Photocatalytic Performance of ZnO Nanomaterials Fo
Photocatalytic Performance of ZnO Nanomaterials Fo
net/publication/267742691
CITATIONS READS
328 13,636
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Lakshi Saikia on 24 April 2019.
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: ZnO nanomaterials of different morphologies are synthesized by different methodologies. These semicon-
Received 6 August 2014 ductor photocatalysts are potentially explored for self-sensitized photodegradation of malachite green
Received in revised form 14 October 2014 (MG) dye in water in a batch reactor. The effects of various parameters like initial dye concentration, cat-
Accepted 25 October 2014
alyst loading, solution pH, light source on degradation efficiency was also investigated. The experimental
Available online 4 November 2014
results showed substantial reduction of COD, besides removal of colour. The photodegradation of MG
dye followed the pseudo first order kinetics of Langmuir–Hinshelwood model. The hydrothermally syn-
Keywords:
thesized flower shaped homocentric pencil like ZnO nanorod bundles exhibit excellent photocatalytic
Self-sensitized photodegradation
Malachite green dye
activity under solar light. A comparative study of photodegradation efficiency among ZnO nanoparti-
ZnO nanomaterials cles, ZnO nanoparticles (hydrothermal) and flower shaped homocentric pencil like ZnO nanorod bundles
Langmuir–Hinshelwood were also performed. Semiconductor photocatalysis often leads to partial or complete mineralization of
Warburg apparatus organic pollutants. The CO2 gas evolved due to mineralization of MG was determined using Warburg
manometric method under solar light. The possible mechanism of photodegradation under both solar
and UV light were also proposed.
© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2014.10.053
0926-860X/© 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
L. Saikia et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 490 (2015) 42–49 43
and ZnO is more suitable for photodegradation of dyes in pres- 2.2.1. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles by colloidal precipitation
ence of sunlight which is another advantage for practical use of method
photocatalyst in wastewater treatment [18]. The use of TiO2 for ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized by slight modification
large scale wastewater is not economical so ZnO would be a pos- of method described by Tayebee et al. [29]. 0.5 M zinc acetate
sible replacement of TiO2 because of its low cost. Its efficiency dihydrate solution was prepared in 50 mL absolute ethanol. This
is reported to be particularly noticeable in the advanced oxida- solution was refluxed for 6 h at 80–85 ◦ C under continuous
tion of pulp mill bleaching wastewater [25], the photooxidation of magnetic stirring. Thereafter, the precipitate was collected by
2-phenylphenol and photocatalytic oxidation of phenol [26]. The decantation from the ethanol and dried at room temperature. The
photodegradation of malachite green by heterogeneous photocat- precipitate was then calcined in an electric furnace at 450 ◦ C for
alyst under UV and solar light is reported [9–13], but in most of the 16 h and cooled to room temperature naturally.
cases either the degradation efficiency was less or took longer time
for degradation or in some cases composite materials were used as 2.2.2. Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles by hydrothermal synthesis
photocatalyst. method
The ZnO nanomaterials of different morphology are reported ZnO nanoparticles were hydrothermally synthesized by modi-
as photocatalyst for degradation of phenol under UV light [27]. fying the method of Baruwati et al. [30]. 2 g of Zn(NO3 ).6H2 O was
Therefore, the present study is to synthesize ZnO nanomaterials of dissolved in mixture of 100 mL double distilled water and 100 mL
different morphology and to study the photodegradation of MG dye ethanol. The pH of the solution was made 9.5 by adding NH3 solu-
under solar light by the synthesized ZnO nanomaterials. The ZnO tion. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h and then transferred
nanomaterials of different morphology such as nanoparticles and to a 300 mL Teflon lined steel autoclave and maintained at 110 ◦ C
flower shaped homocentric pencil like ZnO nanorod bundles were temperature for 16 h. The autoclave then cooled at room temper-
synthesized in aerobic and oxygen less hydrothermal condition, ature and the product was washed with double distilled water by
respectively, as oxygen vacancy can affect the photocatalytic activ- centrifugation until the pH become neutral. The product was then
ity of ZnO nanomaterials [28]. The Warburg manometric method filtered and dried in a hot air oven at 80 ◦ C for overnight.
