0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views6 pages

leila

The document presents a statistical analysis involving various financial metrics such as ROA, Lev, BGD, CSR, ETR, and SIZE, with detailed summary statistics and regression results. Key findings include significant relationships between BGD and CSR, as well as the impact of ROA and SIZE on CSR, with R-squared values indicating moderate explanatory power. Additionally, the document includes tests for fixed and random effects, autocorrelation, and variance analysis, highlighting the robustness of the results.

Uploaded by

hamza.nizarr
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views6 pages

leila

The document presents a statistical analysis involving various financial metrics such as ROA, Lev, BGD, CSR, ETR, and SIZE, with detailed summary statistics and regression results. Key findings include significant relationships between BGD and CSR, as well as the impact of ROA and SIZE on CSR, with R-squared values indicating moderate explanatory power. Additionally, the document includes tests for fixed and random effects, autocorrelation, and variance analysis, highlighting the robustness of the results.

Uploaded by

hamza.nizarr
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Wednesday April 9 21:22:41 2025 Page 1

___ ____ ____ ____ ____(R)


/__ / ____/ / ____/
___/ / /___/ / /___/
Statistics/Data Analysis

ROA Lev BGD SIZE


name: <unnamed>
log: C:\Users\user\Downloads\résultat leila V2.smcl
log type: smcl
opened on: 25 Mar 2025, 17:08:30

1 . summarize ROA Lev BGD CSR ETR SIZE

Variable Obs Mean Std. dev. Min Max

ROA 900 .0678471 .1778857 -2.459641 1.398627


Lev 899 .2468258 .1838999 0 1.446826
BGD 900 16.32859 13.30502 0 63.63636
CSR 900 51.43348 22.44009 3.248013 94.33357
ETR 900 .201211 1.51524 -32.66667 21.5

SIZE 900 22.28534 1.762718 14.3184 26.3015

2 . pwcorr ROA Lev BGD SIZE, star(5)

ROA Lev BGD SIZE

ROA 1.0000
Lev -0.0985* 1.0000
BGD 0.0633 0.1356* 1.0000
SIZE 0.1857* 0.4001* 0.1969* 1.0000

3 . regress CSR BGD ROA Lev SIZE

Source SS df MS Number of obs = 899


F(4, 894) = 230.13
Model 229599.998 4 57399.9996 Prob > F = 0.0000
Residual 222982.785 894 249.421459 R-squared = 0.5073
Adj R-squared = 0.5051
Total 452582.783 898 503.989736 Root MSE = 15.793

CSR Coefficient Std. err. t P>|t| [95% conf. interval]

BGD .6405111 .0405085 15.81 0.000 .5610082 .720014


ROA -10.70046 3.074954 -3.48 0.001 -16.73543 -4.665492
Lev 2.275865 3.194208 0.71 0.476 -3.993155 8.544885
SIZE 6.811656 .3403205 20.02 0.000 6.143736 7.479577
_cons -110.6588 7.194177 -15.38 0.000 -124.7782 -96.53935

4 . vif

Variable VIF 1/VIF

SIZE 1.30 0.771947


Lev 1.24 0.804948
ROA 1.08 0.927889
BGD 1.05 0.955555

Mean VIF 1.17

5 . xtreg CSR BGD ROA Lev SIZE, fe


must specify panelvar; use xtset
r(459);
Wednesday April 9 21:22:41 2025 Page 2

6 . ssc install xtreg


ssc install: "xtreg" not found at SSC, type search xtreg
(To find all packages at SSC that start with x, type ssc describe x)
r(601);

7 . xtset ID Year

Panel variable: ID (strongly balanced)


Time variable: Year, 2010 to 2021
Delta: 1 unit

8 .
9 . xtreg CSR BGD ROA Lev SIZE, fe

Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 899


Group variable: ID Number of groups = 75

R-squared: Obs per group:


Within = 0.3063 min = 11
Between = 0.5519 avg = 12.0
Overall = 0.5028 max = 12

F(4,820) = 90.50
corr(u_i, Xb) = 0.2320 Prob > F = 0.0000

CSR Coefficient Std. err. t P>|t| [95% conf. interval]

BGD .5657215 .0354868 15.94 0.000 .4960657 .6353772


ROA -5.057311 2.476179 -2.04 0.041 -9.917706 -.1969165
Lev -1.047338 3.75511 -0.28 0.780 -8.418099 6.323422
SIZE 5.119021 .8459625 6.05 0.000 3.458514 6.779528
_cons -71.27556 18.58928 -3.83 0.000 -107.7637 -34.78739

sigma_u 14.151951
sigma_e 8.326686
rho .74283841 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

