I.M Chapter VI - Price Decision - 2
I.M Chapter VI - Price Decision - 2
A firm's pricing system and policies must also be consistent with other
unique global constraints. Those responsible for global pricing decisions
must take into account international transportation costs, middlemen in
elongated international channels of distribution, and the demands of global
accounts for equal price treatment regardless of location. In addition to the
diversity of national markets in all three basic dimensions-cost, competition,
and demand-the international executive is also confronted by conflicting
governmental tax policies and claims as well as various types of price
controls. These include dumping legislation, resale price maintenance
legislation, price ceilings, and general reviews of price levels. For example,
Procter & Gamble (P&G) encountered strict price controls in Venezuela in
the late 1980. Despite increases in the cost of raw materials, P&G was
granted only about 50 percent of the price increases it requested; even
then, months passed before permission to raise prices was forthcoming. As
a result, by 1988 detergent prices in Venezuela were less than what they
were elsewhere.
The low-wage strategy option should never become a formula, however. The
problem with shifting production to a low-wage country is that it provides a
one-time advantage. This is no substitute for ongoing innovation in creating
value.
Dumping
Dumping is an important global pricing strategy issue. GATT's 1979
Antidumping Code defined dumping as the sale of an imported product at a
price lower than that nominally charged in a domestic market or country of
origin in addition, many countries have their own policies and procedures
for protecting national companies from dumping. There are several types of
dumping: sporadic, predatory, persistent, and reverse.
Sporadic dumping occur when a manufacturer with unsold inventories
warts to get rid of distressed and excess merchandise. To preserve its
competitive position at home, the manufacturer must avoid starting a price
war that could harm its home market. One way to find a solution involves
destroying excess supplies, as in the example of Asian farmers dumping
small chickens in the sea or burning them. Another way to solve the
problem is to cut losses by selling for any price that can be realized. The
excess supply is dumped abroad in a market where tee product is normally
not sold.
Transfer Pricing
Transfer pricing refers to the pricing of goods and service bought and sold
by operating units or divisions of a single company. In other words, transfer
pricing concerns intra-corporate exchanges-transactions between buyers
and sellers that have the same corporate parent. As companies expand and
create decentralized operations, profit centers become an increasingly
important component in the overall corporate financial picture. Appropriate
intra-corporate transfer pricing systems and policies are required to ensure
profitability at each level. There are three major alternative approaches to
transfer pricing. The approach used will vary with the nature of the firm,
products, markets, and the historical circumstances of each case. The
alternatives are:
1) Cost-Based Transfer Pricing: Because companies define costs
differently, some companies using the cost-based approach may arrive
at transfer prices that reflect variable and fixed manufacturing costs
only. Alternatively, transfer prices may be based-on full costs,
including overhead costs from marketing, research and development
(R&D), and other functional areas. The way costs are defined may
have an impact on tariffs and duties on sales to affiliates and
subsidiaries by global companies. Cost-plus pricing is a variation of
the cost-based approach. Companies that follow the cost-plus pricing
method are taking the position that profit must be shown for any
product or service at every stage of movement through the corporate
system. While cost-plus pricing may result in a price that is
completely unrelated to competitive or demand conditions in
international markets, many exporters use this approach successfully.
2) Market-Based Transfer Price: A market based transfer price is
derived from the price required to be competitive in the international
market. The constraint on this price is cost. However, as noted
previously, there is a considerable degree of variation in how costs
are defined. Because costs generally decline with volume, a decision
must be made regarding whether to price on the basis of current or
planned volume levels. To use market-based transfer prices to enter a
new market that is too small to support local manufacturing, third-
country sourcing may be required. This enables a company to
establish its name or franchise in the market without committing to a
major capital investment.
3) Negotiated Transfer Prices: A third alternative is to allow the
organization's affiliates to negotiate transfer prices among
themselves. In some instances, the final transfer price may reflect
costs and market prices, but this is not a requirement. The gold
standard of negotiated transfer prices is known as an arm's-length
price: the price that two independent, unrelated entities would
negotiate.
Cartels
A cartel exists when various companies producing similar products or
services work together to control markets for the types of goods and
services they produce. The cartel association may use formal agreements to
set prices, establish levels of production and sales for the participating
companies, allocate market territories, and even redistribute profits. In
some instances, the cartel organization itself takes over the entire selling
function, sells the goods of all the producers and distributes the profits. The
economic role of cartels is highly debatable, but their proponents argue that
they eliminate cutthroat competition and “rationalize” business, permitting
greater technical progress and lower prices to consumers. However, in the
view of most experts, it is doubtful that the consumer benefits very often
from cartels.
2) Forms of payment
The four basic forms of payment arrangement are practiced in international
marketing:
a) Letter of credit: Worldwide, letters of credit are very important
mode of payment. The letter of credit is an undertaking by a bank, so
the seller can look to the bank for payment instead of relying on the
ability of willingness of buyers to pay. Letters of credit shift the
buyer’s credit risk to the bank issuing the letter of credit. When a
letter of credit is employed the seller ordinarily can draw a draft
against the bank issuing the letter of credit and receive payments by
presenting proper shipping documents. Except for cash in advance
letters of credit afford the greatest degree of protection for the seller.
The Procedure for a letter of credit begins with completion of the
contract when the buyer goes to a local bank and arranges for the
issuance of a letter of credit, the buyer’s bank then notify its
correspondent bank in seller’s country that the letter has been issued.
After meeting the requirements set forth in the letter of credit the
seller can draw a draft against the credit (in effect, the bank issuing
the letter) for payment of the goods. The precise conditions of the
letter of credit require presentation of certain documents with the
draft before the correspondent bank will honor it.
b) Bills of exchange: - A bill of exchange is defined as an unconditional
order in writing, addressed by one person to another signed by the
person giving it requiring the person to whom it is addressed to pay
on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time, a certain sum in
money to, or to the order of a specified person or the bearer. The
exporter draws a bill of exchange on an overseas buyer or third party
as designated in the export contract for the sum agreed. When the
customer signs it, it becomes accepted and this means that the
customer has accepted the terms and agreed to pay by the date
designated in the document. In letters of credit, the credit of one or
more bank is involved and the seller risk is reduced considerably but
in the use of bills of exchange the seller assumes all risk until the
actual payment is received. Bills of exchange have one of three time
periods- sight, arrival or date. A sight draft requires acceptance and
payment on presentation of the draft and often before arrival of the
goods. An arrival draft requires payment be made on arrival of goods.
Unlike the other two, a date draft has an exact date of payment and in
no way is affected by the movement of good. There may be time
designations placed on sight and arrival drafts stipulating a fixed
number of days after acceptance when the obligation must be paid
usually this period is 30 to 120 days, thus providing a means of
extending credit to the foreign buyer. For exporters a sight bill would
be preferred to a time bill, as it would delay payment once the goods
had already been delivered.
c) Cash payment in advance: Cash places unpopular burden on the
customer and typically is used where buyer is unknown or known to
be unstable and there is little likelihood of further orders being
requested and being paid for. It is also used when exchange
restrictions within the country of destination are such that the return
of funds from abroad may be delayed for an unreasonable period.
Usually, when the character of the merchandise is such that an
incomplete contract can result in heavy loss-like complicated
machinery or equipment manufactured to specification or special
design would necessitate advance payment which would be in fact a
non refundable deposit.
d) Open account: Sales on open accounts are not generally made in
foreign trade except to customers of long standing with excellent
credit reputations or to a subsidiary or branch of the exporter. As this
is based purely on trust, it offers the least security to the exporter. It
saves money and procedural difficulties but increases risk. It is
popular within EU.