2025 L2 Alternative
2025 L2 Alternative
Review 61
M.M152248032.
This document should be used in conjunction with the corresponding learning modules in the 2025 Level 2 CFA® Program
curriculum. Some of the graphs, charts, tables, examples, and figures are copyright 2024, CFA Institute. Reproduced and
republished with permission from CFA Institute. All rights reserved.
Required disclaimer: CFA Institute does not endorse, promote, or warrant accuracy or quality of the products or services
offered by MarkMeldrum.com. CFA Institute, CFA®, and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA
Institute.
1
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
b. compare the life cycle of commodity sectors from production through trading
or consumption
c. contrast the valuation of commodities with the valuation of equities and bonds
e. analyze the relationship between spot prices and futures prices in markets in
contango and markets in backwardation
g. describe, calculate, and interpret the components of total return for a fully
collateralized commodity futures contract
M.M152248032.
2
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Commodities
3
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 3
1. Energy LOS a
1) Crude Oil – low in density & flows freely at - compare
room temperature ⇒ Light
- easier to process, yielding more valuable gasoline & diesel
- low in sulfur content ⇒ Sweet
- weather ➞ temporary impact (e.g. hurricane)
· as economies grow, oil demand increases (availability of
oil at affordable prices also facilitates growth)
extraction
· drivers of supply & demand technology
politics refining
business cycle usage
e.g./ shale oil – supply availability due to extraction technology
electric vehicles, solar – reduce demand for oil products
US & Canada – ban offshore drilling in Artic waters
1. Energy Page 4
LOS a
2) Natural Gas – can be used directly
- compare
(heavier compounds – NGLs – are also extracted
liquids
- categorized as either:
a) associated gas – coming from an oil well (a co-product of oil)
can be: - sold in spot markets
- burned off
- re-injected into the oil field to maintain
pressure (keeps extraction costs low)
b) unassociated gas – on its own (where oil is not present)
- Storage/transportation cost high ➞ need to keep gas under
M.M152248032.
pressure
- liquified natural gas (LNG) – for transport by ships
- must be cooled to -260℉
- primary demand – electric generation
cooling
- also weather dependent
heating
4
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 5
1. Energy LOS a
3) Refined products – heating oil, gasoline, - compare
jet fuel, propane, etc…
- refined products typically have a short shelf life (availability
measured in days)
- refineries typically located on major coastlines & ports
(that is where the oil is delivered)
- planned refinery maintenance ➞ switch over from summer gas
(typically low demand periods) to winter gas
Page 6
3. Industrial (base) Metals/ can be stored for years
LOS a
- mined ore that is processed into
- compare
copper, aluminum, nickel, zinc, lead, tin & iron
feeder
4. Livestock/ · hogs · cattle M.M152248032. · sheep · poultry
live
- depends on low cost inputs (feed) i.e. grains
- high grain costs lead to short-term oversupply
as herds are slaughtered (mid-term price increases)
- tied to GDP growth (especially in emerging/developing
economies)
5
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 7
4. Livestock/ LOS a
Weather – affects health & weight - compare
- winters tough for cattle, heat & humidity tough for hogs
- limits weight gain
avian flu
- disease
mad cow disease
porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDv)
Page 8
6. Softs (cash crops) · cotton, coffee, sugar, LOS a
cocoa - compare
- called ‘cash crops’ since they are grown to be sold,
not consumed for subsistence
M.M152248032.
6
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 10
⇒ Energy/
LOS b
· Refineries – affect demand for crude - compare
& supply of oil products
7
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 11
⇒ Industrial/Precious Metals
LOS b
- ore & finished products can be stored - compare
for years (but storage costs, risks of ownership, financing
costs)
e.g./ Copper
Page 12
⇒ Industrial/Precious Metals
LOS b
- smelting/processing relies on economies of scale - compare
- large facilities with high utilization rates
∴ when supply > demand, difficult to cut production
- overproduction continues until smaller players
drop out
- long lead times + large costs to add extraction or processing
capacity
- monthly futures contracts with no seasonality (unlike energy)
8
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 14
⇒ Grains/ - demand for grains is year round
LOS b
- storage facilities supply year round
- compare
⇒ need to understand old crop vs. new crop
(inventory) (coming harvest)
for futures trading
⇒ Softs/ commodities in this sector differ significantly
e.g./ coffee
M.M152248032.
9
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Valuation
Page 16
estimation of
FV LOS c
future profitability
- contrast
CF CF CF TV and cash flows
PV = DCF Stocks
bonds
financial assets
no cash inflows
10
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Participants
Page 17
1) Hedgers – eliminate price risk
LOS d
- may be a registration requirement - describe
(hedgers face different margin requirements
since they make/take delivery)
5) Regulators
futures futures
price price
spot - price difference
between one
contract & another
is called the
calendar
spread
M.M152248032.
spot
Backwardation Contango
𝒕 𝒕
- bearish indicator - bullish indicator
- expected future spot - expected future spot price
price = lower = higher
Note: for commodities
11
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 19
Contango LOS e
$ (negative $ - analyze
spot
calendar
spread)
Backwardation
(positive
calendar spread)
spot
𝒕 𝒕
Trading strategy 1. Trading strategy 3.
Buy long-dated contract Sell long-dated contract
Sell short-dated contract Buy short-dated contract
speculator)
∴ such a resulting price curve would be ‘normal’
⇒ not backed by observation however:
i.e. backwardation does not generate positive returns
contango does not generate negative returns
(statistically significant that is)
12
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
- if hedging demand from producers > hedging demand from end users
then futures prices would have to be lower to induce
speculators to fill the gap ⇒ Backwardation
- if hedging demand from producers < hedging demand from end users
then the futures prices will be higher ⇒ Contango
Problem: producers tend to be more persistently exposed to
price risk than end-users/consumers
Page 22
3) Theory of Storage/
LOS f
- compare
Futures price = spot price + direct storage costs – convenience yield
M.M152248032.
13
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 24
e.g./
LOS g
- 11 Jan contracts = $110 exposure - describe
10 - rolling forward to Feb, need - calculate
12 contracts = $108 exposure - interpret
(opposite for contango)
9
Jan Feb
𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐫 − 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
. 9 %′𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞
− 𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 − 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
𝐑𝐨𝐥𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐧 = × 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠
𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐫 − 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝
e.g./ 𝟏𝟎 − 𝟗
= . 𝟏 𝐨𝐫 𝟏𝟎% M.M152248032.
𝟏𝟎
14
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 25
3) Collateral Return/ yield from bonds/cash
LOS g
used to maintain the position - describe
- when calculating E(R), most indices will use S.t. T-Bills - calculate
- interpret
Notes/ price return on front month contracts typically different
from the price change of the physical commodity
contract–standardized (quality, delivery)
physical markets – not to the same degree
spot 𝚫𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬
− 𝚫𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐭
= 𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥
futures
futures spot neg. roll
no roll yield pos. roll
T T T
minimal
storage
15
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Commodity Swaps
Page 28
e.g./ oil refiner ➞ long a swap that pays the LOS i
amount exceeding $100/barrel every - describe
month for 9 months
pays $25/barrel
for the 9-month period
· called an ‘excess return swap’
M.M152248032.
overall (-9)
+ 16
16
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 29
- OTC, customizable LOS i
· Total return swap – one party receives payment based - describe
on the change in the level of an index (multiplied
by some notional amount)
Commodity Index
used as a benchmark to evaluate Page 30
⇒ Index LOS j
broader moves in commodity pricing
- describe
for macroeconomic or forecasting purposes
the basis for an investment vehicle
17
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
18
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 33
⇒ Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index/
LOS j
- uses a fixed weighting scheme - describe
- rolling a bit complicated ⇒ attempts to maximize
backwardation & minimize contango
Page 34
⇒ Rogers International Commodity Index (RICI)/ LOS j
- 37 commodities, fixed weights, selection committee - describe
- not all components are denominated in USD
- Rebalancing Frequency/
- rebalancing is more important if a market is
frequently mean reverting (more peaks to sell, more
valleys to buy)
- can lead to underperformance in a trending market
19
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
b. explain economic value drivers of real estate investments and their role in a
portfolio
d. explain the due diligence process and valuation approaches for real estate
investments
M.M152248032.
20
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 2/
Net Operating Income = Effective gross income - opex - Maint. allowance
(NOI)
Effective gross income = Gross rent + other rev. - vacancies - concessions
Operating expenses (opex) = Fixed costs (prop. taxes, insurance, services, repairs)
+ variable costs (utilities, etc.)
Property maint. allowance = maintenance CAPEX to maintain property’s
current level of income generation
M.M152248032.
21
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 3/
Page 4/
Capital Structure
Loan to value (LTV) ratio = Mortgage Debt / Property value
M.M152248032.
