Draft 2 - R1
Draft 2 - R1
clean, safe facilities for public at large and to enhance the quality of urban scapes. It
functions as an important form of urban infrastructure since it contributes value to the city
scapes not only as a utility but also as an amenity.
When we visualise a public toilet, do we ever imagine a universally accessible, fully
functional, well lit, thoroughly sanitised and clean toilet, having a dispenser generously filled
to the brim with undiluted soap?
Its no surprise that this particular sector of public facilities is gravely neglected in terms of
design and infrastructure. A public toilet although many to be inclusive has been reduced to
an unnecessary road block. In order to understand the significance of these spaces, we need
to employ a team of active participants who thoroughly understand, research and collect
data based on user feedback.
Methods such as Data collection of what the public wants, Interviews, Surveys, File Reviews
and structured observation should be used to increase public input as they are the real
stakeholders. Research techniques such as small Focus group discussions can also be
conducted to collect data through group interaction. The group comprises a small number
of carefully selected people who discuss a given aspect. Focus groups are used to identify
and explore how people think and behave.
Public toilets carry great potential in order to establish a progressive outlook towards the
city’s hygiene and perception of maintenance.
Other than this, we tend to overlook the factors that help maintain these facilities “labour”.
Unfortunately, the staff responsible for the cleanliness of toilets are exposed to a futile
discrimation in terms of respect and opportunities. When we start to focus on uplifting the
perceived status of the staff itself, it will be easier to achieve our goals towards a
progressive mindset.
Providing a dedicated area for the staff encourages their participation in the process and
increases their earnestness towards work ethic.
This will also help to neutralise the barrier between the user and cleaner.
Providing a performance review will help upgrade the quality of work and implement a
sense of trust in the users towards the facility.
An example of this is seen in the United States where seven airports around the country,
including Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), have invested in a software system called
TRAX SMARTRESTROOM, which aims to keep bathrooms cleaner and helps move the lines
to use stalls more. First, each bathroom with the smartrestroom has a light above the stall
indicating whether it’s in use: a green light means it’s available while red signals occupied.
The software also has a counting sensor at the entrance of the restroom that tracks when
passengers walk in and leave. Each airport can pick how many people enter the restroom
before an email alert is sent to its custodial supervisor indicating that it’s time to clean the
restroom, after 300 people. And, most importantly for passengers, they have the option to
leave feedback on their bathroom visit through a tablet at the exit of the bathroom. They
can choose one of three faces: "exceptional," "average" or "poor." If they pick the sad face
(poor), the tablet displays a series of six potential issues they encountered. This feedback is
instantly emailed to the custodial supervisor who can dispatch an employee to fix the
problem as quickly as possible.
Similar systems utilising QR codes to access online forms for collecting user feedback are
operational in many private institutions across our own country as well.
The modern solution to a clean restroom would be a self-cleaning toilet, although easier to
install, it still requires maintenance. And it is more important to utilise this necessity for
maintenance in order to provide job opportunities that significantly improve the economic
state of low-income groups.
But does the clean interior of a public toilet ensure a clean environment outside it? Can we
provide a stable exterior environment for the users? Or are the two environments to
perpetually remain mutually exclusive of each other?
I beg to differ, but a dingy street or a busy highway are not the most welcoming sites for
users, and in order for public toilets to truly be inclusive they need good design for not just
their interiors, but as much for the exterior scape within which they are placed.
Perhaps, we can try to extend the boundaries of these facilities beyond the sewage lines and
robust tiling. What if the nearest tree was an extension to the toilet and surrounded the
neighbouring landscape within the boundaries of the toilet? Would this not help us
generate more footfall within the area and hence, avoid a sense of insecurity while using the
washrooms?
When we take this a step further, an inbuilt water treatment plant can lead to a more
sustainable built up space and reduce resource and energy consumption as well. The
remaining greywater can be strategically used to irrigate the surrounding landscape.