THE EEFFECTIVENESS OF SPECIALIZED SUBJECTS IN RELATION TO WORK

IMMERSION PERFORMANCE OF GRADE 12 ABM STUDENTS FOR THE S.Y. 2022-2023

A Quantitative Research
presented to the Faculty of Limay Senior High School
Duale, Limay, Bataan

In Partial Fulfillment
of the Subject Requirements in
Inquiry, Investigation, and Immersion

Broncano, Angela Love V.

Diwa, Jenna B.
Logro, Kim Felicity C.
Lopez, Jelainne A.
Obero, Mitzy Sam Y.
Tan, Justin M.

ABM 12-A

Date of Completion
April 26, 2024
 Chapter IV

PRESENTATION ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This section provides a comprehensive collection of data obtained from the

administered questionnaires to the student participants. The data was organized,
examined, and interpreted to measure the level of understanding of Grade 12 ABM
students about the relevance of specialized subjects to their work immersion
performance. The analysis of the significant correlation between the students’
profiles and their understanding has also been discussed in line with the specific
issues mentioned in the first chapter. This analysis is pertinent to the academic year
2022-2023.

How may the profile of the respondents be described in terms of sex, age,
section, socio-economic, number of hours in work immersion, and work Immersion
venue?

Table 1

Measurements of Respondents Sex

Gender Frequency Percentage Rank

MALE 13 26% 2
FEMALE 37 74% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The table the sex of the respondents involved in the study. As provided in the
table above, the collected data shows that 13 respondents or 26%, are male, while
37 respondents, or 74%, are female. Therefore, It can be concluded that the
respondents are more female than male.
 Table 2

Age of the Respondents

Age Frequency Percentage Rank

16 years old and
below 0 0% 3
17 to 20 years old 43 86% 1
21 and above 7 14% 2
TOTAL 50 100%

According to table 2, 86% of the respondents has the age of 17-20answered

the questionnaire, 14% from the age of 21 and above and 0% from the age of 16 and
below. Therefore, most of our respondents came from 17- 20 of age and answered
our questionnaire.

Table 3

Section of the Respondents

SECTION FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANK

ABM -A 16 32% 2
ABM -B 23 46% 1
ABM -C 11 22% 3
TOTAL 50 100%

Table 3 provides information on the gender distribution of the respondents

participating in the study. According to the data presented, 16 or 32% of the
respondents , belong to the Accountancy, Business, and Management (ABM) strand
section A. Meanwhile 23 or 46% are from ABM B, and 11 or equivalent to 22% are
from ABM C.

The analysis of data reveals that ABM B has the highest number of
respondents, comprising 23 or 46% of the total sample, while ABM C has the lowest
respondents, 11 or 22%.
 TABLE 4

SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS OF THE RESPONDENTS

SOCIO ECONOMIC FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANK

STATUS
Lower Class 7 14% 2
Middle Class 40 80% 1
Upper Class 3 6% 3
TOTAL 50 100%

Table 4 shows that 80% of the respondents that answered our questionnaire
are from middle class, 14% from lower class and 6% from upper class. Therefore
most of the socio-economic status of our respondents is in middle class.

TABLE 5

NUMBER OF OURS IN WORK IMMERSION OF THE RESPONDENTS

Number of hours Frequency PERCENTAGE RANK

in work immersion
40-60 HOURS 12 24% 2
61-80 HOURS 34 68% 1
81 HOURS ABOVE 4 8% 3
TOTAL 50 100%

Table 5 shows 68% of the respondents has experience 61-80 hours in work
immersion, 24% has experience to 40-60 hours in work immersion and 8% taken 81
hours above. Therefore most of the respondents under take 61-80 hours in work
immersion because it has 68%.

TABLE 6

WORK IMMERSION VENUE

VENUE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE RANK

HOTEL 0 0% 5
BANK 1 2% 4
 FACTORIES 1 2% 3
OFFICES 34 68% 1
OTHERS 14 28% 2
TOTAL 50 100%

Table 6 shows that 68% of our respondents conducted in offices, 28%

conducted on other places that’s not in the said choices, while 2% of our
respondents does their work immersion in bank and factories. Therefore most of our
respondents work immersion venue is in offices.