22
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 5/
Page 6/
23
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 7/
RE Classifications
REITs
RE mgmt. + development
(REOCs)
Property classes
Age, local income levels,
property condition, amenities
Page 8/
Basic Forms
NOI ➞ income-based return at
property level
Risks
M.M152248032.
Economic ➞ activity levels, demographics, supply, capital costs
Property specific ➞ management, obsolescence, environmental, tech changes
Level of leverage
24
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 9/
Page 10/
M.M152248032.
25
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 11/
Portfolio Characteristics of RE
Sources of return ➞ Income and Capital appreciation
Characteristics ➞ Bond-like CFs or Equity-like speculative
step-up clauses, indexed rents, overage rent
Page 12/
M.M152248032.
26
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 13/
Page 14/
Commercial Property Types
Residential ➞ multi-family
Non-residential ➞ office, industrial/warehouse, retail, hospitality
Mixed use ➞ combine residential, office, retail
Specialty ➞ student housing, senior living, self storage, data centers,
parking, cell towers, etc.
27
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 15/
Page 16/
M.M152248032.
28
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 17/
Page 18/
29
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 19/
Page 20/
M.M152248032.
30
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 21/
Page 22/
Market Review and Outlook
Assess current prices, economic uses, demand/supply changes, macro factors
Current Lease Review
Current tenant rents/creditworthiness, market rents, vacancies, lease length
Future Lease Outlook
Costs/incentives for renewals, re-leasing challenges, zoning/legal changes
Financial Review
Analyze historical financials, Is current NOI sustainable?
Documentation Review
Ensure property is free of liens, tax obligations, compliant w/zoning & environ. regs.
Property Inspection and Service Agreements
Comprehensive property survey: physical, engineering, environ. inspections
Review of all building systems, foundation,
M.M152248032.
utilities, service agreements
Evaluate property management if not owner-managed
Address any discrepancies through remediation or price adjustments
31
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 23/
Page 24/
M.M152248032.
32
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 25/
𝐍𝐎𝐈𝐧 (𝟏 + 𝐠)
Terminal value =
𝐫−𝐠
Page 26/
M.M152248032.
33
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 27/
Page 28/
Cost Approach
Replacement cost ➞ expense of buying land and constructing
a new property that has same economic use as
subject property, then make necessary adjustments
Investors should not pay more than cost of vacant land
+ development of comparable property
M.M152248032.
34
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 29/
Page 30/
M.M152248032.
35
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 31/
Page 31/
M.M152248032.
36
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 32/
Page 33/
Application of Real Estate Valuation Methods
Income Approach ➞ Best for income-producing properties
with consistent NOI
Cost Approach ➞ useful when comparing cost of new
construction to market value
Sales comparison approach ➞ Most reliable in markets
with frequent transactions of similar
properties
M.M152248032.
37
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 34/
Page 35/
Appraisal-Based Indexes
Rely of professional estimates of property values
Examples: Global Real Estate Fund Index (GREFI),
National Council of Real Estate Investment
Fiduciaries (NCREIF)
38
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 36/
Page 37/
Transaction-Based Indexes
Based on actual transactions rather than appraisals
Infrequency of transactions an issue, addressed through
econometrics techniques such as regression analysis
Repeat sales index
Relies on multiple sales of the same property
When same property sells twice, change in value between
sales dates indicates how market conditions have changed
Hedonic index
Does not require repeat sales of same property
Controls for property differences using regression
analysis on characteristics like size, age, and location
M.M152248032.
39
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 38/
Page 39/
𝐑∗𝐭 = 𝐚𝐑 𝐭 + (𝟏 − 𝐚) 𝐑∗𝐭$𝟏
40
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 40/
Page 41/
41
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 42/
M.M152248032.
42
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
b. justify the use of net asset value per share (NAVPS) in valuation of publicly
traded real estate securities and estimate NAVPS based on forecasted cash net
operating income
c. describe the use of funds from operations (FFO) and adjusted funds from
operations (AFFO) in REIT valuation
d. calculate and interpret the value of a REIT share using the net asset value,
relative value (price-to-FFO and price-to-AFFO), and discounted cash flow
approaches
M.M152248032.
43
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
- taxable
- REOC structure used when a jurisdiction does not have a
tax advantaged REIT regime in place
or/ engage to a large extent in the development of properties
(with the intent to sell)
or/ if they offer other non-qualifying services ➞ brokerage, 3rd party
property management
Page 2/
➞ Types of Publicly Traded Real Estate Securities/
44
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 3/
➞ Advantages/
➞ Disadvantages/
- lack of retained earnings - more frequent secondary offerings
- constrained in the types of assets the own
Page 4/
+ premium = potential overvaluation
➞ Net Asset Value per share
- discount = potential undervaluation
(NAVPS)
key word - over/under valuation may
largest component of be justified
intrinsic value
45
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 5/
NAVPS - difference between assets and liabilities all
taken at market value, divided by the number of
shares outstanding
# of shares outstanding
Page 6/
M.M152248032.
$𝟐, 𝟗𝟏𝟒, 𝟏𝟗𝟖
= $𝟓𝟐. 𝟑𝟑 𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐏𝐒
𝟓𝟓, 𝟔𝟖𝟗
46
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 7/
- since comparables are from the private market,
so are cap-rates and values per square foot
- NAV reflects the value of a REITs/REOCs assets
to a private market buyer
Page 8/
➞ FFO/AFFO: widely accepted and reported measure of
the operating performance of a REIT
+ losses
➞ on sale of properties - do not represent sustainable
- gains
normal income
+ impairments
+ writedowns M.M152248032.
47
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 9/
➞ FFO/AFFO: AFFO is superior to FFO as a measure of
economic income since it takes into consideration
the CAPEX needed to maintain the economic
income of the property
- also more reflective of dividend-paying ability ex. # 30/31
Page 10/
drivers of multiples
2/ risk associated with the underlying real estate
- cash flow volatility associated with asset type,
quality, age, market conditions, etc…
-/ may not capture the intrinsic value of all real estate assets
(esp. non-income producing assets, e.g. undeveloped land)
P/FFO ignores cap. reinvestment necessary to maintain income levels
- P/AFFO does, wide variations in assumptions exist
48
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 11/
LOS n - calculate/interpret - mini case study
LOS o - explain
M.M152248032.
49
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
h. describe how factor models may be used to understand hedge fund risk
exposures
M.M152248032.
50
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 2
➞ Classification/ LOS a
- discuss
51
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 3
➞ Equity Strategies/ Long-Short Equity LOS b
- discuss
- reliance on fundamental
research
- most managers specialize in a
specific geography, sector or style
- some are more generalist
and avoid complex sectors
Page 4
➞ Equity Strategies/ Dedicated Short/Bias LOS b
- discuss
+ activist short
selling
➞ take a short position then
present research publicly
➞ reputation effect may help
52
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 5
➞ Equity Strategies/ Equity Market Neutral LOS b
- discuss
➞ 𝐄(𝛃𝐏 ) = 𝟎
➞ typically try to be sector and
industry neutral as well
(pairs trading, stub trading, multi-class
➞ more diverse holdings trading)
- adjusted often (daily, hourly)
must balance
neutrality with the costs
of rebalancing
often seen as preferred
replacements for FI during
low return periods or YC is
flat
➞ since 𝛃 = 𝟎, require leverage to
generate meaningful returns
Equity Strategies
Page 6
Short bias L/S
LOS b
Dedicated Market long-only - discuss
Short neutral (100% +)
(60%-120%)
Leverage low high low
Volatility high low high
𝛃 exposure negative neutral positive
Return Correlation negative zero positive
Orientation deep. fund. quantitative fundamental
Valuation approach absolute relative absolute
Position sizing concentrated diverse concentrated
M.M152248032.
53
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 7
Dedicated Short/Short Bias LOS b
𝛂 – stock picking, some market timing - discuss
return – lower than other HFs, but negative correlation
risk – more volatile than typical L/S benefit
Market Neutral
𝛂 – security selection, market timing
return – steadier than other equity hedge strategies
risk – less volatility, but leverage risk creates tail
risk
Page 8
Event-Driven Strategies/ Merger Arbitrage LOS c
- discuss
- soft-catalyst ED approach
- trade in anticipation of an
event
- hard-catalyst ED approach - trade
in reaction to an event
(less volatile/risky)
- cash-for-stock deal, buy target
stock
- Stock-for-stock deal, buy T and sell
A in same ratio as the offer
(contrarian approach - sell T, buy A)
uncorrelated source of alpha
- trades typically done using common
stock, but may include preferred,
M.M152248032.
or junior/senior debt
54
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 9
Event-Driven Strategies/ Distressed Securities LOS c
- in bankruptcy, potential bankruptcy, - discuss
or financial distress
Event-Driven Strategies
Page 10
Merger Arbitrage: LOS c
𝛂 – specific deal selection - discuss
return – 7 - 12% range, low correlation to market return
risk – low, single digit s.d.
- market sensitivity in times of market stress
∴ left-tail risk
Distressed Securities
𝛂 – deal selection, capital structure decisions
return – higher end of event-driven strategies
risk – higher volatility M.M152248032.
than other event-driven strategies
55
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 11
Relative Value Strategies/ Fixed-Income Arbitrage LOS d
- discuss
- valuation differences
between securities due to
credit quality, and/or implied
volatility spreads
Page 12
Relative Value Strategies/ Convertible Bond Arbitrage LOS d
- discuss
56
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Opportunistic Strategies
Page 13
- wide range of markets and securities LOS e
- discuss
region and asset-class level (vs. individual securities)
- broad themes, global relationships, market trends, cycles
- generally divided by:
technical fundamental
relies on mgr. skill, subject
discretionary to behavioral biases
rules-based algorithms, may
systematic fail in new contexts
(subject to herding effects)
use statistical methods use economic data and focus
to predict relative price on fair valuation of securities,
movements based on past sectors, markets
price trends
Page 14
➞ Global Macro ➞ wide range of asset classes LOS e
➞ focus on themes or regions - discuss
➞ top-down, typically fundamental
57
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 15
➞ Managed Futures LOS e
uncorrelated with stocks and bonds - discuss
returns tend to be positively skewed
- since funds only acquire asset exposure (not assets), the
majority of capital (85% - 90%) is invested in short-term
government debt
- tend more towards systematic trading with a quantitative
driven approach to trend identification
Page 16
Opportunistic Strategies/ Global Macro LOS e
Managed Futures - discuss
M.M152248032.
58
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 17
Specialist Strategies/ Volatility Trading LOS f
- discuss
Relative Value
volatility arbitrage
- buy cheap vol. and
sell more expensive vol.
Long/Short vol.
- VIX futures
- options
- swaps
(watch term structure
of vol., skew & smile)
M.M152248032.
59
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Page 19
Multi-Manager Strategies/ FoF, Multi-Strategy HF
LOS g
- discuss
FoF ➞ fees
fees
fund 1 … … … fund n
FoF manager allocates to
uncorrelated strategies
- more diversification
- less extreme risk exposure
- lower realized volatility
fees
Multi-strategy
strategy 1 … … … strategy n
60
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
REVIEW
M.M152248032.
61
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Commodities
Review - 1
⇒ commodity – a physical good that is tradable and supplied
without substantial differentiation (spot & future/forward
markets)
- potential for diversification – low 𝐫 with stocks
and bonds
- possible inflation hedging benefits
⇒ Energy/ – most economically valuable sector
1) Crude Oil - different grades (Brent, WTI)
– low in density ⇒ Light - low sulfur content ⇒ Sweet
- drivers of supply & demand technology extraction
politics refining
usage
2) Natural Gas business cycle
· associated gas – coming from an oil well
· unassociated gas – no oil present
- storage/transportation costs high - markets tend to be
- primary demand – electric generation regional
(heating/cooling)
⇒ Energy/ Review - 2
3) Refined products – heating oil, gasoline, jet fuel etc…
- shut down for planned maintenance 2x/yr. during low
demand periods
⇒ Grains/ · Corn · Soybean · Wheat · Rice - can be stored season
- heat/precipitation determine yield over season
⇒ Industrial (base) Metals/ - copper, aluminum, zinc, lead, tin, iron etc…
· demand tied very closely to GDP
feeder
⇒ Livestock/ · hogs · cattle · sheep · poultry
live
- depend on price of grains (input)
M.M152248032.
62
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Review - 3
⇒ Softs/ cash crops · cotton, coffee, sugar, cocoa
- weather affects supply, GDP growth affects demand
63
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
64
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Jan. Feb.
Commodities
Review - 6
⇒ Components of Futures Returns/
· Price return (spot yield) price 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 − 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
=
· change in price in the return 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
front month contract
· Roll – depends on the shape of the futures curve (p. 24)
roll return = "𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 − 𝐟𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫4 %’age of the
𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
× position
𝐧𝐞𝐚𝐫 − 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞
being rolled
65
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Commodity Swaps
Page 28
e.g./ oil refiner ➞ long a swap that pays the LOS i
amount exceeding $100/barrel every - describe
month for 9 months
pays $25/barrel
for the 9-month period called an ‘excess return swap’
M.M152248032.
66
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Commodities
M.M152248032.
67
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Investment Characteristics
Review - 1
Equity:
1/ Long/short: specialize by region/sector/style (some generalists)
typically net long (pos. market factor exposures) (40 - 60%)
heterogeneity in exposures to various equity factors
alpha through stock picking (market timing poor)
𝐄(𝐑) ~ long only, 𝐄(𝛔) = 𝟏Q𝟐 long only
liquid, average leverage
df
2/ Dedicated Short:
negatively correlated returns vs. equities and other HF
alpha through stock picking (market timing poor) strategies
60% - 120% short
𝛔𝐒 > 𝛔𝐋'
𝐒
liquid, low leverage
Review - 2
Equity:
3/ Equity Market Neutral:
high leverage, quantitative approach
steadier returns, less volatile
highly diversified, high liquidity
short IH, mean-reverting trades, higher turnover, tax
no/low beta risk issues
Event Driven:
df
4/ Merger-Arb.:
cash-for-stock ➞ long target
stock-for-stock ➞ long target, short acquirer (𝟕+ %)
cross-border M/A, vertical M/A ➞ wider spreads, more risk
friendly M/A, horizontal M/A, domestic deals ➞ smaller spreads
M.M152248032.
(3-7%)
left-tail risk due to M/A failures, market sensitivity (more deals
alpha from deal selection fail with
high leverage, 𝐄(𝐑) ~ low double digits, 𝐄(𝛔) < 𝟏𝟎% market stress)
68
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Review - 3
Event Driven:
5/ Distressed Securities:
very illiquid, long IH, longer lock-up periods
𝐄(𝐑) highest for event driven strategies, but higher 𝛔
typically long-biased (returns are
low diversification, concentrated positions lumpy and
best in early recovery period cyclical)
df
moderate to low leverage (1.2x – 1.7x NAV)
Relative Value:
6/ Fixed Income Arbitrage: - credit quality, liquidity, volatility premiums
reversion to the mean
net positive carry (as well)
high levels of leverage (4x – 5x)
liquidity varies by security type
Review - 4
Relative Value:
7/ Convertible Bond Arbitrage
tend to be volatility related trades
more illiquid (small issues sizes) ➞ low investment
high levels of leverage (3x) capacity
may/may not hedge credit, interest rate risk
diversification benefit, small return, risk reduction effect
df
Opportunistic:
8/ Global Macro
fundamental/technical, discretionary, some systematic
strong trends or themes (mean reverting, low vol. markets
risk factor exposure very heterogeneous, dynamic poor)
high leverage, 6x – 7x
M.M152248032.
69
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Review - 5
Opportunistic:
9/ Managed Futures:
uncorrelated with stocks/bonds
cyclical return profile, range-bound, mean-reverting
markets poor
highly liquid, systematic, trend following, wide range
of risk factor exp.
positively skewed returns in stressed markets
higher volatility than most
df HFs
high leverage
Specialist:
10/ Volatility Trading - long vol. ➞ positive convexity, short equity bet
- short vol. ➞ premium income, long equity bet
- low leverage
11/ Reinsurance/Life Settlement – no asset class correlation
- very specialized skills
- low investment capacity
Review - 6
Multi-Strategy:
F-o-F: - diversification, investment access
- liquidity, manager selection expertise
- strategic, tactical, style allocation
- lower realized 𝛔, less single mgr. risk
- netting risk, added layer of fees, less transparency
- steady, low vol. returns
df
Multi-Strategy – faster tactical allocations
- GP absorbs netting risk, one layer of fees
- concentration of M.M152248032.
operational risks
- steady, low vol. returns > FoF, but more variance
- less investor liquidity than FoF
- more leverage than FoF
70
Last Revised: 09/16/2024
Hedge Funds
Review - 7
LOS h/
Conditional Factor Risk Model
𝐑 𝐇𝐅𝐢 = 𝛂𝐢 + 𝛃𝐢,𝟏 𝐅𝟏 + ⋯ + 𝛃𝐢,𝐧 𝐅𝐧
+ 𝐃𝐭 𝛃𝐢,𝟏 𝐅𝟏 + ⋯ + 𝐃𝐭 𝛃𝐢,𝐧 𝐅𝐧
df
dummy var. ➞ incremental exposure
e.g. 𝛃𝟏 = . 𝟕𝟏 or 𝛃𝟐 = . 𝟔𝟒
𝐃𝛃𝟏 = . 𝟎𝟑 𝐃𝛃𝟐 = −. 𝟎𝟖
. 𝟕𝟒 . 𝟓𝟔
Review - 8
LOS i/
- when added to a 60/40 eq./fx-inc. port.
df
M.M152248032.
71