U4_St e
U4_St e
Unit 4 Risk
Classroom activities 1
I Starting point
1. Read, discuss, define the theme all the quotes refer to.
“I knew that if I failed I wouldn’t regret that, but I knew the one thing I might regret is not trying.”
– Jeff Bezos, founder and CEO of Amazon
“Make the choices that make you nervous. If you make the choice that’s the easy way out, that
wasn’t the big vision or big choice to make.” – Eileen Burbidge, partner of Passion Capital
“Living at risk is jumping off the cliff and building your wings on the way down.”
— Ray Bradbury, novelist
“You can’t cross a chasm in two small steps.” — David Lloyd George, British Prime Minister
1. Jeff Bezos emphasizes regret minimization—the idea that not trying at all is often worse
than failure. The message: it’s better to act than to live wondering what if.
2. Eileen Burbidge encourages choosing the path of growth, even when it’s intimidating. Her
quote reminds us that comfort doesn't lead to breakthroughs.
3. Judith McNaught keeps it simple: you can’t succeed without participation. No action = no
results.
4. Ray Bradbury poetically describes risk-taking as leaping before you’re fully ready, trusting
your ability to adapt mid-air.
5. David Lloyd George warns against half-measures. Some goals require a big leap, not
incremental steps.
2. Discuss:
3. What kinds of risks do businesses face? How can they plan to manage risks?
Businesses face many types of risks, including:
Financial risk – losing money due to bad investments, poor cash flow, or market downturns.
Market risk – changes in consumer demand or competition.
Operational risk – failures in internal systems, processes, or technology.
Legal risk – lawsuits, contract issues, or regulatory problems.
Reputational risk – damage to a company’s public image.
To manage these risks, businesses can:
Conduct risk assessments regularly
Create backup plans and contingency strategies
Buy insurance to cover potential losses
Diversify products, investments, or suppliers
Train employees and strengthen internal processes
Monitor the market and adapt quickly
II Video Zone
1. Can you explain the meaning of the words and word combinations below?
Match with the definitions:
• coping capacity • resilience • hospital capacities
• building codes • risk-informed • fragility
• strong data • exposure
the ability of healthcare facilities to provide adequate medical care for patients,
including the availability of beds, medical equipment, and staff.
the approach of making decisions based on a thorough understanding of potential
risks and their consequences, in order to minimize negative outcomes and
promote positive ones.
the degree to which people, buildings, and infrastructure are likely to be affected by a
particular hazard, such as a natural disaster or disease outbreak.
the ability of individuals, communities, or organizations to withstand and recover
from the impacts of a hazard or stressor, such as a major weather event or
economic downturn.
a set of standards and regulations that govern the design, construction, and
maintenance of buildings and other structures, with the goal of ensuring safety
and minimizing risk to occupants and the public.
3
the susceptibility of a system or community to damage or failure in the face of
stressors or shocks, such as natural disasters, economic downturns, or political
instability.
high-quality, reliable information that is based on sound research methods and
can be used to inform decision-making and policy development.
the ability of a system or community to adapt and recover from stressors or
shocks, while maintaining its essential functions and structures.
Coping capacity
The ability of a system or community to adapt and recover from stressors or shocks, while
maintaining its essential functions and structures.
Building codes
A set of standards and regulations that govern the design, construction, and maintenance of
buildings and other structures, with the goal of ensuring safety and minimizing risk to
occupants and the public.
Strong data
High-quality, reliable information that is based on sound research methods and can be used to
inform decision-making and policy development.
Resilience
The ability of individuals, communities, or organizations to withstand and recover from the
impacts of a hazard or stressor, such as a major weather event or economic downturn.
Risk-informed
The approach of making decisions based on a thorough understanding of potential risks and
their consequences, in order to minimize negative outcomes and promote positive ones.
Exposure
The degree to which people, buildings, and infrastructure are likely to be affected by a
particular hazard, such as a natural disaster or disease outbreak.
Hospital capacities
The ability of healthcare facilities to provide adequate medical care for patients, including the
availability of beds, medical equipment, and staff.
Fragility
The susceptibility of a system or community to damage or failure in the face of stressors or
shocks, such as natural disasters, economic downturns, or political instability.
3. Name the key factors that need to be taken into account when building infrastructure projects
in a resilient manner.
