2008 Worldwide Survey of Subsea Processing Systems
2008 Worldwide Survey of Subsea Processing Systems
www.akerkvaerner.com/subsea FLOWSERVE SHINES FMC Technologies delivered the world’s first full-scale subsea separation of oil,
Reliable seabed boosting with
part of Aker multiphase twin-screw pumps
water and sand for StatoilHydro. The Next Generation Subsea system will extend
the life of Tordis, and along with other upgrades to the field, it will enable the
ÃV«i
STATUS OF THE TECHNOLOGY Fig. 4: Bornemann Twin Screw Pump & Motor Incorporates Multiphase Boosting, Multiphase
COURTESY OF CURTISS-WRIGHT & LEISTRITZ
--Ê «ÀiÃÃ
COURTESY OF FLOWSERVE
COURTESY OF FRAMO ENGINEERING Metering, Multiport Selector Manifold for up to 8 "ÀiÊ>}iÊnxäÊÉÓ]ÇnÊv̰®
M ARCH 2008
COURTESY OF LEISTRITZ COURTESY OF CURTISS-WRIGHT & LEISTRITZ
wells and with Fiber optics and Hydraulics Control
system. Two systems delivered to Oilexco.
Fig. 2: Leistritz Twin Screw Pump & Motor
COURTESY OF FRAMO ENGINEERING 6Ê*ÜiÀÉ ÌÀ
Prepared By: Tom Choate, PE, Michael Padilla, Mac McKee, and Tim Turner of INTEC COURTESY OF AKER KVAERNER COURTESY OF CAMERON COURTESY OF CURTISS-WRIGHT & LEISTRITZ
Engineering and E. Kurt Albaugh, PE of BHP Billiton COURTESY OF Baker Hughes SUBSEA BOOSTING METHODS USING ESPs SUBSEA PROCESSING ENABLER – MARS™ SS WATER INJECTION SYSTEMS Fig. 3 & 4: AkerKvaerner LiquidBooster™ Subsea Raw Seawater Injection System (Photo: StatoilHydro Tyrihans SS Raw Seawater Injection (SRSWI) System)
}Ê£]ÇääÊÉx]xÇnÊv̰®
Centrilift
Email comments, corrections, or additions to: ssp@intec.com Fig. 1: Horizontal ESP Boosting Station Fig. 2: ESP in Caisson Boosting System (Multiple Application Re-injection System) Fig. 1: Raw Seawater WI Schematic Fig. 2: Raw Seawater WI Schematic Sample
6Ê iVÌÀ
Fig. 1: MARS™ Subsea Tree Fig. 2: Cameron’s MARS™ Fig. 3: MARS™ First Application:
Interface diagram. System on SS Tree BP King Project (2007)
COURTESY OF Baker Hughes Centrilift ÃÌ>i` }Ê£]ÇääÊÉx]xÇnÊv̰®
COURTESY OF LEISTRITZ COURTESY OF BORNEMANN COURTESY OF FRAMO ENGINEERING COURTESY OF Baker Hughes Centrilift
+Õ>vi`É/iÃÌ}Ê
Vi«ÌÕ>
SUBSEA GAS COMPRESSION SYSTEMS & PRODUCTS Fig. 4: FMC & Siemens Fig. 5: Kvaerner Booster Fig. 6: FRAMO Wet Fig. 7: FRAMO SS
Technology – SS Wet Station (KBS) for SS Gas Compression Wet Gas
Fig. 1: Aker Kvaerner – Proposed Ormen Fig. 2: Aker Kvaerner – GasBooster™ Fig. 3: FMC Technologies SS Gas
Gas Compressor Gas Compression System Compression System äÊ xääÊ £]äääÊ £]xääÊ Ó]äääÊ Ó]xääÊ Î]äääÊ
Lange SS Gas Compression Package SS Wet Gas Compression System Compression Station
MAGAZINE COURTESY OF TECHNIP COURTESY OF BAKER HUGHES CENTRILIFT COURTESY OF AKER KVAERNER äÊv̰ £]È{äÊv̰ Î]Ón£Êv̰ {]Ó£Êv̰ È]xÈÓÊv̰ n]ÓäÓÊv̰ ]n{ÎÊv̰
Information Accuracy: We have attempted to use correct and current, as of press time, information for the subsea processing systems and equipment described herein. No installed, sanctioned, nor TABLE 2 – METHODS/CONFIGURATIONS TABLE 1 – WORLDWIDE SURVEY OF SUBSEA GAS COMPRESSION, BOOSTING, WATER INJECTION, AND SEPARATION (1)
69
pending application was intentionally excluded. We have summarized the capability and operating experience by acting as a neutral party and integrator of information. Information has been collected £]È{ä
from public sources, company brochures, personal interviews, phone interviews, press releases, industry magazines, vendor-supplied information, and web sites. No guarantee is made that information TECHNOLOGY
GAS VOLUME
is accurate or all-inclusive. Neither INTEC Engineering nor Offshore Magazine assumes any responsibility or liability for any party’s use of the information presented. If any information is found to be STATUS *>âvÀ "ÀiÊ>}i
FRACTION
incorrect, not current, or has been omitted, please send comments to ssp@intec.com. OWNER/ £]äää
STATUS
POWER
PUMPS
NO. OF
COUNT
SAMPLE PROJECTS PROCESSING WATER TIEBACK SYSTEM LIQUID DIFFERENTIAL SYSTEM PUMP >ÃÊi`Ê Ûi«i
INSTALLED OR
CONCEPTUAL
Î]Ón£
OPERATING
FIELD OR PROJECT COMMENTS YEAR FIELD REGION PUMP TYPE
QUALIFIED
METHOD/CONFIGURATION Where systems have
LOCATIONS FOR CONCEPTUAL, QUALIFIED, AND INSTALLED SYSTEMS progressed the furthest DISCIPLINE DEPTH DISTANCE THROUGHPUT PRESSURE PACKAGER MANUFACTURER "Êi`Ê Ûi«i
>ÀiÌÃÊ-i> OPERATOR
- Ì>Ê «ÀiÃî £]xää
ÀÜi}>Ê-i> {]Ó£
7>ÌiÀÊ i«Ì
- ÛÌÊ «ÀiÃî Fig. 6: Well Processing SWIT
i>Ê*Õ«}® SUBSEA COMPRESSION METHODS/CONFIGURATIONS MBOPD % OF }
Yr. (11) COMPANY Meters Feet Km Miles M3/Hr. BAR (3) PSI (3) MW (2) COMPANY PUMPS TYPE COMPANY COURTESY OF FRAMO ENGINEERING
System As A Template.
À>Õ}iÊ*Õ«}®
ÀÌ Ê-i> 1 Centrifugal (AKS, Siemens/FMC) Q Ormen Lange, Asgard MBWPD VOL. À}>ÕÌ>Ê £ä®
/ÀÊ-i«>À>Ì]Ê7® Ó]äää
/ÞÀ >ÃÊ7® ÕL>Ê >ÃÌÊ7® 2 Contra-Rotating Axial (Framo WGC) Q 1 DEMO 2000 Q Statoil K-Lab Test 2001 Statoil Norway 3.60 Framo Engineering Framo È]xÈÓ
Ã}>À`Ê «ÀiÃî VÊ*Õ«}® 3 Twin-Screw Multiphase Pump C
"ÀiÊ>}iÊ «ÀiÃî Ài`>Ê*Õ«}® 2 Ormen Lange (4) Q 2011 Hydro Norway 850 2,789 120 193 520 79 60 870 60 Aker Kvaerner 4 Aker Kvaerner/GE >ÃÊqÊ Vi«ÌÕ>
/ÀÊ «ÀiÃî /*Ê*Õ«}® WELL PRODUCTION FLOW BOOSTING METHODS/CONFIGURATIONS Ó]xää
>ÃV>`i
3 Asgard Q 2012 StatoilHydro Norway 250 820 53 85 16 TBA 2 TBA >ÃÊqÊ+Õ>vi`É/iÃÌ}Ê
ÞiÊ*Õ«}® 1 MPP Per Well O Ceiba C3 & C4, King SUBSEA GAS n]ÓäÓ
À}ÞÊ-i«>À>Ì® "ÊqÊ+Õ>vi`É/iÃÌ}
7iÃÌÊvÊ- iÌ>`Ã
2 MPP at SS Manifold O Ceiba
COMPRESSION 4 Troll C 2016 StatoilHydro Norway 340 1,116 4 6 TBA TBA "ÊqÊÃÌ>i`
/À`ÃÊ-i«>À>Ì]Ê*Õ«}]Ê7®
-V i >Ê*Õ«}®
Ài`>ÊÓÊ*Õ«}® 3 MPPs Incorporated within SS Manifold I Brenda, Exeter + Mutineer 5 Shtokman C 2020 Gazprom Barents Sea 350 1,148 565 909 240 TBA TBA Î]äää
/ÀiV>Ìi ]n{Î
ä £ää Óää Îää {ää xää Èää
*ÀiâÃÊ*Õ«}®
4 MPP at Flowline Inlet I Ceiba, Shiehallion, Vincent, Azurite 6 Snohvit C 2020 Statoil Barents Sea 345 1,132 143 230 60 TBA TBA ä ià ÈÓ £Ó{ £nÈ Ó{ Σ£ ÎÇÎ
5 MPP at Riser Base Q
1 Prezioso (20) I MPP @ Base of Platform 1994 AGIP Italy 50 164 0 0 65 10 40 580 0.15 30-90% Nuovo Pignone (8) 1 Twin-Screw GE Oil & Gas /iL>VÊ ÃÌ>Vi COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING
6 ESP Downhole in SS Well O Otter, Gannet, Lihua
LÕÊ >L 2 Draugen Field I SMUBS Project 1994 A/S Norske Shell Norway 270 886 6 3.7 193 29 53 773 0.75 42% Framo Engineering 1 Helico-Axial Framo COURTESY OF Well Processing
" <>ÕÊ-i«>À>Ì®
7 ESP Downhole + MPP O Mutineer/Exeter
>Û>Ê*Õ«}® 8 ESP Downhole + Caisson ESP O Jubarte 3 Gela Field I 1994 AGIP À>« ÊÎÊqÊ/iL>VÊ ÃÌ>ViÊÛðÊ/i
}Ê*Õ«}® Fig. 7: Well Processing’s new Sea Water Óään
>ÃV>`iÊ*Õ«}® -ÕÌ Ê >Ê-i> 9 ESP Downhole + ESP Horiz. Boost Station Q 4 Lufeng 22/1 Field (9)(19) O Tieback to FPSO 1998 StatoilHydro South China Sea 330 1,083 1 0.6 860 130 35 508 0.40 3% FMC Technologies 5+2 Spare Centrifugal (1P) Framo Injection and Treatment System (SWIT) äÊ
Ê*Õ«}® Õvi}Ê*Õ«}® 10 ESP Vertical Boost Station (Caisson ESP) Q Golfinho 5 Machar Field (ETAP Project) I 1999 BP Amoco North Sea 85 277 35.2 21.9 555 84 22 319 0.90 64% Framo Engineering 2+1 Spare Helico-Axial Framo now in development in Norway. äÊ Õvi} *>âvÀ /À
*iÀ``Ê-i«>À>Ì® COURTESY OF Well Processing /«>V
11 ESP Horizontal Seafloor Boost Station Q Cascade/Chinook
-*-Ê-i«>À>Ì®
µÕ>ÌÀ>ÊÕi> }>
6 Topacio Field O Tieback to Zafiro FPSO 2000 ExxonMobil Equatorial Guinea 500 1,641 9 5.6 470 71 35 508 0.86 75% 2+1 Spare Helico-Axial Framo Óä
12 ESP in Flowline Riser O Navajo V
£Ó
/«>VÊ*Õ«}® âÕÀÌiÊ*Õ«}® 7 Ceiba C3 and C4 O 2002 Triton E.G. Equatorial Guinea 750 2,461 7.5 4.7 450 68 45 653 0.84 50% Framo Engineering 2+1 Spare Helico-Axial Framo À>« ÊÈÊqÊ->«iÊvÊ vviÀiÌ>Ê*ÀiÃÃÕÀiÊEÊ*Õ«Ê-iiVÌÊ
iL>Ê Ê*Õ«}®Ê *>âvÀÊ-i«>À>Ì® 13 ESP in Flowline Jumper (Note 1) C ÛðÊ6Ê>`ÉÀÊ"«iÀ>Ì}Ê/i } /ÞÀ >Ã
Ceiba Field (FFD) >V >ÀÊ /*®
iL>ÊÎÊEÊ{Ê*Õ«}® SUBSEA WATER INJECTION METHODS/CONFIGURATIONS 8 O Full Field Development 2003 Triton E.G. Equatorial Guinea 700 2,297 7.5 4.7 1,800 272 40 580 0.85 75% Framo Engineering 4+1 Spare Helico-Axial Framo {ä
Óxä Óx
1 Produced WI System (with SS Separation) O Troll C Pilot 9 Mutineer/Exeter O Well ESPs+MPP on seafloor 2004 Santos W. Australia 140 459 7 4.3 600 91 30 435 1.10 0-40% Framo Engineering 2+1 Spare Helico-Axial (16)
-** -**ÊqÊ-}iÊ* >ÃiÊ*Õ« Ã}>À`
/iL>VÊ ÃÌ>Vi
vviÀiÌ>Ê*ÀiÃÃÕÀi
>«ÃÊ >à ëÀÌÊ->ÌÊ >à 2 Raw Sea Water SS Injection System I Colomba E 10 Brenda Field O For Framo MultiManifold 2005 OILEXCO N.S. North Sea 145 476 8.5 5.3 750 113 35 508 1.10 40-65% Framo Engineering 1+1 Spare Helico-Axial Framo Óää **ÊqÊÕÌÊ* >ÃiÊ*Õ« Èä
>ÀL>Ê-i«>À>Ì® ÕL>ÀÌiÊ*Õ«}®Ê SUBSEA SEPARATION METHODS/CONFIGURATIONS 7 ÊqÊ7iÌÊ>ÃÊ «ÀiÃà ÎÇ
ë>`>ÀÌiÊ*Õ«}®
7iÃÌiÀÊÕÃÌÀ>> 11 Lyell O SS Tieback to Ninian South 2005 CNR North Sea 140 459 11 6.8 200 30 20 290 1.10 0-90% Aker Kvaerner 1 Twin-Screw Bornemann
ÕL>ÀÌiÊ* >ÃiÊÓÊ*Õ«}®
>ÀÊ*Õ«}® >>«ÕÊ-i«>À>Ì® ÃÌ>i` 6ViÌÊ*Õ«}® 1 In-line Supersonic - Twister Technology Q Canapu Field £xä
L>VÀ>Ê7® £äÊ-i«>À>Ì]Ê*Õ«}® +Õ>vi`É/iÃÌ}Ê ÕÌiiÀÉ ÝiÌiÀÊ*Õ«}® 12 Jubarte Field O Uses BCSS (14) 2007 Petrobras Espirito Santo Basin 1,350 4,429 4 2.5 146 22 138 2,002 1.10 10-40% FMC Technologies 4 ESP BH Centrilift nä
2 ESP Downhole Oil/Water Separation Q xä
v Ê*Õ«}® Vi«ÌÕ> COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING FULL WELLSTREAM 13 Schiehallion I 2 Systems 2006 BP West of Shetlands 400 1,312 3 1.9 2x1,350 2x204 26 377 1.80 74% Framo Engineering 4 Helico-Axial Framo ÞLÀ`
3 ESP Downhole Gas/Liquid Separation Q £ää } Ê ÃÌ
4 ESP Caisson Separation O Marimba (VASPS) SUBSEA BOOSTING 14 King (7) O SS Tieback to Marlin TLP 2007 BP GOM, MC Blks 1,700 5,578 29 18 550 83 50 725 1.00 0-95% Aker Kvaerner 2+1 Spare Twin-Screw Bornemann *£rxä *£rÓä *£r£ä £ää
L>À> ÈÓ
TABLE 3 – DRIVERS FOR: 2.3 FACILITIES ADVANTAGES
2.3.1 Longer subsea tiebacks 5 2-Phase - Gas/Liquid Q Pazflor 15 Nicol Field I 2007 OILEXCO N.S. North Sea 145 476 18.5 11.5 338 51 Framo Engineering 1 Helico-Axial Framo xä
1.0 SUBSEA COMPRESSION
1.1 Increase subsea tieback distance 6 2-Phase - Water/Oil with Water Reinjection O Troll C Pilot ** 7 £Óä
"ÀiÊ>}i
1.2 Improve flow assurance issues 3.0 SUBSEA WATER INJECTION 16 Navajo Field (17) O ESP in Flowline Riser 2007 Anadarko GOM 1,169 3,834 6.7 4.2 24 4 40 583 0.75 57% Centilift 1 ESP BH Centrilift Çx
3.1 Eliminate topsides water injection handling equipment 7 3-Phase - Gas, then Oil/Water I Tordis äÊL>À
3.2 Eliminate water injection flowlines 17 Vincent I 2008 Woodside W. Australia 475 1,558 3 1.9 1,250 189 42 609 1.80 25-70% Framo Engineering 2+2 Spare Helico-Axial Framo ä £ä Óä Îä {ä xä Èä Çä nä ä £ää
>ÃÊqÊ Vi«ÌÕ>
2.0 SUBSEA BOOSTING
2.1 RESERVOIR ADVANTAGES
>ÃÊqÊ+Õ>vi`É/iÃÌ}Ê
£{ä
2.1.1 Increase ultimate recovery by lowering abandonment pressure 4.0 SUBSEA SEPARATION ,*ÊÊqÊ-ÕLÃi>Ê*Õ«}Ê"«iÀ>ÌÊ Ý«iÀiViÊLÞÊ*ÀiVÌ 18 Marlim Q SBMS-500 SS Field Test 2008 Petrobras Campos Basin 640 2,100 3.1 1.9 500 75 60 870 1.20 0-100% Curtiss-Wright/Kvaerner 1 Twin-Screw Leistritz COURTESY OF FRAMO ENGINEERING 6ʯ® EÊ/i nÇ "ÊqÊ+Õ>vi`É/iÃÌ} - ÛÌ
2.1.2 Enable oil recovery from low pressure reservoirs 4.1 Minimize topsides water handling "ÊqÊÃÌ>i`
2.1.3 Enable oil recovery for low quality fluids 4.2 Remove liquids from gas stream
Ê Ê "°Ê"Ê
19 Brenda #2 Q 2008 OILEXCO N.S. North Sea 145 476 8.5 5.3 750 113 35 508 1.10 40-65% Framo Engineering 1 Helico-Axial Framo À>« ÊÇÊqÊ6Ê >«>LÌÞÊLÞÊ*Õ«Ê/Þ«i
2.2 PRODUCTION ADVANTAGES 4.3 Increase hydrocarbon production volume £Èä
*," /É Ê "* ,/",Ê *1*-Ê 9 ,-Ê"Ê"* ,/"
2.2.1 Increase production rate by reducing the flowing wellhead pressure 4.4 Decrease total boost system power requirements 20 Argonauta (BC-10) Q Caisson /Artifical Lift Manifold 2009 Shell Brazil 1,900 6,234 9 5.6 64 9.7 165 2,393 1.10 30% FMC Technologies 2 ESP BH Centrilift
2.2.2 Reduce opex by reducing recovery time (shorten life of field) £x Óäää Óääx Óä£ä Óä£x ÓäÓä ÓäÓx
/Ü-VÀiÜÊ"«iÀ>Ì} n
2.2.3 Offset friction or elevation pressure loss COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING & BHP BILLITON
1 ÊÊ -//"Ê", /Ê x³ÓÊ °ää 21 Golfinho Field Q ESP in Caisson (BCSS) 2009 Petrobras Espirito Santo Basin 1,350 4,429 146 22 138 2,002 1.10 10-40% FMC Technologies 4 ESP Ìi\Ê- Ì>Ê«ÀiVÌÊÀiÛi`ÊÌÊÀi`ÕViÊÛiÀ>ÊÃV>i°ÊxÈxÊÊÊ9i>ÀÊÓäÓä® 9i>À COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING
*Õ«Ê/Þ«i
LDDM Long Distance Delivery Management SUBSIS Subsea Separation and Injection System Ê ÎÊEÊ {Ê , Ê --Ê Ó³£Ê x°ää
BCSS Centrifugal Subsea Submersible Pump LDDS Long Distance Delivery System SWIT Subsea Water Injection and Treatment System äÊ
24 Chinook Q Horizontal ESP on Skid 2009 Petrobras GOM 2,682 8,800 19.3 12 135 20 160 2,326 1.80 0% FMC Technologies 4 ESP BH Centrilift -*Ê iÌÀvÕ}>®ÊÜÌ ÊiÊ-i«>À>ÌÀ {x äÊv̰ <>Õ
BLPD Barrels of Liquid per Day MBLPD Thousand Barrels of Liquid per Day VASPS Vertical Annular Separation and Pumping System Ê Ê --Ê È³ÓÊ {°ää À}Þ Ã}>À` - Ì>
BPD Barrels per Day MPP Multiphase Pump VSD Variable Speed Drive
BOPD Barrels of Oil per Day MW Megawatts WD Water Depth 1/ ,É 8/ ,Ê - /"-Ê Ó³£Ê ΰää 25 Espadarte Q Horizontal ESP on Skid 2009 Petrobras Brazil 1,400 4,593 83 13 120 1,740 0.90 10-40% 1 ESP EÊ- ÛÌ
-*Ê iÌÀvÕ}>®ÊÜÌ ÊiVÝ>Ê-Ì>}ià Çx À>Õ}i
CAPEX Capital Expenditures OPEX Operational Expenditures WGC Wet Gas Compressor
CTCU Cable Traction Control Unit PCM Power Control Module WI Water Injection "" Ê Ê ,Ê ÓÊ £°ää 26 Jubarte Field Q Phase 2 - Uses BCSS (14) 2010 Petrobras Espirito Santo Basin 1,193 3,914 145 22 30-40% Aker Kvaerner 8 ESP /À
xää
iVÝ>Ê"«iÀ>Ì} n /«>V
ESP Electrical Submersible Pump PCDM Power and Communication Distribution Module WIP Water Injection Pump , Ê " 8 "Ê £³£Ê ä°xä 1 Troll C Pilot (15) O SUBSIS (SS Sep.& WI Sys.) 2000 NorskHydro AS Norway 340 1,116 4 2.5 250 38 151 2,190 1.60 ABB/Framo 1+1 Spare Helico-Axial Framo £]È{ä -*-Ê*ÀiVÌ
FFD Full Field Development PLIM Pipeline Inline Manifold
FPS Floating Production System ROV Remote Operated Vehicle SUBSEA SEPARATION TYPES /", -Ê -//"Ê Ó³ÓÊ ä°£ä iVÝ>Ê>ÝÕ £ää
FPSO Floating, Production, Storage, & Offloading Vessel RPM Revolutions Per Minute 2-Phase (Gas/Liquid)
2 Tordis Field (13) I SS Sep. + MPP + WI 2007 StatoilHydro North Sea 200 656 11 6.8 650 98 100 1,450 2.30 FMC Technologies (12) Helico-Axial Framo/FMC iL>Ê ÎÊEÊ { "ÀiÊ>}i
GOWSP Gas-Oil-Water Separation Platform RWI Raw Water Injection 2-Phase (Oil/Water) 6 /Ê 7"" - Ê ,9Ê Ó³ÓÊ ä°£ä SUBSEA WATER
3 Columba E. I SS Water Injection 2007 CNR North Sea 145 476 331 50 305 4,424 2.30 Framo Engineering 2 Centrifugal Framo ä¯ Óä¯ {ä¯ Èä¯ nä¯ £ää¯ £]äää
GVF Gas Volume Fraction SCM Subsea Control Module 3-Phase (Gas/Oil/Water)
*Ê - " Ê {Ê ä°ää INJECTION Î]Ón£
Hp Horsepower SIORS Subsea Increased Oil Recovery System 4-Phase (3-Phase with solids removal & disposal)
4 Albacora Leste Field Q Raw Water Injection 2009 Petrobras Brazil 1,240 4,068 375 57 80 1,160 .5-1.2 Framo Engineering 3+1 Spare Helico-Axial Framo COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING 6¯
ICS Integrated Compressor System SMUBS Subsea Multiphase Booster Station
7>ÌiÀÊ i«Ì
IOR Improved (Increased) Oil Recovery SS Subsea COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING & BHP BILLITON COURTESY OF FRAMO ENGINEERING
ä £ Ó Î { x È Ç n £ä
5 Tyrihans Q SS Raw Sea WI System 2009 StatoilHydro Norway 300 984 31 19.3 710 107 190 2,756 2.50 Aker Kvaerner 2+1 Spare Centrifugal Aker Kvaerner À>« ÊnÊqÊ*ÜiÀÊ,iµÕÀiiÌÃÊÊ`Û`Õ>Ê*Õ«ÃÊUÊ-i«>À>ÌÊ>`Ê ÃÌ}Ê"Þ
£]xää
CHART 1 – SUBSEA SUPPLIER MATRIX 1 SPS Project Q 1968 Exxon GOM 610 2,001 80 12 ΰä {]Ó£
}
-1 - Ê*," -- 2 Zakum I 1970 BP Abu Dhabi 22 72 0 0 ÃÌ>i`
-9-/ - Ó°x
+Õ>vi`É/iÃÌ} /ÞÀ >Ã Ó°x
3 Argyll I 1989 BOET (6) North Sea 75 246 Ó°Î
Ó]äää
/À`Ã ÕL>Ê È]xÈÓ
4 Troll C Pilot (15) O SUBSIS (SS Sep.& WI Sys.) 2000 NorskHydro AS Norway 340 1,116 4 2.5 250 38 15-25 218-363 1.60 ABB/Framo 1+1 Spare Helico-Axial Framo
-1 - Ó°ä
*," 1 /" -9-/ -ÊE SUBSEA 5 Marimba Field O VASPS Field Test 2000 Petrobras Campos Basin 395 1,296 1.1 0.7 46 7 10 145 0.08 Cameron 1 ESP Reda £°n >ÃV>`i
*iÀ``
Ó]xää >ÃÊqÊ Vi«ÌÕ>
** /" - +1* / SEPARATION 6 Tordis Field (13) I SS Sep. + MPP + WI 2007 StatoilHydro North Sea 200 656 11 6.8 596 120 16 232 2.30 FMC Technologies (12) Helico-Axial Framo/FMC n]ÓäÓ >ÃÊqÊ+Õ>vi`É/iÃÌ}Ê
*ÜiÀ
£°x "ÊqÊ+Õ>vi`É/iÃÌ}
7 Perdido Q Caisson Sep. & Boosting 2010 Shell GOM 2,438 7,999 20-40 159 2,303 1.00 15% FMC Technologies 5 ESP BH Centrilift "ÊqÊÃÌ>i`
£°Ó L>VÀ>
-1 - Ê,7 "/ , 8 Ostra/Abalone (BC 10) Q Caisson/Artifical Lift Manifold 2010 Shell Brazil 1,900 6,234 9 6 185 28 152 2,205 1.10 5% FMC Technologies 4 ESP BH Centrilift >À iÃÌi
-1 - -1 - -1 - 6ÊE " /," Þi v Î]äää
- Ê7/ , -1**",/ âÕÀÌi ]n{Î
- *,/" ""-/ "*, --" É Ê*"7 , -9-/ - £°ä £Èx £Çx £nx £x Óääx Óä£x ÓäÓx
/" -9-/ - 9 Pazflor (5) Q Gas/Liq. Sep. 2011 Total Angola, Blk 17 800 2,625 4 3 100 1,450 2.30 <16% FMC Technologies 6+2 Spare
9i>À COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING
10 Canapu Field Q Twister Separation Technology Petrobras Espirito Santo Basin 1,700 5,578 21 13.1 TwisterBV none
°äx
,Ê6 , , ,Ê6 , , ,Ê6 , , ,Ê6 , , ,Ê6 , , LEGEND (“Stop Light”) NOTES: 6. British Offshore Engineering Technology 13. Tordis Field - Statoil hopes to increase oil recovery from 49% to 55%, an additional 36 17. Navajo field is a SS tieback to Anadarko’s Nansen spar.
6 ÃÊE 6 À>« ÊxÊqÊ*Õ«Ê/ ÀÕ} «ÕÌÊÛÃ°Ê vviÀiÌ>Ê*ÀiÃÃÕÀiÊ«iÀʫի®
>Li°V >iÀÛ>iÀiÀ°V >iÀÛ>iÀiÀ°V >iÀÛ>iÀiÀ°V 1 >iÀÛ>iÀiÀ°V >iÀÛ>iÀiÀ°V 1. See information accuracy statement below title block. 7. King project utilizes the world’s first umbilical to combine with HV cables with the service MMBO due to the world’s first commercial subsea separation, boosting, and injection system. 18. BH Centrilift = Baker Hughes Centrilift
8", ,- " /",-
C Conceptual Project 2. Power for gas compression is for the entire compression station. All other power listed umbilical. 14. BCSS - Centrifugal Subsea Submersible Pumps. They are placed in protective holes in the 19. World Record - 7 years of operation without intervention
Q Qualified/Testing ä°äÊ7 Óää
is for an individual pump motor. 8. Nuovo Pignone is now part of GE Oil & Gas. seabed 200m from the producing wells. 20. World’s first deployment of an electrically driven twin screw MPP operating on a live well. /ÜÊ-VÀiÜ iVÝ> -* iÌvÕ}>
Ê" - , Ó]ä£
I Installed 3. DP values are for individual pumps. 9. Low wellhead pressure of 100 psig at seabed dictated that artificial lift was required. 15. Troll SUBSIS - The world’s longest operating SS separation system and world’s first SS water Testing occurred in ’94 and ’95 for a total of 7,850 hours of operation at base of platform "ÊqÊ+Õ>vi`É/iÃÌ}
,Ê6 , , ", , -- ,q, -1 - É- - ," *Ê/ -
>iÀÛ>iÀiÀ°V LÀi>°V `ÀiÃÃiÀÀ>`°V vV̰V ,Ê6 , , 1/- V>°V >« >Ì >iðV°Õ
O Installed & Currently Operating 4. Ormen Lange is pumping low volumes of condensate 10. WI - Water Injection and WIP - Water Injection Pump injection pump system. on seafloor. *Õ«Ê/Þ«i "ÊqÊÃÌ>i`
ÃiiðV >iÀÛ>iÀiÀ°V >LL°V `iÕÌÃV °V Indicates a World Record 5. According to Total the Pazflor development will utilize seabed gas/liquid separation next 11. Year indicates first year of operation for the SS processing system. 16. Manufacturers are: Framo and Centrilift. There are 2 ESPs per well feeding Framo MPP Ìi\Ê >V ÊL>VÊiÊÊÌ iÊVÕÃÊÀi«ÀiÃiÌÃÊ>ʫիÊ>««V>Ì°Ê £Çx
to the production well, which will be the world’s first application of this approach. 12. Tordis Field: 1+1 Spare Multi-Phase Boosting Pumps, and 1+1 Spare Water Injection Pumps on seafloor. COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING & BHP BILLITON "ÞÊÌ iÊ>ÝÕÊ«ÜiÀÊiÛiÃÊÜiÀiÊ>Lii`ÊvÀÊi>V ÊV>Ìi}ÀÞ° COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING Ó]xÎn À}>ÕÌ>Ê £ä®
," É Ê" - ,
," É* /, " 1,/--Ê7,/É -1 - É- - ," ," É - £xä "ÃÌÀ>ÉL>i
V>°V -/,/< vV̰V vÀ>i}° 1 "
,1 -
"1 vVÌiV }iðV V>°V SUBSEA SEPARATION SYSTEMS Fig. 2A & 2B: Twister BV Gas/Liquids Separation System Fig. 3: Twister BV Gas/Liquids Fig. 4: Cameron’s Micro Separation System Fig. 6: FMC Gas/Liquid Separation & Fig. 7A & 7B: FMC Liquid/Liquid Separation Fig. 8: Caisson/ESP Separation System Fig. 10: Troll C Subsea Separation Longest Fig.12A: Petrobras’s Centrifugal Subsea Submersible Pumps (BCSS) Fig. 13: FMC’s Direct Vertical
/,/ Separation System Boosting System Using In-Line Separation Technology Running Subsea Separator (Note 15) Access Caisson with ESP Ó]£ÇÈ
V>°V ÃiiðV ÌiV «°V `>Õ`°V
L>iÀ Õ} iðV Fig. 1A: FMC SS Separation System – Tordis Project Boosting (A Gas – Liquid v
vviÀiÌ>Ê*ÀiÃÃÕÀi
Separation & Boosting System)
£Óx
/,/ ë>`>ÀÌi
É - ," 7 Ê*," -- ," " 6 ,/ £]n£Î
L>iÀ Õ} iðVÉ
vVÌiV }iðV vÀ>i}° Üi«ÀViÃÃ}°V , 8 8 - >`}>ðvÀ>° VÛiÀÌi>°V
ViÌÀvÌ
`ÀV>LiðV Liiݰ iÝ>ðV
£ää
£]{xä /À`Ã
/7-/ ,Ê 6 "7- ,6 Ê"ÊEÊ- 6 / "Ê,9
ÌÜÃÌiÀLÛ°V vÜÃiÀÛi°V }i>`}>ðV 8 - " 6 ,/ " }i>`}>ÃÉÛiÌV}À>Þ
COURTESY OF GE OIL & GAS Çx
iÝ>ðV VÛiÀÌi>°V `°V
£]änn
COURTESY OF CAMERON
Fig. 11: Aker Kvaerner’s DeepBooster™ System – >À
Gas/Liquid Separation & Liquid Boosting System }
xä
Fig. 5: Cameron’s 2-Phase Separation System COURTESY OF BAKER HUGHES CENTRILIFT
6ViÌ
vVÌiV }iðV " , \ ," /," ÇÓx
COURTESY OF FMC TECHNOLOGIES Ài`>
Vi>iiÀ}°V vÀ>i}° ÌÀV°V°Ã} Fig. 9: Petrobras’s
Vertical Annular iL>Ê ®
Separation and Óx
," Pumping System ÎÈÎ -V i >
vÀ>i}° - ,"* ," " 6 / "Ê,9 COURTESY OF FMC TECHNOLOGIES
ÃV>À«i° -,LV°V }i>`}>ÃÉÛiÌV}À>Þ
äÊL>À
äʫà ä ÎÉ À £ää Óää Îää {ää xää Èää Çää nää
COURTESY OF TWISTER BV
-1< , ä * £x Îä {x Èä Çx ä £äx £Óä
- - Fig.12B: BCSS
ÃÕâiÀ«Õ«Ã°V iiÀ}Þ«ÀÌ> Fig. 1B: Tordis Separation Schematic COURTESY OF AKER KVAERNER
°ÃiiðV Ìi\ÊÀÊ"Ê*À`ÕVÌÊ"Þ° / ÀÕ} «ÕÌ COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING
COURTESY OF INTEC ENGINEERING Fig. 1C: Tordis Separator COURTESY OF TWISTER BV COURTESY OF CAMERON COURTESY OF FMC TECHNOLOGIES COURTESY OF Petrobras COURTESY OF AKER KVAERNER COURTESY OF FMC TECHNOLOGIES
�������������������������������������������������������������������������
Cameron quality, experience and reliability come together with
technology to create CAMFORCE™ Subsea Processing Systems. ����������������������������������������������������������������������������� Subsea production:
Representing a unique culmination of strategic planning and
partnering with technical innovation, CAMFORCE brings the true
�������������������������������������������������
it’s genetic
force of Cameron to this emerging and exciting market through It starts with the right people and it ends with the right solution.
multiphase boosting, separation and enabling technology. VetcoGray has been pushing offshore and subsea technology
boundaries for more than 50 years. With a long tradition of
Together with our partners, CAMFORCE will fulfill the Cameron industry-firsts, we provide complete systems and services to
promise of raising performance together with our customers. help our customers meet their production goals – whatever
and wherever they may be. To some, deepwater is an obstacle.