Is The Gentile Now A Jew
Is The Gentile Now A Jew
NOW A JEW?
by Avram Yehoshua
http://SeedofAbraham.net
TABLE OF CONTENTS
iii
IS THE GENTILE NOW A JEW?
by Avram Yehoshua
http://SeedofAbraham.net
The Gentile believer in Messiah Yeshua is part of the Commonwealth of Israel, but that doesn’t make him
a Jew, Hebrew, Israeli (‘Israelite’),1 or even a so-called ‘spiritual Jew.’ Yes, the Gentile is part of the Seed
that Father Abraham was promised and he has also been grafted into the Olive Tree (Israel; Romans 9–
11), but that doesn’t change him into a Jew or a Hebrew anymore then when a woman marries a man. The
man and his wife become ‘one flesh’ (Gen. 2:24), but the woman doesn’t become a man. The Jewish and
Gentile believers are ‘one in Messiah’ (Gal. 3:28), but the Gentile doesn’t become a Jew. He remains a
Gentile.
The Apostle Paul speaks of the Gentile believer now being part of the Commonwealth of Israel (Eph.
2:1-12).2 What does it mean to be part of the Commonwealth of Israel? Let’s take an illustration from the
natural realm first, to explain it—let’s take an Irishman. He’s part of the Commonwealth of Great Britain,
but he’s not an Englishman (or a Brit, as many Englishmen now like to call themselves). In other words,
the Irishman is still an Irishman. He was an Irishman before Ireland came into the Commonwealth of
Great Britain, and also after. Being part of the Commonwealth of Great Britain means that both the Irish-
man and the Brit have the same king (or queen), and their rule of life (law) is built upon the same
foundation of English law (the Magna Carta, etc.), but it doesn’t mean that the Irishman is no longer an
Irishman or that he has become a Brit.
Now for the spiritual application. Let’s take the classic Gentile—Ruth the Moabitess. The Covenant was
given to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and their Seed. Those who came on board with them, like Ruth, re-
mained a Gentile and became part of the covenant people (i.e. Commonwealth) of Israel. Ruth, after she
spoke of being ‘one with Naomi, Naomi’s people and her God’ (Ruth 1:16-18) became part of Israel
(without rabbinic conversion, which is an artificial, non-biblical concept), but Ruth remained a Moabitess
all the days of her life (Ruth 1:22; 2:2, 6, 21; 4:5, 10; cf. 2:10-12), but all the divine laws of Moses that
applied to a Jewish woman applied to her, too. She was ‘one’ with Israel.
Boaz, as the kinsmen-redeemer3 of Ruth, pictures Yeshua as the Kinsmen-Redeemer.4 Ruth, the Moa-
bitess, the woman from a pagan land, pictures the Gentiles of the nations who leave their father and her
mothers, and their gods and become one with Israel through Yeshua, the Kinsmen-Redeemer. These Gen-
tiles, like Ruth, don’t become Jews or Hebrews, but are one with Israel through their marriage to the
Kinsmen-Redeemer.
Rabbinic conversion is a man-made concept that artificially makes a Gentile a Jew. There is nothing in
the Tanach (Old Testament), nor the New Testament, to support this change of racial identity. Looking at
1
The term Israelite is an archaic term from the Greek New Testament for an Israeli, hence, my use of Israeli in-
stead of Israelite. I will be using these terms (Jew, Hebrew, Israeli) interchangeably. For an article on how the
term Jew constitutes ‘Israel,’ ask for the PDF Jews, Israel and the Jews Today.
2
The ASV, KJV, NASB, NKJV and the NRSV have Commonwealth, while the HCSB, NET and the NIV have
citizenship. Either translation is acceptable, yet, Commonwealth is preferred because it speaks of the entity (Is-
rael ‘after the Spirit’) rather than the individual within the entity.
3
The term relative is used 11 times in the story (Ruth 2:1; 3:2, 9, 12 (twice), 13; 4:1, 3, 6, 8, 14). It can also be
translated as kinsmen (KJV, NIV, etc.), which means kinsmen-redeemer.
4
Ex. 6:6; Lev. 25:25f.; Hosea 13:14; Rom. 3:24; 1st Cor. 1:10; Eph. 1:7; Col. 1:14; Titus 2:14; Heb. 9:12.