Hazards (e.g., flooding, landslides)
Exposure and vulnerability of people and systems
Coping capacity of communities and institutions
Building codes and technical standards
Social, political, financial, and environmental risks
Risk drivers like urbanization, climate change, and fragility
Location-specific impacts (e.g., environmental footprint)
Stakeholder participation and political engagement
Solid data and cross-sector collaboration
Lifecycle planning – from design to long-term operation
1. What are some of the risks that need to be considered during the planning of a dam? Can the
approach be generalised to apply to a different kind of project?
2. How can courses of action be negotiated across sectors to make a decision as risk-informed as
possible?
3. Why is it important to involve experts, local communities, and political participation in
development decision-making?
1. What are some of the risks that need to be considered during the planning of a dam? Can the
approach be generalised to apply to a different kind of project?
Risks for a dam project include:
Flooding
Landslides
Insufficient building codes
Water supply issues (e.g., restriction leading to regional or transnational conflict)
Environmental impact
Social tensions
Budget limitations
✅ Yes, the approach can be generalized.
Any infrastructure project (like roads, power grids, hospitals, etc.) requires:
Risk assessment of natural hazards
5
Analysis of social and environmental effects
Evaluation of long-term consequences
Inclusion of various stakeholders in the planning process
2. How can courses of action be negotiated across sectors to make a decision as risk-informed as
possible?
Involve multiple sectors (e.g., environment, finance, engineering, health, social services) in
planning discussions.
Encourage collaboration rather than siloed decision-making.
Use strong, reliable data as a shared foundation for dialogue.
Weigh the trade-offs between different priorities (e.g., environmental protection vs. economic
cost).
Make decisions that reflect diverse perspectives and needs.
Key principle: Risk-informed decisions require transparent communication and compromise
between stakeholders.
строительные н правила
способность справляться с нагрузкой/ сопротивляемость
воздействие окружающей среды/ внешних факторов/ неблагоприятное
воздействие/
хрупкость/ уязвимость/ непрочность
устойчивость к внешним раздражителям/ гибкость/ приспосабливаемость
с учетом факторов риска
убедительная/ достоверная информация/ точные данные
6
7
5. Fill in with the words and word combinations from the list above:
During a pandemic, it is important to maintain coping capacity to ensure that patients receive
adequate medical care.
Risk-informed decision-making is essential for minimizing the negative impacts of hazards and
promoting resilience.
Exposure to natural disasters can be reduced by implementing measures such as building codes
and early warning systems.
Communities with high resilience are better able to withstand and recover from the impacts of
stressors and shocks.
Building codes and regulations play a crucial role in ensuring the safety and resilience of
buildings and infrastructure.
Fragile ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change and other
stressors.
Reliable information is needed to accurately assess risks and develop effective strategies for
managing them.
Resilience can be strengthened through measures such as disaster preparedness planning,
community engagement, and investment in infrastructure.
The adverse COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of maintaining adequate
coping capacity and investing in healthcare systems.
By improving coping capacity and reducing exposure to hazards, communities can become more
resilient and better able to adapt to a changing world.
2. The controversy over diesel emissions testing by car manufacturers highlights the need for
companies to be aware of the risks involved in decisions they make. Read the article and
answer questions 1-4.
The emissions scandal shows that no company, however large or well-established, is immune to a crisis. But
how a business responds when things go wrong can mean the difference between a swift resolution and
making the problem a whole lot worse.
HAVE A PLAN those affected, and then explain how they plan to solve
Of course, history is littered with corporate crises, and the problem. But Weber Shandwick's Mr Clayton
yet firms all too often fail to learn from each has some sympathy with companies expected to
other's mistakes. So how should they best prepare show public remorse. 'People often underestimate
for the worst? According to Rod Clayton, vice what a challenge it is to communicate very quickly
president of crisis at Weber Shandwick, they should about something very complicated when you don't
start with some proper contingency planning. know enough about what happened, and when there
Companies are often quite well prepared could be a lot of implications in what you say. The
operationally for emergencies - if something blows lawyers may tell you to say nothing about
up, they know what to do - but they don't know something - but if you end up being excessively
what to do when the blow-up is more metaphorical conservative you can end up winning in the
or legal because they don't have robust courtroom and losing all of your customers.'