was used for determination of evolved CO2 from complete mineral-
ization of MG dye. The photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticles 2.2.3. Synthesis of flower shaped homocentric pencil like ZnO
was thoroughly studied and comparative study with ZnO nanopar- nanorod bundles by template assisted hydrothermal method
ticles (hydrothermal) and flower shaped homocentric pencil like The flower shaped homocentric pencil like ZnO nanorod bundles
ZnO nanorod bundles are performed. The probable mechanism (hereafter will refer to as ZnO flowers) were synthesized using the
of the photodegradation under solar and UV light are also reported procedure by Bhuyan et al. [31].
proposed.
2.3. Photocatalytic degradation experiment using ZnO
nanomaterials
2. Experimental
flowers were also investigated under solar light and compared with
ZnO nanoparticles.
Fig. 3. FE-SEM images of (a) ZnO nanoparticles, (b) ZnO nanoparticles (hydrothermal), (c) ZnO flowers and (d) one individual ZnO flower.
3.2. Photocatalytic activity available active catalytic sites of ZnO nanoparticles and donated
more electrons to the conduction band of ZnO nanoparticles. But
ZnO nanomaterials are efficiently tested as photocatalyst for beyond 0.2 g L−1 of dye concentration, a decrease in degrada-
self sensitized degradation of MG dye under solar light. The effect tion efficiency was observed which may be due to competition
of different parameters such as catalyst loading, dye concentra- of adsorption between dye molecules and dissolved O2 into the
tion, solution pH on photodegradation was evaluated using ZnO catalyst surface. As O2 molecules is the electron acceptor in the
nanoparticles under solar light. photocatalytic reaction, therefore, lesser the O2 adsorbed than the
dye on the catalyst surface, lesser is the degradation efficiency as
3.2.1. Effect of the catalyst loading well as rate constant [40]. Otherwise, a fixed amount of catalyst
The study of the effect of catalyst loading on photodegradation is provides a fixed amount of reactive radical which is not enough to
important for its use for practical purpose. Experiments were car- degrade a higher concentration of dye [41].
ried out using different amount of ZnO nanoparticles from 0.1 to
0.5 g L−1 and keeping the MG dye concentration fixed at 0.2 g L−1 . 3.2.3. Influence of pH
The optimum amount of catalyst for the highest photodegrada- The influence of different pH (4, 7 and 10) value on the degrada-
tion efficiency was found to be 0.2 g L−1 (Fig. 4). In principle, the tion efficiency of MG was investigated (Fig. S5, ESI). The natural pH
amount of catalyst is proportional to the number of active radical value of MG solution was found to be 5.2. The pH value was adjusted
like • OH and O2 • which rapidly degraded the adsorbed MG dye. using dilute HCl or dilute NaOH solution for the experiment.
Above 0.2 g L−1 of the catalyst amount, the degradation efficiency It was observed that the degradation efficiency was mini-
was decreased rather than increased; this may be due to the aggre- mum (58.59%) at pH 4. On the other hand, degradation efficiency
gation of the catalyst at higher concentration which decreases the increases at pH 10 to its maximum value (93.09%). The probable
total active sites of the catalyst for adsorption of dye molecules. reason of this difference can be explained as adsorption of MG on
Moreover, higher amount of catalyst can create turbidity which catalyst surface is dependent of its surface charge. As ZnO has high
reduces the penetration of light through the solution by scatter- zero point charge (zpc), so at pH < pzpc , ZnO surface is positively
ing the light and it results in the deactivation of the active catalyst charged (at acidic pH ) which decreases the active sites available for
molecules by colliding with ground state molecules [39]. adsorption of a cationic dye like malachite green. At pH > pzpc , the
ZnO surface is negatively charged (at pH 10). Therefore at alkaline
3.2.2. Effect of the initial dye concentration: pH , the number of surface hydroxyl group at ZnO was increased
The effect of initial concentration of MG dye on degradation effi- which facilitates adsorption of MG as well as its self sensitized
ciency was studied by varying the dye concentration from 0.05 to degradation [42].
0.4 g L−1 , keeping the catalyst concentration fixed at 0.2 g L−1 . The
degradation efficiency of MG dye under solar light was increased 3.2.4. Kinetic study
with increasing dye concentration up to 0.2 g L−1 (Fig. S4, ESI), prob- The kinetic study of degradation of MG was done by tak-
ably at this concentration more dye molecules are adsorbed on ing the different initial concentration of MG range from 0.05
46 L. Saikia et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 490 (2015) 42–49
(a) 90 (b)
-1
0.1 gL 86
85 -1
0.2 gL
-1 84
0.3 gL
80 -1
0.4 gL 82
-1
75 0.5 gL
% Degradation
% Degradation
80
70
78
65
76
60 74
55 72
50 70
45 68
20 40 60 80 100 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
-1
Irradiation time(min) Catalyst loading (gL )
Fig. 4. (a) Effect of catalyst loading on photodegradation efficiency of MG dye under solar light, initial concentration 0.2 g L−1 and initial pH 5.2. (b) Catalyst loading plotted
against % degradation of MG dye under solar light.
(a) (b)
2.1
0.014
1.8
0.012
1.5
k (min-1)
ln (C0 /C)
0.010
1.2
0.008
0.9
0.006
0.6
Fig. 5. (a) Pseudo first order reaction kinetics curves for photodegradation of MG dye with different initial concentration, () 0.05 g L−1 , ( ) 0.1 g L−1 , ( ) 0.2 g L−1 , ( )
0.3 g L−1 , ( ) 0.4 g L−1 , initial pH 5.2, catalyst loading 0.2 g L−1 . (b) Plot of different initial dye concentration against the rate constant for photodegradation of MG dye.
to 0.4 g L−1 . The kinetic curves for degradation of MG was nanoparticles under UV light as a light source (93.75%) and low-
(Fig. 5(a)) follows pseudo first order kinetics represented by the est in case of photolysis experiment (4.88%). At dark condition
Langmuir–Hinshelwood equation as follows: and under solar light the degradation efficiency were 16.32% and
C 85.29%. This result suggests that ZnO nanoparticles efficiently catal-
0 ysed the degradation of MG in presence of both UV and solar light.
ln = kapp t
C
Fig. 7. (a) Comparative photodegradation of MG dye by ZnO nanoparticles, ZnO nanoparticles (hydrothermal) and ZnO flowers under solar light. (b) Rate constant for
comparative photodegradation of MG dye by ZnO nanoparticles, ZnO nanoparticles (hydrothermal) and ZnO flowers under solar light.
4. Mechanism
ZnO cannot absorb solar light directly due to its band gap (b)
∼3.37 eV [46], but when a colored organic compound is present,
a sensitized photocatalytic process is able to operate. Huang et al.
reported dye sensitized photodegradation [47] which follows the
radical mechanism. Similarly, the MG dye can also act as a pho-
tosensitizer [48] and it was adsorbed on ZnO surface during the
photodegradation experiment.
+ •
MGads ∗ +ZnO → MGads + ZnO(e− ) λ 〈 390
•
O2 + e−
cb
→ O2−
•
O2− + e−
cb
+ 2H+ → H2 O2
Table 1
COD values of MG dye solution before and after photodegradation reaction.
Catalyst Before treatment COD (mg L−1 ) After treatment COD (mg L−1 ) Photodegradation efficiency (%)
4.2. In UV light and ZnO flowers under solar light was confirmed by measuring
the CO2 production using Warburg apparatus. The Warburg mano-
ZnO can absorb UV light ( < 390 nm) and generate metric method generally used for biological samples to measure
electron–hole pairs. These photogenerated electron and hole gas absorption as well as gas production [49]. In a typical pro-
pairs can migrate into the catalyst surface and react with surface cedure, an experiment was conducted with 4 mL of 0.2 g L−1 MG
adsorbed O2 to form O2 •− . In absence of O2 these electrons and dye solution and 0.002 g ZnO nanomaterials as photocatalyst. The
holes will recombine. The O2 •− can react with surface adsorbed ZnO flowers generated much more CO2 gas than ZnO nanoparti-
H2 O to form H2 O2 which is responsible for generation of • OH cles (hydrothermal) and ZnO nanoparticles (Fig. 9). These results
radical. The • OH is a potent indiscriminant oxidizing agent which strongly resemble with the previously found better photocatalytic
possibly responsible for degradation of most of the surface activity of ZnO flowers than ZnO nanoparticles (hydrothermal) and
adsorbed MG (Fig. 8(b)). The h+ can also react with the surface ZnO nanoparticles. The evolved gas was confirmed to be CO2 as
adsorbed H2 O to form • OH radical and in alkaline pH , h+ can react BaCO3 precipitate formed by adding BaCl2 solution to KOH solution
with − OH to generate • OH. removed from the center wells of the Warburg vessels by using CO2
free water.
(390 nm)
ZnO −→ ecb − + hvb +
O2 •− + ecb − + 2H+ → H2 O2 The COD of MG dye was estimated before and after photodegra-
dation reaction. The COD is used as a measure of the oxygen
equivalent of the organic content in a sample that is susceptible
H2 O2 → 2• OH
to oxidation to CO2 and H2 O by a strong oxidant. The COD was
estimated using dichromate reflux method [50]. The initial dye
h+ +− OH → • OH concentration and catalyst loading taken for COD measurement
was 0.2 g L−1 and 0.02 g L−1 , respectively. The COD of the MG was
h+ + H2 O → • OH + H+ determined for solar light photodegradation. The photodegrada-
tion efficiency from COD measurement can be determined by the
•
• OH or O2− + MGads → Degraded Product following equation [51] which shows the reduction of COD after
degradation and is in good agreement with the previously deter-
mined data by UV method (Table 1).
5. Determination of CO2 production from the
mineralization of malachite green dye InitialCOD − FinalCOD
Photodegradation = × 100%
InitialCOD
The complete mineralization of MG dye by photocatalytic degra-
dation using ZnO nanoparticles, ZnO nanoparticles (hydrothermal)
Fig. 9. Comparative CO2 production studies using Warburg manometric method for Fig. 10. Reusability study of ZnO nanoparticles for photodegradation of MG dye
photodegradation of MG dye using ZnO nanomaterials. under solar light.
L. Saikia et al. / Applied Catalysis A: General 490 (2015) 42–49 49
7. Reusability of the catalyst [4] K.V.K. Rao, Toxicol. Lett. 81 (1995) 107–113.
[5] D.J. Alderman, R.S. Clifton-Hadley, J. Fish Dis. 16 (1993) 297–311.
[6] A. Mittal, J. Hazard. Mater B133 (2006) 196–202.
The ZnO nanoparticles were reused for three times without sig- [7] S. Ramezani, A.A. Pourbabaee, H.D. Javaheri, J. Bioremed. Biodegrad. 4 (2013),
nificant loss of degradation efficiency. Prior to reuse the used ZnO 1000175(1-6).
nanoparticles were collected by centrifugation, washed with water [8] J. Wang, M. Qiao, K. Wei, J. Ding, Z. Liu, K.Q. Zhang, X. Huang, J. Mol. Microbiol.
Biotechnol. 20 (2011) 220–227.
and ethanol for three times each and dried at 110 ◦ C in an oven [9] F. Sayilkan, M. Asilturk, P. Tatar, N. Kiraz, E. Arpac, H. Sayilkan, J. Hazard. Mater.
for 2 h. The initial dye concentration and catalyst loading taken 148 (2007) 735–744.
for reusability study was 0.2 g L−1 and 0.02 g L−1 , respectively. The [10] C.C. Chen, C.S. Lu, Y.C. Chung, J.L. Jan, J. Hazard. Mater. 141 (2007) 520–528.
[11] B. Pare, B. Sarwan, S.B. Jonnalagadda, Appl. Surf. Sci. 258 (2011) 247–253.
degradation efficiency decrease a little possibly due to the loss of
[12] Y. Liu, Y. Ohko, R. Zhang, Y. Yang, Z. Zhang, J. Hazard. Mater. 184 (2010) 386–391.
catalyst because of centrifugation as there is an effect of amount [13] A.G.S. Prado, L.L. Costa, J. Hazard. Mater. 169 (2009) 297–301.
of catalyst loading for self photosensitized decomposition of MG in [14] W.W. Lee, W.H. Chung, C.S. Lu, W.Y. Lin, C.C. Chen, Sep. Purif. Technol. 98 (2012)
488–496.
presence of ZnO nanoparticles as a photocatalyst (Fig. 10).
[15] I. Konstantinou, T. Sakellarides, V. Sakkas, T. Albanis, Environ. Sci. Technol. 35
(2001) 398–405.
8. Conclusion [16] Y.T. Kwon, K.Y. Song, W.I. Lee, G.J. Choi, Y.R. Do, J. Catal. 191 (2000) 192–197.
[17] H.F. Lin, S.C. Liao, S.W. Hung, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A: Chem. 174 (2005)
82–87.
In summary, the photocatalytic degradation of MG dye by ZnO [18] S. Sakthivel, B. Neppolian, M.V. Shankar, B. Arabindoo, M. Palanichamy, V.
nanomaterials like nanoparticles, nanoparticles (hydrothermal) Murugesan, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 77 (2003) 65–82.
and flowers were very effective in removal of this dye from aque- [19] S. Chakrabarti, B.K. Dutta, J. Hazard. Mater. B 112 (2004) 269–278.
[20] C. Lizma, J. Freer, J. Baeza, H.D. Mansilla, Catal. Today 76 (2002) 235–239.
ous solution. Photodegradation of MG dye by ZnO nanoparticles [21] N. Daneshvar, D. Salari, A.R. Khataee, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A: Chem. 157
was studied thoroughly and effect of various parameters like initial (2003) 111–116.
catalyst loading, initial dye concentration, initial pH etc., was also [22] F.D. Mai, C.C. Chen, J.L. Chen, S.C. Liu, J. Chromatogr. A 1189 (2008) 355–365.
[23] C.C. Chen, H.J. Fan, J.L. Jan, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008) 11962–11972.
investigated. A comparative photocatalytic activity study was con- [24] C.C. Chen, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 264 (2007) 82–92.
ducted among different as-synthesized ZnO nanomaterials which [25] M.C. Yeber, J. Rodriguez, J. Freer, J. Baeza, N. Duran, H. Mansilla, Chemosphere
revealed that ZnO flowers exhibited highest photocatalytic activ- 39 (1999) 1679–1688.
[26] A.A. Khodja, T. Sehili, J. Pilichowski, P. Boule, J. Photochem. Photobiol., A: Chem.
ity. Using the Warburg manometric method, it was proved that 141 (2001) 231–236.
the photodegradation of MG results the complete mineralization [27] L. Xu, Y.L. Hu, C. Pelligra, C.H. Chen, L. Jin, H. Huang, S. Sithambaram, M. Aindow,
of dye to produce CO2 . Finally, the as-synthesized ZnO materials R. Joesten, S.L. Suib, Chem. Mater. 21 (2009) 2875–2885.
[28] D.S. Bohle, C.J. Spina, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 12380–12381.
will probably show same effectiveness in the photodegradation of
[29] R. Tayebee, F. Javadi, G. Argi, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 368–369 (2013) 16–23.
other environmentally hazardous substances under natural solar [30] B. Baruwati, D. Kishore Kumar, S.V. Manorama, Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 119
light. (2006) 676–682.
[31] D. Bhuyan, B. Malakar, S.S. Arbuj, L. Saikia, RSC Adv. 4 (2014) 8256–8259.
[32] D. Chu, Y. Masuda, T. Ohji, K. Kato, Langmuir 26 (2010) 2811–2815.
