Enviromental Audit
Enviromental Audit
LEARNING OUTCOMES
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
UNIT 1: Environmental Auditing UNIT 2: Energy Audit
• Regulatory Framework • Overview of Energy Audit
• Scope and Objective • Functions of Energy Auditor
• Features, Tools & Techniques of • Preliminary Energy Audit
Environment Audit • Detailed Energy Audit and its steps
• Environment Audit Process • Audit Report
• Audit Report
• Summary Flowchart
1. OVERVIEW
Environmental audits are becoming increasingly common in certain industries. The term
“environmental audit” has a wide variety of meanings. They can be performed by external or internal
experts (sometimes including internal auditors), at the
discretion of the entity’s management. In practice,
persons from various disciplines can qualify to perform
“environmental audits”. Often the work is performed by
a multi-disciplinary team. Normally, “environmental
audits” are performed at the request of management
and are for internal use.
2. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
In Indian scenario, the Regulatory Authorities like Ministry of Environment and Forest (MOEF), State
Pollution Control Board (SPCB), State Department of Environment (SDOEn.) etc., have come into
play to clear the projects from environmental viewpoint before it’s commissioning. The Environmental
Impact Assessment (EAI) is a pre-requisite to start an industry. The EAI tries to forecast the expected
damage to be caused by the development of the industries to the environmental and the means
required to mitigate that damage, incorporating the same in the Project Report for compliance in due
course, keeping in view the serious threat to all the living beings in the universe by the rapid
industrialisation which is polluting the environmental on an irreparable exten t. The Indian Govt.
notified by GSR No.329E dated 13.02.1992 that “Every person carrying on an industry, operation or
process requiring consent under Section 25 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,
1974 (6 of 1974) or under Section 21 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 (4 of
1981) or both or authorisation under the Hazardous Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989
issued under Environment Protection Act, 1986 (29 of 1986) shall submit an environment audit repor t
for the financial year ending the 31 st march in form V to the concerned State Pollution Control Board
on or before the 15 th day of May every year, beginning 1993”.
But a standard scope of Environmental Audit, as ought to be defined and adopted by standard
companies, should be as follows:
“A management tool comprising a systematic, documented, periodic and objective evaluation of how
well environmental organisation, management and equipment are performing with the aim of h elping
to safeguard the environment by:
(i) Facilitating management control of environmental Process.
(ii) Assessing compliance with company policies, which would include meeting regulatory
requirements”.
The objective of the Environmental Audit are to evaluate the efficacy of the utilisation of resources
of man, machines and materials, and to identify the areas of environmental risks and liabilities and
weakness(es) of management system and problems in compliance of the directives of the regulat ory
agencies and control the generation of pollutants and/or waste.
As the Environmental Audit, especially in India, is still in its infancy the information usually gathered
in the course of Environmental Audit is only what is required for the compliance o f the statutory
requirements, i.e., for Water Act, 1974, Air Act, 1981, etc., and for environmental clearance required
before establishing an industry.
people in such a way that the results are comparable and can reflect change in both quantitative
and qualitative terms.
(v) Documented – Like any other audit, the base of any environmental auditing is that its
findings are supported by documents and verifiable information. The audit process is designed
in such away that it seeks to verify on a sample basis past actions, activities, events and
procedures with available evidences to ensure that they were carried out according to system’s
requirements and in a correct manner.
(vi) Periodic – Environmental audit is generally conducted at pre-defined intervals. It is a long-
term process.
(vii) Objective Evaluation – Though environmental auditing is conducted using pre-decided
policies, procedures and a proper documented system, there is always an element of subjectivity
in an audit, particularly if it is conducted internally. In addition to internal environmental audits,
having independent audit teams that have specialized skills and who come back periodically (say
annually) to repeat audits tends to increase objectivity in the system. Hence for the sake of
objectivity, external environmental audits are preferable. This is also required under many
certification guidelines (e.g. ISO 14001).
(viii) Environmental Performance – As mentioned before, the essence of any environmental
audit is to find out how well the environmental organization, environmental management and
environmental equipments are performing. The ultimate aim is to ensure that organization’s
environmental performance meets the goals set in its environmental policy and also to ensure
compliance with standards and regulatory requirements.
(iv) Choose audit criteria – Against what will the facility be audited (e.g., for regulatory compliance
audits, against what regulations or standards will the facility be audited)?
(v) Select the audit team members – The audit team leader selects team members based on
appropriate knowledge and experience. The team both. If internal staff is going to be involved,
they should be chosen in a proper way so as to avoid conflict of interest. The facility
environmental manager, for example, should not be on the audit team.
(vi) Develop audit plan and protocols – Protocols are written guides for the auditors that outline
the activities to be undertaken in conducting a review of a given topic area during the
environmental audit. They often contain detailed information about audit criteria, such as,
applicable regulations. Computers are often used in creating audit protocols and in locating
and sharing information between team members during the audit (e.g., regulatory database s
are often utilized in creating audit protocols).
(vii) Inform the facility – Arrangements for on-site activities need to be made.
(viii) Desktop review.
5.2 On-site or Field Audit (Stage 2)
The following are steps involved in on-site or field audit:
(i) Opening conference – Communicate the objectives and methods of the audit of key facility
personnel and schedule necessary meetings and interviews.
(ii) Facility tour – Identify areas of concern for more detailed inspection, get a feel for the site and
modify the audit schedule accordingly.
(iii) Site/ facility inspection – Established protocols should guide the inspection. The team may also
wish to inspect areas of concern or interest that they have been identified in the facility tour. It
may not be possible to inspect the entire facility (comprehensive inspection), theref ore,
sampling techniques may be an important part of determining the parts of a site to be inspected.
(iv) Evidence – Collect sufficient, appropriate and reliable audit evidences to check the activities,
performance impacts and reports.
(v) Records/ document review – The audit protocols should give instructions as to the types of
records to request as well as what to look for when examining the documents.
(vi) Staff interviews – Interviews with key informants will yield the least reliable information, due to
the fallibility of human memory, but are important in the identification of potential problems and
in collecting information about facility operations.
(vii) Initial review of findings – Findings are the result of the evaluation of evidence collected against
audit criteria. It is Important at this stage to review where the facility does not meet the audit
criteria.
(viii) Closing/ exit conference – This is a chance for auditees to identify misunderstandings and to
be introduced to the findings of the audit team.
The Audit report should be complete, precise, accurate and balanced. It should contain constructive
and precise recommendations. It must be persuasive and instrumental in inspiring the managements
of entities to take corrective actions. The violations and omissions should also be effectively
mentioned in the report. Last but not the least, the contents of green audit report should be easy to
understand and free from vagueness or ambiguity, include information which is supported by
complete and relevant audit evidence and be independent, objective fair and constructive.
Contents of Report: It is to be noted that length and detail of environmental audit report may vary
according to nature and type of organization audited and also on the basis of scope and object of
audit. However, usually it is expected that the report should include following contents:
I Executive summary
II. Table of contents
(i) Background:
nature and type of auditee organization,
main business, facility description, EMS, etc.
(ii) Audit objective:
to review compliance status of the organization, to check reporting of non-compliance
or to verify the mechanisms for rectifying non-compliance.
(iii) Audit scope: whether it is initial audit, audit of only one site, facility or process or audit
of whole organization, etc.
(iv) Audit criteria: National law, Supra-national law, International agreements, Applicable
standards, Industry guidelines, or corporate policy.
(v) Audit team
(vi) Audit schedule
(vii) Audit methodology:
- Document review
- Checklist
- Interviews, etc.
(viii) Audit findings:
-Compliance status: compliance with environmental laws, specific regulation, certification
requirement or company’s own environmental policy.
- Violation information: e.g. failure to have required clearance, permit or approval, failure
to have required plan or failure to report to authorities.
- Mention the relevant law or regulation to which the violation relates like, air, water or
hazardous waste Acts.
- Significant consequences of non-compliance. e.g., penalty
- Areas where non-compliance was found and corrected during audit period and areas
where it is yet to be corrected.
(ix) Audit conclusions and recommendations
- If audit findings indicate commendable level of compliance and no non-compliance was
identified, still some opportunities for improvement can be identified and listed.
- If non-compliance was found, recommendations can be made for developing some
mechanism so that in future, it is not repeated. Indicate the time until the correction is to be
completed and person responsible for making corrections.
(x) Annexes
- Environment policy and action plan of organization
-List of applicable laws and regulations
-Checklists