communications plans in place. 'And even when
they do, sometimes they haven't actually tested
those plans or run simulation exercises,' he says. THE ROAD TO RECOVERY
Rebecca Gudgeon, a managing director at Grayling, Ms Gudgeon believes VW can restore its reputation,
says it is 'blatantly obvious' this is where VW went just as carmakers Toyota and Lexus have survived
wrong. 'If you're a car company or train operator their own scandals. But she says it will take a huge
you are responsible for public safety, and so you are amount of 'investment and engagement' as well as a
expected to have a plan in place if something goes rethink of where it stands in the car market. That
wrong' said, popular brands can be surprisingly resilient to
crises. 'Ultimately, if there is a problem that needs
STEP UP TO THE PLATE fixing, people will judge you more on what you did
It is vital that a chief executive — not their about the situation than what the situation originally
communications team or more junior members of was,' says Mr Clayton. 'And if you deal with an
staff — takes ownership of a crisis and speaks to issue well, then ultimately you get credit for that'
the press. They should always start by expressing
care for
7. Work with a partner. Using the phrases from the previous task, discuss what advice you
would give to someone in the following situations:
• running a company that has just had to withdraw a faulty product from sale
• having to deal with a damaging report about the company in the media
• telling your team that a mistake you made means that you have lost the client
• losing customers as a result of a recent law suit and damaged reputation
13
Unit 4 Risk
Home activities 1
I Listening Zone
1 what their job might be 2 what risks they have to deal with
3. Which of the adjectives in the previous task have a positive connotation (+) and which have
a negative connotation (-)?
4. Read these four comments from employee appraisal reports. Which of the adjectives from
the tasks above could you use to describe the employees' attitudes towards risk?
6. Complete sentences 1-8. Use the answers to complete the crossword and the hidden word.
6. AV4.1 Make sure you have revised the following words and word combinations:
8. Pair work.
Work with a partner. Read this information about a PEST(EL) analysis.
PEST analysis (n): a way of analysing four key external factors that may affect an organization,
business or project.
Political (e.g. change of government; change of legislation; change of tax; impact of corruption)
Economic (e.g. change of inflation rate; change of labour supply and costs; impact of competitors'
behaviour)
16
Social & Cultural (e.g. change of public opinion, taste or attitudes; population and employment
changes; educational changes)
Technological (e.g. new technologies; changing costs of communications; different ways of
working)
Think about a company (you can elaborate one of your own). For each category in the
PEST(EL) analysis:
Example: (Economic) One of our competitors might launch a rival product at a lower price. We
would then run the risk of losing market share. We should try to be bold about new product ideas to
keep ahead of the competition.
Key expressions.
1. Work with a partner.
Look at the categories given below and decide what expressions each of them refers to.
2. Work with a partner. What advice would you give to someone participating in
a teleconference in English for the first time?
Compare your ideas with the following guidelines:
18
Guidelines for participating in a teleconference
3. Read the Context and look at the agenda. Then listen to four extracts fern the
teleconference and note which guidelines from the previous task are (or aren't) followed
by the participants. Audio 4.2
Context:
Frangipani Travel has been organizing luxury specialist tours and safaris in Kenya, Brazil, India and
Egypt for a number of years. Their main target clientele has been well-off European couples.
However, more potential Frangipani customers are organizing holidays for themselves via the
Internet and there is less demand for ready-made packages. The company is considering a bold
reorientation to focus exclusively on ecologically-sound 'green holidays'. Jean-Luc, a senior
manager based in France, has organized a teleconference with the regional managers to discuss the
risks. The participants in the teleconference are —Joana in Brazil, Khalid in Egypt, Thomas in
Kenya, and Greta in India.
Agenda
Details 1. Introductions.
2. Proposal 1: redirect Frangipani
Conference call entirely towards ‘Green-Stay' tours
23 November (Joana).
10 a.m. GMT 3. Proposal 2: introduce 'Green-Stay' tours
alongside traditional holiday offers
(Greta).
Moderator: Jean-Luc Boyer
4. Decide on conclusions to take to the board.
Agree action points.
5. AOB
6. Set date for follow-up meeting.
5. Look at the expressions from the teleconference in A and the alternative expressions in
B. What are the differences between them?
A B
1. Could you talk us through this? Tell us about it.
2. Am I right in saying that the general Do you all agree to go ahead on this? Tell
opinion is we can go ahead on this?
3. I'd be interested in hearing what you think us what you think.
about this.
4. Can I just check …? Can I check …?
5. We seem to have some sort of consensus. We all agree.
6. Listen to these extracts from the teleconference. Decide what the speaker really means
in each case. Follow the example. Audio 4.3.
1. That's interesting, Thomas.
That's not relevant. I don't want to continue talking about this topic.
2. Maybe we can let Joana answer that.
4. Sorry, Khalid …
One of the participants is describing the call to a colleague. For each underlined section, discuss what
each speaker might have said.