F test that all u_i=0: F(74, 820) = 32.38 Prob > F = 0.0000

10 . estimate store fe

11 . xtreg CSR BGD ROA Lev SIZE, re

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 899


Group variable: ID Number of groups = 75

R-squared: Obs per group:


Within = 0.3056 min = 11
Between = 0.5528 avg = 12.0
Overall = 0.5056 max = 12

Wald chi2(4) = 446.27


corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

CSR Coefficient Std. err. z P>|z| [95% conf. interval]

BGD .5650451 .034344 16.45 0.000 .4977321 .632358


ROA -5.624307 2.418179 -2.33 0.020 -10.36385 -.8847642
Lev -.3157617 3.547905 -0.09 0.929 -7.269528 6.638005
SIZE 5.932752 .6433326 9.22 0.000 4.671843 7.193661
_cons -89.55111 14.14145 -6.33 0.000 -117.2678 -61.83437

sigma_u 13.772882
sigma_e 8.326686
rho .73232916 (fraction of variance due to u_i)
Wednesday April 9 21:22:42 2025 Page 3

12 . hausman fe

Coefficients
(b) (B) (b-B) sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B))
fe . Difference Std. err.

BGD .5657215 .5650451 .0006764 .0089335


ROA -5.057311 -5.624307 .5669961 .5327961
Lev -1.047338 -.3157617 -.7315768 1.230131
SIZE 5.119021 5.932752 -.8137307 .5493411

b = Consistent under H0 and Ha; obtained from xtreg.


B = Inconsistent under Ha, efficient under H0; obtained from xtreg.

Test of H0: Difference in coefficients not systematic

chi2(4) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B)
= 3.91
Prob > chi2 = 0.4180

13 . xttest0

Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects

CSR[ID,t] = Xb + u[ID] + e[ID,t]

Estimated results:
Var SD = sqrt(Var)

CSR 503.9897 22.44972


e 69.3337 8.326686
u 189.6923 13.77288

Test: Var(u) = 0
chibar2(01) = 2534.57
Prob > chibar2 = 0.0000

14 . xtserial CSR BGD ROA Lev SIZE

Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data


H0: no first-order autocorrelation
F( 1, 74) = 78.475
Prob > F = 0.0000

15 . xtreg ETR BGD ROA Lev SIZE, fe

Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 899


Group variable: ID Number of groups = 75

R-squared: Obs per group:


Within = 0.0134 min = 11
Between = 0.0017 avg = 12.0
Overall = 0.0018 max = 12

F(4,820) = 2.78
corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.3812 Prob > F = 0.0258

ETR Coefficient Std. err. t P>|t| [95% conf. interval]

BGD .0154514 .0062189 2.48 0.013 .0032445 .0276583


ROA -.7617103 .4339407 -1.76 0.080 -1.613476 .0900551
Lev -.2244193 .6580686 -0.34 0.733 -1.516117 1.067278
SIZE .1142473 .1482516 0.77 0.441 -.1767501 .4052447
_cons -2.49038 3.257699 -0.76 0.445 -8.88479 3.904031

sigma_u .64363035
sigma_e 1.4592195
rho .16286485 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

F test that all u_i=0: F(74, 820) = 1.61 Prob > F = 0.0013
Wednesday April 9 21:22:42 2025 Page 4

16 . estimate store fe

17 . xtreg ETR BGD ROA Lev SIZE, re

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 899


Group variable: ID Number of groups = 75

R-squared: Obs per group:


Within = 0.0007 min = 11
Between = 0.3439 avg = 12.0
Overall = 0.0309 max = 12

Wald chi2(4) = 26.68


corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

ETR Coefficient Std. err. z P>|z| [95% conf. interval]

BGD .0038495 .003886 0.99 0.322 -.0037669 .0114658


ROA 1.08466 .294489 3.68 0.000 .5074725 1.661848
Lev .0584756 .3077504 0.19 0.849 -.5447042 .6616554
SIZE .0698476 .0328935 2.12 0.034 .0053775 .1343178
_cons -1.50628 .6956166 -2.17 0.030 -2.869663 -.1428964

sigma_u .09486396
sigma_e 1.4592195
rho .00420852 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

18 . hausman fe

Coefficients
(b) (B) (b-B) sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B))
fe . Difference Std. err.

BGD .0154514 .0038495 .0116019 .0048554


ROA -.7617103 1.08466 -1.846371 .3187174
Lev -.2244193 .0584756 -.2828949 .5816733
SIZE .1142473 .0698476 .0443997 .1445564

b = Consistent under H0 and Ha; obtained from xtreg.


B = Inconsistent under Ha, efficient under H0; obtained from xtreg.

Test of H0: Difference in coefficients not systematic

chi2(4) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B)
= 46.89
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

19 . xttest0

Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects

ETR[ID,t] = Xb + u[ID] + e[ID,t]

Estimated results:
Var SD = sqrt(Var)

ETR 2.298496 1.516079


e 2.129322 1.459219
u .0089992 .094864

Test: Var(u) = 0
chibar2(01) = 1.78
Prob > chibar2 = 0.0911
Wednesday April 9 21:22:42 2025 Page 5

20 . xtserial ETR BGD ROA Lev SIZE

Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data


H0: no first-order autocorrelation
F( 1, 74) = 18.677
Prob > F = 0.0000

21 . xtreg ETR BGD CSR ROA Lev SIZE, fe

Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 899


Group variable: ID Number of groups = 75

R-squared: Obs per group:


Within = 0.0141 min = 11
Between = 0.0020 avg = 12.0
Overall = 0.0021 max = 12

F(5,819) = 2.34
corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.3675 Prob > F = 0.0405

ETR Coefficient Std. err. t P>|t| [95% conf. interval]

BGD .018019 .0071196 2.53 0.012 .0040441 .0319938


CSR -.0045385 .0061215 -0.74 0.459 -.0165543 .0074772
ROA -.7846631 .4351625 -1.80 0.072 -1.638828 .0695022
Lev -.2291727 .6582805 -0.35 0.728 -1.521288 1.062943
SIZE .1374801 .1515671 0.91 0.365 -.1600256 .4349859
_cons -2.813866 3.287675 -0.86 0.392 -9.267126 3.639395

sigma_u .64040818
sigma_e 1.4596203
rho .16142657 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

F test that all u_i=0: F(74, 819) = 1.61 Prob > F = 0.0013

22 . estimate store fe

23 . xtreg ETR BGD CSR ROA Lev SIZE, re

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 899


Group variable: ID Number of groups = 75

R-squared: Obs per group:


Within = 0.0004 min = 11
Between = 0.3356 avg = 12.0
Overall = 0.0316 max = 12

Wald chi2(5) = 26.84


corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0001

ETR Coefficient Std. err. z P>|z| [95% conf. interval]

BGD .0056017 .0044124 1.27 0.204 -.0030464 .0142498


CSR -.0026257 .0032324 -0.81 0.417 -.0089612 .0037097
ROA 1.044888 .2974017 3.51 0.000 .4619917 1.627785
Lev .0628359 .3093576 0.20 0.839 -.5434938 .6691656
SIZE .0878923 .039737 2.21 0.027 .0100092 .1657753
_cons -1.800338 .785736 -2.29 0.022 -3.340353 -.260324

sigma_u .10765457
sigma_e 1.4596203
rho .0054104 (fraction of variance due to u_i)
Wednesday April 9 21:22:42 2025 Page 6

24 . hausman fe

Coefficients
(b) (B) (b-B) sqrt(diag(V_b-V_B))
fe . Difference Std. err.

BGD .018019 .0056017 .0124173 .0055875


CSR -.0045385 -.0026257 -.0019128 .0051985
ROA -.7846631 1.044888 -1.829551 .317677
Lev -.2291727 .0628359 -.2920086 .5810604
SIZE .1374801 .0878923 .0495879 .1462654

b = Consistent under H0 and Ha; obtained from xtreg.


B = Inconsistent under Ha, efficient under H0; obtained from xtreg.

Test of H0: Difference in coefficients not systematic

chi2(5) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B)
= 46.43
Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

25 . xttest0

Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier test for random effects

ETR[ID,t] = Xb + u[ID] + e[ID,t]

Estimated results:
Var SD = sqrt(Var)

ETR 2.298496 1.516079


e 2.130492 1.45962
u .0115895 .1076546

Test: Var(u) = 0
chibar2(01) = 1.85
Prob > chibar2 = 0.0871

26 . xtserial ETR BGD CSR ROA Lev SIZE

Wooldridge test for autocorrelation in panel data


H0: no first-order autocorrelation
F( 1, 74) = 18.663
Prob > F = 0.0000

27 . log close
name: <unnamed>
log: C:\Users\user\Downloads\résultat leila V2.smcl
log type: smcl
closed on: 25 Mar 2025, 17:47:50

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy