0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views20 pages

Chap005 Part2-Edited

The document discusses the allocation of capital between risky and risk-free assets, illustrating how to split investments and calculate expected returns and risks. It introduces concepts such as the Capital Allocation Line (CAL), risk premium, and risk aversion, explaining how these factors influence investment decisions. Additionally, it contrasts active and passive investment strategies, highlighting the benefits of a passive approach that utilizes broad market indices.

Uploaded by

banhmi1986
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views20 pages

Chap005 Part2-Edited

The document discusses the allocation of capital between risky and risk-free assets, illustrating how to split investments and calculate expected returns and risks. It introduces concepts such as the Capital Allocation Line (CAL), risk premium, and risk aversion, explaining how these factors influence investment decisions. Additionally, it contrasts active and passive investment strategies, highlighting the benefits of a passive approach that utilizes broad market indices.

Uploaded by

banhmi1986
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

5.

5 Asset Allocation Across


Risky and Risk Free
Portfolios

5-1
Allocating Capital Between Risky &
Risk-Free Assets
◼ Possible to split investment funds between safe and
risky assets
◼ Risk free asset Rf : proxy;T-bills or money market fund
________________________
◼ Risky asset or portfolio Rp:______________________
risky portfolio

◼ Example. Your total wealth is $10,000. You put $2,500


in risk free T-Bills and $7,500 in a stock portfolio
invested as follows:
– Stock A you put $2,500
______
– Stock B you put $3,000
______
– Stock C you put $2,000
______
$7,500

5-2
Allocating Capital Between Risky &
Risk-Free Assets Stock A $2,500
Weights in Rp Stock B $3,000
– WA = $2,500 / $7,500 = 33.33% Stock C $2,000

– WB = $3,000 / $7,500 = 40.00%


– WC = $2,000 / $7,500 = 26.67%
100.00%
The complete portfolio includes the riskless
investment and Rp (risky portfolio).
WRf = 25% ; WRp = 75%
In the complete portfolio
WA = 0.75 x 33.33% = 25%; WB = 0.75 x 40.00% = 30%

WC = 0.75 x 26.67% = 20%; Wrf = 25%


5-3
Example

rf = 5% srf = 0%

E(rp) = 14% srp = 22%

y = % in Rp (1-y) = % in Rf

5-4
Expected Returns for Combinations

E(rC) = yE(rp) + (1 - y)rf


sc = ysrp + (1-y)srf

E(rC) = Return for complete or combined portfolio


rf = 5% srf = 0%
For example, let y = 0.75
____
E(rp) = 14% srp = 22%
E(rC) = (.75 x .14) + (.25 x .05)
y = % in Rp (1-y)
- = % in Rf
E(rC) = .1175 or 11.75% p

sC = ysrp + (1-y)srf
sC = (0.75 x 0.22) + (0.25 x 0) = 0.165 or 16.5%

5-5
Complete portfolio
E(rc) = yE(rp) + (1 - y)rf
sc = ysrp + (1-y)srf

Varying y results in E[rC] and sC that are ______


linear
___________ of E[rp] and rf and srp and srf
combinations
respectively.
This is NOT generally the case for
the s of combinations of two or
more risky assets.

5-6
Possible Combinations
E(rc) CAL
(Capital
Allocation
Line)

E(rc) = 14%
E(rc) = 11.75% Rp
y=1

y =.75

rf = 5%
Rf
y=0

0 16.5% 22% sc
5-7
Combinations Without Leverage
rf = 5% srf = 0%

E(rp) = 14% srp = 22%

(1-y)- = % in Rf
Since σrf = 0 y = % in Rp
rp

σc= y σrp E(rc) = yE(rp) + (1 - y)rf


If y = .75, then y = .75
σc= 75(.22) = 16.5% E(rc) = (.75)(.14) + (.25)(.05) = 11.75%

If y = 1 y=1
σc= 1(.22) = 22% E(rc) = (1)(.14) + (0)(.05) = 14.00%

If y = 0 y=0
σc= 0(.22) = 0% E(rc) = (0)(.14) + (1)(.05) = 5.00%

5-8
Using Leverage with Capital
Allocation Line
Borrow at the Risk-Free Rate and invest in stock
Using 50% Leverage y = 1.5
E(rc) = (1.5) (.14) + (-.5) (.05) = 0.185 = 18.5%
(1.5) (.22) = 0.33 or 33% rf = 5% srf = 0%
sc = Possible Combinations
E(r) E(r ) = 14% p srp = 22%

E(r )= 18.5% y = % in rp (1-y) = % in rf


E(rCc) =18.5%
E(rcp) = 14%
y = 1.5
E(rc) = 11.75% P
y=1

y =.75

rf = 5%
F
y=0

0 16.5% 33% sc
22% 33% 5-9
Risk Premium & Risk Aversion
• The risk free rate is the rate of return that can be
earned with certainty.
• The risk premium is the difference between the
expected return of a risky asset and the risk-free rate.
Excess Return or Risk Premiumasset = E[rasset] – rf

Risk aversion is an investor’s reluctance to accept


risk.

How is the aversion to accept risk overcome?


By offering investors a higher risk premium.
5-10
Risk Aversion and Allocation
◼ Greater levels of risk aversion lead investors to
choose larger proportions of the risk free rate
Lower levels of risk aversion lead investors to
◼ choose larger proportions of the portfolio of risky
assets
◼ Willingness to accept high levels of risk for high
levels of returns would result in
leveraged combinations Possible Combinations
E(r
E(r)c)

E(rc) =18.5%
E(rc) =14% y = 1.5
E(rcp) =11.75% P
y=1

y =.75

rf = 5%
F
y=0

0 16.5% 22% s
33% 5-11
P or combinations of
E(r) P & Rf offer a return CAL
per unit of risk of (Capital
9/22. Allocation
Line)
P
E(rc) = 14%

E(rc) - rf = 9%
) Slope = 9/22
rf = 5%
F

0 src= 22% s
5-12
Quantifying Risk Aversion
E (rc ) − rf = 0.5  A  s c
2

E(rp) = Expected return on portfolio p


rf = the risk free rate
0.5 = Scale factor
A x sp2 = Proportional risk premium
The larger A is, the larger will be the
investor’s added return required to bear risk
_________________________________________

5-13
Quantifying Risk Aversion
Rearranging the equation and solving
for A
E (rc ) − rf
A=
0.5  σ c2
Many studies have concluded that
investors’ average risk aversion is
between _______
2 and 4

5-14
Using A
E (rc ) − rf
A=
0.5  σ c2
E(r)
E(r) CAL
What is the maximum (Capital
Allocation
A that an investor P
Line)

could have and still E(rcp) = 14%

choose to invest in the E(rc) - rf = 9%


risky portfolio P? rf = 5%
) Slope = 9/22
FF

0.14 − 0.05
A= = 3.719
0.5  0.22 2 0 src
rp = 22%
src

Maximum A = 3.719
5-15
Sharpe Ratio
• Risk aversion implies that investors will accept a
lower reward (portfolio expected return) in
exchange for a sufficient reduction in risk (std
dev of portfolio return)
• A statistic commonly used to rank portfolios in
terms of the risk-return trade-off is the Sharpe
measure (also reward-to-volatility measure)
• The higher the Sharpe ratio the better
• Also the slope of the CAL
Sharpe ratio

portfolio risk premium E (rc ) − rf


S= =
std dev of portfolio excess return sc

• Example: You manage an equity fund with


an expected return of 16% and an expected
std dev of 14%. The rate on treasury bills is
6%.
Risk premium 16 − 6
S= = = 0.71
Standard deviation 14
5.6 Passive Strategies and
the Capital Market Line

5-18
A Passive Strategy
• Investing in a broad stock index and a risk
free investment is an example of a passive
strategy.

– The investor makes no attempt to actively find


undervalued strategies nor actively switch
their asset allocations.

– The CAL that employs the market (or an index


that mimics overall market performance) is
called the Capital Market Line or CML.

5-19
Active versus Passive Strategies
• Active strategies entail more trading costs than
passive strategies.
• Passive investor “free-rides” in a competitive
investment environment.
• Passive involves investment in two passive
portfolios
– Short-term T-bills
– Fund of common stocks that mimics a broad
market index
– Vary combinations according to investor’s
risk aversion.

5-20

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy