Cerezer Et Al 2022 Springer
Cerezer Et Al 2022 Springer
Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Species Richness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Compositional Dissimilarity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Species Richness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Compositional Dissimilarity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Species Richness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Compositional Dissimilarity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Cross-References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Abstract
Understanding the causes of spatial variation in biodiversity is a prominent issue
in ecology and biogeography. Here, the species richness and the change in the
species composition (beta diversity) of American marsupials were mapped and
the main predictors underlying these diversity patterns were investigated. Species
distribution maps covering the American continent were obtained from the IUCN
F. O. Cerezer (*)
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Departamento de Ecologia e Evolução,
Centro de Ciências Naturais e Exatas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
e-mail: cerezerfelipe@gmail.com
N. C. Cáceres
Departamento de Ecologia e Evolução, CCNE, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria,
Brazil
A. Baselga
Depto de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Univ. de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de
Compostela, Spain
and mapped onto grid cells of 1 by 1 . For each grid cell, species richness and
species composition were quantified and climatic/environmental variables eco-
logically relevant for marsupials (e.g., energy and seasonality) were extracted.
Then, structural equation models were used to analyze the association between
species richness and predictor variables. Models of distance decay of similarity
and variance partitioning were applied to evaluate whether beta diversity (com-
positional dissimilarity) in the northern and southern hemispheres is related to
geographic or climatic distances. We show that energy availability and climatic
seasonality measures are the best predictors of the latitudinal cline in marsupial
species richness. We also recorded a latitudinal asymmetry in beta diversity in
which communities in the southern hemisphere exhibit a distinct species compo-
sition from those of the northern hemisphere and the contribution of geographic
and climatic distances differed between these regions of the Americas.
Keywords
Small mammals · Diversity gradients · Macroecology · Turnover component ·
Distance-decay · Structural equation
Abbreviations
FVS Forest vertical structure
IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature
NPP Net primary productivity
PCoA Principal coordinate analysis
Pmin Precipitation of driest month
SEM Structural equation models
Tmean Annual mean temperature
Tmin Minimum temperature of coldest month
βjac Jaccard dissimilarity index
βjne Nestedness-resultant dissimilarities
βjtu Spatial turnover
ΔP Precipitation seasonality
ΔT Temperature seasonality
Introduction
Across many animal taxa, the large-scale patterns in species richness have
generally been attributed to spatial variations in climatic conditions (Currie et al.
2004). Due to the ubiquity of the climate-diversity relationship (Hawkins et al.
2003a), different mechanisms have been widely proposed: (i) the “evolutionary
speed hypothesis” suggests that higher temperatures in the tropics may accelerate
metabolic processes (Brown et al. 2004), increasing the rates of molecular evolution
and speciation (Allen et al. 2006); (ii) the “more-individuals hypothesis” predicts
that more productive areas can support more individuals, which would allow the
co-existence of more species with viable populations due to the reduced stochastic
extinctions (Storch et al. 2018); (iii) the “climatic stability hypothesis” states that
seasonality associated with climate may indicate environmental instability, promot-
ing extinction or forcing species to develop broader niches (Evans et al. 2005);
(iv) the “climatic tolerance hypothesis” suggests that colder and drier environments
are physiologically stressful and few species can tolerate these conditions (Evans
et al. 2005). Alternatively, several previous studies have also shown that environ-
mental heterogeneity, such as topographic complexity and forest vertical structure,
are important forces influencing spatial variation in species richness (Gouveia et al.
2014; Rahbek et al. 2019). Therefore, it is reasonable to argue that the above
hypotheses are not mutually exclusive and that they can interact to maintain latitu-
dinal gradients of species richness.
Although most macroecological studies focus exclusively on processes that drive
the number of species in a given area, recent efforts have been directed to investigate
how species composition varies along spatial and environmental gradients (i.e., beta
diversity – differences in species composition; Tuomisto 2010). Approaches that
include differences in species composition between areas can provide additional
information that is difficult to capture using only species richness. Changes in
species composition among sites may be a reflection of community assembly
mechanisms (Nekola and White 1999; Soininen et al. 2007), which are related to:
(i) purely deterministic processes including selection imposed by environmental
heterogeneity (environmental filtering); (ii) purely stochastic processes including
random birth-death events and spatially restricted dispersal; (iii) interaction between
these two processes, resulting in a continuum from purely deterministic to purely
stochastic. Additionally, the relative contribution of deterministic and stochastic
processes has been shown to vary along with space depending on abiotic conditions
and taxonomic groups (Chase and Myers 2011). Thus, patterns of beta diversity and
the importance of space and climate for those patterns can vary across regions
(e.g., hemispheres) due to particular events, such as disturbance, evolutionary
history, climatic, and geographic changes over time (Dunn et al. 2009; Castro-
Insua et al. 2016).