Ittai, the Gentile general who served under King David, will reveal that Ittai remained a Philistine all the
days of his life, even though he lived in Israel. In other words, Ittai didn’t become a Hebrew even though
he was ‘one’ with David and Israel, and even though he lived in Israel.5
When David fled from his own son Absalom, who wanted to murder him and assume the kingship over
Israel, David and his entourage hurriedly left Jerusalem. In stopping to reconnoiter who was with him
David saw Ittai and Ittai’s men (soldiers). Scripture records:
‘And the King went out with all the people after him and stopped at the outskirts. Then
all his servants passed before him; and all the Cherethites, all the Pelethites, and all the
Gittites, six hundred men who had followed him from Gath (Philistines!) passed before
the King. Then the King said to Ittai the Gittite,’
‘Why are you also going with us? Return and remain with the king (Absalom),
for you are a foreigner and also an exile from your own homeland. In fact, you
came only yesterday.6 Should I make you wander up and down with us today,
since I don’t know where I’m going? Return and take your brethren back. Mercy
and truth be with you.’
‘But Ittai answered the King (as Ruth did to Naomi) and said,’
‘As Yahveh lives!, and as my Lord the King lives! Surely in whatever place my
Lord the King shall be, whether in death or in life, even there also your servant
will be!’
“So David said to Ittai, ‘Go and cross over!’”
‘Then Ittai the Gittite and all his men and all their children who were with him crossed
over.’ (2nd Samuel 15:17-22)
Ittai the Gittite’s loyalty to King David is truly commendable because Ittai was a Philistine (general) from
the Philistine city of Gath, as the Hebrew-Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament brings out.7 Ittai had
come to serve the King of Israel, but he remained a Philistine all the days of his life,8 as this passage
brings out when David says to him, ‘you are a foreigner,’ not, you were a foreigner. Ittai was still a Gen-
tile, even though he was an integral part of King David’s Israel.
As a Philistine Ittai should have been a mortal enemy of David, but he was now part of the Common-
wealth of Israel and would receive benefits, both temporal and eternal, because of his love for King
David.9 Ittai is a picture of the Gentile believer, while King David is a picture of Messiah Yeshua.
5
In one sense, Ittai would be seen as an Israeli, one who lived in Israel, but in racial terms, Ittai would never be an
Israeli.
6
David doesn’t literally mean that Ittai came ‘only yesterday,’ but chooses that phrase to say that Ittai hadn’t been
with David for a long time. David was trying to give him ‘a way out.’
7
Ludwig Koehler, Walter Baumgartner, and J. J. Stamm, authors; M. Richardson, translator, The Hebrew-Ara-
maic Lexicon of the Old Testament vol. 1 (Boston, MA USA: Brill Academic Publishers, 2002), p. 206. ‘…גתיof
( גתGath) ( הגתיhaGiti) ‘from Gath; Jos. 13:3 2S 6:10f; 15:19-22; 18:2; 21:19; 1C 13:13; 20:5; pl. ( הגתיםhaG-
itim) 2S 15:18.’
Also, גתיHebrew to English Dictionary and Index to the NIV Old Testament, n.p. (numbers correspond to
Strong’s Concordance) ‘1785 [1663] גתי, gittiy, a.g. [1781; cf. 1780]. Gittite, of Gath.’ Accordance Bible
Software.
8
2nd Samuel 18:2, 5.
9
See also Uriah the Hittite, one of King David’s champions, as another example of a foreigner residing within Is-
rael who was one with Israel, but wasn’t seen as a Jew (1st Sam. 26:6; 2nd Sam. 11:3, 6, 17, 21, 24; 12:9; 23:39;
1st Kgs. 15:5), and the Gibeonites, who were in Canaan before Israel (Joshua 9:1ff.), but Joshua was deceived
into making a covenant with them. Four hundred years later, in the reign of King David, they were still seen as
2
A Gentile who comes to believe in Yeshua, the King of Israel, doesn’t become a Jew, or a Hebrew, or an
Israeli, but remains a Gentile. Yes, he is part of the Seed that Father Abraham was promised, but nowhere
in the New Testament do we see any Gentile being referred to as a Jew, or a Hebrew, or an Israeli.
Nowhere in the New Testament does it say that a Gentile believer was anything other than a Gentile be-
liever. All believers are in Messiah’s Kingdom, but not all are Jews, yet, all are part of the Common-
wealth of Israel, the Olive Tree, and The Seed of Abraham.
The word Jew or Jews in the New Testament always refers to the person who was racially born from the
Seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.10 God cements this concept in the New Covenant by saying that the
Gentile believers weren’t to be circumcised like the Jews (Acts 15:1f.; 21:20-24; 1st Cor. 7:17-19; Gal.