Acknowledgement [33] Q. Jiang, Z.Y. Wu, Y.M. Wang, Y. Cao, C.F. Zhou, J.H. Zhu, J. Mater. Chem. 16
(2006) 1536–1542.
[34] Y. Li, G. Cheng, L. Zhang, J. Mater. Res. 15 (2000) 2305–2308.
The authors are grateful to Director, CSIR-North East Institute [35] K. Vanheusden, W.L. Warren, C.H. Seager, D.R. Tallant, J.A. Voigt, B.E. Gnade, J.
of Science and Technology, Jorhat, Assam, India, for his kind per- Appl. Phys. 79 (1996) 7983–7990.
mission to publish the work. We also acknowledge the support of [36] Y.J. Kwon, K.H. Kim, C.S. Lim, K.B. Shim, J. Ceram. Process. Res. 3 (2002) 146–149.
[37] L. Wu, Y. Wu, L. Wei, Physica E 28 (2005) 76–82.
Dr. Ankur Bordoloi, Scientist, CSIR-IIP Dehradun and Mr. Ananta Kr
[38] Y. Lv, C. Pan, X. Ma, R. Zong, X. Bai, Y. Zhu, Appl. Catal., B: Environ. 138–139
Sarmah, Principal Technical Officer, Biotechnology Division, CSIR- (2013) 26–32.
NEIST, Jorhat. Thanks are also to DST, New Delhi (DST Fast Track [39] B. Neppolian, H.C. Choi, S. Sakthivel, B. Arabindoo, V. Murugesan, Chemosphere
46 (2002) 1173–1181.
project GPP-0267) and CSIR, New Delhi (in-house project MLP-
[40] S.T. Tan, B.J. Chen, X.W. Sun, W.J. Fan, H.S. Kwok, X.H. Zhang, S.J. Chua, J. Appl.
6000, WP-1) for financial support. M. S. acknowledges DST, New Phys. 98 (2005), 013505(1-5).
Delhi for INSPIRE Fellowship. [41] R.A. Prates, A.M. Yamada Jr., L.C. Suzuki, M.C.E. Hashimoto, S. Cai, S.G. -Soares,
L. Gomes, M.S. Ribeiro, J. Photochem. Photobiol., B: Biol. 86 (2007) 70–76.
[42] C. Lu, Y. Wu, F. Mai, W. Chung, C. Wu, W. Lin, C. Chen, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
Appendix A. Supplementary data 310 (2009) 159–165.
[43] X. Bai, L. Wang, R. Zong, Y. Lv, Y. Sun, Y. Zhu, Langmuir 29 (2013) 3097–3105.
[44] Y. Lv, W. Yao, X. Ma, C. Pan, R. Zong, Y. Zhu, Catal. Sci. Technol. 3 (2013)
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
3136–3146.
found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata. [45] J. Zhao, C. Chen, W. Ma, Top. Catal. 35 (2005) 269–278.
2014.10.053. [46] M.A. Rauf, S.S. Ashraf, Chem. Eng. J. 151 (2009) 10–18.
[47] S.T. Huang, Y.R. Jiang, S.Y. Chou, Y.M. Dai, C.C. Chen, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 391
(2014) 105–120.
References [48] G.A. Parks, Chem. Rev. 65 (1965) 177–198.
[49] R.B. Hespell, E.C. -Parola, J. Bacteriol. 103 (1970) 216–226.
[1] S. Sarmah, A. Kumar, Indian J. Phys. 85 (2011) 713–726. [50] APHA., Standard Methods for the Examination of water and Waste Water,
[2] S. Srivastava, R. Sinha, D. Roy, Aquat. Toxicol. 66 (2004) 319–329. America Water Works Association, New York, NY, 1989.
[3] W. Cheng, S.G. Wang, L. Lu, W.X. Gong, X.W. Liu, B.Y. Gao, H.Y. Zhang, Biochem. [51] A.K. Subramani, K. Byrappa, S. Ananda, K.M.L. Rai, C. Ranganathaiah, M.
Eng. J. 39 (2008) 538–546. Yoshimura, Bull. Mater. Sci. 30 (2007) 37–41.