20
`By five minutes past two we were all online. The moderator 1 nominated the HR Manager to talk
about the proposal and our options, because he's championing the suggestion. I wasn't sure if I had
properly understood what he said, so I 2 asked for clarification to check if I had understood
correctly. He gave a much clearer response. After that we all started discussing the main proposal
quite usefully. Then the moderator 3 invited the representative from Finance to give her opinion,
but she started making a long and irrelevant speech about executive bonuses so the moderator 4
interrupted her and 5 tried to get the discussion back on topic. We talked for about 25 minutes and
then the moderator 6 ended the meeting by asking us to 7 summarize the main points that had been
made.'
8. Work in small groups with people in the same company or in a similar field of
work.Think of a current issue in your work and follow points 1-3.
Alternatively, turn to the prompts below. Work in small groups, choose a moderator, and
have the teleconference.
Background
You are regional managers for Farmview, a manufacturer of dairy products. Farmview has recently
launched a new, very strongly flavoured blue cheese. Despite a positive reaction to its taste, the
cheese hasn't been selling well and it has been agreed that the name ‘Old Mouldy' (which was
intended to be humorous) has probably been putting customers off. A teleconference has been
arranged to decide on a new name and marketing strategy.
Preparation
1. Think of a possible new name for the cheese and some reasons why it should be used.
2. Prepare to do at least three of the following during the teleconterence.
• digress
• check your understanding
• express doubts
• nominate another person to say something
• intervene to ensure a speaker doesn't dominate
• interrupt in order to take over the topic
Agenda
1. Introductions
2. Each participant to suggest a new name for the cheese,
with reasons. Follow-up questions and discussion.
3. Reach agreement on new name.
4. Discuss whether the product name can simply be
21
changed on the packaging or fi a full new product launch is required.
5. Agree action points.
1. Listen to 4.2. Then look at these extracts. For each one, say what the underlined
pronouns it, this and that refer to.
Example: How about now, Greta? Is that any better?
The word 'that' refers to the sound quality of the call.
1. That's interesting Thomas ... but I think ifs probably best left for another meeting.
2. Well, if you remember, we did explore this last year - that was just before you joined us Khalid
- and we decided ... it wasn't the route to go down.
3. Greta - I'd be interested in hearing what you think about this.
4. What do you think of this? We offer customers the option of paying …
5. I think that's whew we've got to. Is that right? Joana?
6. To me, it sounds a lot more manageable.
7. It's been quite hard, but I think we've made the right decision. It would have been too risky to ...
1 If you want to refer to something that is clearly distant or in the past, use that / it.
2 If you want to refer to something new, important, more relevant, use this / that.
Jorge According to report, sales of our new PXD tools have gone up 22%.
Cerys Excellent news. Been a long time since we sold so many.
Jorge True, but have you seen? A review of market prospects over the next five years and not
encouraging.
Cerys No, not one I've seen. What does say? Is suggesting that the market's slowing?
Jorge About right.
22
Cerys I've read a number of recent articles saying.
Jorge Quite depressing. Makes me wonder if time to get out of market.
Cerys I think a good idea to call a meeting. Something we need to discuss.
23
Unit 4 Risk
Home activities 2
X, could you talk us through this? I'm not fully convinced as yet.
With respect ... I'm having some second thoughts about ...
We seem to have some sort of consensus. I'd like to draw things to a close.
That's interesting X, but I think ... I'd be interested in hearing what you think about
this.
Sorry X. Could you let X finish, please? I still have serious reservations.
Maybe we're digressing a little. Can I just check — we are now talking about ...?
Maybe we can let X answer that. Can I just ask everyone to sum up their views?
If I could just bring the conversation back to the Am I right in saying that the general opinion is …?
agenda.
2. Katja’s team are discussing the menu for a formal dinner at a large company
event. Complete their conversation with the phrases a-i.
a could you let Torsten finish, please e could you talk us through this
b I'd be really interested to hear what you think f you're saying that
about the printer issue g bring the conversation back to the agenda
c I'm not fully convinced as yet h can I just check - we are now talking about
d we seem to have some sort of consensus i maybe we're digressing a little
3. The team are now discussing entertainment. Choose the correct words in italics.
Wolfgang So, what's happening with the entertainment? We haven't discussed that at all yet.
Katja Maybe we can 1let /allow /ask Elke answer that. She's been working on entertainment.
Elke Have you seen this brochure of party decorations? They look great. I think we should get some
balloons and ...
Katja That's interesting, Elke, but I think it's probably best 2discussed / left /given for another
meeting. We don't have much time, so I'd like to prioritize entertainment.
Elke Sorry. Yes, er ... we were thinking of hiring that Abba tribute band, but I'm having second
3opinions / ideas / thoughts about it now. Maybe the Beatles tribute band would be better.