Extant American marsupials radiated mostly in the isolated South American
continent during the Cenozoic and only recently invaded the Central and North
America during the Great American Interchange (Willig and Gannon 1997;
Sánchez-Villagra 2013; Goin et al. 2016). Approximately 130 species of American
marsupials are currently recognized within the orders Didelphimorphia,
Paucituberculata, and Microbiotheria (Astúa et al. 2022). The vast majority of
4 F. O. Cerezer et al.
species are endemic to South America and represented mainly by Didelphidae (Jansa
et al. 2014). With representatives in the three Americas, American marsupials exhibit
a wide geographic distribution, ranging from lowland tropical rainforests to xeric,
arid environments (Gardner 2008). They also show a broad adaptive spectrum to the
environment in which they occur (Charles-Dominique 1983; Bubadué et al. 2019;
Cerezer et al. 2020). However, despite the conspicuous morphological and ecolog-
ical diversity, studies attempting to explain the drivers of species richness and beta
diversity in American marsupials are scarce (e.g., Willig and Gannon 1997; Figuei-
redo and Grelle 2018).
Here spatial patterns of American marsupial species richness were mapped and
the influence of multiple candidate variables related to energy, seasonality, and
environmental heterogeneity were investigated. We also examined the spatial pat-
terns on taxonomic beta diversity (here compositional dissimilarity) and quantified
to what extent the beta diversity is related to geographic (e.g., dispersal limitation)
and climatic (e.g., adaptation) distances between communities in the southern and
northern American hemispheres.
Methods
Species Richness
variables were extracted for each cell from WorldClim (resolution of 2.5
arc-minutes; Hijmans et al. 2005). NPP was obtained from moderate resolution
imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) at 1-km pixel resolution (Running et al.
2011). FVS was extracted from the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System at a 1-km
spatial resolution (Simard et al. 2011).
To analyze the direct effects of energy, seasonality, and heterogeneity measures
on species richness, structural equation models (SEM) were used. This approach is a
powerful analytical tool for testing causal relationships in multi-variable datasets and
has already been applied to an array of ecological studies (Fan et al. 2016). Using
SEM, it can be hypothesized that some variables may be influencing species richness
through indirect associations with other variables. For example, the Tmean was
predicted to affect species richness both directly and indirectly through NPP. Sim-
ilarly, NPP was hypothesized to affect species richness directly and indirectly
through FVS. In addition to the direct effects on species richness, indirect paths of
Tmin and Pmin were adjusted for ΔT and ΔP, respectively. The relationships between
variables were quantified using standardized regression coefficients (β), which allow
assessing the relative contribution of each effect. The total effects of a predictor
variable on species richness are equal to the sum of direct and indirect effects
(estimated simply by multiplying the standardized paths involved).
Compositional Dissimilarity
from 0.5 to 47.5 ) and southern (latitude ranging from 0.5 to 48.5 ) hemi-
spheres to investigate whether the contribution of geographic and climatic distances
differs between hemispheres. First, a geodesic distance matrix between each pair of
cells was calculated to assess how the turnover component of Jaccard dissimilarity
changes with spatial distance. Second, to evaluate the role of climate in structuring
marsupial communities, a climatic distance matrix was created using Euclidean
distances from 19 variables of the WorldClim (resolution of 2.5 arc-minutes;
Hijmans et al. 2005). These variables were previously standardized at mean ¼
0 and standard deviation ¼ 1.
To investigate the unique and joint contribution of geographic and climatic
distance on the turnover component between southern and northern hemispheres,
we used models of distance decay of similarity and variance partitioning. The
distance decay in the similarity of species composition between hemispheres was
explored fitting negative exponential models through the decay.model function of
the “betapart” package (Baselga et al. 2018). Additionally, the unique and joint
contribution of space and climate were partitioned through negative exponential
models fitted. More specifically, the unique contribution of space was computed
using the r2 explained by the complete model (space and climate together) minus the
r2 explained only by the climate. To compute the unique contribution of climate, the
r2 explained by the complete model (space and climate together) minus the r2
explained only by the space was used.
All analyses were conducted in the R software (R Core Team 2019). Species
richness was calculated using the “raster” (Hijmans 2018) and “sp” (Bivand et al.
2013) packages. Taxonomic beta diversity was calculated using the “betapart”
package (Baselga et al. 2018). Structural equation models (SEM) were implemented
through “lavaan” (Rosseel 2012) package.
Results
Species Richness
Fig. 1 Spatial distribution of marsupial species richness. (a) Observed species richness across the
Americas and (b) relationship between marsupial species richness and latitude. Each point in (b)
represents the marsupial species richness (in 1 by 1 cells) at a given latitude. Dashed lines delimit
the tropical region
8 F. O. Cerezer et al.
Fig. 2 Structural equation model (SEM) showing the paths and coefficients of the relationship
between marsupial species richness and predictor variables. Positive effects are indicated by solid
arrows and negative effects by dashed arrows. Values on arrows represent standardized regression
coefficients (β). NS represents a nonsignificant effect. Abbreviations: Tmean (annual mean temper-
ature); NPP (net primary productivity); FVS (forest vertical structure); Topography (topographic
complexity); Tmin (minimum temperature of the coldest month); ΔT (temperature seasonality); ΔP
(precipitation seasonality); Pmin (precipitation of driest month). The total effect of a predictor
variable on species richness is equal to the sum of direct and indirect effects. The indirect effects
are estimated simply by multiplying the standardized paths involved
indirectly mediated through ΔP was significant but very weak (β ¼ 0.093 [0.671
x 0.140], P > 0.001). The direct effects of Tmean on species richness were stronger
(β ¼ 0.324, P > 0.001) than their indirect effects mediated by NPP (β ¼ 0.104 [0.346
x 0.302], P > 0.001). Similarly, NPP directly influences species richness (β ¼ 0.302,
P > 0.001), but the indirect effects through the FVS were weak (β ¼ 0.029 [0.504 x
0.059], P ¼ 0.001). The FVS was weakly associated with species richness
(β ¼ 0.059, P ¼ 0.001). Interestingly, the topographic complexity was negatively
and weakly associated with the variation in richness of American marsupials
(β ¼ 0.089, P > 0.001).
Compositional Dissimilarity
Fig. 3 Spatial variation in the taxonomic composition of American marsupial. (a) Changes in
taxonomic composition represented by ordering scores (ranging from 0.4 to 0.5). (b) Changes in
taxonomic composition between different regions of the northern and southern hemisphere (SNH
10 F. O. Cerezer et al.
turnover component was more strongly related to geographic distance (r2 ¼ 0.22;
p < 0.05) than climatic distance (r2 ¼ 0; p < 0.05), with an important portion of
variation shared between space and climate (r2 ¼ 0.26; p < 0.05; Fig. 4a). These
results indicate that the decrease in species similarity in the northern hemisphere is
mainly associated with spatial factors (Fig. 5a and b). In the southern hemisphere,
the turnover component was closely associated with both geographic (r2 ¼ 0.10;
p < 0.05) and climatic (r2 ¼ 0.06; p < 0.05) distances (Fig. 4b). Therefore, the
similarity between marsupial communities decreases with geographic and climatic
distance (Fig. 5c and d), although the shared variance explained by space and climate
is more important in the southern hemisphere (r2 ¼ 0.29; p < 0.05; Fig. 4b).
Discussion
Species Richness
Fig. 3 (continued) ¼ > 23.4 ; TROP ¼ 23.4 to 23.4 ; SSH ¼ < 23.4 ). Ordering scores were
obtained from a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using the turnover component of the pairwise
Jaccard dissimilarity. Note that the similarity in species composition declines abruptly toward the
northern hemisphere (indicated by black arrow). Abbreviations: SSH ¼ subtropical region of the
southern hemisphere; TROP ¼ tropical region; SNH ¼ subtropical region of the northern
hemisphere
Species Richness and Beta Diversity Patterns of American Marsupials 11
Fig. 5 Relationship between similarity in species composition (1 minus the turnover component of
Jaccard dissimilarity) and geographic and climatic distances for all pairwise comparisons of
marsupial communities in the northern and southern hemispheres. The decay of compositional
similarity with (a) geographic distance and (b) climatic distance in the northern hemisphere. The
decay of compositional similarity with (c) geographic distance and (d) climatic distance in the
southern hemisphere
indirect effects operating on plant productivity (Storch 2012). Statistical models that
mechanistically try to disentangle the relative contribution of these processes are
important avenues to be explored in the future (see Cerezer et al. 2021). However,
this chapter is in line with other evidence observed in evolutionarily and ecologically
distinct groups (Currie et al. 2004; Evans et al. 2005) and shows that the energy is a
crucial determinant of species richness at large scales.
Surprisingly, variables associated with environmental heterogeneity had low
predictive power in the marsupial species richness. Topographic complexity was
negatively and weakly associated with species richness (Fig. 2). Indeed, a weak
relationship between species richness and topographic variability has been recorded
in some previous studies (Hawkins et al. 2003b; Diniz-Filho et al. 2004), suggesting
that the explanatory power of topographic complexity may be reduced over a large
geographical extent. Additionally, the forest vertical structure (FVS) measure had a
very weak effect on species richness (Fig. 2). Previous studies showed that species
richness in some continents and clades (primates and amphibians) are better
explained by the forest vertical structure, while for other clades this does not apply
Species Richness and Beta Diversity Patterns of American Marsupials 13
(birds and mammals) (Roll et al. 2015). American marsupials occupy a wide range of
habitat types and encompass diverse locomotor strategies, which may explain this
weak association found between species richness and FVS (in opposition to the
mostly arboreal primates). Therefore, it may be suggested that variables representing
energy and seasonality are more important than variables representing topographic
and habitat heterogeneity to predict broad-scale patterns of marsupial species
richness.
Compositional Dissimilarity
results suggest that species distribution across South America appears to be struc-
tured by an interaction between ecological determinism (e.g., environmental filter-
ing) and stochasticity-driven assembly (e.g., dispersal limitation) (Gravel et al.
2006). Exponential decay of similarity to geographic and climatic distances can
have many explanations (Soininen et al. 2007). An attractive explanation may be
based on the complex biogeographic history of South America, involving the uplift
of the Andes mountain chain (Rahbek et al. 2019) and the frequent episodes of
expansion and contraction of forest and open environments (Giarla and Jansa 2014).
Additionally, extant marsupials are autochthonous to South America (Voss and Jansa
2009) and are highly influenced by the climate (Cerezer et al. 2021) so that the
isolation and species accumulation for a long time inside the continent may have
limited the expansion toward cold latitudes outside the tropics (Sánchez-Villagra
2013; Jansa et al. 2014). Collectively, all of these events may have left footprints in
the patterns of beta diversity and explain why deterministic and stochastic processes
are equally important.
Conclusion
This chapter shows that some specific measures of energy and seasonality are better
predictors of species richness of American marsupials than measures of environ-
mental heterogeneity. Therefore, a higher restriction of marsupial species in the
tropics may be a consequence of an environment with greater energy input and
climatically more stable. Concerning beta diversity, a hemispheric asymmetry was
recorded in the turnover component (compositional dissimilarity), whereby the
contribution of space and climate differs between the southern and northern hemi-
spheres. In summary, the influences of geographic and climatic distances were very
similar in the southern hemisphere. In contrast, geographic distance was the main
agent structuring the marsupial species turnover in the northern hemisphere, empha-
sizing the importance of dispersal limitation in this hemisphere. The authors claim
that the history of marsupials through the Cenozoic, including the historic biogeog-
raphy of land bridges and the appearance of geographic barriers (e.g., the Andes
mountains), was crucial to the American marsupial diversification.
Cross-References
Scientific Research (CNPq) during the chapter elaboration. We are grateful to Thaís Battistella for
their relevant comments on the chapter.
