth.

21
This finding is consistent with studies by Deloitte and Accenture, which found that
companies leveraging AI technologies effectively are significantly more likely to outperform
competitors in terms of revenue and operational efficiency..

Interpretation of Results

1) The bar graph contrasts three major quantitative impacts of AI adoption:

 Job Displacement (75 million): A significant number of global jobs are projected to
be automated or replaced by AI technologies.
 Productivity Gains (6.2 billion hours): AI technologies can recover billions of hours
of worker productivity, indicating enhanced operational efficiency.
 Revenue Generation ($2.9 trillion): AI is also expected to drive massive business
value and economic output.
 Insight: While AI leads to job loss, its positive contributions to productivity and
revenue creation are even more substantial, indicating a transformational shift rather
than a purely negative impact.
 Time to Hire: Dropped from 45 days to 15 days post-AI.This 66% reduction shows
how AI accelerates candidate screening and scheduling.
 Cost per Hire: Decreased from $6,000 to $4,200.AI helps companies reduce
recruitment overhead by automating repetitive tasks.
 Diversity Increase: Jumped from 0% to 25% after AI.AI systems, when properly
designed, can reduce unconscious bias and promote inclusive hiring.
 Recruiter Workload: Reduced from 100% manual effort to 50%, thanks to
automation in resume screening, interview scheduling, and chat support.
 Quality of Hire: Increased from 50% to 75%, showing that AI helps match the right
candidates based on skill fit, potential, and cultural alignment.

2. Pie Chart: Sector-Wise Job Displacement Due to AI in the U.S. by 2030

 Retail Sector (largest slice - 14.9 million jobs): Most vulnerable due to automation
of sales, cashier, and inventory roles.
 Customer Service & Admin Roles: Also significantly impacted as AI chatbots,
virtual assistants, and process automation replace routine tasks.
 Finance & Insurance, Transport & Logistics: Facing high disruption, particularly
from robo-advisors and self-driving technologies.

22
  Insight: The chart highlights the sectors that policymakers and businesses need to
target for retraining and reskilling efforts.
 Pre-AI Metrics Distribution :The largest slices were Recruiter Workload and Cost
per Hire, indicating a heavy burden on HR and significant financial investment in
hiring processes. No diversity improvement was present, highlighting the need for
more inclusive tools
 Post-AI Metrics Distribution: The distribution becomes more balanced. Time to
Hire and Workload take up less space, showing improved efficiency. Diversity and
Quality of Hire gain more prominence, reflecting positive outcomes of AI integration.

3. Scatter Plot with Regression Line: AI Adoption vs. Revenue Growth

The scatter plot shows a positive correlation between AI adoption rate and revenue growth:

 As the percentage of AI adoption increases, there is a general upward trend in revenue

growth.
 Despite some variance (due to noise and external factors), the regression line
indicates that companies adopting AI are likely to experience higher revenue
increases.
 Insight: AI is not just a cost-cutting tool; it’s a strategic investment that can lead to
meaningful financial returns. This supports claims from surveys (e.g., Deloitte,
Accenture) that AI boosts growth and innovation.

Comparison with Previous Studies

The current study aligns with and expands upon the findings of several previous studies:

 World Economic Forum vs. McKinsey Global Institute: While the WEF predicts a net
gain of 58 million jobs, McKinsey cautions that 375 million workers may need to
reskill, highlighting the scale of transition required.
 PwC (Automation Risk): PwC’s prediction that 38% of U.S. jobs could be automated
by the early 2030s complements Oxford Economics’ sector-specific forecasts. These
numbers affirm the urgent need for structural labor market interventions.

 Accenture and Deloitte (Organizational Benefits): The positive relationship between

AI adoption and revenue supports findings from Accenture (82% of executives

23
 believe AI allows for more meaningful work) and Deloitte (AI-adopting firms are 3.5
times more likely to report over 10% revenue growth).

Implications of the Findings

1)For Policymakers

The scale of job displacement calls for national AI strategies that include large-scale
reskilling initiatives and updated labor regulations.Government intervention is necessary to
ensure equitable access to AI education, especially in vulnerable communities and industries.

2)For Businesses

Organizations must treat AI as a transformative strategy, not merely a cost-cutting

tool.Investments in AI should be coupled with workforce development to ensure employees
can collaborate with new technologies.

3)For Educational Institutions

Curricula must be revised to include data literacy, AI ethics, machine learning, and
automation management.Schools should shift toward interdisciplinary education that
combines technical skills with human-centric competencies like creativity and critical
thinking.

4)For the Workforce

Lifelong learning is no longer optional. Workers must continuously adapt to new roles, learn
new tools, and engage in digital upskilling to remain competitive in the AI-driven labor
market

Jobs most affected by AI

24
Writing is just one example of a job being automated by the latest AI systems, but there are
many job types that could be affected in various ways, including the following:

1. Administrative- GenAI tools can help office administrators and assistants with tasks
such as basic email correspondence, identifying data trends, finding mutually
available meeting times across time zones and other summary/synthesis exercises.For
example, Microsoft 365 Copilot -- a collection of AI-powered tools integrated into
Microsoft's productivity suite -- could radically increase office workers' productivity.

2. Content writers - Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini can generate
text that aims to convince readers that a human wrote it. This has implications for
content writers, especially in fields that require less nuance, originality or factual
accuracy. Original or specialized writing might become increasingly valuable as
generic, AI-generated writing proliferates on the internet, obscuring genuine human
perspectives. These tools can aid content writers in developing ideas, fixing grammar
or syntax and doing high-level research.

3. Coding Programs - such as ChatGPT can write fluent, syntactically correct code
faster than most humans, so coders who are primarily valued for producing high
volumes of low-quality code quickly might be concerned. Coders who produce a
quality product might have nothing to fear, however, and use AI to improve their
workflow instead.
4. Customer service - The customer service sector offers many opportunities for
automation. AI-powered chatbots can provide speedy, personalized responses to
customer questions, reducing the need for human workers. There are many examples
of AI in customer service pre-ChatGPT, including the following: Robotic process,
Automation Customer self-service, Chatbots and Sentiment analysis.
5. Drivers - The prevalence of AI in vehicles has the potential to affect car and truck
driving jobs. Rideshare companies are partnering with self-driving car providers to
minimize the need for human drivers and give riders the option to ride in an
autonomous vehicle.

The trucking industry uses AI for driver assistance and accident prevention systems,
route planning, predictive maintenance and more advanced driver training systems. AI
is changing the role of the truck driver and their daily responsibilities. This has the

25
 potential to create new efficiencies in the space. It also might create new challenges as
workers adapt to the technology.

6. Legal -There is significant evidence indicating AI will affect legal jobs.A March 2023
study from Goldman Sachs said AI could perform 44% of the tasks that U.S. and
European legal assistants typically handle. GPT-4, OpenAI's latest and greatest
language model, passed the Uniform Bar Examination in the 90th percentile.AI could
help automate routine law tasks such as the following: 1. Document review, 2.
Contract analysis, 3. Legal research, 4. Searches for relevant case law.
7. Marketing- AI can automate several marketing-related tasks such as personalized
content creation, customer segmentation, social media management and data analysis.
Generative AI tools can help marketers create marketing content, personalize sales
emails and score leads at a faster rate than humans can. AI can also help SEO
marketers optimize content with meta descriptions and title tags, and solidify a
consistent brand voice across marketing materials.

One example of a generative AI-powered marketing campaign was the

#NotJustACadburyAd campaign, which used the digital likeness of Bollywood star
Shah Rukh Khan to create thousands of hyper-personalized ads for small local
businesses. The campaign used a microsite that enabled small-business owners to
create their own version of the ad featuring the Bollywood star.

8. Manufacturing - In manufacturing, AI has long played a critical role in automating

repetitive, rote physical tasks. By using AI and robots to automate assembly line tasks
such as product assembly, welding and packaging, manufacturers can benefit.
Computer vision systems in manufacturing can identify flaws in the product using
machine learning and sensor data. AI systems integrated with robots have the
potential to increase precision, productivity and quality, reducing downtime on the
assembly line and in manufacturing more broadly.

