The document critically compares formal and informal reflection in teaching practice, highlighting their distinct functions and effectiveness in different situations. Informal reflection allows for immediate adjustments during or after lessons, while formal reflection supports long-term assessment and professional growth. The author emphasizes the importance of combining both approaches for continuous improvement in teaching and enhancing student learning experiences.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views3 pages
assignment solved edu406
The document critically compares formal and informal reflection in teaching practice, highlighting their distinct functions and effectiveness in different situations. Informal reflection allows for immediate adjustments during or after lessons, while formal reflection supports long-term assessment and professional growth. The author emphasizes the importance of combining both approaches for continuous improvement in teaching and enhancing student learning experiences.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
Critical Thinking and Reflective Practices (EDU406)
Assignment 1 (Spring 2025)
Student Name: Kainat Rafi Roll no: bc250214567 Assignment Question Q. Critically compare formal and informal reflection in teaching practice. In what situations might one be more effective than the other, and why? Support your answer with specific examples. Formal and Informal Reflection in Teaching Practice: A Critical Comparison Introduction Reflection comes naturally to us as educators. Sometimes it occurs during a lesson, and other times it occurs hours later while we're reflecting. Through reflection, we know what's going well, what didn't, and what can be completed better the next time. The two primary categories are formal and informal. Although both are useful, their functions and ideal operating environments differ. Formal and Informal Reflection Formal reflection is systematic and structured. Writing in teacher journals, lesson planning, attending workshops, and peer review are some of its activities. Formal reflection, which is usually recorded, compels us to think about our teaching critically over time. Informal reflection occurs spontaneously and naturally. "That activity did not work as planned," or "I will try a different example next time," are just some of the short thoughts that may be made during or immediately after class. It assists in making immediate changes although it is seldom written down When Informal Reflection Becomes More Effective Informal reflection is most effective during a lesson or just after. This enables teachers to correct things in the moment or just afterwards. Example: In my own classroom, I have a good lesson plan and attempt to have a warm classroom where students will feel comfortable questioning. But at times, intended or unintended, students appear perplexed. That is when I think on my feet and compensate. For example, in a math’s class, if the students are unable to grasp a concept, I would change it to a visual aid or present another example instantly. That thinking on my feet helps me to reply spontaneously. Why It Works: Immediate action: Helps solve problems during teaching. Timesaving: Doesn’t interrupt the flow of the class. Student-centered: Allows me to respond based on how students are reacting in real time.
When Formal Reflection Is More Effective
Formal reflection is more effective when considering long-term teaching habits or assessing whole units of instruction. Example: After having taught a grammar lesson in English for several weeks, I observed students were having difficulty with sentence structure. Over the weekend, I looked over my lesson plans, reviewed student tests, and even consulted with colleagues. I concluded that my method required more interactive practice. From this reflection, I adjusted upcoming lessons to incorporate more group activities and sentence-construction games. Why It Works: Detailed assessment: Allows for patterns and areas of improvement to be detected. Supports growth: Good for professional development and setting goals. Documentation: Good when doing teacher evaluations and workshops. Combining Both for Maximum Impact The best teaching method is combining both informal and formal approaches. Informal helps me be adaptable and make fast changes in or immediately after a lesson, whereas formal enables careful consideration and planning over time. When these two are combined, they form a loop of ongoing improvement—assisting me in meeting students' needs in the moment and also making significant, strategic adjustments over time. This equilibrium makes my teaching stronger and allows for an improved learning experience for my students. Conclusion Both formal and informal reflection are essential tools in a teacher’s journey. Informal reflection keeps me responsive and adaptable during class, while formal reflection gives me the time and structure to dig deeper, review patterns, and plan for lasting improvements. By combining both, I’m not just reacting, I’m growing. This ongoing process helps me provide the best possible education to every student, every day.
Solution-Focused Brief Therapy in Education: A Practical Guide for Teachers, Counselors, and Mentors with 950 Questions & Techniques to Inspire Student Growth
Getting Started with Teacher Clarity: Ready-to-Use Research Based Strategies to Develop Learning Intentions, Foster Student Autonomy, and Engage Students
A.T.A.P How to Achieve a Workable Classroom Environment: In a Core Curriculum Classroom (Grades Pre-K Through 8Th and Special Education) (A Book of Strategies and Research)
Hacking Learning Centers in Grades 6-12: How to Design Small-Group Instruction to Foster Active Learning, Shared Leadership, and Student Accountability