References
Allen AP, Gillooly JF, Savage VM et al (2006) Kinetic effects of temperature on rates of genetic
divergence and speciation. PNAS 103:9130–9135
Astúa D, Cherem JJ, Teta P (2022) Taxonomic checklist of living American marsupials. In: Cáceres
NC, Dickman CR (eds) American and Australasian marsupials: an evolutionary, biogeograph-
ical, and ecological approach. Springer, Cham
Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol
Biogeogr 19:134–143
Baselga A (2012) The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from
nestedness, and nestedness. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:1223–1232
Baselga A, Gómez-Rodríguez C, Lobo JM (2012) Historical legacies in world amphibian diversity
revealed by the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. PLoS One 7:e32341
Baselga A, Orme D, Villeger S et al (2018) Betapart: partitioning beta diversity into turnover and
nestedness components. R package version 1.5.1
Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gomez-Rubio V (2013) Applied spatial data analysis with R, 2nd edn.
Springer, New York
Brown JH (2014) Why are there so many species in the tropics? J Biogeogr 41:8–22
Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP et al (2004) Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:
1771–1789
Bubadué JM, Hendges CD, Cherem JJ et al (2019) Marsupial versus placental: assessing the
evolutionary changes in the scapula of didelphids and sigmodontines. Biol J Linn Soc 128(4):
994–1007
Castro-Insua A, Gómez-Rodríguez C, Baselga A (2016) Break the pattern: breakpoints in beta
diversity of vertebrates are general across clades and suggest common historical causes. Glob
Ecol Biogeogr 25:1279–1283
Cerezer FO, Ribeiro JRI, Graipel M et al (2020) The dark side of coloration: ecogeographical
evidence supports Gloger’s rule in American marsupials. Evolution 74:2046–2058
Cerezer FO, Cáceres NC, Dambros CS (2021) Effect of productivity on community size explains
the latitudinal diversity gradient of South American small mammals. Am Nat 198:E111–E121
Charles-Dominique P (1983) Ecology and social adaptations in didelphid marsupials: comparisons
with eutherians of similar ecology. In: Eisenberg J, Kleiman D (eds) Advances in the study of
mammalian behavior. Special publication. American Society of Mammalogists, Stillwater,
pp 395–422
Chase JM, Myers JA (2011) Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic
processes across scales. Philos Trans R Soc B 366:2351–2363
Currie DJ, Mittelbach GG, Cornell HV et al (2004) Predictions and tests of climate-based hypoth-
eses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecol Lett 7:1121–1134
Diniz-Filho JAF, Rangel TFLVB, Hawkins BA (2004) A test of multiple hypotheses for the species
richness gradient of South American owls. Oecologia 140:633–638
Dunn RR, Agosti D, Andersen AN et al (2009) Climatic drivers of hemispheric asymmetry in global
patterns of ant species richness. Ecol Lett 12:324–333
Evans KL, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2005) Species–energy relationships at the macroecological
scale: a review of the mechanisms. Biol Rev 80:1–25
Fan Y, Chen J, Shirkey G et al (2016) Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in
ecological studies: an updated review. Ecol Process 5:19
Figueiredo Mde SL, Grelle CEde V (2018) Phylogenetic diversity as a key to understand
mechanisms of New World marsupials diversification (Didelphimorphia: Dididelphidae).
Oecol Aust 22:168–178
16 F. O. Cerezer et al.
Gardner AL (2008) Mammals of South America. Volume 1: marsupials, xenarthrans, shrews, and
bats. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Giarla TC, Jansa SA (2014) The role of physical geography and habitat type in shaping the
biogeographical history of a recent radiation of Neotropical marsupials (Thylamys:
Didelphidae). J Biogeogr 41(8):1547–1558
Goin FJ, Woodburne MO, Zimicz AN et al (2016) Summary: milestones in the evolution of south
American Metatherians. In: Goin FJ, Woodburne MO, Zimicz AN et al (eds) A brief history of
south American Metatherians. Springer earth system sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 209–225
Gouveia SF, Villalobos F, Dobrovolski R et al (2014) Forest structure drives global diversity of
primates. J Anim Ecol 83:1523–1530
Gravel D, Canham CD, Beaudet M et al (2006) Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum
hypothesis. Ecol Lett 9:399–409
Hawkins BA, Field R, Cornell HV et al (2003a) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns
of species richness. Ecology 84:3105–3117
Hawkins BA, Porter EE, Diniz-Filho JAF (2003b) Productivity and history as predictors of the
latitudinal diversity gradient of terrestrial birds. Ecology 84:1608–1623
Hijmans RJ (2018) Raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 2.8-4
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL et al (2005) Very high-resolution interpolated climate surfaces
for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978
Hillebrand H (2004) On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am Nat 163:192–211
Jansa SA, Barker FK, Voss RS (2014) The early diversification history of didelphid marsupials: a
window into South America’s “splendid isolation”. Evolution 68(3):684–695
McGill BJ, Chase JM, Hortal J et al (2019) Unifying macroecology and macroevolution to answer
fundamental questions about biodiversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 28:1925–1936
Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology.