TABLE 7

KNOWLEDGE (Question 1)

QUESTION 1 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 3.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 3.5
3 Merely Agree 0 0% 3.5
4 Agree 21 42% 2
5 Strongly Agree 29 58% 1
TOTAL 50 100

The highest percentage gathered is 58% which is categorized as strongly agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as moderately
agree, disagree and strongly disagree.

TABLE 8

KNOWLEDGE (Question 2)

QUESTION 2 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 5
Disagree
2 Disagree 1 2% 4
3 Merely Agree 4 8% 3
4 Agree 14 28 % 2
5 Strongly Agree 31 62% 1
TOTAL 50 100%
 The highest percentage gathered is 62% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.
Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Strongly
Disagree.

TABLE 9

KNOWLEDGE (Question 3)

QUESTION 3 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 4 8% 3
4 Agree 19 38% 2
5 Strongly Agree 27 54% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 54% which is categorized as strongly agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 10
KNOWLEDGE ( Question 4 )
QUESTION 4 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK
1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 20 40% 1
4 Agree 14 28% 3
5 Strongly Agree 16 32% 2
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 40% which is categorized as merely agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 11

KNOWLEDGE (Question 5 )

QUESTION 5 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

 1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 2 4% 3
4 Agree 19 38% 2
5 Strongly Agree 29 58% 1
TOTAL 50 100

The highest percentage gathered is 58% which is categorized as strongly agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 12

PRACTICAL APPLICATION (Question 1 )

QUESTION 1 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 3.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 3.5
3 Merely Agree 4 8% 2
4 Agree 23 46% 1.5
5 Strongly Agree 23 46% 1.5
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 46% which is categorized as Strongly Agree and
Agree. Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as
Disagree and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 13

PRACTICAL APPLICATION (Question 2 )

QUESTION 2 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
 3 Merely Agree 4 8% 3
4 Agree 19 38% 2
5 Strongly Agree 28 56% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 56% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 14

PRACTICAL APPLICATION (Question 3 )

QUESTION 3 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 4 8% 3
4 Agree 21 42% 2
5 Strongly Agree 25 50% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 50% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 15

PRACTICAL APPLICATION (Question 4 )

QUESTION 4 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 3 6% 3
4 Agree 20 40% 2
 5 Strongly Agree 27 54% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 54% which is categorized as Strongly

Agree .Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as
Disagree and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 16

PRACTICAL APPLICATION (Question 5 )

QUESTION 5 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 2 4% 3
4 Agree 13 26% 2
5 Strongly Agree 35 70% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 70% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 17
 PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITIES (Question 1 )

QUESTION 1 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 8 16% 3
4 Agree 15 30% 2
5 Strongly Agree 27 54% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 54% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 18

PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITIES (Question 2 )

QUESTION 2 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 3 6% 3
4 Agree 20 40% 2
5 Strongly Agree 27 54% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 58% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 19

PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITIES (Question 3 )

 QUESTION 3 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK
1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 6 12% 3
4 Agree 19 32% 2
5 Strongly Agree 25 50% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 50% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 20

PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITIES (Question 4 )

QUESTION 4 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 6 12% 3
4 Agree 20 40% 2
5 Strongly Agree 26 52% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 52% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 21

PROBLEM SOLVING ABILITIES (Question 5 )

QUESTION 5 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
 Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 4 8% 3
4 Agree 20 40% 2
5 Strongly Agree 26 52% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 52% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 22

WORK IMMERSION GRADE ( Question 1 )

CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

QUESTION 1
1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 4 8% 3
4 Agree 13 26% 2
5 Strongly Agree 33 66% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 66% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 23

WORK IMMERSION GRADE ( Question 2 )

QUESTION 2 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
 3 Merely Agree 2 4% 3
4 Agree 17 34% 2
5 Strongly Agree 31 62% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 62% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 24

WORK IMMERSION GRADE ( Question 3 )

QUESTION 3 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 2 4% 3
4 Agree 21 42% 2
5 Strongly Agree 27 54% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 54% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 25

WORK IMMERSION GRADE ( Question 4 )

QUESTION 4 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 7 35% 3
4 Agree 23 46% 2
 5 Strongly Agree 24 48% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 48% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 26

WORK IMMERSION GRADE ( Question 5 )

QUESTION 5 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 3 6% 3
4 Agree 12 24% 2
5 Strongly Agree 36 72% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 72% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 27

READINESS (Question 1 )

QUESTION 1 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 2 4% 3
4 Agree 17 34% 2
5 Strongly Agree 31 62% 1
TOTAL 50 100%
 The highest percentage gathered is 62% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.
Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 28

READINESS (Question 2 )

QUESTION 2 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 1 2% 3
4 Agree 21 42% 2
5 Strongly Agree 28 56% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 56% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Meanwhile the lowest percentage gathered id 0% which is categorize as Disagree and
Strongly Disagree.

TABLE 29

READINESS (Question 3 )

QUESTION 2 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 3 6% 3
4 Agree 16 32% 2
5 Strongly Agree 31 62% 1
TOTAL 50 100%
 The highest percentage gathered is 62% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.
Mean while the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree

TABLE 30

READINESS (Question 4 )

QUESTION 4 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 5
Disagree
2 Disagree 1 2% 4
3 Merely Agree 3 6% 3
4 Agree 17 34% 2
5 Strongly Agree 29 58% 1
TOTAL 50 100%

The highest percentage gathered is 58% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.

Mean while the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree

TABLE 31

READINESS (Question 5 )

QUESTION 5 CATEGORY TOTAL PERCENTAGE RANK

1 Strongly 0 0% 4.5
Disagree
2 Disagree 0 0% 4.5
3 Merely Agree 3 6% 3
4 Agree 20 40% 2
5 Strongly Agree 27 54% 1
TOTAL 50 100%
 The highest percentage gathered is 54% which is categorized as Strongly Agree.
Mean while the lowest percentage gathered is 0% which is categorized as Disagree
and Strongly Disagree

How may the effectiveness of specialized subjects on the work immersion

performance described in terms of knowledge, practical application, problem-
solving abilities, work immersion grade, and readiness?

TABLE 32

Descriptive Measures of Respondents’ effectiveness of specialized subjects in to

their work immersion performance in terms of Knowledge

Preventive Measures Mean Descriptive Rating

1. I have enough knowledge that has 4.49 Strongly Agree

been instrumental in performing tasks
during my work Immersion.

2. I apply the concepts learned to my 4.50 Strongly Agree

practical situations I encountered
during work immersion.

3.I have a strong knowledge 4.46 Strongly Agree

foundation that directly applies to my
work immersion.

4. I have knowledge that significantly 4.50 Strongly Agree

contributed to my overall
performance during work immersion.

5. I am equipped with the knowledge 3.92 Agree

to navigate challenges in the work
environment during my immersion.

Mean 4.37

Descriptive Equivalent Strongly Agree

As shown in the table, It's about the students’ effectiveness of specialized

subjects in to their work immersion performance in terms of Knowledge with the
average mean of 4.32 (Strongly Agree). The highest mean gathered is 4.50 which
shows the students strongly agree that they applied the concepts learned to their
practical situations they encountered during work immersion and students' also
strongly agree that they have knowledge that significantly contributed to their overall
performance during work immersion. Meanwhile the lowest mean gathered is 4.46
which shows the students strongly agree in having a strong knowledge foundation
that directly applies to their work immersion.

TABLE 33

Descriptive Measures of Respondents’ effectiveness of specialized subjects in to

their work immersion performance in terms of Practical Application

Preventive Measures Mean Descriptive Rating

1. I have skills that apply to real-world 4.28 Strongly Agree

situations during my work immersion.

2. I use the principles learned from 4.56 Strongly Agree

specialized subjects in practical
scenarios encountered during work
immersion.

3. I am provided with practical skills 4.42 Strongly Agree

directly applicable to my work
immersion experience.

4. I am equipped with the necessary 4.48 Strongly Agree

skills to perform tasks during work
immersion effectively.

5. I apply my learned skills to improve 4.66 Strongly Agree

my performance during work
immersion.

