0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views16 pages

L3A - Surds, Indices & Logarithms

The document provides lecture notes on indices, powers, and logarithms, detailing rules for multiplication, division, and manipulation of powers and logarithmic expressions. It includes examples and explanations of surds, natural logarithms, and methods for calculating logarithms using change of base formulas. The notes emphasize the importance of understanding these mathematical concepts for further studies in algebra.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views16 pages

L3A - Surds, Indices & Logarithms

The document provides lecture notes on indices, powers, and logarithms, detailing rules for multiplication, division, and manipulation of powers and logarithmic expressions. It includes examples and explanations of surds, natural logarithms, and methods for calculating logarithms using change of base formulas. The notes emphasize the importance of understanding these mathematical concepts for further studies in algebra.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

SMA1108: Algebra

Lecture Notes 3

Indices/Powers
In an expression an , a is called the base and n is called the index (or power or exponent).

Multiplication/Division of Powers

a3 × a4 = (a × a × a) × (a × a × a × a) = a7
This illustrates:
Rule 1: ap × aq = ap+q

a×a×a×a×a
Also: a5 ÷ a4 = =a
a×a×a×a
Rule 2: ap ÷ aq = ap−q

Consequences of Rule 2:

a a1 a
= 1 = a1−1 = a0 . But also = 1
a a a

so a0 = 1

a0
Also 1
ap = ap = a0−p = a−p

1
so = a−p
ap

Powers of powers
Examples:

(a3 )2 = a3 × a3 = a6
(a2 )5 = a2 × a2 × a2 × a2 × a2 = a10

Rule 3: (ap )q = apq

q q
Note: The brackets are important here! ap is a(p ) but not (ap )q (therefore, to reduce
q
the chance of confusion, never use ap . Always use the variant with brackets!). E.g.,
2 2
103 = 10(3 ) = 109 (a billion), but (103 )2 = 103×2 = 106 (a million).
The numbers p, q in Rule 3 do not have to be integers, so
 1 n
an = a1 = a.

This shows:
√ 1
Rule 4: n
a = an

Note: If in an expression ap the number p is not an integer, then a has to be positive.

Examples
2
(i) Evaluate 4 3 .
2 Rule 3 1 1
43 = 42 3 = 16 3
Rule 4 √
3
√ √
3
= 16 = 3 8 × 2 = 2 2.
3
(ii) Evaluate 4 2 .
1 3
3
 
Rule 3
42 = 42
√ 3
Rule 4
= 4 = 23 = 8.

1
(iii) Evaluate (43 ) 2 .
1 Rule 3 3 see (ii)
43 2
= 42 = 8.

2 × 23
(iv) Simplify .
42
2 × 23 Rule 1 24 4=22 24 Rule 3 24 Rule 2
= = = = 24−4 = 20 = 1
42 42 (22 )2 24

Logarithms

Examples: (a) What is the power that 10 must be raised to, to give answer 100?
Answer: Since 102 = 100, answer is 2.
(b) What power must 2 be raised to, to give 16?
Answer: 4

We can express these results using logarithms:


(a) says log10 100 = 2
(b) says log2 16 = 4
In general:
b = ac is equivalent to loga b = c.
In words: “The logarithm of b to the base a is c.”

Example: What is log4 64?


Since 43 = 64, one has log4 64 = 3.

Manipulating logarithms

How can we simplify expressions like loga (bc)? The rule is:

Rule 1: loga (bc) = loga b + loga c

Where does this rule come from?

Suppose x = loga b and y = loga c. This means ax = b and ay = c.


So, from Rule 1 for indices (recall ap × aq = ap+q ) we have b × c = ax × ay = ax+y . We
can write this another way as loga (bc) = x + y, and therefore obtain loga (bc) = x + y =
loga b + loga c.
So we have proved Rule 1.

Similarly, one can show (using Rule 2 for indices, i.e., ap /aq = ap−q ):

 
b
Rule 2: loga = loga b − loga c
c

and (using Rule 3 for indices, namely (ap )q = apq )

Rule 3: loga (bd ) = d loga b

Note: Since log is the inverse operation to taking powers, the rules for manipulating
logarithms can be deduced from the rules for manipulating indices here.
 
p
Example: Express loga √ in terms of loga p and loga q.
q
 
p Rule 1
 1
Rule 3 1
loga √ = loga p − loga q 2 = loga p − loga q.
q 2
END: PART1 OF LECTURE 3
In this chapter we have looked at expressions of the type ap = b. Note that the following
cases may emerge:

• You know p and b. Then a is given by a = p b.

• You know a and p. Then b is given by b = ap .

• You know a and b. Then p is given by p = loga b.

We summarise the rules for manipulating surds, indices and logarithms here:

• Surds:
√ √ √
◦ n ab = n a × n b
√ √
◦ n ab = n a ÷ n b
p

• Indices:

◦ Rule 1: ap × aq = ap+q
◦ Rule 2: ap ÷ aq = ap−q
◦ Rule 3: (ap )q = apq
1 √
◦ Rule 4: a n = n a
◦ a0 = 1 and a−p = 1
ap .

• Logarithms:

◦ Rule 1: loga (bc) = loga b + loga c


b
◦ Rule 2: loga c = loga b − loga c
◦ Rule 3: loga bd = d × log ab

Further observations (for logarithms):

(a) Since x0 = 1, this can be rewritten as logx 1 = 0 (for any x 6= 0).


Think about the condition x 6= 0: What would “log0 a” mean, and for which numbers a is this meaningful?

   
1 Rule 2 1
(b) Also loga = loga 1 − loga c, so loga = − loga c
c c

Example
Write − loga p + 3 loga q as a single logarithm.

q3
   
Rule 3 1 Rule 1
+ loga q 3

− loga p + 3 loga q = loga = loga
p p
Natural logarithm
There is a special irrational number that plays an important role as base in calculations
involving logarithms and powers (especially, for integration and differentiation of func-
tions, something we will about later in this course): Euler’s number e = 2.71828 . . ..

Powers to this base e are written as ex = y, while logarithms – which should read
loge y = x – are written ln y = x (ln is the abbreviation of the Latin “logarithmus
naturalis”).

The natural logarithm ln and the logarithm to base 10, which is abbreviated log (written
without any base!), can be found on a (scientific) calculator. This notation for logarithms
is also used in applied sciences.

Warning: In (pure) mathematics, however, log usually denotes the natural logarithm
(log10 plays no special role there!).
In this course, log = log10 always!

Calculating logarithms
Look at the following table:

x 1 2 5 10
log x 0 0.301 (3 d.p.) 0.699 (3 d.p.) 1

If one remembers log 2 ≈ 0.3, many logarithms can be estimated closely.

Examples: log 4 = log(2 × 2) = log 2 + log 2 ≈ 0.3 + 0.3 = 0.6


(in fact, log 4 = 0.602 (3 d.p.))
log 5 = log 10
2 = log 10 − log 2 ≈ 1 − 0.3 = 0.7 (in fact, log 5 = 0.699 (3 d.p.))
3
log 8 = log 2 = 3 log 2 ≈ 3 × 0.3 = 0.9 (in fact, log 8 = 0.903 (3 d.p.))

More examples on logarithms


(a) If 10x = 5, find x.
x = log10 (5) = 0.699 (3 d.p.) (see above or use your calculator).

(b) If (0.1)x = 5, find x.


The easy solution would be x = log0.1 5, but then, how do we calculate logarithms
1
to base 0.1? Note that 0.1 = 10 = 10−1 , therefore
x
5 = (0.1)x = 10−1 = 10−x ,

so −x = log 5 and hence x = − log 5 = −0.699 (3 d.p.).


Change of base
In more general terms, the last example (b) asks the following question: Given ap and a
number b, can one find the index q such that ap = bq ?
Write a = bx , then x = logb a, i.e., a = blogb a (this is actually the definition of the
logarithm!). But then  p
ap = blogb a = bp logb a ,

i.e., ap = bp logb a (~).

On the calculator, only ln and log can be found. How can we calculate log2 5, log3 7 etc.?
~
Again, p = loga c means c = ap = bp logb a , hence logb c = p logb a. So, we have two
equations for p, namely p = loga c and p = logb c/ logb a, and therefore obtain
logb c
loga c =
logb a

This is the formula if we want to change the base in logarithms (the “old” base a appears
in the logarithm in the denominator on the right-hand side!)

log 5
Example: log2 5 = log 2 = 2.322 (3 d.p.)
7
With log 2 ≈ 0.3 and log 5 ≈ 0.7, we estimate log 5 ÷ log 2 ≈ 0.7/0.3 = 3
= 3.3.

More examples and a warning (not lectured)


Examples:
(a) If 3x = 5, find x.
log 5
x = log3 5 = = 1.465 (3 d.p.).
log 3
(b) Write log8 32 in terms of logs to base 2, hence find log8 32 exactly.
log2 32 5
log8 32 = =
log2 8 3

logb c c
Warning: logb a 6= logb a (e.g., log 10/ log 2 = 1/ log 2 = 3.322 (3 d.p.), while
10
log 2 = log 5 = 0.699 (3 d.p.))
Expression where two logarithms are multiplied or divided cannot be sim-
plified, at least not in an “easy way”!
For the “not-so-easy” way, study the following example:
Rule 3 for log
 
(log2 100) × (log 2) = log 2log2 100 = log 100 = 2.

END: PART2 OF LECTURE 3:


MORE ON SURDS TO
FOLLOW
MORE ON: SURDS, INDICES & LOGARITHMS

§3 Surds, Indices & Logarithms

Square roots √ √
√ b = a × a, then we say that a is the square root of b, written a = b, e.g., 2 = 4.
If
b always means
√ the postive square√root of b.
Example 49 = 7 and −7 = − 49

General roots
Examples:

4
16 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 so 2 = 16 (“the fourth root”)

5

10
1024 = 4 × 4 × 4 × 4 × 4 so 4 = 1024 Also 2 = 1024 .

n
| ×a×
If b = a {z· · · × a}, then a = b.
n times

Surds √
Some roots are irrational, e.g., 2. Such numbers are called surds and are manipulated
as symbols.


Irrationality of 2 (not given in lecture, not examinable)

This is an example in mathematical reasoning.


One easily verifies the following two statements:
n
(a) If a fraction m is in lowest terms, the numerator n and the denominator m cannot
be both even numbers (if they were, we could cancel a common factor of 2).

(b) The square of an even number is even, the square of an odd number is odd.
√ √ n
Now assume that 2 is rational, i.e., there are integers n and m such that 2 = m .
n
Let m be in lowest terms (so, according to (a) above, at least one of the two numbers is
√ n n2 2 2
odd). Taking the square of 2 = m on both sides yields 2 = m2 and hence 2m = n .
2
But this shows, that n contains a factor of 2 and is therefore even. Using (b) above, we
therefore conclude that n itself is even;
√ consequently, m is odd.
n
So far, we have: If we assume that 2 = m is rational, then the numerator n is even
and the denominator m is odd.
However, since n is even, there is another integer k such that n = 2k (k is half of n and
√ n 4k2
an integer since n is even). Then 2 = m = 2k
m and squaring this yields 2 = m2 and
hence m2 = 2k 2 . But then, m2 (being twice some integer) is even and therefore (using
(b)) also m!
√ √ n
Result: From the assumption that 2 is rational, 2 = m , we have concluded that the
denominator m is both even and odd. This is absurd, √ since an integer is either even or
odd, therefore the assumption has to be wrong. So, 2 is not rational.

Addition/Subtraction
√ √ √
Example: 2 + 3 2 = 4 2.
√ √
We cannot simplify 2 − 5 3.

Multiplication
√ √ √
The rule is: n ab = n a × n b
Examples:
√ √ √ √ √
8= 4×2= 4× 2=2 2

3
√ √3
√3

3
24 = 3 8 × 3 = 8 × 3 = 2 3

Division r √
n
a a
The rule is : n
= √
n
b b
q √
9 √9 3
Example: 25 = 25
= 5

Examples
√ √ √
(a) Simplify 12 − 3 + 5.
Reducing to smallest possible surds, answer is
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
12 − 3+ 5 = 2 3 − 3 + 5 = 3 + 5.
√ √
(b) Simplify: (2 + 3)(3 + 5).
√ √ √ √ √ √
(2 + 3)(3 + 5) = 2 × 3 + 2 5 + 3 3 + 3 × 5
√ √ √
= 6 + 2 5 + 3 3 + 15.
√ √
(c) Simplify: 7(4 − 7).
√ √ √ √ √ √
7(4 − 7) = 4 7 − 7 7 = 4 7 − 7.

When simplifying fractions we are required to make sure that the denominator is rational.

Example: √ √
3 3 5 3 5
√ = √ √ =
5 5 5 5
↑ ↑
irrational denom. rational denom.

2 √
For fractions such as √ , multiplying numerator and denominator by 4 + 3 will
4− 3
rationalise the denominator (remember the formula for the difference of two squares:
(a − b)(a + b) = a2 − b2 ):
√ √ √
2 2(4 + 3) 8+2 3 8+2 3
√ = √ √ = = .
4− 3 (4 − 3)(4 + 3) 16 − 3 13

Examples:

(a) Simplify √ 5 .
3 7−2
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
5 5(3 7 + 2) 3 5 7+2 5 3 35 + 2 5 3 35 + 2 5
√ = √ √ = √ = =
3 7−2 (3 7 − 2)(3 7 + 2) 9( 7)2 − 4 63 − 4 59

(b) Simplify √ 5 .
5−1
√ √ √ √ √ √ √
5 5( 5 + 1) ( 5)2 + 5 5+ 5 5+ 5
√ = √ √ = √ = =
5−1 ( 5 − 1)( 5 + 1) ( 5)2 − 1 5−1 4

END OF LECTURE 3

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy