Imaaca2011 281
Imaaca2011 281
AND CONTROL
281
2.1. Servovalve modeling
This section describes the methodologies to model a
servovalve which is generally comprised of a torque
motor and a valve spool assembly (Jelali and Kroll
2003; Dransfield 1981; Poley 2005). The servovalve
consists of a torque motor; application of electrical
signal to its coil will generate a torque. The flapper of
the torque meter is integrated with the spool assembly.
The flapper acts as a mechanical feedback for the
control of spool position (Maskrey 1978; Jones 1997;
DeRose 2003).
The servovalves can be modeled using two
approaches. The first method is to model the
subcomponents of the valve. This requires the design
parameters for the mechanical and electrical
components of the valve. It is possible to derive
meaningful transfer functions for electrohydraulic
Figure 2: Physical and schematic configuration of the
servovalves, and several papers have reported such
modeled valve (Johnson 2008)
work (Jelali and Kroll 2003). Unfortunately,
servovalves are complex devices and have many
The total valve coefficient is defined to be the flow
nonlinear characteristics which are significant in their
coefficient at the flow rating conditions:
operation. These nonlinearities include: electrical
hysteresis of the torque motor, change in torque-motor QN
output with displacement, change in orifice fluid (2)
PN
impedance with flow and with fluid characteristics,
change in orifice discharge coefficient with pressure It is necessary to know the coefficient of each of
ratio, sliding friction of the spool, and others (DeRose the four lands. The valve ratio is defined as
2003, Maskrey 1978).
Experience has shown that these nonlinear and (3)
non-ideal characteristics limit the usefulness of
theoretical analysis of servovalve dynamics in systems
design. Instead, the more meaningful approach is to where K VPL and K VRL have units of Holes and represent
approximate measured servovalve response with the valve coefficients for the pressure and return lines,
suitable transfer functions (Thayer 1965, Clarke 1969). respectively. It is safe to assume that valve ratio is
Moog has performed sophisticated analyses of unity in absence of evidence to the contrary as there is
servovalve dynamic response including computer no reason to deliberately design a non-symmetrical
simulations of various nonlinear effects, and up to valve. The relation between total valve coefficient and
eight-order dynamics (excluding any load dynamics). coefficients for valve lands is
The results indicate that these complex analyses have
not contributed significantly to servovalve design due to 1 (4)
uncertainties and inaccuracies associated with the
higher-order effects.
(5)
2.1.1. Servovalve Hydraulic Modeling
The actual flow through the valve is dependent upon The above equations are derived based on the fact
electrical command signal and valve pressure drop. The that two orifice resistances are in series and are related
flow for a given valve pressure drop can be calculated by
using the square root function for sharp edge orifices:
(6)
P
Q QN PN
(1)
It is noteworthy that these parameters take into
where Q [gpm] = calculated flow, QN [gpm] = rated account the spool geometry, discharge coefficient and
flow, P [psi] = actual valve pressure drop and PN oil density (Johnson 2008).
[psi] = rated valve pressure drop. The servovalve used Servovalve delivers a control flow proportional to
in these simulations is high performance Moog- D765 the spool position which is also proportional to the
series valves and the values for QN and PN are square root of the pressure drop across the valve.
provided in the valve datasheet. The modeled valve’s Combining equations (1) and (2) and comparing with
schematics (Johnson 2008) is shown in figure 2. the well known formula for flow–pressure relation for
turbulent flow,
282
A typical performance graph for a high-response servo-
valve Moog D765 is shown in figure 4 where the
Q C A √ΔP (7) frequency response of the valve is plotted for different
command percentages, taken from the manufacturer’s
it is clear that provides us with the coefficient in the datasheet.
above formula easily which contains parameters for the
spool geometry, discharge coefficient and oil density.
Torque motor can be modeled as a series L-R
circuit, neglecting any back-EMF effects generated by
the load (Poley 2005). The transfer function is
I
(8)
V L R
MV (10)
V V
283
The model of the torque motor and the servovalve
dynamics is described in the previous section. The
values for the parameters are taken from the
manufacturer’s data sheet. Modulated resistors are used
to model the sharp edge orifices. As it is shown in
figure 7, the modulated resistors are located between
pressure drops between four valve ports. Ps, Pa, Pb and
Pt represent supply pressure, port A and B pressures and
return line pressure, respectively. The spool position is
provided by the valve dynamics computed by the
transfer functions and the R-elements are modulated by
the value of the spool position. In this model, the
pressures of port A and B of the valve are respectively
connected to the actuator chambers A and B. Port S is
Figure 5: Simulated frequency response of Moog D765 connected to an effort source which models an ideal
valve source of power capable of supplying constant pressure
at any flow required (Muvengei and Kihiu 2010). Port T
The step response of the servo valve is shown in figure is the pressure for the return line. The infinitesimal
6. The open loop settling time is 0.04s. leakage between port S and T is also modeled as a
Resistor.
284
First a constant reference position is used to carry out
position control on the cylinder. The stroke length is
30cm and the initial position of the piston is 15cm. The
controller will extend the piston 5 cm and stop (shown
in figure 11).
p
MV
PID
SP
Controller Sine
Servovalve Actuator
Ca
Constant 0
C
R
1 MR MR 1
R
I_saturation
MR_SA MR_AT
0 TF Integrate
1 k 2 Aa
s2 + 2 s + 2
MR
0.59s + 100
MR_ST
TorqueMotor Servovalve
1 R 1 1
Se 0 0 1 0 Rl
Pp
0 TF
I 1 I
1 MR MR 1 Ab
Im IM
MR_SB MR_BT
1 R
Rr1
0
C
Cb
Se 0 1
Pe
285
Actuator parameters
Description Value
Rod Diameter 1 ¾”
Piston Diameter 2 ½”
Length of cylinder 0.3m
Length of piston 0.01m
REFERENCES
Merritt, H. E., 1967. Hydraulic Control Systems. New
York: John Wiley and Sons.
Jelali, M. and Kroll, A., 2003. Hydraulic Servo
Systems- Modelling, Identification and Control,
Springer Verlag.
Dransfield, P., 1981. Hydraulic Control systems-
Design and Analysis of Their Dynamics. Springer
Verlag.
Muvengei, M. and Kihiu, J., 2010. Bond Graph
Modeling of Inter-Actuator Interactions in a Multi-
Cylinder Hydraulic System. International Journal
of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace
Engineering. World Academy of Science,
Figure 12: Response of the system for sinusoidal piston Engineering and Technology, 32-41.
movement – Desired and actual piston location (above) Johnson, J.L, 2008. Designer`s Handbook for
and corresponding control signal (below) Electrohydraulic Servo and Proportional Systems.
4th edition. IDAS Engineering Inc.
Feedforward PID controller enables increased Karnopp, D. C., Margolis, D. L, and Rosenberg, R. C.,
dynamic system responsiveness while decreasing 2006. System Dynamics: Modelling and
positioning and velocity error. Feedforward gains are Simulation of Mechatronic Systems. 4th edition.
predictive gains that contribute to the control signal in New York:John Wiley and Sons.
the form of a linear combination of the target velocity Maskrey, R.H. and Thayer, W.J., 1978. A Brief History
and acceleration terms. The result is higher performance of Electrohydraulic Servomechanisms. ASME
and durable machine control due to smoother motion. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and
The control signal is applied to the valve and in both Control Vol 100, No 2, pp 110-116.
cases is appropriate in the sense that they do not excite Thayer, W.J., 1965. Transfer Functions for Moog
the valve with jerk that usually causes immature failure Servovalves. Technical Bulletin 103. Moog Inc.
of the components. Jones, J.C., 1997. Developments in Design of
Electrohydraulic Control Valves. Technical Paper.
APPENDIX A - PARAMETERS AND SYMBOLS Moog Inc.
Clarke, D.C., 1969. Selection and Performance Criteria
Symbol Description Value for Electrohydraulic Servovalves. Technical
Oil Density 867 kg/ Bulletin 103. Moog Inc.
Hose 1 Area 0.000791 ( 1 ¼”) DeRose, D., 2003. Proportional and Servo Valve
Hose 2 Area 0.000506 ( 1”) Technology. Fluid Power Journal. March/April,
Hose 1 length 20 cm 8-15.
Hose 2 length 20 cm Caputo, D., 1996. Digital Motion Control for Position
and Force Loops. Proc. National Conference
Kinematic Fluid 27cSt
Confreence. Fluid Power. Vol: Issue 47th:263 Vol
Viscosity
1-268.
Absolute Fluid 0.023409 Pa.s
Hölcke, J., 2002. Frequency Response of Hydraulic
Viscosity
Hoses. Licentiate Thesis. Royal Institute of
B Bulk modulus 1.5 GPa
Technology, KTH, Stockholm.
of Oil
Poley, R., 2005. DSP Control of Electro-Hydraulic
E Elastic Modulus 30 MPa Servo Actuators. Application Report SPRAA76.
of hydraulic Texas: Texas Instruments.
hoses D765 Series Servovalves. Product Datasheet. Moog
m Rod and piston 2.5 kg Inc.
mass 20sim version 4.1. Controllab Products B.V.. Enchede,
M Load mass 500kg Netherlands. http://www.rt.el.utwente.nl/20sim/.
286