Torsten With 4regret / respect / regards Elke, do we really believe that those kinds of bands are a
good idea at such a sophisticated evening event? Wolfgang Do we need any live music at all?
Elke Well, I've started to wonder that. Maybe we don't ...
Katja I'm not sure this 5gets / leaves / is getting us anywhere. The decision has already been made
that we'll have live music, so can we try and make a decision on this? Can I just ask everyone 6to
conclude / to sum up / to tell their views on this?
Wolfgang OK, well I still have serious 7reservations / considerations / observations about having a
tribute band. If we must have live music, I would prefer a jazz band or a string quartet.
Torsten I totally agree.
Elke Well, I suppose I could look into that.
Katja So am I right 8about / with / in saying that the general opinion is we'll go with either jazz or
classical?
Elke Yes - I think so.
Katja Good. I'd like to 9draw / say / manage things to a close now, so could we check that we are
all clear on what needs to be done next?
Example: We've booked you a meeting room. The meeting room will be ready from 3.00 p.m.
= It will be ready from 3.00 p.m.
2. Aleph's submitting his evaluation by email. His evaluation should be very helpful, I think.
5. The auditors are arriving today. The auditors arriving today is what's worrying me.
25
6. A My problem is understanding all the jargon.
B Understanding all the jargon is my problem too.
5. Complete this presentation with it, this or that. Sometimes more than one answer is
possible.
We can't say exactly what will happen next year. 1 would make our jobs much less
interesting, anyway! But there are some predictions we can make fairly confidently. 2 is
why I've called the meeting today. 3 will have three parts. Firstly, we'll carry out a review
of our performance last year. 4 will help us identify the current trends in the market, and
our strengths and weaknesses. Next will be a 'blue skies' session. 5 will involve us
splitting into groups of six.
6. Look back at your answers in the previous task and decide what they refer to. Choose the
correct options (a or b).
1. a next year
b not being able to say exactly what will happen next year
2. a the fact that there are some predictions
b the fact that we can be fairly confident
3. a the meeting
b today
4. a our performance
b the review
5. a the session
b splitting into groups of six
7. Fill in the gaps using words and word combinations from AV4 from the list below. There
are 3 extra words.
• an allegation • I still have serious • simulation exercises
• blatant reservations. • strong data
• contingency planning • remorse • to cap sth
• exposure • resilient • amid plagiarism claims
• foolhardy • risk averse
• fragility • risk-informed
Work with a partner. Choose a topic from the list below or think of your own. Discuss your
opinions on the topic using referencing language and AV4 where possible.
Example:
A Have you seen that email about bonuses? What do you think?
B I think it's going to be pretty negative for us. It's going to mean we get less money and this is going
to make a lot of people angry.
• a recent presentation
• a recent email giving news about your company
• a news article
• a conference
• a meeting
Video Zone
1. Comment on the word cloud:
1. What are some steps we can take to reduce our impact on the planet while
traveling?
2. How does the tourism industry impact the environment and what can be done
to mitigate this impact?
1. How has the tourism industry grown over the past 50 years and what impact does this growth
have on the environment?
2. How does water use in the tourism industry compare to water use by individuals?
3. What are some of the effects of climate change on the world's most visited destinations
and tourist attractions?
4. What steps can individuals take to be more sustainable when traveling, such as choosing locally
sourced food and souvenirs?
5. How can businesses and destinations promote sustainable tourism practices, such as focusing on
higher yield rather than higher numbers?
II Video Zone
2. Culture question
• Are you often interrupted in meetings? If so, how does this make you feel?
• What factors would you consider before making an interruption?
1. What are the three types of interruptions identified by Julia A. Goldberg in her paper
on interruptions?
2. How do neutral interruptions differ from power interruptions?
3. Can you provide examples of power interruptions, both verbal and non-verbal?
4. What is tangenting and why is it considered a disrespectful type of interruption?
5. How can we assess the situation and people around us to determine whether or not interrupting
is appropriate?
•
Do you think cultural differences play a significant role in how people perceive interruptions?
Why or why not?
•
What are some tips you would suggest for improving our emotional intelligence and
communication skills to better handle interruptions in conversations?
1. Which of the methods for establishing rapport (a—j) would you use ...?
2. Listen to five conversation extracts. For each extract decide on the relationship between
the speakers, the methods in the previous task they use to establish rapport, and the phrases
they use to do this. Complete the table. Audio 4.4
2.
3.
4.
5.
