57 62 Min
57 62 Min
five key elements. They are Expectations, Per- useful information that will help physicians in
formance, Comparison, Confirmation/Disconfir- Bangladesh to be more patient friendly, the re-
mation, Discrepancy3. Satisfaction can be defined searcher thinks in a nutshell that these are the jus-
as the extent of an individual’s experience com- tification of the study.
pared with his or her expectations4. Patient satis- Materials and methods
faction is related to the extent to which general
health care needs and condition-specific needs are The study design was an observational, cross sec-
met5. tional and convenient type of sampling technique
was followed to assess patients level of satisfac-
The health care services may be defined as "to
tion with health care services provided at out pa-
meet by the use of available resources, knowl-
tient department of A Public Hospital ie. Chatto-
edge, and skills of the service providers”.The pur-
gram Medical College Hospital (CMCH) and A
pose of health care services is to improve the
Private Hospital ie. Chottogram Maa Shishu-O-
health status of the population. The scope of
General Hospital (CMSOGH) Chittagong. To
health services varies widely from country to
conduct this study written permission was taken
country and influenced by general and ever
from research council of Chattogram Medical
changing national, state and local health prob-
College, Director of CMCH and CMSOGH.The
lems, needs and attitudes as well as the available
study was conducted within six months time,
resources to provide these services6.
commencing from 1st January 2011 to 30thJune
This is unsatisfied a broad agreement that an ideal 2011. Purposively selected out-patient depart-
health care service should be appropriate, compre- ments are Surgery out-patient department and
hensive or balanced, adequate, available, accessi- Medicine out-patient department. Scale of satis-
ble, affordable, feasible7. The quality of service in faction level score for patients:the level of pa-
health means an inexpensive type of service with tients” satisfaction was evaluated as 5 for highly
minimum side effects that can cure or relieve the satisfied,4 for satisfied,3 for fairly satisfied,2 for
health problems of the patients8-9. dissatisfied,1 for complete dissatisfied.Data were
This study was therefore undertaken with the aim collected two to three days in a week for four
to find out the level of patient satisfaction related months of time by personal interview by myself.
to different parameters of quality health care in- In each day the relevant data were collected from
cluding the prescription at public health facilities 2-3 respondents. Data was collected by using
in the Chittagong, port city of Bangladesh. questionnaire containing structured questions
In order to improve the satisfaction level of pa- which had two parts. All interviewed questions
tients with health care provided at OPD, it is a re- were checked for completeness, correctness and
quirement to have knowledge of the level of satis- internal consistency to exclude inconsistent and
faction of patients and feedback, about the serv- missing data. For analyzing data frequency and
ices provided in the outpatient departments10-11. percentage were used. In order to find out the as-
Satisfaction of patient is a very important part of sociation between dependent variables chi-squar-
any clinical practice. Patient's satisfaction is di- etests were done. Data was presented in table.
rectly proportionate to the service delivered and Inclusion criteria
any decline in the quality of service ultimately
i) Patients whose age was more than 20 years and
leads to the dissatisfaction of the patient. Studies
less than 60 years
have shown that physicians who are more focused
on their patients benefit them more12. ii) Those who were willing to participate and give
consent in the interview among the selected pa-
This study on patient satisfaction with health care
tients
services provided at OPD will help the relevant
policy makers and planners in making appropriate iii) Those who were willing to give sufficient time
plan and policies to reduce the problems and im- for interviewing among the selected patient.
prove their health. Such improvement will in- Exclusion criteria
crease productivity of labor and promote general i) Patients whose age was less than 20 years and
well being with an objective to improve the quali- more than 60 years
ty of life. Moreover, the study will reveal much
58
Original Article JCMCTA 2018 ; 29 (2) : 57-62
ii) Patients who were seriously ill. Table V reveals that female patients (44.74%)
iii) Mentally handicap and retarded patients were more satisfied with doctor’s examination
time than male patients (39.71%). In case of edu-
iv) Those who were not willing to give sufficient cational level,44.00% patients of Illiterate to pri-
time for interviewing mary level group were satisfied whereas 39.29%
v) Patients who had relation with doctor or any patients of secondary to graduate level group were
service provider of attending hospital. satisfied.44.26% patients who have monthly in-
come 500-10,000 are satisfied whereas 51.11%
Results patients were satisfied who have monthly income
A total of 106 patients, 68 male and 38 female, 10,001-20,000+.
were included in this study. The mean ageof the Table VI shows that 55.26% female patients were
patients was 35 years ± 6.9. Getting services from satisfied with attitude of the doctor whereas
these two hospitals, the highest percentage was 51.47% male patients are satisfied. 53.57% secon-
among the age group 30-39 years which is about dary to graduate level patients were satisfied and
36.66% and lowest among the age group 50-59 Illiterate to primary level group were 52.00%. Pa-
years which is about 16.98%. Among them, the tients of 500-10,000 monthly income (54.10%)
highest percentage (29.24%) were businessman were more satisfied than patients of 10,001-
and the lowest percentage (06.60%) were wager 20,000+ monthly income (51.11%) with attitude
and most of the patients were in primary level of the doctor.
both in CMCH (33.33%) and in CMSOGH Table I : Demographic features of the respond-
(30.43%). Out of 106 patients the percentage of ents (n=106)
patients having income of 5001-10000 taka is
33.33% which was more than others in CMCH CMCH (n=60) CMSOGH (n=46) Total (n-106)
and the percentage of patients having income of n % n % n %
10001-15000 taka is 30.44% which was more
1. Gender
than others in CMSOGH (Table I).
a. Male 42 70.00 26 56.52 68 64.15
Regarding satisfaction of respondents about hos- b. Female 18 30.00 20 43.48 38 35.84
pital environment eg waiting time, cleanliness of 2. Age group (Years)
waiting room, cleanliness of toilet, Seating ar- a. 20-29 12 20.00 15 32.61 27 25.47
rangement, Attitude of hospital staffs and Inter- b. 30-39 22 36.67 14 30.43 36 33.96
ruption of service negative response was more c. 40-49 14 23.33 11 23.91 25 23.58
than the positive response both in CMCH and d. 50 – 59 12 20.00 6 13.04 18 16.98
CMSOGH. On the other side 86.67% patients in 3. Occupation
CMCH were satisfied with the OPD ticket fee a. Service holder 27 45.00 12 26.09 39 36.79
whereas only 26.09% patients were satisfied in b. Business 13 21.67 18 39.13 31 29.24
CMSOGH (Table II). c. Housewife 9 15.00 15 32.61 24 22.64
Patients were satisfied with sympathy and respect d. Wagers 5 8.33 2 4.35 7 06.60
(54.72%) by doctors, Privacy during examination e. Other 6 10.00 9 19.57 15 14.15
(71.70%) Investigation from outside hospital 4. Level of education
(60.38%) and not satisfied with consent before ex- a. Uneducated 8 13.33 8 17.39 16 15.09
amination (79.25%) in total of CMCH & b. Primary 20 33.33 14 30.43 34 32.07
CMSOGH patients. On the other side, 56.52% pa- c. Secondary 14 23.33 10 21.74 24 22.64
tients were satisfied with time given for examina- d. Higher secondary 8 13.33 7 15.22 15 14.15
tion in CMSOGH whereas 46.67% were satisfied e. Graduate 10 16.67 7 15.22 17 16.03
in CMCH (Table III).
5. Monthly family income
Table IV shows that patients who were Illiterate to a. 500-5000 17 28.33 9 19.57 26 24.52
primary level group more satisfied with hospital b. 5001-10,000 20 33.33 10 21.74 30 28.30
environment except OPD ticket fee than secon- c. 10,001-15,000 12 20.00 14 30.43 26 24.52
dary to graduate level group. 60.71% secondary to d. 15,001-20,000 7 11.67 7 15.22 14 13.20
graduate level patients only satisfied with OPD e. >20,000 4 6.67 6 13.04 10 09.43
ticket fee.
59
Original Article JCMCTA 2018 ; 29 (2) : 57-62
Table II : Satisfaction of the respondents about the Table IV : Educational level based satisfaction of
hospital environment (n=106) the respondents about the hospital environment
(n=106)
Factors Satisfaction CMCH CMSOGH Total
(n=60) (n=46) (n-106) Factors Educational level Yes No
n % n % n % n % n %
1. Waiting time Yes 14 23.33 16 34.78 30 28.30 1. Waiting time Illiterate to primary (n=50) 18 36.00 32 64.00
No 46 76.67 30 65.22 76 71.70 Secondary to graduate (n=56) 12 21.43 44 78.57
2. Cleanliness of Total (n=106) 30 28.30 76 71.70
waiting room Yes 24 40.00 18 39.13 42 39.62 2. Seating
No 36 60.00 28 60.87 64 60.38 arrangement Illiterate to primary (n=50) 23 46.00 27 54.00
3. Cleanliness of Secondary to graduate (n=56) 21 37.50 35 62.50
toilet Yes 13 21.67 10 21.74 23 21.70 Total (n=106) 44 41.51 62 58.49
No 48 80.00 36 78.26 84 79.25 3. Attitude of
4. Seating hospital staffs Illiterate to primary (n=50) 22 44.00 28 56.00
arrangement Yes 26 43.33 18 39.13 44 41.51 Secondary to graduate (n=56) 18 2.14 38 67.86
No 34 56.67 28 60.87 62 58.49 Total (n=106) 40 37.74 66 62.26
5. Attitude of 4. OPD ticket fee
hospital staffs Yes 22 36.67 18 39.13 40 37.74 Illiterate to primary (n=50) 30 60.00 20 40.00
No 38 63.33 28 60.87 66 62.26 Secondary to graduate (n=56) 34 60.71 22 39.29
6. Interruption of Total (n=106) 64 60.38 42 39.62
service Yes 26 43.33 16 34.78 42 39.62
No 34 56.67 30 65.22 64 60.38 Table V : Patients’ opinion regarding doctor’s
7. OPD ticket fee examination time (n=106)
Yes 52 86.67 12 26.09 64 60.38 Features Subgroups Yes No
No 08 13.33 34 73.91 42 39.62 n % n %
Gender Male (n=68) 27 39.71 41 60.29
Table III : Satisfaction of the respondents about the
Female (n=38) 17 44.74 21 55.26
service of the doctors (n=106)
Total (n=106) 44 41.51 62 58.49
Factors Satisfaction CMCH CMSOGH Total Educational level Illiterate to primary (n=50) 22 44.00 28 56.00
(n=60) (n-106) (n=46) Secondary to graduate (n=56) 22 39.29 34 60.71
n % n % n % Total (n=106) 44 41.51 62 58.49
1. Sympathy and Monthly income 500 – 10,000 (n=61) 27 44.26 34 55.74
respect by 10001 – 20,000 (n=45) 17 37.78 28 62.22
doctor Yes 32 53.33 26 56.52 58 54.72 Total (n=106) 44 41.51 62 58.49
No 28 46.67 20 43.48 48 45.28
2. Consent before Table VI : Patients’ opinion regarding attitude of
examination Yes 12 20.00 10 21.74 22 20.75 the doctor (n=106)
No 48 80.00 36 78.26 84 79.25 Features Subgroups Yes No
n % n %
3. Privacy during
Gender Male (n=68) 35 51.47 33 48.53
examination Yes 44 73.33 32 69.57 76 71.70
Female (n=38) 21 55.26 17 44.74
No 16 26.67 14 30.43 30 28.30
Total (n=106) 56 52.83 50 47.17
4. Time given for
examination Yes 28 46.67 26 56.52 54 50.94 Educational level Illiterate to primary (n=50) 26 52.00 24 48.00
No 32 53.33 20 43.48 52 49.06 Secondary to graduate (n=56) 30 53.57 26 46.43
5. Investigation Total (n=106) 56 52.83 50 47.17
from outside Monthly income 500 – 10,000 (n=61) 33 54.10 28 45.90
hospital Yes 36 60.00 28 60.87 64 60.38 10001 – 20,000+ (n=45) 23 51.11 22 48.89
No 24 40.00 18 39.13 42 39.62 Total (n=106) 56 52.83 50 47.17
60
Original Article JCMCTA 2018 ; 29 (2) : 57-62
61
Original Article JCMCTA 2018 ; 29 (2) : 57-62