Mean 4.48

Descriptive Equivalent Strongly Agree

As shown in the table, It's about the students' effectiveness of specialized subjects
in to their work immersion performance in terms of Practical Application with the
average mean of 4.48 ( Strongly Agree). The highest mean gathered is 4.66 which
shows the students strongly agree that they applied their learned skills to improve
their performance during work immersion. Meanwhile the lowest mean gathered is
4.28 which shows the students strongly agree in having skills that applied to the real-
world situations during their work immersion.
 TABLE 34

Descriptive Measures of Respondents’ effectiveness of specialized subjects in to

their work immersion performance in terms of Problem-Solving Abilities

Preventive Measures Mean Descriptive Rating

1. I understand how to apply 4.38 Strongly Agree

problem-solving techniques to real-
world situations during work
immersion.

2. I am confident in my ability to 4.34 Strongly Agree

analyze complex problems
encountered during work immersion.

3. I have the skills to tackle challenges 4.38 Strongly Agree

to find innovative solutions.

4. I can overcome obstacle with skills 4.36 Strongly Agree

in problem solving in work
immersion.

5. I am prepared to handle problem- 4.44 Strongly Agree

solving tasks during work immersion.

Mean 4.38

Descriptive Equivalent Strongly Agree

As shown in the table, It's about the students' effectiveness of specialized subjects
in to their work immersion performance in terms of Problem-Solving Abilities with
the average mean of 4.38 ( Strongly Agree ). The highest mean gathered is 4.44
which shows that students strongly agree that they are prepared to handle problem
solving task during work immersion. Meanwhile the lowest mean gathered is 4.34
which shows that students strongly agree in being confident in their ability to
analyze complex problems encountered during work immersion.
 TABLE 35

Descriptive Measures of Respondents’ effectiveness of specialized subjects in to

their work immersion performance in terms of Work Immersion Grade

Preventive Measures Mean Descriptive Rating

1. I believe that specialized subjects 4.58 Strongly Agree

have significantly improved my
overall grades during work
immersion.

2. I can able to contribute a higher 4.58 Strongly Agree

grades with my work immersion skills.

3. I am given a competitive edge, 4.50 Strongly Agree

resulting in better grades in work
immersion.

4. I feel that the specialized subjects 4.66 Strongly Agree

have a noticeable impact on my
grades during work immersion

5. I am prepared to achieve satisfying 4.74 Strongly Agree

grades in work immersion with
specialized subjects.

Mean 4.61

Descriptive Equivalent Strongly Agree

As shown in the table, It's about students' effectiveness of specialized subjects

in to their work immersion performance in terms of Work Immersion Grade with the
average mean of 4.61 ( Strongly Agree ). The highest mean gathered is 4.74 which
shows that the students strongly agree in being prepared to achieve satisfying grades
in work immersion with specialized subjects. Meanwhile the lowest mean gathered is
4.50 which shows that the students strongly agree that they are given a competitive
edge, resulting in better grades in work immersion.

TABLE 36
 Descriptive Measures of Respondents’ effectiveness of specialized subjects in to
their work immersion performance in terms of Readiness

Preventive Measures Mean Descriptive Rating

1. I am prepared for the challenges 4.58 Strongly Agree

and demands of work immersion.

2. I have skills and knowledge from 4.60 Strongly Agree

specialized subjects that significantly
contribute to my readiness for work
immersion

3. I have a solid foundation and 4.56 Strongly Agree

confidence to excel in the work
immersion setting.

4. I believe that specialized subjects 4.48 Strongly Agree

significantly prepare me for the
practical aspects of work immersion.

5. I am adequately equipped with the 4.48 Strongly Agree

necessary readiness for work
immersion.

Mean 4.54

Descriptive Equivalent Strongly Agree

As shown in the table, It's about students' effectiveness of specialized subjects

in to their work immersion performance in terms of Readiness with the average
mean of 4.54 ( Strongly Agree). The highest mean gathered is 4.60 which shows that
students strongly agree in having skills and knowledge from specialized subjects that
significantly contribute to their readiness for work immersion. Meanwhile the lowest
mean gathered is 4.48 which shows that students strongly agree that they believed
that specialized subjects significantly prepare them for the practical aspects of work
immersion and they are adequately equipped with the necessary readiness for work
immersion.

TABLE 37
Summary of the Total Mean of the Effectiveness of Specialized Subjects in Relation
to Work Immersion Performance of the Students

Variables Mean

Knowledge 4.37

Practical Application 4.48

Problem-Solving Abilities 4.38

Work Immersion Grade 4.61

Readiness 4.54

Total Mean 4.4

The highest mean among the variable is 4.61 which is categorized as Work
immersion grade. This clearly shows that students have the highest proficiency
concerning in their work immersion grade.

According to Dela cruz et. al (2019) The Business Institutions they will possibly
deploy the students and what tasks to be done in that department. Likewise Senior
High Schools should work hand in hand in studying and exploring the performance of
the students. Trainers must also explain to the students their evaluation regarding
the students' core competencies and stress out their strengths and weaknesses so
that in return the students may become aware of these must also discuss to Senior
High Schools after the Work Immersion their evaluation and observation about the
students and not only let the evaluation form speaks for them. In this way, they can
come up with strategies or ways to educate and develop the students who were
subjected to the Work Immersion. This study proved that we can see the
effectiveness of specialized subject in relation to work immersion program of the
students in terms of work immersion grade.
Is there significant relationship between the profile of the students and
specialized subjects towards their work immersion performance of the students?

TABLE 38

Relationship between the Profile of the the Students and the Effectiveness of
Specialized Subjects in to their Work Immersion Performance

Profile of Students’ Work Immersion Performance Mean

the Grade
Knowledge Practical Problem- Work Readiness
Students
Application Solving Immersio
Abilities n Grade

Sex - 0.0776* - 0.0776* - 0.1402* - 0.0842* - 0.0857* -0.0931*

Age - 0.0378** - 0.0378** - 0.1161* 0.0685* - 0.0811* -0.0409**

Section 0.1475* 0.1475* -0.0243** 0.0891* -0.0242** 0.0671*

Socio- 0.1191* 0.1191* 0.1028* 0.2099* 0.1002* 0.1302*

economic
Status

Number of - 0.0483** - 0.0483** 0.0886* 0.2783* 0.0504* 0.0641*

Hours in
Work
Immersion

Work - 0.1275* - 0.1275* - 0.2918* - 0.4355* -0.3161** -0.2597*

Immersion
Venue

P -value -0.0041** -0.0246** -0..3810* 0.1261* -0.3565*

P ≤ 0.01 correlation is highly significant

P ≤ correlation is significant
 As shown in table 38, the result indicated that Knowledge, Practical Application,
Problem-Solving Abilities, Work Immersion Grade, and Readiness were founded
significantly related to sex. On the other hand, Knowledge, Practical Application,
Problem-Solving Abilities, Work Immersion Grade, and Readiness was found highly
significant related to age and work immersion venue. In terms of sex, it was found
highly significant related to problem solving and readiness. Hence, as shown in the
table above, work immersion grade was found significant to the profile of the
students. Lastly, Knowledge, Practical Application, Problem-Solving Abilities and
Readiness were found highly significant related to the profile of the students.
 Notes in Chapter 4

Dela cruz et. al (2019) An Assessment of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes of

Accountancy Business and Management (ABM) Students of Senior High Schools
 CHAPTER V

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary

This chapter includes a summary of the research findings, conclusions, and

suggestions based on the study's findings, which were obtained from the problem
statement offered in chapter 1 of this investigation.

This study determined the effectiveness of specialized subject in relation to

work immersion.

The general problem of the study is “How may the effectiveness of

specialized subjects in relation to the work immersion performance of Grade 12 ABM
students at Limay Senior High School, School Year 2022-2023 be determined?”

Specifically, the study sought answers to the following questions:

1. How may the profile of the respondent be described in terms of:

1.1 Sex;

1.2 Age;

1.3 Section
1.4 Socio-economic Status;
1.5 Number of Hours in Work Immersion; and
1.6 Work Immersion Venue?

2. How can the effectiveness of specialized subjects on the work immersion

performance of students be described in terms of:

2.1 Knowledge;

2.2. Practical Application;

2.3 Problem-Solving Abilities;

 2.4. Work Immersion Grade; and

2.5 Readiness

3. Is there a significant relationship between specialized subjects and the work

immersion performance of Grade 12 Accountancy Business and Management
students at Limay Senior High School?