J Biogeogr 26:867–878
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for
Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rahbek C, Borregaard MK, Colwell RK et al (2019) Humboldt’s enigma: what causes global
patterns of mountain biodiversity? Science 365:1108–1113
Rohde K (1992) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos
65:514
Roll U, Gefen E, Yom-Tov Y (2015) Linking vertebrate species richness to tree canopy height on a
global scale. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:814–825
Rosseel Y (2012) Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48(2):1–36
Running S, Mu Q et al (2011) MOD17A3 MODIS/Terra net primary production yearly l4 global
1km SIN Grid V055 [Data set]. NASA EOSDIS land processes DAAC
Sánchez-Villagra MR (2013) Why are there fewer marsupials than placentals? On the relevance of
geography and physiology to evolutionary patterns of mammalian diversity and disparity.
J Mammal Evol 20(4):279–290
Schloss CA, Nuñez TA, Lawler JJ (2012) Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate
change in the Western hemisphere. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:8606–8611
Simard M, Pinto N, Fisher JB et al (2011) Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne
lidar. J Geophys Res-Biogeo G04021:1–12
Šímová I, Storch D, Keil P et al (2011) Global species-energy relationship in forest plots: role of
abundance, temperature and species climatic tolerances. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:842–856
Soininen J, McDonald R, Hillebrand H (2007) The distance decay of similarity in ecological
communities. Ecography 30:3–12
Soininen J, Heino J, Wang J (2018) A meta-analysis of nestedness and turnover components of beta
diversity across organisms and ecosystems. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 27:96–109
Spasojevic M, Harrison S, Day HW et al (2014) Above- and belowground biotic interactions
facilitate relocation of plants into cooler environments. Ecol Lett 17:700–709
Species Richness and Beta Diversity Patterns of American Marsupials 17
Stevens RD, Tello SJ, Gavilanez MM (2013) Stronger tests of mechanisms underlying geographic
gradients of biodiversity: insights from the dimensionality of biodiversity. PLoS One 8:e56853
Storch D (2012) Biodiversity and its energetic and thermal controls. In: Sibly RM, Brown JH,
Kodric-Brown A (eds) Metabolic ecology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 120–131
Storch D, Bohdalková E, Okie J (2018) The more-individuals hypothesis revisited: the role of
community abundance in species richness regulation and the productivity-diversity relationship.
Ecol Lett 21:920–937
Tello JS, Stevens RD (2010) Multiple environmental determinants of regional species richness and
effects of geographic range size. Ecography 33:796–808
Tuomisto H (2010) A diversity of beta diversities: straightening up a concept gone awry. Part 1.
Defining beta diversity as a function of alpha and gamma diversity. Ecography 33:2–22
Voss RS, Jansa SA (2009) Phylogenetic relationships and classification of didelphid marsupials, an
extant radiation of New World metatherian mammals. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 322:1–77
Webb SD (1991) Ecogeography and the great American interchange. Paleobiology 17:266–280
Williams SE, Middleton J (2008) Climatic seasonality, resource bottlenecks, and abundance of
rainforest birds: implications for global climate change. Divers Distrib 14:69–77
Willig MR, Gannon MR (1997) Gradients of species density and turnover in marsupials: a
hemispheric perspective. J Mammal 78(3):756–765
Willig R, Kaufman M, Stevens DR (2003) Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process,
scale, and synthesis. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 20:273–309
Woodburne M (2010) The great American biotic interchange: dispersals, tectonics, climate, sea
level and holding pens. J Mammal Evol 17:245–264