General audit procedures
General audit procedures
Welcome to the firms, this memo aims to explain fundamental concepts you’ll encounter in your daily
work
Materiality refers to the significant of misstatement or omissions on financial statements that affect the
decisions making process of users of audited FS such as shareholders, managers, public investors,… If
there is high risk area, auditors must set low materiality and investigate further. Materiality also based
on the size and nature of the entity being audited. Materiality can be based on both qualitative and
quantitative information to judge. Some transaction are material in nature such as cash, tax,…
Sampling is a application procedures for auditor to able to access the accuracy and completeness of
transactions and balances without investigate 100% of items with FS. Sampling can be determined based
on professional subjective judgement of auditors and based on firm situation or high risk area. We use
sampling because examining every transactions would be impractical and inefficient. Results from
samples are extrapolated to draw conclusions about the entire population.
Detection risk is the risk that out audit procedures will fail to detect a material misstatement that exist in
FS. It is components of total audit risk. This is the only risk that auditor can control through planning and
execution, and it can never be eliminated entirely, only reduced to an acceptable level.
Reasonable assurance is assurance from auditors that FS are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error. It acknowledges that due to inherent limitations in auditing, we cannot guarantee
the absolute absence of misstatements due to costly and time limited. It recognizes that an audit has
limitations, including the use of judgement and the nature of evidence, and the fact that we do not test
every transactions
Essay question
1. The future of auditing and the auditing profession has been under
a lot of scrutiny lately. Explain how the auditing process and the
auditing profession might develop in the next ten year
Auditing profession: rules for auditors is to be independence =>
discuss problem associated with long association and intimidation =>
there need to be stricter rules and certain guideline subject to
situations
Audit process: Obtain engagement letter => Planning=> Perform the
audit => Review and reporting
In future, use more technology to gather information and
evidence, use more expert for compute auditing
Conclude on more things other than just financial statement
More regulations
Do more KAMs for other company as well, what have auditor
done to verify transparency
7. The latest trend in auditing is the use of technology in audit work.
Explain the benefits and potential pitfalls of using technology.
What is auditing though, with, round the computer?
Technology benefits vs cost
Benefits: efficiency and accuracy
Broad, reliable and consistent, date base, remote working, collaboration
across geographic location
Question 13:
Weakness:
1. Chris rewards his staff through bonus scheme and competitions. This can promote unethical
behaviors through conflict of interest, the staff may have incentives to manipulated accounting
transactions to overstate revenue and understated expenses so that store’s performance appear
favorable
Manager might use these records to provide favorable financial positions for the company
2. The stock level of each store is not managed properly as the staff are not permitted to call
another store to deliver stock resulting in overdue stock in one store and out of stock in another
store. Moreover, the company does not have a system for customer to do online ordering. This
will significantly delay sales process as they customers have to wait for ordering stock. This might
eventually lead to loss of sales.
The stock level at each store is independently manage, hence the discrepancies are harder to
notices. This would allow the assistant manager to steal stock without immediate detection
3. Anyone in the store can raise a purchase requisition, and the store manager authorizes these.
However, there is no system to check if the requisition is necessary or valid.
Manager could raise falsify purchase orders, as no one will check the purchases and stock level,
manager can use this to steal the orders or cash outflows from the orders
4. There is lack of segregation of duties as the accounts staff process payments without additional
authorization or oversight, leaving room for fraudulent invoices to be paid. This might promote
incentives for committing fraud activities.
5. When goods are delivered, there is no signed that qualified staff are appointed to verify the
quality and quantity of stock inventory. This reduces accountability and increases the risk of
unwanted stock going unnoticed.
The assistant manager could deliberately accept incorrect or inflated deliveries and later
misappropriate the excess stock without anyone questioning the discrepancies.
6. There is no secondary review of invoices before payment. This lack of dual control creates an
opportunity to submit fraudulent invoices and ensure payment. The manager depends on his
store managers and account staff experience rather than implementing systematic controls. This
can lead to lack of accountability and monitoring.
7. Review cash flow and stock reports monthly is not timely enough to detect anomalies quickly.
Quarterly management accounts prepared externally may not highlight smaller, ongoing
fraudulent activities.
8. There assistant manager exploited the lack of control over purchase requisition amendments.
There is no safeguards to prevent modifications, which allowed her to add unauthorized items.
9. GRNs were sent directly to head office without cross checking against the original, authorized
purchase requisitions. This lack of verification allowed false or manipulated GRNs to pass
unnoticed.
10. The accounts team processed invoices without secondary authorization or matching them to the
original purchase requisitions. This allowed payments for fraudulent goods to proceed without
raising alarms.
The assistant manager could submit fraudulent invoices for goods that were never ordered or
received, and the accounts team would process them without detecting the fraud.
There assistant manager exploited the lack of Identify who has access to amend PRs and
control over purchase requisition amendments. whether the person have enough expertise to
There is no safeguards to prevent modifications, order or approve for PRs
which allowed her to add unauthorized items. Identify unauthorized or questionable additions,
such as items not aligned with operational needs.
GRNs were sent directly to head office without Document the full process from purchase
cross checking against the original, authorized requisition to goods receipt and GRN issuance.
purchase requisitions. This lack of verification Select a sample of GRNs sent to head office and
allowed false or manipulated GRNs to pass trace each GRN back to its original, authorized PR
unnoticed. and matching purchase order.
Check for discrepancies in items descriptions,
quantities, or pricing and whether any these were
flagged or corrected
The accounts team processed invoices without Analyze payment patterns to identify anomalies
secondary authorization or matching them to the like frequent payments to new or unknown
original purchase requisitions. This allowed suppliers, duplicate invoices, or unusually high
payments for fraudulent goods to proceed quantities or values.
without raising alarms. Review company policies to assess whether
The assistant manager could submit segregation of duties exists in the accounts
fraudulent invoices for goods that were payable process (e.g., one person preparing and
never ordered or received, and the another approving invoices).
accounts team would process them Discuss with the procurement team to assess
without detecting the fraud. how they ensure the authenticity of purchase
requisitions and whether they communicate with
accounts about goods ordered and received.