0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views7 pages

Essay On The Administrative System of Guptas

The Gupta period is recognized as a 'Golden Age' in Indian history, characterized by significant advancements in literature, art, and science, although its benefits were primarily limited to the upper classes in Northern India. The administrative system was a benevolent monarchy where the king held substantial powers but shared authority with ministers and local bodies, ensuring a degree of popular governance. The well-organized administrative divisions, from central to local levels, facilitated effective governance and revenue collection, contributing to the prosperity and stability of the empire.

Uploaded by

rishujain2587
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views7 pages

Essay On The Administrative System of Guptas

The Gupta period is recognized as a 'Golden Age' in Indian history, characterized by significant advancements in literature, art, and science, although its benefits were primarily limited to the upper classes in Northern India. The administrative system was a benevolent monarchy where the king held substantial powers but shared authority with ministers and local bodies, ensuring a degree of popular governance. The well-organized administrative divisions, from central to local levels, facilitated effective governance and revenue collection, contributing to the prosperity and stability of the empire.

Uploaded by

rishujain2587
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Essay on the Administrative System Of

Guptas

The age of the Guptas has been regarded as the age of progress in India by all
historians. Of course, Dr. Romila Thaper seems to be near the mark when she
contends that when we accept the Gupta period as the classical age of ancient
India we have accepted its limitations also.

That the living standard which reach 3d their peak were limited to upper
classes alone and, further the classicism of the Gupta period was restricted to
Northern India alone. With these limitation she agrees with others regarding
the progress achieved during this period.

Majority of scholars agree with the view that it was die "Golden Age" of Ancient
India. Dr. V.A. Smith writes, "The age of great Gupta Kings presented a more
agreeable and satisfactory picture than any other period in the history of Hindu
India.

Literature, Art and Science flourished in a degree beyond ordinary and gradual
changes in the religion were effected without persecution." The empire of the
Guptas was certainly less extensive than the empire of the Mauryas prior to
them.

The great Gupta ruler provided political unity to a large part of North India for
nearly two centuries. The political institutions of the Gupta Age were not
original but were rather "founded the historical traditions of the past and
improved and adapted to suit contemporary conditions."

They were both imposing and benevolent. The imperial perfection was achieved
in the hands of the Guptas and their administrations was better than that of the
Mauryas.

I. The Central Administration


(I) King

Monarchy was the form of government which was in vague during the Gupta
Age. But it was the benevolent monarchy The king was the head of the state as
well as that of administration. The theory of the divinity of kings was popular
during the Gupta period by which the royal power and prestige had increased.

The guptas were fond of sounding titles and the whole administrative structure
was saturated with designations and titles.

The Gupta rulers assumed a number of titles such as 'Raja-dhiraja', 'Maharaja-


dhiraja 'Paramaraja-dhiraja 'Raja-dhirajashi', 'Eka-dhiraja', 'Pramdevata',
'Parambhattarka', 'Prithipala', 'Paramesvara', 'Samrat', and 'Chakravartin'.
Samudragupta is described as equal to the gods "Dhanda" or "Kubera",
"Varuna", Indra" and "Antaka" or "Yama".

Who was battle-axe of the god "Kritanta" or "Yama"," Certainly, the


establishment of a Vast empire had helped in increasing the powers of the
rulers and divinity and assigned to the kings.

The Gupta Kings enjoyed a large number of powers. Those powers covered the
political, administrative, military and judicial fields. Samudragupta,
Chandragupta-II and Skandagupta personally led their armies.

The Gupta Kings appointed all the governors and important military and civil
officers. They were also responsible to the king. The governors and their
officers had to work under the control and guidance of the King. The King was
the source of all honours and titles.

All land in the empire was the property of the King who could give away the
same to anybody he pleased. He could construct dams, give shelter to any one,
impose, recover and remit taxes and impart the justice. Yet the Kings could not
afford to be selfish despots. They had to ruled according to "Rajya Dharwa" and
with the help of their ministers.

In other words it is wrong to say that the Gupta Kings were autocrats. They
shared their powers with ministers and other high officers. A large number of
powers were delegated to the local bodies such as village Panchayats and town
councils.

The king was required to adopt all means to win popularity among the people
by respecting their wishes and promoting their welfare. The King toured the
country with a view to keep himself in touch with the people . The important
matters were decided in the joint meeting. The king respected the advice given
by his ministers.

The secret of the success of the Gupta rulers lies in the principle of succession
to kingship which was based on sound principles. The old law of the
primogeniture was not in vogue then.

The usual practice was selection by the dying King of the best fitted prince
from amongst his sons. Samudragupta represent this kind of selection.

The use of words "selected by the father in the Mathura inscriptions points to
this in the case of Chandragupta-13 as well. The personal life of the King was
very simple. He took great interest in redeeming the poor from misery in
protecting religion and in dispensing justice.

(ii) Council Of Ministers


It appears that the Gupta rulers had their councils. Perhaps, it consisted of
princes, high officials and feudatories. Kalidas refers to the "Mantri-Parishad"
or council of ministers.

Some officers the designation of "Kanchuki" or "Chamberlain" acted as an


agent between the King and the council. Whatever decisions were taken by the
council of Mnisters were conveyed to the King through an "Amatya".

It means that the matter was placed before the "Council of Ministers" and
efforts were made to arrive at some conclusion then the decisions were
conveyed to the King who was left to arrive at any conclusion he pleased. It
was the duty of the "Council of Ministers" to advise the king but ultimately it
had to obey the verdict of the King.

The emperor was assisted by a council of ministers of "Mantri-Parishad". The


prominent "Mantris" among whom was the "Prime Minister" of the state known
as "Mantri Mukhya".

The portfolios of war and peace, the chief Councillorship, military forces and
law and order were held by different persons respectively known as,
'MahasandhiVigrahaka', 'Amatya', 'Mahabaladhikrita' and 'Mahadandanayaka'.

Examiner's Choice

The provinces were called Desas or Bhuktis and were governed by Uparikas.

The Uparika may represent the pradesikas of the Ashokan epigraphs and in the
same as the Amatyas of the Satavahana provinces.

The provinces were divided into districts, called Vishyas. Each vishaya was
administered by a royal official, known as the Adhisthana Adhikarna.
Ranabhandahi-Karana was the military exchequer. Dandaparsadhikarna, office
of the chief of police.

Vinayasthiti-Sthapaka, office of minister in charge of law and order.

Bhatasvapati, head of the infantry and cavalry. Mahapratikara chief


chamberlain. Vinayasur, chief censor.

According to Kalidas, there were three ministers foreign-minister, finance


minister and the law-minister. The ministers were expected to be experts in
their spheres of works. In many cases their office was hereditary.

The great secrecy was maintained with regard to the deliberations in the
meetings of the ministers. Further, it appears that the Question of the
succession to the throne was a function of the 'Council of Ministers'.

(iii) Civil Officers


The Guptas entire central government was under the direct control of the King.
The most important officers of the royal court were known as "Mahapratihara"
or "Receptionist", "Rajamatya" or "Adviser to the king" and "Ajnasamchrikas"
or courtiers.

The Gupta civil administration was a "bureaucracy of high- sounding officials


like "Rajapurusha", "Rajanayaka", "Rajaputra", "Rajamatya", "Mahasamanta",
"Mahapratihara" and "Mahakumaramatya" etc.

(iv) Revenue And Police Officers

The duties of revenue and police administration were not separate and were
run by officials like 'Uparika', 'Dashparadhika', 'Chauroddharanika', 'Dandika',
'Dandapashika', 'Gaulmika', 'Kottapala' or 'Kottupala' 'Angarakshka' and
'Ayuktaka- Viniyuktaka', 'Rajuka' etc.

(v) Military Officers

The military officers referred to in the inscriptions are the 'Senapati',


'Mahasenapati', 'Baladhikrita' 'Mahabaladhikrita', 'Dandanayaka',
'Sandhivigrahika', Mahasandhivigrahika', Gopta etc. They were the key
functionary in the Gupta army.

The Gupta army had four wings such as- informatory, cavalry, elephant and the
navy. The main weapons of war were bows and arrows, swords, axes and
spears.

(vi) Judicial Officers

Inscriptions of Gupta's refer to such judicial officers as 'Mahadanda nayaka',


'Mahakshapatalika' etc. Probably, 'Mahadandanayaka' combined the duties of a
judge and a general. The "Mahadandanayaka" was probably the "Great keeper
of Records".

It appears that the "Kumaramatya" a "Bhondapashika" and the "Uparika" had


each his separate "Adhikarna" or "court or office" where the transactions
pertaining to land were decided. It is possible that judicial matters were also
decided there.

According to Fa-Hien, punishments were very lenient and capital punishment


was very rare. However, the testimony of Fa-Hien is not accepted and it is
pointed out by the Kalidas, Visakhadatta that punishments were pretty harsh in
the Gupta period-such as death, death by elephant etc.

Four kinds of ordeals seemed to have been employed to ascertain the guilt or
innocence of a person. These are by water, by fire, by weighing and by poison.

ii. Administrative Divisions


A study of the Gupta inscriptions shows that there was an hierarchy of
administrative divisions from top to bottom. The empire was called by various
names such as "Rajya", Rashtra", "Desha", "Mandala", "Prithvi" and "Avani".

It was divided into provinces which were called as, "Bhukti", Pradesha" and
"Bhoga". Provinces were divided into "Vishayas" and put under the control of
"Vishaya Patis".

"Vishaya" were divided in "Nagaras" and "Nagares" were divided into villages.
A part of a "Vishaya" was called "Vithi ." A union of villages was called
"Pethaka" and "Santaka". Smaller units or divisions of a village were
"Agrahara" and "Patta".

iii. Provincial Administration

The head of the provincial administration was known by various names and
some of them were- "Uparika", "Gupta", Bhogika", "Bhogapati" and
"Rajasthaniya".

In certain cases, the son of the King or "Rajaputra" was appointed the
Governor. The minister in attendance on the royal Governor was called
"Kumaramatya".

There are the references to various provincial officials such as-


"Baladhikaranika" or "Head of the army or military"; "Dandapasadhikaranika"
or 'Chief of the Police'; 'Ranabhandarika' or 'Chief Justice'; 'Vinayasthiti
Sthapaka' or 'Minister of Law and order"; 'Sadhanika' or 'Officer to deal with
debts and fines'; 'Hiranya-Samudyika' or 'Currency Officer; 'Tadayuktaka' or
'Treasury Officers'; 'Audrangika' or 'Collector of the Udranga tax'; 'Aurna-
Sthanika' or 'Superintendent of silk factories'; etc.

iv. District Or "Vishaya" Administration

The head of the "Vishaya" administration was the "Vishayapati" or District


Magistrate'. The District Magistrate or "Vishayapati" was assisted in his work
by the "Mahattaras" or "Village elders".

"Gramikas" or "Village Headmen", "Saulkikas" or Collectors of Customs and


tolls', "Gaulmika" or "officers in charge of forests and forts", "Agar harikas",
"Dhruvadhikaranikas" or "Treasurers" etc.

There were many clerks in the department whose duty was to write and copy
out the records and documents. The writers were called "Lekhakas" and
"Diviras". The officer-in-charge of the documents was known as the "Karanika".

v. City Administration
The head of the city administration was known as the "Nagara-Rakshaka"
or"Purapala". "Purapala Uparika" was another officer who controlled the heads
of the various cities.

A city was governed by a "Parishad". In the city, there was a reference of"
Avasthika", who was a special officer who acted as the "Superintendent of
Dharamsalas."

vi.VillageAdministration

The village was the smallest unit of the administration. "Gramika" was the head
of the village but there were other officials known as "Dutas" or "Messengers",
heads men, Kartri, etc. He was assisted by a village assembly but due to the
lack of references, it is not possible to describe the exact duties and functions
of the assembly.

Examiner's Choice

The administrative and judicial business of villages were carried on by the


Gramikas.

He was assisted by a group of village elders, such as Kutumbikas,


Mahamataras etc.

The royal servant in the village was the Gram-Vridha.

Vii. Source Of Revenue

In order to meet the vast expenditure incurred on the maintenance of such a


vast administration of the empire, the king levied different types of tax. Land
revalue has always been an important source of income in an agricultural
country.

Land revalue was one of the primary sources of the income of the Guptas and
they helped in increasing agricultural production and provided security to the
cultivators. Waste lands was brought under cultivation and pasture land was
also protected and increased.

The government increased the man-made means of irrigation at both-capital


and provincial levels. All this helped in the growth of agricultural and animal
husbandry.

During the Gupta days "Uparika" or "land- tax", which was levied on cultivators
who had no property rights on soil, "Vata", "Bhuta", "Dhanya", "Hiranya" or
gold, "Adeya" etc. Perhaps, it was one sixth of the total produce.

Though there were other means of source of income like surplus or income tax
known as "Bhaga", customs, mint, inheritance and presents etc. In addition to
these taxes, fines known as "Dasa-Paradha" from offenders and free labour due
to the king known as "Vaishtika" formed the source of income.

On the whole, the Gupta administration was well organised. Peace and
prosperity of the subjects and the progress achieved by them in practically all
walks of their life was its proof. It is to be observed that the designation of
Gupta officials continued even after the passing away of the Gupta empire.

The early Kala curiyas were the first to be influenced by the Gupta
administrative system. Likewise the Chalukyas of Badami, the Rashtrakutas of
Malkhed and the Western Chalukyas of Kalyani were also accepted the Gupta
administrative system.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy