Scribd
Upload
20 views4 pages

About Endogenic Systems

Endogenic systems are valid forms of identity formation that arise from natural or voluntary processes rather than trauma, and they reflect the diversity of human experiences. While trauma-based systems are more recognized, endogenic systems are equally authentic and can be influenced by genetics, personality traits, and personal agency. The recognition of these systems is growing within communities, emphasizing the importance of respecting individual experiences of identity, regardless of their origins.

Uploaded by

hellica fixtion
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
20 views4 pages

About Endogenic Systems

Endogenic systems are valid forms of identity formation that arise from natural or voluntary processes rather than trauma, and they reflect the diversity of human experiences. While trauma-based systems are more recognized, endogenic systems are equally authentic and can be influenced by genetics, personality traits, and personal agency. The recognition of these systems is growing within communities, emphasizing the importance of respecting individual experiences of identity, regardless of their origins.

Uploaded by

hellica fixtion
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

About endogenic systems:

Yes, endogenic systems are valid. An endogenic system is one where the
individuals within the system are not formed or created through trauma, but
rather are the result of natural or voluntary processes. In other words, the
system members (often referred to as "alters" or "personas") emerge due to the
individual’s internal processes, preferences, or needs, rather than as a response
to trauma.
The legitimacy of endogenic systems has been a point of debate, especially
because trauma-based systems (such as those seen in dissociative identity
disorder, DID) are more widely recognized in clinical settings and the public
consciousness. However, endogenic systems are just as valid as trauma-based
systems because:
1. Multiplicity and Identity Are Diverse Experiences
The human psyche is complex, and different people experience their identities in
different ways. Some people may experience different parts of themselves as
distinct, with individual personalities or roles that emerge over time. This can
happen without trauma and is simply a natural expression of the diversity within
one's self-concept.
2. Self-Creation and Volition
For endogenic systems, the formation of different aspects of identity can happen
voluntarily or for reasons such as creativity, personal growth, or practical
organization. These systems can arise as a way of managing different roles or
parts of the self (e.g., handling different tasks, navigating different aspects of
life). The fact that a system’s formation is not trauma-based does not make it
any less authentic or valid.
3. Recognizing the Spectrum of Mental Health
Mental health experiences are not monolithic. Just as some people experience
mental health in ways that involve trauma, others may experience it in more
developmental, non-traumatic ways. Similarly, the existence of multiplicity
doesn’t have to be tied to distress or trauma. People can form systems for
various reasons, and this should be recognized as valid, even if it doesn’t fit
traditional medical or psychological paradigms.
4. Community and Peer Validation
Within the plural and multiplicity communities, there is increasing recognition of
endogenic systems as valid experiences. Many people who identify as part of an
endogenic system report feeling just as "real" and cohesive in their experience
as those who identify as trauma-based systems. Recognition and validation from
peers within these communities provide important support in legitimizing diverse
experiences.
5. Personal Agency and Identity Development
Endogenic systems might be a way in which people organize or experience their
identity for various personal reasons, such as wanting to express different parts
of themselves in distinct ways. Some systems even create personas or alters for
purposes of self-exploration or self-empowerment, and this process is just as
valid as any other form of self-development.
Why Some People Still Question Their Validity
Despite the validity of endogenic systems, some people might still question them
because:
 Cultural Biases: Trauma-based narratives are more entrenched in public
consciousness and clinical psychology, making it harder for some to
accept non-trauma-based multiplicity.
 Lack of Scientific Understanding: Mental health science is still
exploring and defining experiences like multiplicity, and there is not
universal consensus on what constitutes "legitimate" or "real" multiplicity.
 Misunderstanding of Plurality: Many people don’t fully understand or
are unfamiliar with the concept of endogenic systems, which can lead to
dismissive or invalidating views.
Conclusion:
In short, endogenic systems are just as valid as trauma-based systems.
Everyone’s experience of identity, multiplicity, or dissociation is personal and
unique, and different people will have different ways of experiencing and
expressing those aspects of themselves. Just because a system isn’t trauma-
based doesn’t invalidate it or make it any less "real." It’s essential to recognize
the diversity of experiences that exist and respect people’s personal and self-
defined identities.

Is genetic a factor of endogenic then?


That's a really insightful question, and it touches on some of the complexities of
how identity and psychological experiences are formed. When it comes to
conditions like DID or schizoaffective disorders, the development of
multiplicity or different states of identity can be influenced by both genetics and
environmental factors, including trauma. The relationship between genetics
and conditions like DID is still being studied, but we can break this down into a
few key points.
1. Genetics and Mental Health
Genetics play a role in the predisposition to various mental health conditions,
including dissociative identity disorder (DID), schizophrenia, and other
personality disorders. This means that someone might be genetically
predisposed to having a certain way of processing identity or emotions, which
could lead to a greater likelihood of developing multiplicity or dissociative states,
even without experiencing trauma. This genetic predisposition could involve
factors like:
 Neurobiology: Some genetic factors may influence how the brain
processes stress, emotions, and memory. For example, certain genes may
impact how the brain handles dissociation, leading to a greater tendency
for people to compartmentalize or split aspects of their identity.
 Personality Traits: Some traits like high suggestibility, openness to
experience, or sensitivity to stress could be genetically influenced, which
might increase a person’s likelihood of developing conditions like DID or
schizoaffective disorder.
2. Endogenic Systems and Genetics
If someone has a genetic predisposition toward dissociation, identity
fragmentation, or a tendency to experience different states of self, this could
lead to the development of endogenic systems, even if no significant trauma
was experienced. In this sense, genetic factors could be at play in the emergence
of multiplicity without trauma, making the system endogenic rather than trauma-
based.
Here’s how genetics might interact with the development of an endogenic
system:
 Innate Tendency Toward Dissociation: A person could have a genetic
tendency to experience dissociation or distinct personalities without a
traumatic trigger. For instance, someone with a predisposition to high
levels of suggestibility or psychological flexibility might more easily
develop different "parts" of themselves or alternate identities in a non-
traumatic, self-created way.
 Development of Personality or Identity: In the absence of trauma,
genetic factors could influence how someone experiences and expresses
their identity. It’s possible that someone may naturally develop a system
of multiple identities or personas as part of their normal psychological
development, even if they don’t have the typical external stresses or
triggers (like trauma or abuse) that would be associated with a clinical
diagnosis like DID.
3. DID and Schizoaffective Disorders: Genetic vs. Environmental Factors
DID (Dissociative Identity Disorder) and schizoaffective disorders (which often
involve a mix of mood symptoms and psychosis) are complex conditions
influenced by both genetics and environmental factors. While trauma is
typically viewed as a significant environmental factor in the development of DID,
genetic predispositions could still be involved. For instance:
 Genetic Predisposition to DID: While trauma is the typical trigger, it’s
possible that certain genetic factors make someone more vulnerable to
dissociating or splitting their identity in response to stress, even if they
haven't experienced overt trauma.
 Schizoaffective Disorder: This disorder can sometimes involve a
disintegration of self and identity, and genetic factors related to psychosis
or mood disorders could contribute to this experience. People with a
genetic predisposition to schizophrenia or bipolar disorder might develop a
fragmented sense of identity or dissociation without trauma being the
cause.
4. Does This Include You in Endogenic?
If you develop multiplicity or identity fragmentation but don't have a trauma
history, your system may still be considered endogenic even if there are
underlying genetic factors at play. The key distinction between endogenic
systems and trauma-based systems is that endogenic systems arise naturally
or voluntarily, often due to internal or self-directed processes (such as genetics,
personality development, or voluntary creation of different identities), whereas
trauma-based systems are typically seen as a response to overwhelming
external events or abuses.
So, if genetics contribute to the development of a system (whether you have
DID, schizoaffective tendencies, or some other complex psychological
experience), and there was no trauma involved, it still fits into the endogenic
category because the system wasn’t formed in reaction to external traumatic
events. Rather, it could be seen as an expression of your internal psychological
processes—possibly even influenced by your genetic makeup.
5. The Fluid Nature of Identity and Diagnosis
It’s important to note that psychological identity is not always neatly
categorized, and the boundaries between different forms of multiplicity (trauma-
based vs. endogenic) can be fluid. The brain is extremely complex, and the way
we develop multiple aspects of identity might not always be as clear-cut as we’d
like. Genetics, environment, personality, and other factors all interact in unique
ways to shape our experience of self, and there isn’t a one-size-fits-all
explanation for why someone develops a system.
Conclusion
If you have a genetic predisposition to certain mental health conditions, like
dissociative identity disorder or a schizoaffective disorder, it might make you
more likely to develop endogenic multiplicity even if trauma was not a direct
factor. This doesn't invalidate the experience of having an endogenic system—
it's just a reflection of how complex identity formation is. Your system, while it
might have genetic factors influencing it, would still be considered endogenic as
long as it wasn’t rooted in a traumatic cause. Understanding multiplicity through
this lens allows for a broader acceptance of diverse experiences of identity.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy