Scribd
Upload
10 views2 pages

Marking Rubric For Scientific Investigation

The document outlines a grading rubric for evaluating research projects based on various criteria including title and objective clarity, background information, hypothesis, variables, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, conclusions, evaluation of limitations, communication, use of scientific language, and references. Each criterion is rated on a scale from excellent to poor, providing specific descriptors for each level of performance. This structured approach aims to ensure comprehensive assessment of research quality.

Uploaded by

fwpd5hv9y6
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views2 pages

Marking Rubric For Scientific Investigation

The document outlines a grading rubric for evaluating research projects based on various criteria including title and objective clarity, background information, hypothesis, variables, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, conclusions, evaluation of limitations, communication, use of scientific language, and references. Each criterion is rated on a scale from excellent to poor, providing specific descriptors for each level of performance. This structured approach aims to ensure comprehensive assessment of research quality.

Uploaded by

fwpd5hv9y6
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1)

Title clearly reflects Objective is clear, Objective is Title and/or


Title and the purpose of the specific, and stated but lacks objective are
Objective study. measurable. specificity. unclear or missing.
Provides a Relevant
comprehensive background Background Background
Background overview of the information is information is information is
Information topic. provided. limited. inaccurate.
Hypothesis or Stated but
Research Clearly stated and somewhat vague or Present but not
Question focused. broad. clearly defined. Missing or unclear.
Independent,
dependent, and
controlled variables Variables are Variables are not
are clearly Variables are identified but are identified or are
identified and identified but may not clearly incorrectly
Variables described. lack clarity. described. described.
Detailed and clear,
allowing for Mostly clear but Some steps are Methodology is
replication of the may lack some unclear or unclear or
Methodology experiment. detail. missing. insufficient.
Data are mostly Data collection
Data are collected accurate but may lacks organization Data collection is
accurately and lack some or some data are incomplete or
Data Collection systematically. organization. inaccurate. inaccurate.
Data are analysed
thoroughly, Data analysis is
showing a clear mostly accurate Analysis is Analysis is
understanding of but may lack incomplete or inaccurate or not
Data Analysis the methods used. depth. lacks depth. performed.
Results are clearly Results are
presented and Results are presented but do
support the presented but may not support the Results are missing
Results conclusions drawn. lack clarity. conclusions. or unclear.
Conclusions are Conclusions are
logical and Conclusions are present but not Conclusions are
supported by the drawn but may lack well-supported by missing or
Conclusion data. depth. the data. unsupported.
Discusses
limitations, sources Limited
of error, and Discusses some discussion of No discussion of
potential limitations or limitations or limitations or
Evaluation improvements. errors. errors. errors.
The report is well- Report is mostly Report lacks Report is
organized, clear, clear but may lack organization or disorganized or
Communication and concise. some organization. clarity. unclear.
Uses some
Use of Uses appropriate Mostly uses scientific Does not use
Scientific scientific appropriate terminology scientific
Language terminology. terminology. incorrectly. terminology.
Includes some
Includes references references but
Includes relevant but may be they are not
and properly incomplete or relevant or
formatted formatted properly No references are
References references. incorrectly. formatted. included.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy