ISM - Clubbing of Income
ISM - Clubbing of Income
CHAPTER
5
INCOME OF OTHER
PERSONS INCLUDED
IN ASSESSEE’S TOTAL
INCOME
LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this chapter, you would be able to -
identify when clubbing provisions are attracted and apply the same
in computing total income of the assessee;
examine the circumstances when income of the spouse is clubbed
with the income of the individual and apply the same in computing
total income of the individual;
examine the circumstances when income of son’s wife is included in
the hands of the individual and apply the same in computing total
income of the individual;
identify the nature of income of minor, in respect of which clubbing
provisions are not attracted;
examine how minor’s income is included in the hands of the parent
and compute the amount to be included in the hands of the parent;
examine the circumstances when income of HUF is included in the
hands of a member of the HUF.
ILLUSTRATION 1
Mr. Vatsan has transferred, through a duly registered document, the income arising
from a godown to his son, without transferring the godown. In whose hands will the
rental income from godown be charged?
SOLUTION
Section 60 expressly states that where there is transfer of income from an asset
without transfer of the asset itself, such income shall be included in the total
income of the transferor. Hence, the rental income derived from the godown
shall be clubbed in the hands of Mr. Vatsan.
This clubbing provision will operate even if only part of income of the
transferred asset had been applied for the benefit of the transferor. Once the
transfer is revocable, the entire income from the transferred asset is includible in
the total income of the transferor.
(i) a transfer by way of trust which is not revocable during the life time of the
beneficiary; and
(ii) any other transfer, which is not revocable during the life time of the transferee.
In the above cases, the income from the transferred asset is not includible in the
total income of the transferor, provided the transferor derives no direct or
indirect benefit from such income.
If the transferor receives direct or indirect benefit from such income, such income is
to be included in his total income even though the transfer may not be revocable
during the life time of the beneficiary or transferee, as the case may be.
As and when the power to revoke the transfer arises, the income arising by
virtue of such transfer will be included in the total income of the transferor.
The term ‘relative’ in relation to an individual means the husband, wife, brother
or sister or any lineal ascendant or descendant of that individual [Section 2(41)].
Where any such income is once included in the total income of either spouse,
income arising in the succeeding year shall not be included in the total income of
the other spouse unless the Assessing Officer is satisfied, after giving that spouse
an opportunity of being heard, that it is necessary to do so.
ILLUSTRATION 2
Mr. A holds shares carrying 25% voting power in X (P) Ltd. Mrs. A is working as a
computer software programmer in X (P) Ltd. at a salary of ` 30,000 p.m. She is,
however, not qualified for the job. The other income of Mr. A & Mrs. A are
` 7,00,000 & ` 4,00,000, respectively. Compute the gross total income of Mr. A and
Mrs. A for the A.Y.2023-24, assuming that they do not opt for section 115BAC.
SOLUTION
Mr. A holds shares carrying 25% voting power in X (P) Ltd i.e., a substantial
interest in the company. His wife is working in the same company without any
professional qualifications for the same. Thus, by virtue of the clubbing
provisions of the Act, the salary received by Mrs. A from X (P) Ltd. will be
clubbed in the hands of Mr. A.
Computation of Gross total income of Mr. A
Particulars ` `
Salary received by Mrs. A (` 30,000 × 12) 3,60,000
ILLUSTRATION 3
Will your answer be different if Mrs. A was qualified for the job?
SOLUTION
If Mrs. A possesses professional qualifications for the job, then the clubbing
provisions shall not be applicable.
Gross total income of Mr. A = ` 7,00,000[Other income].
Gross total income of Mrs. A = Salary received by Mrs. A [` 30,000×12] less
` 50,000, being the standard deduction under section 16(ia) plus other income
[` 4,00,000] = ` 7,10,000
ILLUSTRATION 4
Mr. B holds shares carrying 30% voting power in Y (P) Ltd. Mrs. B is working as
accountant in Y (P) Ltd. getting income under the head salary (computed) of
` 3,44,000 without any qualification in accountancy. Mr. B also receives ` 30,000
as interest on securities. Mrs. B owns a house property which she has let out.
Rent received from tenants is ` 6,000 p.m. Compute the gross total income of
Mr. B and Mrs. B for the A.Y.2023-24.
SOLUTION
Since Mrs. B is not professionally qualified for the job, the clubbing provisions
shall be applicable.
Computation of Gross total income of Mr. B
Particulars `
Income under the head salary of Mrs. B (Computed) 3,44,000
Income from other sources
- Interest on securities 30,000
3,74,000
ILLUSTRATION 5
SOLUTION
Section 64(1)(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 provides for the clubbing of income
in the hands of the individual, if the income earned is from the assets (other than
house property) transferred directly or indirectly to the spouse of the individual,
otherwise than for adequate consideration or in connection with an agreement to
live apart.
In this case, Mr. Vaibhav received a gift of ` 5,00,000 on 1.4.2022 from his wife
Mrs. Vaishaly, which he invested in his business immediately. The income to be
clubbed in the hands of Mrs. Vaishaly for the A.Y. 2023-24 is computed as under:
(ii) Asset transferred invested in the business: For this purpose, where the
assets transferred directly or indirectly by an individual to his or her son’s
wife are invested by the transferee in the business, proportionate income
arising from such investment is to be included in the total income of the
transferor. If the investment is in the nature of contribution of capital, the
proportionate interest receivable from firm will be clubbed with the income
of the transferor.
(II) Transfer of assets for the benefit of son’s wife [Section 64(1)(viii)]
All income arising directly or indirectly, to any person or association of
persons from the assets transferred, directly or indirectly, without adequate
consideration, to such person or association of persons by an individual will
be included in the total income of the individual to the extent such income
is used by the transferee for the immediate or deferred benefit of the
transferor’s son’s wife.
Note: Where any asset is transferred by a person to any other person without
consideration or for inadequate consideration, the provisions of 56(2)(x) would
get attracted in the hands of transferee, if conditions specified thereunder are
satisfied.
ILLUSTRATION 6
Mrs. Kasturi transferred her immovable property to ABC Co. Ltd. subject to a
condition that out of the rental income, a sum of ` 36,000 per annum shall be
utilized for the benefit of her son’s wife.
Mrs. Kasturi claims that the amount of ` 36,000 (utilized by her son’s wife)
should not be included in her total income as she no longer owned the property.
Examine with reasons whether the contention of Mrs. Kasturi is valid in law.
SOLUTION
asset is for the immediate or deferred benefit of son’s wife. Such income shall
be included in computing the total income of the transferor-individual.
Therefore, income of ` 36,000 meant for the benefit of daughter-in-law is
chargeable to tax in the hands of transferor i.e., Mrs. Kasturi in this case.
The contention of Mrs. Kasturi is, hence, not valid in law.
Note - In order to attract the clubbing provisions under section 64(1)(viii), the
transfer should be otherwise than for adequate consideration. In this case, it is
presumed that the transfer is otherwise than for adequate consideration and
therefore, the clubbing provisions are attracted. Moreover, the provisions of section
56(2)(x) would also get attracted in the hands of ABC Co Ltd., if the conditions
specified thereunder are satisfied.
If it is presumed that the transfer was for adequate consideration, the provisions of
section 64(1)(viii) would not be attracted.
(viii) In case the asset transferred to a minor child (not being a minor married
daughter) without consideration or for inadequate consideration is a house
property, then, by virtue of section 27(i), the transferor-parent will be the
deemed owner of the house property. Therefore, the income from house
property will be taxable in the hands of the transferor-parent, being the
deemed owner and not in the hands of the minor child. Consequently,
clubbing provisions under section 64(1A) would not be attracted in respect
of such income, due to which the benefit of exemption u/s 10(32) (discussed
above) cannot be availed against such income.
However, if the house property is transferred by a parent to his or her minor
married daughter, without consideration or for inadequate consideration,
then, section 27(i) is not attracted. In such a case, the income from house
property will be included u/s 64(1A) in the hands of that parent, whose total
income before including minor child’s income is higher; and benefit of
exemption u/s 10(32) can be availed by that parent in respect of the income
so included.
ILLUSTRATION 7
Mr. A has three minor children – two twin daughters, aged 12 years, and one son,
aged 16 years. Income of the twin daughters is ` 2,000 p.a. each and that of the son
is ` 1,200 p.a. Mrs. A has transferred her flat to her minor son on 1.4.2022 out of
natural love and affection. The flat was let out on the same date and the rental
income from the flat is ` 10,000 p.m. Compute the income, in respect of minor
children, to be included in the hands of Mr. A and Mrs. A u/s 64(1A) (assuming that
Mr. A’s total income is higher than Mrs. A’s total income, before including the
income of minor children).
SOLUTION
Particulars ` `
Twin minor daughters [` 2,000 × 2] 4,000
Note – As per section 27(i), Mrs. A is the deemed owner of house property
transferred to her minor son. Natural love and affection do not constitute
adequate consideration for this purpose. Accordingly, the income from house
property of ` 84,000 [i.e., ` 1,20,000 (-) ` 36,000, being 30% of ` 1,20,000) would
be taxable directly in her hands as the deemed owner of the said property.
Consequently, clubbing provisions under section 64(1A) would not be attracted
in respect of income from house property, owing to which exemption u/s 10(32)
cannot be availed by her.
ILLUSTRATION 8
Compute the gross total income of Mr. & Mrs. A from the following information:
Particulars `
(a) Salary income (computed) of Mrs. A 2,30,000
(b) Income from profession of Mr. A 3,90,000
(c) Income of minor son B from company deposit 15,000
(d) Income of minor daughter C from special talent 32,000
(e) Interest from bank received by C on deposit made out of her
special talent 3,000
(f) Gift received by C on 30.09.2022 from friend of Mrs. A 2,500
SOLUTION
As per the provisions of section 64(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, all the
income of a minor child has to be clubbed in the hands of that parent whose total
income (excluding the income of the minor) is greater. The income of Mr. A is
` 3,90,000 and income of Mrs. A is ` 2,30,000. Since the income of Mr. A is greater
than that of Mrs. A, the income of the minor children have to be clubbed in the
hands of Mr. A. It is assumed that this is the first year when clubbing provisions
are attracted.
Income derived by a minor child from any activity involving application of his/her
skill, talent, specialised knowledge and experience is not to be clubbed. Hence,
the income of minor child C from exercise of special talent will not be clubbed.
However, interest from bank deposit has to be clubbed even when deposit is
made out of income arising from application of special talent.
The Gross Total Income of Mrs. A is ` 2,30,000. The total income of Mr. A giving
effect to the provisions of section 64(1A) is as follows:
Computation of gross total income of Mr. A for the A.Y. 2023-24
Particulars ` `
Income from profession 3,90,000
Income of minor son B from company deposit 15,000
Less: Exemption under section 10(32) 1,500 13,500
Income of minor daughter C
From special talent – not to be clubbed -
Interest from bank 3,000
Gift of ` 2,500 received from a non-relative is not taxable
under section 56(2)(x) being less than the aggregate limit of
` 50,000 Nil
3,000
Less : Exemption under section 10(32) 1,500 1,500
Gross Total Income 4,05,000
4. CROSS TRANSFERS
In the case of cross transfers also (e.g., A making gift of ` 50,000 to the wife of his
brother B for the purchase of a house by her and a simultaneous gift by B to A’s
minor son of shares in a foreign company worth ` 50,000 owned by him), the income
from the assets transferred would be assessed in the hands of the deemed transferor
if the transfers are so intimately connected as to form part of a single transaction,
and each transfer constitutes consideration for the other by being mutual or
otherwise. Thus, in the instant case, the transfers have been made by A and B to
persons who are not their spouse or minor child so as to circumvent the provisions of
this section, showing that such transfers constituted consideration for each other.
The Supreme Court, in case of CIT v. Keshavji Morarji[1967] 66 ITR 142,observed
that if two transactions are inter-connected and are parts of the same transaction
in such a way that it can be said that the circuitous method was adopted as a
device to evade tax, the implication of clubbing provisions would be attracted.
Accordingly, the income arising to Mrs. B from the house property should be
included in the total income of B and the dividend from shares transferred to A’s
minor son would be taxable in the hands of A. This is because A and B are the
indirect transferors to their minor child and spouse, respectively, of income-
yielding assets, so as to reduce their burden of taxation.
ILLUSTRATION 9
SOLUTION
In the given case, Mr. Vasudevan gifted a sum of ` 6 lakhs to his brother’s wife on
14.06.2022 and simultaneously, his brother gifted a sum of ` 5 lakhs to
Mr. Vasudevan’s wife on 12.07.2022. The gifted amounts were invested as fixed
deposits in banks by Mrs. Vasudevan and his brother’s wife. These transfers are in the
nature of cross transfers. Accordingly, the income from the assets transferred would
be assessed in the hands of the deemed transferor because the transfers are so
intimately connected to form part of a single transaction and each transfer
constitutes consideration for the other by being mutual or otherwise.