AI is also changing the nature of work in warehouses. Amazon fulfilment centres use
autonomous mobile robots to help workers on the warehouse floor with retrieving and
consolidating inventory.

26
9. Teachers -Teachers could be affected by AI in several ways. The immediate concern
is that they will have a harder time detecting plagiarism or students cheating on
assignments. But AI could help teachers by doing the following:
 Acting as productivity tools.
 Drafting lesson plans.
 Generating quiz questions and mock tests.

Teacher sentiments range from being worried about the technology replacing them to
insisting that the in-person classroom connection is essential to education.

Some people draw an analogy between ChatGPT and when students weren't allowed to
use calculators in the classroom. Now, most people have a calculator app on their
smartphone. There might also be a time when it becomes accepted for students to use
ChatGPT to aid with schoolwork.

10. Travel and tourism -AI can help travellers discover new destinations and travel
opportunities. AI assistants and chatbots let users book flights, rent vehicles and find
accommodations online and offer a personalized booking experience. AI can also
perform flight forecasting, which helps prospective travellers find the cheapest time to
book a flight based on automated analysis of historical price patterns.
Travel companies can also use AI to analyse the deluge of data that customers in their
industry generate constantly. For example, travel companies can use AI to help
aggregate and interpret customer feedback, reviews and polls to evaluate the
company’s performance and develop strategies for improvement.
11. Translators- AI has the potential to affect the translation services industry. AI
improves the capability of translation services, enabling automated, real-time
translation in multiple languages. Translation requires a certain level of nuance, as
translators need to be able interpret body language and emotions of the speaker or in
the text they are translating.

12. Finance -AI is also making an impact on finance and banking. GenAI could be used
to monitor transactions and give detailed financial advice on how to save and spend
efficiently. For example, Morgan Stanley uses AI-powered chatbots to organize its
database.

27
Conclusion and Recommendations

Summary of the Key Findings

This study explored the complex relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and job
displacement within the broader context of economic change. The key findings of the
research are as follows:

AI is significantly transforming the nature of work by automating both routine manual and
cognitive tasks. This transformation is leading to widespread restructuring of job roles across
various industries, particularly in sectors such as manufacturing, logistics, finance, and
customer service. Low- and medium-skill jobs are most vulnerable to displacement, while
high-skill positions that involve creativity, critical thinking, or complex interpersonal
interactions are more resilient and often complemented by AI technologies.

AI adoption contributes to labor market polarization and income inequality. While it creates
new high-paying jobs for specialized AI developers and analysts, it reduces demand for
routine jobs, leading to wage stagnation and potential increases in unemployment among
certain demographics. Current reskilling and workforce transition programs, while beneficial,
are often underfunded, inadequately targeted, or inaccessible to those most at risk of
displacement. There is a significant gap between the pace of AI advancement and the
preparedness of labor markets. Policymakers and businesses have a critical role to play in
managing the transition. Proactive interventions can mitigate adverse impacts and help
societies harness the full benefits of AI.

In contrast to these colossal expectations, our current situation paints a more measured
picture. 14% of workers have experienced job displacement due to AI, suggesting that the
present impact is somewhat more restrained than the anticipation .However, the majority of
businesses foresee computers replacing human tasks within 50 years, highlighting that while
AI is a reality, it has not fully realized its potential for job replacement just yet. Moreover, the
influence of AI extends beyond employment statistics. It presents a formidable challenge in
the context of pandemic recovery, potentially hindering the restoration of 42% of job
losses incurred during these unprecedented times.

28
My analysis and synthesis of the literature review done on the topic "The economies of
artificial intelligence and job displacement" suggest that the integration of AI is likely to lead
to significant job displacement, particularly for low-skilled and routine jobs. However, it is
also suggested that these technologies have the potential to create new employment
opportunities and increase productivity. The studies that were used in the analysis provide a
comprehensive understanding of the impact of AI on job displacement and employment
opportunities. They highlight that the potential for job displacement is likely to be significant,
particularly for low-skilled and routine jobs. However, they also suggest that AI have the
potential to create new employment opportunities and increase productivity.
The synthesis of the literature review shows that the impact of AI on employment is complex
and multifaceted. It is influenced by a range of factors such as the speed of
technological advancement, the ability of workers to adapt to new technologies, and the
specific industries and occupations that are affected. It is also important to note that the
findings of this literature review should be considered in the context of the limitations of the
studies used, such as their focus on developed countries and short-term
impact on employment.