4. What are the implications of the study?

The respondent of this study were the 50 students from the total population
of students of ABM in Limay Senior High School which are taken randomly. Frequency
and percentage distribution were used to present the profile of the students in terms
of their age, sex, section, socio-economic status, number of hours in work
immersion, work immersion venue. On the other hand, descriptive rating will be
used to determine the effectiveness of specialized subjects on the work immersion
on students concerning knowledge, practical application, problem-solving abilities,
work immersion grade, and readiness.
For the data gathering purposes, the study used researcher made
questionnaires. These tests meant to assess the effectiveness of specialized subjects
on the work immersion among students in their knowledge, practical application,
problem-solving abilities, work immersion grade, and readiness.
The devised research instruments were administered, a dry run or pilot test
was conducted to ensure the instruments' content validity.
In the gathering pertinent data in this study, structured questionnaire was
used. The questionnaire for the current study was designed to measure the
effectiveness of specialized subjects of the students about work immersion and of
which consists of two parts.
Part I is contains the information of the respondents.
Part II is divided into 8 definition of terms for the different criteria namely:
Age, Average grade, Financial stability, List of specialized subjects, Numbers of hours
in work immersion, Sex, Work immersion venue, and Work immersion attributes.
 The pertinent data were treated with the most fitted statistical tool or
treatment in order to unlock the problem involved in this study. The data were
tabulated, analyzed and presented through the appropriate statistical tools.
Summary of Findings

Using the light of the foregoing findings, The findings of the study can summarize as
follows:

1. The profile of the respondent which is described in terms of:

Most of the students in Limay Senior High School that under go work
immersion are find it effective on their specialized subjects. Most students that
undergo work immersion is from section ABM-C which is 46%.On the other hand,
74% of the total sample size are female. The highest mean among the variables is the
work immersion grade, therefore, it has the highest effectiveness of work immersion
into their specialized subjects.

2. The students’ effectiveness of specialized subjects in to their work immersion

performance which us described in terms of:

From the computed mean of 4.37, students “ Strongly Agree “ in

effectiveness of specialized subjects in to their work immersion performance in terms
of Knowledge. From the computed mean of 4.48, students “ Strongly Agree “ in
effectiveness of specialized subjects in to their work immersion performance in terms
of Practical Application. From the computed mean of 4.38, students “ Strongly Agree
“ in effectiveness of specialized subjects in to their work immersion performance in
terms of Problem-Solving Abilities. From the computed mean of 4.61, students
“Strongly Agree “ in effectiveness of specialized subjects in to their work immersion
performance in terms of Work Immersion Grade. From the computed mean of 4.54,
students “ Strongly Agree “ in effectiveness of specialized subjects in to their work
immersion performance in terms of Readiness. The highest mean among the
variables is Descriptive measures with descriptive equivalent of “Strongly Agree”.
Most students finds the Descriptive Measures of students’ effectiveness of
specialized subjects in to their work immersion performance in terms of Work
Immersion Grade. Hence, The Work immersion grade has the highest effect on
students work immersion performance.
3. The difference in the profile of the students and the effectiveness of specialized
subject on the work immersion performance of students. The findings show that
Work immersion grade was found significant to the profile of the students with a P-
value of 0.1261 Also, Knowledge(0.0024), Practical application (0.0246), Problem
solving abilities (0.3810), and Readiness (0.3565) were found highly significant to the
profile of the respondents. The statistical value gathered is 0.008 hence, the null
hypothesis is rejected.

4. The Implications of the study

The probability of students joining in work immersion will increase because of the
high level of the effectiveness of specialized subjects in relation to Limay Senior High
School Students' work immersion.

Conclusion

In the light of the foregoing findings, the following conclusion are hereby drawn:

1. The null hypothesis is therefore rejected. Hence there is significant difference in

effectiveness of specialized subjects in relation to work immersion performance of
the students in Limay Senior High School.

Recommendations

In the light of the foregoing findings, the following recommendations are hereby
drawn:

1. Students in Limay Senior High School under the strand Accountancy Business and
Management are moderately have enough knowledge as shown on the findings with
a total of 29 respondents at a percentage of 58% of the total sample size. The
researchers recommend the students to maintain the knowledge through work
immersion.

2. Students in Limay Senior High School under the strand Accountancy Business and
Management have skill that they have apply in there work immersion. The
researchers recommend the students to have additional experience and knowledge.