Slake Durability of Shales and Other Similar Weak Rocks: Standard Test Method For
Slake Durability of Shales and Other Similar Weak Rocks: Standard Test Method For
1
D4644 − 16
5. Significance and Use 6.3 Balance, with sensitivity of 1 g and having a 3000-g
5.1 The test method is used to estimate qualitatively the capacity, using the guidelines of Guide D4753.
durability of weak rocks through weakening and disintegration 6.4 Miscellaneous Apparatus, including a brush and ham-
resulting from a standard two cycles of wetting and drying in mer.
the service environment. (1-7).3
6.5 Distilled Water.
5.2 This test method is used to assign quantitative durability
6.6 Timer.
index values to weak rocks. A primary example is the Franklin
Rating System (1). 6.7 Camera.
NOTE 1—The quality of the result produced by this standard is NOTE 3—Laboratory has the option of drying the test specimens in the
dependent on the competence of the personnel performing it, and the drum or in a separate specimen’s container. These containers are made of
suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Agencies that meet the materials that are resistant to corrosion and change in mass upon repeated
criteria of Practice D3740 are generally considered capable of competent heating, cooling, and cleaning process. One uniquely numbered (identi-
and objective testing, sampling, inspection, and so forth. Users of this fied) container or numbered-matched container, as required, is needed per
standard are cautioned that compliance with Practice D3740 does not in each water content determination. After finishing each cycle, whole
itself assure reliable results. Reliable results depend on many factors; material from the specimen’s container shall be transferred to number-
Practice D3740 provides a means of evaluating some of those factors. matched drum or vice versa.
2
D4644 − 16
8.3 Using Test Method D2216, Method A, determine the
water content and oven-dried mass of each test specimen
before testing. This shall be done with the test specimen
fragments either in the drum or specimen container to be used
for the actual testing.
8.4 Mount the drum containing the dried test specimen in
the trough and couple to the motor.
8.5 Fill the trough with distilled water at room temperature
to 20 mm (0.8 in.) below the drum axis. Rotate the drum at 20
rpm for a period of 10 min. Record the water temperature at the
beginning and end of the test cycle.
8.6 Remove the drum from the trough immediately after the
rotation period is complete. Oven dry the specimen either in
the drum or specimen container as in 8.3 and obtain the
oven-dried mass.
8.7 Repeat 8.4 through 8.6 to obtain a final oven-dried mass
for the second cycle.
8.8 Photograph specimen retained and file a copy of the
photo with the laboratory report, or record standard verbal
descriptions, as follows:
8.8.1 Type I—Retained specimens remain virtually un-
changed.
8.8.2 Type II—Retained specimens consist of large and
small fragments.
8.8.3 Type III—Retained specimens are exclusively small
fragments.
8.9 See Fig. 2 for representative photographs, each one of
the three types.
9. Calculations
9.1 Calculate the slake durability index (first and second
cycle), as follows:
I d1 5 @ ~ W f1 2 C ! / ~ W i 2 C ! # 3 100 (1)
I d2 5 @ ~ W f2 2 C ! / ~ W i 2 C ! # 3 100
where:
Id1 and Id2 = slake durability index after first and second
cycles accordingly, g,
Wi = mass of drum plus oven-dried specimen
before the first cycle, g,
Wf1 and Wf2 = mass of drum plus oven-dried specimen
retained after the first and the second cycles
accordingly, g, and FIG. 2 Representative Photographs of Fragment Types Retained
C = mass of drum, g. in Drum
3
D4644 − 16
specimens which have uniform physical properties. Any varia- accepted reference value of shale or weak rock for this test
tion observed on the data is just as likely to be due to specimen method; therefore, bias cannot be determined.
variation as to operator or laboratory testing variation: Sub-
committee D18.12 welcomes proposals that would allow for 12. Keywords
development of a valid precision statement. There is no 12.1 abrasion resistance; shale; slake durability; weak rocks
REFERENCES
(1) Franklin Trow Associates, “Field Evaluation of Shales for Construc- Standardization of Laboratory and Field Tests, November 1972 .
tion Projects,” Research and Development Project No. 1404, Ministry (5) Lutton, R. J., “Design and Construction of Compacted Shale
of Transportation and Communications, Research and Development Embankments, Volume 3, Slaking Indexes for Design,” Report No.
Branch, Downsview, Ontario, March 1979. FHWA-RD-77-1, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC,
(2) Chapman, D. R., “Shale Classification Tests and Systems: A Com- February 1977.
parative Study,” MSCE Thesis and Joint Highway Research Project (6) Surendra, M., “Additives to Control Slaking in Compacted Shales,”
No. 75-11, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, June 1975, 90 pp. Ph.D. Thesis and Joint Highway Research Project No. 80-6, Purdue
(3) Deo, P., “Shales as Embankment Materials,” Ph.D. Thesis and Joint University, West Lafayette, IN, May 1980, 277 pp.
Highway Research Project No. 45, Purdue University, West Lafayette, (7) Oakland, M. W., and Lovell, C. W., “Classification and Other
IN, December 1972, 202 pp. Standard Tests for Shale Embankment,” Joint Highway Research
(4) International Society for Rock Mechanics , “Suggested Methods for Project No. 82-4, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, February
Determining Slake-Durability Index Properties,” Commission on 1982, 171 pp.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Committee D18 has identified the location of selected changes to this standard since the last issue
(D4644 – 08) that may impact the use of this standard. (November 1, 2016)
(1) Edited standard title. (9) Edited Section 7 title and its contents.
(2) Edited and renumbered Scope section. (10) Edited Section 8, Procedures, and added to its contents.
(3) Added Gudie D4753 to 2.1. (11) Edited Fig. 2 caption.
(4) Edited Terminology section, 3.1. (12) Added Note 3.
(5) Added Section 4, Summary of Test Method. (13) Edited Section 9, Calculations, and added individual
(6) Edited Section 5, Significance and Use. formula per each cycle.
(7) Edited Section 6, Apparatus. Added requirement of existing (14) Edited Section 10, Report title, and added new item to it.
and use of a timer and camera during the test. (15) Renumbered Sections 4-12.
(8) Edited Fig. 1 caption. (16) Renumbered sections referenced in the test as needed.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, Tel: (978) 646-2600; http://www.copyright.com/