Philippine Court System
Philippine Court System
All cases involving the legality of any tax, impost, assessment, or toll, or any penalty
imposed in relation thereto.
All criminal cases in which the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua or higher.
Rule-Making Powers
The Supreme Court has the exclusive power to promulgate rules concerning the protection and
enforcement of constitutional rights, pleading, practice, and procedure in all courts, the
admission to the practice of law, the integrated bar, and legal assistance to the underprivileged.
Any such rules shall provide a simplified and inexpensive procedure for the speedy disposition
of cases, shall be uniform for all courts of the same grade, and shall not diminish, increase, or
modify substantive rights. Rules of procedure of special courts and quasi-judicial bodies shall
remain effective unless disapproved by the Supreme Court. (Art. VIII, §54(5))
The Court of Appeals
The Court of Appeals was established on February 1, 1936 by virtue of Commonwealth Act No.
3 and is considered as the second highest tribunal in the country. It is composed of one
presiding justice and 68 associate justices, all of which are appointed by the President from a
shortlist submitted by the Judicial and Bar Council. The associate justices shall have
precedence according to the dates (or order, in case of similar appointment dates) of their
respective appointments. The qualifications for the justices of the Supreme Court also apply to
members of the Court of Appeals.
The Court of Appeals’ principal mandate is to exercise appellate jurisdiction on all cases not
falling within the original and exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Its decisions are final
except when appealed to the Supreme Court on questions of law. The jurisdiction of the Court
of Appeals are as follows:
Original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, habeas corpus, and quo
warranto, and auxiliary writs or processes, whether or not in aid of its appellate jurisdiction;
Exclusive original jurisdiction over actions for annulment of judgements of Regional Trial Courts;
and
Exclusive appellate jurisdiction over all final judgements, resolutions, orders or awards of
Regional Trial Courts and quasi-judicial agencies, instrumentalities, boards or commission.
The Court of Appeals shall also have the power to try cases and conduct hearings, receive
evidence and perform acts necessary to resolve factual issues raised in cases falling within its
original and appellate jurisdiction, including the power to grant and conduct new trials or
proceedings.
The Sandiganbayan
Both the 1973 and 1987 Constitution contain provisions on the present anti-graft court known as
the Sandiganbayan. It has jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases involving graft and corrupt
practices and such other offenses committed by public officers and employees, including those
in government-owned or controlled corporations, in relation to their office as may be determined
by law. The jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan is perhaps one of the most often amended
provision from the 1973 Constitution to Republic Act (R.A.) No. 8249. Before R.A. No. 8249,
jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan was determined on the basis of the penalty imposable on the
offense charged. Thereafter, it was amended such that regardless of the penalty, so long as the
offense charged was committed by a public officer, the Sandiganbayan was vested with
jurisdiction. Under R.A. No. 8249, to determine whether the Sandiganbayan has jurisdiction, a
person must look into two (2) criteria, namely, the nature of the offense and the salary grade of
the public official.