Answer to Research Question

The central research question posed was: How does the adoption of artificial intelligence
influence job displacement, and what are the broader economic implications of this
transformation?

Based on the analysis, it is evident that AI adoption is a major driver of job displacement,
particularly in occupations characterized by routine, repetitive tasks. The economic
implications are far-reaching, including increased productivity and innovation on one hand,
and rising inequality and labor market disruptions on the other. The findings confirm the
research hypothesis that AI significantly contributes to displacement and wage polarization,
thereby necessitating a coordinated policy response to ensure inclusive economic growth.

29
Limitations of the Study

While this research provides valuable insights, it is important to acknowledge its limitations:

 Data Constraints: The study relies on existing secondary data and projections, which
may not fully capture the rapidly evolving nature of AI technologies or the full extent
of their labor market impact.
 Geographic Scope: The research primarily focuses on trends in developed economies
due to greater data availability, limiting generalizability to developing countries
where AI adoption and labor market structures differ.
 Technological Uncertainty: The pace and direction of AI innovation are
unpredictable, and the long-term effects on employment are difficult to forecast with
precision.
 Policy Evaluation Limitations: While policy recommendations are made based on
current practices and literature, real-world effectiveness can vary depending on
implementation, governance, and local economic conditions.

Future Research Directions

To build on the findings of this study and address its limitations, future research should
consider the following directions:

 Longitudinal Studies: Conduct empirical, long-term studies to track the actual impact
of AI on employment, wages, and worker well-being across various regions and
sectors.
 Developing Economies: Expand research to include the effects of AI in low- and
middle-income countries where different economic dynamics and labor conditions
may yield unique outcomes.
 AI and Informal Labor Markets: Investigate how AI influences informal sectors,
which are substantial in many parts of the world and often overlooked in policy
discourse.
 Mental Health and Social Well-being: Explore the psychological and community-
level impacts of AI-related job loss, including identity shifts, mental health outcomes,
and family dynamics.

30
  Policy Innovation and Impact Evaluation: Design and evaluate experimental policy
interventions (e.g., pilot reskilling programs, AI taxation, basic income trials) to
determine what works best in addressing displacement and inequality.

By pursuing these research directions, scholars and policymakers can deepen their
understanding of AI’s multifaceted impact on economies and labor markets and develop more
nuanced, effective strategies to navigate the

31
Reference

1. WEF. "The Future of Jobs Report 2020." World Economic Forum, 2020.
https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/

2. World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of Jobs Report 2025. Retrieved from
https://www.weforum.org/reports/future-of-jobs-report-2025

3.Frey, C. B., and Osborne, M. A. "The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are
Jobs to Computerisation?" Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 114, 2017,
pp. 254-280

4.Autor, D. "Why are there Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace
Automation."Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 29, no. 3, 2015, pp. 3-30.

5.McKinsey Global Institute. "Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: What the Future of Work Will Mean
for Jobs, Skills, and Wages." 2018. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-
work/jobs-lost-jobs-gained-what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wages

6. Manyika, J., et al. "Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: What the Future of Work Will Mean for Jobs,
Skills, and Wages." McKinsey Global Institute, 2017, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-
insights/future-of-work/jobs-lost-jobs-gained-what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-
skills-and-wages

7. Gartner. (2019). AI and the Workforce of the Future. Retrieved from

https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3913185

8.Oxford Economics. (2019). How robots change the world: What automation really means
for jobs and productivity. https://www.oxfordeconomics.com/resource/how-robots-change-
the-world

9. Lutkevich, B. (2024, November 4). Will AI replace jobs? 17 job types that might be
affected. TechTarget. https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/feature/Will-AI-replace-
jobs-17-job-types-that-might-be-affected

32
33