If two transactions are inter-connected and are part of the same transaction in
such a way that it can be said that the circuitous method was adopted as a device
to evade tax, the implication of clubbing provisions would be attracted. It was so
held by the Apex Court in CIT vs. Keshavji Morarji (1967) 66 ITR 142.
Accordingly, the interest income arising to Mrs. Vasudevan in the form of interest
on fixed deposits would be included in the total income of Mr. Vasudevan and
interest income arising in the hands of his brother’s wife would be taxable in the
hands of Mr. Vasudevan’s brother as per section 64(1), to the extent of amount of
cross transfers i.e., ` 5 lakhs.
This is because both Mr. Vasudevan and his brother are the indirect transferors of the
income to their respective spouses with an intention to reduce their burden of taxation.
However, the interest income earned by his spouse on fixed deposit of ` 5 lakhs
alone would be included in the hands of Mr. Vasudevan’s brother and not the
interest income on the entire fixed deposit of ` 6 lakhs, since the cross transfer is
only to the extent of ` 5 lakhs.
6
6. INCOME INCLUDES LOSS
As per the Explanation 2 to section 64, ‘income’ would include ‘loss’. Accordingly,
where the specified income to be included in the total income of the individual is
a loss, such loss will be taken into account while computing the total income of
the individual. It is significant to note that this Explanation applies to clubbing
provisions under both sections 64(1) and 64(2).
Note: It may be noted that clubbing provisions are attracted in respect of income
arising from the assets transferred, however, income arising on accretion of
income arising from transferred asset, would not be clubbed except in case of
minor child.
LET US RECAPITULATE
Section Income to be Contents
clubbed
60 Income When a person transfers the income accruing
transferred to an asset without the transfer of the asset
without itself, such income is to be included in the
transfer of total income of the transferor, whether the
asset transfer is revocable or irrevocable.
61 Income arising Such income is to be included in the hands of
from revocable the transferor.
transfer of A transfer is deemed to be revocable if it –
assets (i) contains any provision for re-transfer of
the whole or any part of the income or
assets to the transferor; or
(ii) gives right to re-assume power over the
whole or any part of the income or the
asset.
64(1)(ii) Income arising Such income arising to spouse is to be
to spouse by included in the total income of the individual.
way of
remuneration However, if remuneration received is
from a concern attributable to the application of technical or
in which the professional knowledge and experience of
individual has spouse, then, such income is not to be
substantial clubbed.
interest
64(1)(iv) Income arising Income arising from an asset (other than
to spouse from house property) transferred otherwise than
assets for adequate consideration or not in
transferred connection with an agreement to live apart,
without from one spouse to another shall be included
adequate in the total income of the transferor.
consideration However, this provision will not apply in the
case of transfer of house property, since the
transferor-spouse would be the deemed owner
as per section 27.
Particulars `
(i) Income of one daughter 9,000
Less: Income exempt under section 10(32) 1,500
Total (A) 7,500
(ii) Income of two sons (` 6,200 + ` 4,300) 10,500
Less: Income exempt under section 10(32)
(` 1,500 + ` 1,500) 3,000
Total (B) 7,500
Total Income to be clubbed as per section 64(1A) (A+B) 15,000
Answer
Computation of total income of Mr. A, Mrs. A and their minor son
for the A.Y. 2023-24
Notes:
(1) As per section 60, in case there is a transfer of income without transfer of
asset from which such income is derived, such income shall be treated as
income of the transferor. Therefore, the fixed deposit interest of ` 45,000
transferred by Mr. A to Mr. B shall be included in the total income of Mr. A.
(2) As per section 64(1)(ii), in case the spouse of the individual receives any
amount by way of income from any concern in which the individual has
substantial interest (i.e. holding shares carrying at least 20% voting power or
entitled to at least 20% of the profits of the concern), then, such income
shall be included in the total income of the individual. The only exception is
in a case where the spouse possesses any technical or professional
qualifications and the income earned is solely attributable to the application
of her technical or professional knowledge and experience, in which case,
the clubbing provisions would not apply.
In this case, the commission income of ` 25,000 received by Mrs. A from the
partnership firm has to be included in the total income of Mr. A, as Mrs. A
does not possess any technical or professional qualification for earning such
commission and Mr. A has substantial interest in the partnership firm as he
holds 75% profit share in the firm.
(3) According to section 27(i), an individual who transfers any house property
to his or her spouse otherwise than for adequate consideration or in
connection with an agreement to live apart, shall be deemed to be the
owner of the house property so transferred. Hence, Mr. A shall be deemed
to be the owner of the flat gifted to Mrs. A and hence, the income arising
from the same shall be computed in the hands of Mr. A.
Note: The provisions of section 56(2)(x) would not be attracted in the hands
of Mrs. A, since she has received immovable property without consideration
from a relative i.e., her husband.
(4) As per section 64(1A), the income of the minor child is to be included in the
total income of the parent whose total income (excluding the income of
minor child to be so clubbed) is greater. Further, as per section 10(32),
income of a minor child which is includible in the income of the parent shall
be exempt to the extent of ` 1,500 per child.
Therefore, the income of ` 20,000 received by minor son from the
investment made out of the sum gifted by Mr. A shall, after providing for
exemption of ` 1,500 under section 10(32), be included in the income of
Mr. A, since Mr. A’s income of ` 1,92,000 (before including the income of
the minor child) is greater than Mrs. A’s income of ` 1,90,000. Therefore,
` 18,500 (i.e., ` 20,000 – ` 1,500) shall be included in Mr. A’s income. It is
assumed that this is the first year in which clubbing provisions are attracted.
Note–The provisions of section 56(2)(x) would not be attracted in the hands
of the minor son, since he has received a sum of money exceeding ` 50,000
without consideration from a relative i.e., his father.
(5) In case the income earned by the minor child is on account of any activity
involving application of any skill or talent, then, such income of the minor
child shall not be included in the income of the parent, but shall be taxable
in the hands of the minor child.
Therefore, the income of ` 20,000 derived by Mr. A’s minor son through a
business activity involving application of his skill and talent shall not be
clubbed in the hands of the parent. Such income shall be taxable in the
hands of the minor son.
Question 3
Mr. A has gifted a house property valued at ` 50 lakhs to his wife, Mrs. B, who in turn has
gifted the same to Mrs. C, their daughter-in-law. The house was let out at ` 25,000 per
month throughout the year. Compute the total income of Mr. A and Mrs. C.
Will your answer be different if the said property was gifted to his son, husband of Mrs. C?
Answer
As per section 27(i), an individual who transfers otherwise than for adequate
consideration any house property to his spouse, not being a transfer in
connection with an agreement to live apart, shall be deemed to be the owner of
the house property so transferred.
Therefore, in this case, Mr. A would be the deemed owner of the house property
transferred to his wife Mrs. B without consideration.
As per section 64(1)(vi), income arising to the son’s wife from assets transferred,
directly or indirectly, to her by an individual otherwise than for adequate
consideration would be included in the total income of such individual.
Income from let-out property is ` 2,10,000 [i.e., ` 3,00,000, being the actual rent
calculated at ` 25,000 per month less ` 90,000, being deduction under section
24@30% of ` 3,00,000]
In this case, income of ` 2,10,000 from let-out property arising to Mrs. C, being
Mr. A’s son’s wife, would be included in the income of Mr. A, applying the
provisions of section 27(i) and section 64(1)(vi). Such income would, therefore, not
be taxable in the hands of Mrs. C.
In case the property was gifted to Mr. A’s son, the clubbing provisions under
section 64 would not apply, since the son is not a minor child. Therefore, the
income of ` 2,10,000 from letting out of property gifted to the son would be
taxable in the hands of the son.
It may be noted that the provisions of section 56(2)(x) would not be attracted in
the hands of the recipient of house property, since the receipt of property in each
case was from a “relative” of such individual. Therefore, the stamp duty value of
house property would not be chargeable to tax in the hands of the recipient of
immovable property, even though the house property was received by her or him
without consideration.
Note - The first part of the question can also be answered by applying the
provisions of section 64(1)(vi) directly to include the income of ` 2,10,000 arising to
Mrs. C in the hands of Mr. A. [without first applying the provisions of section 27(i) to
deem Mr. A as the owner of the house property transferred to his wife Mrs. B
without consideration], since section 64(1)(vi) speaks of clubbing of income arising
to son’s wife from indirect transfer of assets to her by her husband’s parent, without
consideration. Gift of house property by Mr. A to Mrs. C, via Mrs. B, can be viewed
as an indirect transfer by Mr. A to Mrs. C.
Question 4
A proprietary business was started by Smt. Rani in the year 2020. As on 1.4.2021
her capital in business was ` 3,00,000.
Her husband gifted ` 2,00,000 on 10.4.2021 to her and such sum is invested by Smt.
Rani in her business on the same date. Smt. Rani earned profits from her proprietary
business for the Financial year 2021-22, ` 1,50,000 and Financial year 2022-23
` 3,90,000. Compute the income, to be clubbed in the hands of Rani’s husband for the
Assessment year 2023-24 with reasons.
Answer
Section 64(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 provides for the clubbing of income in
the hands of the individual, if the income earned is from the assets transferred
directly or indirectly to the spouse of the individual, otherwise than for adequate
consideration. In this case Smt. Rani received a gift of ` 2,00,000 from her
husband which she invested in her business. The income to be clubbed in the
hands of Smt. Rani’s husband for A.Y.2023-24 is computed as under:
Particulars Smt. Rani’s Capital
Capital Contribution Total
Contribution Out of gift
from
husband
` ` `
Capital as at 1.4.2021 3,00,000 - 3,00,000
Investment on 10.04.2021 out of
gift received from her husband 2,00,000 2,00,000
3,00,000 2,00,000 5,00,000
Profit for F.Y. 2021-22 to be
apportioned on the basis of
capital employed on the first day
of the previous year i.e., on 1,50,000 1,50,000
1.4.2021
Capital employed as at 1.4.2022 4,50,000 2,00,000 6,50,000
Profit for F.Y.2022-23 to be
apportioned on the basis of
capital employed as at 1.4.2022 2,70,000 1,20,000 3,90,000
(i.e., 45 : 20)
Therefore, the income to be clubbed in the hands of Smt. Rani’s husband for
A.Y.2023-24 is ` 1,20,000.
Question 5
Mr. B is the Karta of a HUF, whose members derive income as given below:
Particulars `
(i) Income from B' s profession 45,000
(ii) Mrs. B' s salary as fashion designer 76,000
(iii) Minor son D (interest on fixed deposits with a bank which were 10,000
gifted to him by his uncle)
(iv) Minor daughter P's earnings from sports 95,000
(v) D's winnings from lottery (gross) 1,95,000
Answer
Clubbing of income and other tax implications
As per the provisions of section 64(1A), in case the marriage of the parents
subsist, the income of a minor child shall be clubbed in the hands of the
parent whose total income, excluding the income of the minor child to be
clubbed, is greater. In this problem, it has been assumed that the marriage of
Mr. B and Mrs. B subsists.
Further, in case the income arises to the minor child on account of any manual
work done by the child or as a result of any activity involving application of
skill, talent, specialized knowledge or experience of the child, then, the same
shall not be clubbed in the hands of the parent.
Tax implications
(i) Income of ` 45,000 from Mr. B’s profession shall be taxable in the hands of
Mr. B under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession”.
(ii) Salary of ` 26,000 (` 76,000 less standard deduction under section 16(ia) of
` 50,000) shall be taxable as “Salaries” in the hands of Mrs. B.
(iii) Income from fixed deposit of ` 10,000 arising to the minor son D, shall be
clubbed in the hands of the father, Mr. B as “Income from other sources”,
since Mr. B’s income is greater than income of Mrs. B before including the
income of the minor child.
As per section 10(32), income of a minor child which is includible in the
income of the parent shall be exempt to the extent of ` 1,500 per child. The
balance income would be clubbed in the hands of the parent as “Income
from other sources”.
(iv) Income of ` 95,000 arising to the minor daughter P from sports shall not be
included in the hands of the parent, since such income has arisen to the
minor daughter on account of an activity involving application of her skill.
(v) Income of ` 1,95,000 arising to minor son D from lottery shall be included in
the hands of Mr. B as “Income from other sources”, since Mr. B’s income is
greater than the income of Mrs. B before including the income of minor
child.
Note – Mr. B can reduce the tax deducted at source from such lottery
income while computing his net tax liability.