3. Imagine it is five years in the future.You have been invited to a social event to meet up
with the other students who were in your English class. You haven't seen any of them fora
long time.
1 Take a minute to think where you might be and what you might be doing in five years' time.
Make notes below about your future life.
The date today is:
I work at/in:
My work mainly involves:
Now I'm living in:
The biggest difference compared with my life five years ago is:
2 Talk to your “former classmates”. Use as many methods for establishing rapport from
the previous task as you can.
V Reading Zone
1. Read the news items and be ready to discuss the following questions:
1. What went wrong in the two examples of planning the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games?
2. What could have been done to avoid these issues?
The Games Organizing Committee said there were too many doubts over the emblem for it to be
used. Its withdrawal is a highly unusual move.
Belgian designer Olivier Debie claimed that the design was similar to his 2013 logo for the Theatre
de Liege. He and the theatre had filed a lawsuit to prevent it being used.
Mr Debie expressed surprise at the organizers' decision on Tuesday as they had publicly backed the
design only days earlier. He told BBC Radio 5 live: 'I thought the Olympic Committee was a big
machine and I didn't dare to take action against them.' But the director of the Theatre de Liege had
told him they had to 'do something' and they sought the help of good copyright lawyers. He said the
logo, devised in 2011, had been official for two years and would have been available on sites like
Pinterest around the world.
Japan was seen as a safe pair of hands to host the Olympics, but Tuesday's developments cap an
awkward month for the organizers. There may also be repercussions for lucrative sponsorship deals
as Japan Airlines and other sponsors have already started using the logo.
BBC News, 1 September 2015
A new, more scaled-down, design has been chosen for the main stadium at the 2020
Summer Olympics in Tokyo.
Spiralling costs had forced the scrapping of renowned architect Zaha Hadid's futuristic original
design. The new design, by Japanese architect Kengo Kuma, will cost 149bn yen ($1.2bn; E825m)
to build.
Ms Hadid's plan would have cost 252bn yen, making it the world's most expensive sports venue. Mr
Kuma's design will cost an additional 4bn yen to design and maintain.
The scrapping of the design caused a row that eventually led to the resignation of Japan's Education
and Sports Minister Hakubun Shimomura in October.
Mr Kuma's design echoes Japanese temple styles, with a low-lying steel and wood structure,
surrounded by trees. It will sit more than 20 metres lower than the previous design and supporters
say it fits better with its immediate environment, which includes the greenery around the nearby
Meiji Shrine.
It beat a rival proposal by architect Toyo Ito. That too was simpler than Ms Hadid's proposal, which
was compared with a gigantic bicycle helmet or an oyster, and which would have taken up a much
larger area - 78,100 sq m (840,660 sq ft) against 72,400 sq m for Kengo Kuma's concept.
Construction or the new design will also be quicker. Necessarily so when the International Olympic
Committee deadline for completion is January 2020, ahead of the Games' start in July that year.
BBC News, 22 December 2015
2. The 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games were hit by a number of planning difficulties.
Work with a partner. Look at the list of some of these issues below and discuss what could
have been done to avoid the risks.
3. Work as a group. Decide on the top five things that can go wrong when planning a big
national or global event.
4. In your group, hold a meeting to plan a large international event for your company. Decide
on the event and then focus on:
1. Read the explanation and and find more details on the web-site given below, make a MM to
answer the questions “What Is Rapport and how to Build It?”
What Is Rapport?
Rapport forms the basis of meaningful, close and harmonious relationships between people. It's the
sense of connection that you get when you meet someone you like and trust, and whose point of
view you understand. It's the bond that forms when you discover that you share one another's values
and priorities in life.
According to researchers Linda Tickle-Degnen and Robert Rosenthal, when you have a rapport with
someone, you share:
• Mutual attentiveness: you're both focused on, and interested in, what the other person is saying or
doing.
• Positivity: you're both friendly and happy, and you show care and concern for one another.
• Coordination: you feel "in sync" with one another, so that you share a common understanding.
Your energy levels, tone and body language are also similar.
This connection can appear instantly – when you "click" with someone – or develop slowly, over time.
It can grow naturally, without intent, or you can deliberately set out to build it.
Rapport isn't just a tool for building relationships, though; it's often the foundation of success. When
you have a rapport with someone, you're better placed to influence, learn and teach, particularly as
the trust that you've built up means other people are more likely to accept your ideas, to share
information, and to create opportunities together.
Whether you're being interviewed for a job, selling something, or trying to improve a relationship,
knowing how to build rapport can help you to perform successfully.
Interestingly, rapport is similar to trust. You can build trust and rapport simultaneously, but rapport
focuses more on establishing a bond or connection, whereas trust relies more on establishing a
reputation for reliability, consistency and keeping your promises.
Read the article “Ways to build rapport” to find useful info, use the
following link below or a handout.
https://www.mindtools.com/a9f9kqi/building-rapport.
Когда менеджер знает, как управлять рисками, то сумеет вовремя нейтрализовать угрозы,
поставляя работы в рамках бюджета, и с нужным результатом.
Команда тоже работает продуктивнее, если не находится постоянно в режиме аврала, из-за
того, что PM заранее не подумал о возможных проблемах.
Первое правило говорит о том, что с рисками нужно работать систематически, а не от случая
к случаю. Понимание основных принципов управления рисками будет солидным бонусом на
собеседовании, потому что учет возможных опасностей помогает выполнять все
договоренности в рамках «проектного треугольника».
Под риском понимают условие или событие, которое с большей или меньшей вероятностью
повлияет на достижение целей проекта: сроки, стоимость или качество.
Любой проект развивается в среде угроз и неопределенности, поэтому выбирать не
приходится: команда либо начнет работать с рисками, либо «позволит рискам» управлять
процессом.
Некоторые компании игнорируют вопрос возможных неприятностей и «реагируют на
проблемы по мере поступления». Из-за этого вся система проекта подвергается опасности,
становится малоэффективной.
Стандартно, работа по нейтрализации угроз состоит из 5 шагов:
1. Идентификация возможных рисков.
2. Классификация.
3. Анализ.
4. Составление плана реагирования.
5. Отслеживание и предупреждение.
Эти шаги не происходят только однажды, в самом начале работы, а повторяются циклично,
по крайней мере раз в каждой фазе проекта.
Для успешного реагирования важно определять не только риски, но и триггеры — факторы
или обстоятельства, которые предшествуют наступлению риска.
Если есть условие (угрозы или улучшения), возникает триггер, после которого наступают
последствия.
Когда триггер определен, нужно оценить его и понять — насколько событие находится в зоне
контроля, а затем установить стратегию смягчения триггера.
Отслеживание триггеров помогает заметить, что команда не успевает пройти
запланированные шаги и вовремя отреагировать.
Абсолютно на каждой встрече должно быть время для разговора о рисках, будет ли это
отдельный пункт в повестке дня или одно предложение в meeting minutes. Когда о рисках
проинформированы команда, заказчик и руководство, можно вовремя включить в рабочий
план задачи по устранению угроз.
Чтобы общение было действительно продуктивным, менеджеру необходимо строить доверие в
команде, иначе неизбежны непонимание и конфликты. Если люди не привыкли общаться для
достижения общих целей, то могут пропустить момент, когда нужно что-то интегрировать и
протестировать. Когда люди постоянно пишут письма и отчитываются — они не
сотрудничают, а «решают вопросы».
Менеджер может определять проблемы с доверием в других терминах, например, считать:
• Что команда неправильно оценивает.
• Долго разрабатывает.
• Не может предвидеть какие-то обстоятельства.
• Работает не слажено.
• Использует слово «зависимость» вместо «сотрудничество».
Такого рода проблемы РМ пытается «починить» усилением контроля: заводит
дополнительные отчеты, сосредотачивается на стандартах и процессах. Однако, если
появляется постоянная потребность контролировать команды, это уже само по себе сигнал
об отсутствии доверия.
Когда менеджер пытается усилить контроль, то, фактически, «прячет под ковер» все
потенциальные риски. Потому что риски в проекте — это не только то, что пойдет «не так»
от заказчика, но и маркер доверия и сотрудничества в команде.
Часто любое неожиданное событие трактуется как риск — фактор, который обязательно
негативно повлияет на проект. На самом деле, есть два типа неожиданных событий: риски и
возможности.
Возможности, как и угрозы, тоже случаются внезапно, и могут повлиять на ограничения,
стоимость, сроки и цели проекта, но с позитивным результатом.
Неожиданная возможность приводит к уменьшению стоимости программы или проекта,
улучшает производительность, задает другие цели или меняет график.
Возможности планируют на том же этапе, что и угрозы, а задача менеджера — сделать так,
чтобы неожиданных улучшений было как можно больше или расширить их влияние на
проект.
36
Предугадать позитивные события помогут вопросы: «Что может пойти по
незапланированному сценарию, потому что какой-то фактор улучшится? Что команда может
сделать, чтобы сэкономить время и деньги?» Ответы на эти вопросы — это и есть
потенциальные возможности.
Откуда могут прийти улучшения:
• Потенциальные зоны возможностей. За годы работы в определенном домене, в программе
проектов, менеджер уже заранее видит потенциальные зоны возможностей.
• Конкуренция поставщиков. Поставщики могут предоставить лучшие условия за счет
конкуренции друг с другом.
• Тест по сходству и анализу. Всегда полезно проверять, что происходит с похожими
продуктами на вашем или других рынках.
• Автоматизированное гибкое (Lean) производство. Можно привлекать консультантов или
использовать принципы бережливого производства самостоятельно.
• Использование коммерческих частей. Речь идет об использовании коммерческих частей из
других продуктов.
• Agile разработка. При разработке, согласно agile mindset, появляются дополнительные
возможности, помимо тех, которые есть в waterfall.
Кроме угроз и возможностей в риск-менеджменте существует слово «проблема». Риск может
стать проблемой, но отличается тем, что риск — это обстоятельство, которое возможно
случится, а проблема — угрожающее для проекта событие, которое уже точно происходит.
4. Research task
Develop a plan and prepare a 4 - 5 minute presentation using AV on the following topics:
I Presentation Zone
While watching your group-mates’ presentations, fill in the table and be ready to take part in the
discussion.
Reading Zone
Teamwork
Teamwork means the ability of people to work together. It occurs when the members of a
team work together and utilise their individual skills to achieve a common goal. It is a cooperative
process that allows ordinary people to achieve extraordinary results. A team has a common goal or
purpose where team members can develop effective, mutual relationships to achieve team goals.
Successful teamwork relies upon synergism existing between all team members. Team members
create an environment where they are all willing to contribute and promote and nurture a positive,
effective team environment. Team members are flexible enough to adapt to cooperative working
environments. The goals are achieved through collaboration and social interdependence rather than
individualised, competitive goals.
Why is teamwork alleged significant? It is rare that a piece of work is successfully
completed by a single individual working alone without interacting with anyone. With teamwork,
the work gets done more quickly and with higher quality. Teamwork helps to promote deep
learning, which occurs through interaction, problem-solving, dialogue, cooperation and
collaboration. Shared goals can easily be achieved by working together and pooling experience and
expertise.
Teamwork has emerged in recent years as one of the most important ways of organising
work. Many organisations have realised that teamwork enables employees to perform better, hence
resulting in good organisational performance. Teamwork has the potential to improve the
performance of individual employees and the organisation. Teamwork helps in developing the skills
and perspectives of the employees through positive opinions, feedback, experiences and viewpoints.
Teamwork is an important tool that is used to carry out varied functions accurately and efficiently.
The core value of teamwork is the reduction of workload, which helps the employees perform better
without any kind of work pressure because the tasks are distributed equally among all the members.
Here is a short story that will help you to understand the importance of teamwork. Once
upon a time, in a jungle, there was a monkey and an elephant who were good friends. One day an
unusual quarrel happened between the two about who was better. Each one thinks of himself to be
better than the other. While the elephant advocated it was better to be strong, the monkey was
adamant that being fast and agile was better.
Unable to resolve the matter, they headed to the wise owl and posed the same question to
him. The owl promised to answer the question provided they had to take a challenge. They had to
go far away across the river, where a golden fruit was hung on a tall tree. Whosoever will bring the
fruit will be the best.
So, the monkey and the elephant set out on their journey to bring the fruit to the wise owl.
When the monkey reached the banks of the river, he realised that the river was too deep for him and
the currents too strong. The elephant saw his friend and asked the monkey to climb on his back, and
together they crossed the river. When they reached the tree, the elephant tried to push the tree. But
the tree was huge and wouldn’t budge. So the monkey climbed up the tree and plucked the fruit. He
climbed down, sat on the elephant’s back, and they reached the wise owl.
The owl then asked, “Of the two of you, who brings this fruit to me?” The monkey said he did
because he plucked the fruit from the tree and the elephant said he did because he helped the
monkey get onto the other side of the river. At this point, the wise owl stopped the argument and
41
said, “Each one of us has unique abilities and strengths. Collectively as a team, we can achieve the
impossible. All because we used your strength at the right time to do the right thing.”
Finally, teamwork is the collective effort made by each member of a team to achieve the
team goal. Individually, we all have certain skills, and we are good in one area. If all of us come
together and use our strength and expertise in the right direction, then it will give the best result.
Also, it gives an opportunity to each member to learn something new from each other.
(Source: https://byjus.com/cbse/teamwork-essay/)