Passive_Open_Path_FTIR_Measurements
Passive_Open_Path_FTIR_Measurements
DOI: 10.12693/APhysPolA.126.673
(673)
674 S. Ci¦szczyk
the layers or an element of higher temperature, then an lar method for analysing open-path spectra is the par-
absorption spectrum is obtained. If the measured layer tial least-squares (PLS) method [31]. Signicant non-
has a temperature higher than the ambient temperature, linearity and thus Beer's law derogating can occur if the
then an emission spectrum will be observed. The pas- absorbance the spectral lines exceeds 0.5 [32]. This situ-
sive method is less sensitive than the active method, par- ation limits the possibility of using linear CLS and PLS
ticularly when the temperature in the gas layer of in- methods or forces the use of weaker spectral lines. For
terest is near the ambient temperature. The advantage quantitative analysis of the spectra, a neural network can
to these approaches, in comparison with active open- be used as a non-linear method [33].
path absorption measurements, especially under indus-
trial conditions, is that they do not require adjustments
to the source or spectrometer. Exemplar measurements
for assessing re gases are obtained at 180 ◦C [20]. This
method also works well for analysing the thermal decom-
position of sewage sludge [21]. An interesting practical
application of the passive technique is the quantication
of exhaust gases from aircraft engines [22]. OP-FTIR
is also frequently used to measure the gaseous emissions
from the combustion of biomass [23].
In industry, emission spectroscopy is typically used to
measure the radiation spectra of ames. This technique
is clearly most commonly associated with temperature
measurements. However, attempts have been made to
determine the contents of both soot and a homogeneous
layer containing water vapour and CO2 gases [24]. This Fig. 1. CO2 transmittance at 300 K (innite resolu-
method is attractive primarily because it is capable of tion).
Fig. 11. Comparison between the measured and calcu- Fig. 13. Comparis on between the measured and cal-
lated spectra from the forward model after an iterative culated rotational lines spectra from the forward model
tting for warm CO2 derived from biomass gasication. after an iterative tting for warm CO derived from
biomass gasication.
[10] W. Wong, Z. Yang, A. Muriel, ISRN Spectr. 2013, [32] L. Shao, P.R. Griths, P.M. Chu, T.W. Vetter, Appl.
681654 (2013). Spectrosc. 60, 254 (2006).
[11] H. K. Kim, T. H. Song, J. Quant. Spectr. Ra- [33] S. Ci¦szczyk, Metrol. Meas. Syst. 2, 287 (2013).
diat. Transf. 93, 369 (2005). [34] J. Mroczka, D. Szczuczy«ski, Appl. Opt. 49, 4591
[12] T. Song, Heat Transf. Eng. 29, 417 (2008). (2010).
[13] H. Grosch, A. Fateev, K.L. Nielsen, S. Clausen, [35] J. Mroczka, D. Szczuczy«ski, Appl. Opt. 51, 1715
J. Quant. Spectr. Radiat. Transf. 130, 392 (2013). (2012).
[14] D. Hofstetter, J. Di Francesco, L. Hvozdara, [36] J. Mroczka, D. Szczuczy«ski, J. Quant. Spectr. Ra-
H. P. Herzig, M. Beck, Appl. Phys. B 103, 967 diat. Transf. 129, 48 (2013).
(2011). [37] M.D. Coleman, T. Gardiner, Vibrat. Spectrosc. 51,
[15] A.J. de Castro, A.M. Lerma, F. Lopez, M. Gui- 177 (2009).
jarro, C. Diez, C. Hernando, J. Madrigal, Infrared [38] T. Fleckl, H. Jager, I. Obernberger, J. Phys. D:
Phys. Technol. 51, 21 (2007). Appl. Phys. 35, 3138 (2002).
[16] A.V. Sepman, L.P.H. Goey, Biomass Bioen. 35, 2903 [39] M.F. Modest, S.P. Bharadwaj, J. Quant. Spectr.
(2011). Radiat. Transf. 73, 329 (2002).
[17] R.M. Hashmonay, M.G. Yost, Env. Sci. Techn. 33, [40] V. Evseev, A. Fateev, S. Clausen, J. Quant. Spectr.
1141 (1999). Radiat. Transf. 113, 222 (2012).
[18] M. Czerwi«ski, J. Mroczka, T. Girasole, G. Gouesbet, [41] V. Becher, S. Clausen, A. Fateev, H. Splietho, Int.
G. Grehan, Appl. Opt. 40, 1514 (2001). J. Greenhouse Gas Contr. 5S, S76 (2011).
[19] M. Czerwi«ski, J. Mroczka, T. Girasole, G. Gouesbet, [42] V. Becher, S. Clausen, A. Fateev, H. Splietho, Int.
G. Grehan Appl. Opt. 40, 1525 (2001). J. Greenhouse Gas Contr. 5S, S66 (2011).
[20] A. Stec, P. Fardell, P. Blomqvist, L. Bustamante- [43] V. Becher, A. Goanta, H. Splietho, Int. J. Green-
Valencia, L. Saragoza, E. Guillaume, Fire Safety J. house Gas Contr. 11, 34 (2012).
46, 225 (2011).
[44] G.P. Jellison, D.P. Miller, Opt. Eng. 45, 016201
[21] J.H. Ferrase, S. Chavez, P. Arlabosse, N. Dupuy, (2006).
Thermochim. Acta 404, 97 (2003).
[45] M.J. Wooster, P.H. Freeborn, S. Archibald, C. Op-
[22] K. Schafer, C. Jahn, P. Sturm, B. Lechner, M. Bacher, penheimer, G. J. Roberts, T.E.L. Smith, N. Goven-
Atm. Env. 37, 5261 (2003). der, M. Burton, I. Palumbo, Atm. Chem. Phys. 11,
[23] I.R. Burling, R.J. Yokelson, D.W.T. Grith, 11591 (2011).
T.J. Johnson, P. Veres, J.M. Roberts, C. Warneke, [46] J.Mroczka, Measurement 46, 2896 (2013).
S.P. Urbanski, J. Reardon, D.R. Weise, W.M. Hao,
J. Gouw, Atm. Chem. Phys. 10, 11115 (2010).
[47] S. Ci¦szczyk, Metrol. Meas. Syst. 3, 513 (2013).
[27] J. Raisanen, R. Niemela, Ann. Occup. Hyg. 46, 501 D.A. Long, O.M. Lyulin, C.J. Mackie, S.T. Massies,