2:3, etc.). The Pharisees who believed in Yeshua wanted the Gentiles to (artificially) become Jews via
physical circumcision (Acts 15:1-5f.), but God, through Peter and James, overruled them (and rabbinic
conversion), reestablishing the biblical concept that Gentiles who align themselves with Israel are one
with Israel, but don’t become Jews.11
strangers in the midst of Israel, yet one with Israel (2nd Samuel 21:1-2f.).
Also, read Two Different Kingdoms? The Stranger and the Native-Born, the Appendix in The Lifting of the Veil:
Acts 15:20-21 at http://seedofabraham.net/The-Lifting-of-the-Veil.pdf for the Old Testament distinction between
the Gentile who became part of Israel (the ger; translated as stranger in the NKJV and NASB, etc.), and the nat-
ural Seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The schematic diagram of the five different types of Gentiles can also be
found online in the article Gentile Circumcision? at http://seedofabraham.net/Gentile-Circumcision.pdf.
10
Gentiles who mistakenly convert to Judaism via the Rabbis are called proselytes and even though the Rabbis say
that ‘they are now Jews,’ they are not, according to God’s Word.
11
See Acts 15:7-10, 14, 16-17, 19, especially v. 23 where these Gentile believers are still called Gentiles.
12
Dr. Francis Brown, Dr. S. R. Driver and Dr. Charles A. Briggs, based on the lexicon of Professor Wilhelm Gese-
nius; Edward Robinson, translator and E. Rodiger, editor, Hebrew and English Lexicon (Lafayette, IN: Associ-
ated Publishers and Authors, 1978), p. 156. גוי
13
Koehler, The Hebrew-Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament vol. 1, p. 183. גוי, Goy used of Israel: Gen. 18:18;
Is. 60:22; Ezk. 35:10; Ps. 106:5. Goy used of pagan peoples: Ex. 34:24; Lev. 18:24; Ezk. 5:6-8.
3
groups of people according to their territories. When God speaks to Abraham about
Egypt as a strong nation the term ( גויgoy) is used…In this general ethnic sense the term”
is “used of Abraham’s seed…God said to Abraham, ‘I will make of you a great nation’
(goy) i.e. a political, territorial, identified people (Gen 12:2; 17:20; 21:18). In Ex 33:13
Moses, referring to Israel, a distinct body of people, says, ‘This ( גויi.e., nation) is thy
people ( ’עםahm; people). In Deut. 4:6-7, Moses speaks of the Israelite nation as a politi-
cal, ethnic body ( גויgoy) which is a wise and understanding people’ (ahm) existing as,
and recognized by other nations as, a specific national identity (Ps 83:4 [H 5]). It is neces-
sary to stress that the Scriptures speak of Israel’s existing as a distinct nation in Moses’
time because of the widespread misapprehension that Israel became a nation only after
entering Canaan. Israel was a nation in Moses’ time, just as it was in Joshua’s time (Josh
3:17; 4:1; 5:6). So also in Jeremiah’s time and thereafter, in spite of the exile (Jer
31:36).”14
Although today the Hebrew term goy (Gentile) means a non-Jew, when used by a Jew, the term itself ba-
sically means someone belonging to a distinct people (e.g. Babylonians, Hebrews, Egyptians, Canadians,
etc.). By New Testament times the word had come to be applied to peoples other than Jews, and that’s
how it’s used in the New Testament, which uses the Greek term ἔθνος ethnos, which means, a ‘nation,
people or a Gentile.’ The Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament says that it is used for ‘non-Is-
raelite Christians, gentiles of Christian congregations composed of more than one nationality.’15 There is
no inherent evil in the term Gentile.
14
R. L. Harris, editor; Gleason Archer, Jr. and Bruce Waltke, associate editors, Theological Wordbook of the Old
Testament, vol. I (Chicago: Moody Press, 1980), pp. 153-154. גוי
15
Walter Bauer, augmented by William F. Arndt, F. W. Gingrich and Frederick Danker, A Greek-English Lexicon
of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (London: The University of Chicago Press, 1979), p.
218. ἔθνος
16
See Rev. 7:9; 15:4; 21:24, 26; 22:2 where nations can equally be translated Gentiles.
4
NKJV)17
In Romans the Apostle Paul speaks about the Gentiles who had come to believe in Jesus. According to
Paul they were still Gentiles:
“that I might be a minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles, ministering the gospel of God,
that the offering of the Gentiles might be acceptable, sanctified by the Holy Spirit.” (Ro-
mans 15:16)
“who risked their own necks for my life, to whom not only I give thanks, but also all the
congregations of the Gentiles.” (Romans 16:4)
The concept of the Gentile remaining a Gentile is a constant theme throughout both Covenants.18
No other term is ever used for Gentile believers except perhaps ‘uncircumcised,’ to contrast the Gentiles
with the circumcised Jews, as Paul does in Ephesians. In this passage some wrongly think that Paul is
using the word formerly to mean that that’s what the Gentiles used to be called (Gentiles), but nowhere in
this passage, or anywhere else, are the Gentiles given another designation—they are still Gentiles:
11
“Therefore remember, that formerly you, the Gentiles in the flesh, who are called ‘Un-
circumcision’ by the so-called ‘Circumcision,’ which is performed in the flesh by human
hands—12remember that you were at that time separate from Christ, excluded from the
commonwealth of Israel, and strangers to the covenants of promise, having no hope and
without God in the world.” (Ephesians 2:11-12 NASB; see also Eph. 3:6; Colossians
1:9-23 especially vv. 12, 21-22)
The phrase formerly you, the Gentiles doesn’t mean that the Gentiles were formerly called Gentiles, and
now in Messiah they aren’t Gentiles any longer. Formerly applies to their former position as Gentiles in
the flesh—separated from Christ, excluded from the Commonwealth of Israel, and having no hope of sal-
vation. This is brought out with the NASB using remember before formerly, and also, after human hands,
so as to reconnect Paul’s initial thought back to what he was saying: ‘remember, that formerly you, the
Gentiles in the flesh…remember that you were…separate from Christ.’ Paul is speaking about the condi-
tion of the Gentiles before they came to Christ. He’s not saying that they’re no longer Gentiles. The
Gentiles were Gentiles before and after they came to Messiah. This is evident from Paul saying that they
are (still) called Uncircumcision. (See also Eph. 3:1, 6; 4:17 and 1st Thess. 4:4-5 where Paul speaks to the
Gentile believers not to act like Gentiles who don’t know God).
17
This doesn’t mean that the Gentiles only have four rules and no others from the Law of Moses. See The Lifting
of the Veil: Acts 15:20-21 at http://seedofabraham.net/The-Lifting-of-the-Veil.pdf, the chapter titled, Acts 21:25–
Observe No Such Thing! for the Hebraic interpretation of this passage.
18
See also Acts 11:1, 18; 13:48; 15:3, 17; Rom. 1:13; 3:29; 11:12-13; 15:7-12, 16, 18, 27; 16:4 Gal. 2:12; 3:8, 14;
Eph. 3:1, 6; 4:17; 1st Tim. 2:7; 2nd Tim. 1:11.
5
CIRCUMCISION IS NOTHING
The concept of the Gentile believer remaining a Gentile is also seen in what the Apostle Paul says to the
Corinthians concerning physical, covenantal circumcision:
17
‘Only as the Lord has assigned to each one, as God has called each, in this manner let
him walk. And so I direct in all the congregations. 18Was any man called when he was al-
ready circumcised? He is not to become uncircumcised. Has anyone been called in un-
circumcision? He is not to be circumcised.’19
19
‘Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but what matters is the keep-
ing of the Commandments of God. 20Each man must remain in that condition in which he
was called.’ (1st Corinthians 7:17-20)
First, in vv. 17-18 Paul speaks of the Gentile staying as God has made him—an uncircumcised Gentile.
He wasn’t to be circumcised. This is reiterated in v. 20 where the Apostle commands the Gentile to re-
main in that condition in which he was called. Obviously, there’s no change of ethnicity here—the
Gentile remains a Gentile and the Jew remains a Jew.
Second, Paul says in v. 19 that circumcision is nothing, not because he doesn’t ascribe any value to cir-
cumcision, but in the light of eternity it doesn’t matter if a Gentile is circumcised. It’s the circumcision of
the heart, made without human hands (Col. 2:11) that matters for both Gentile and Jew. Paul isn’t throw-
ing circumcision away for the Jew. He upholds it (Acts 21:20-24), because it’s God’s divine order.
Third, Paul says that it is the doing of God’s commandments that matter (v. 19) more than if one is a Jew
or a Gentile (circumcised or not), but how can the Apostle say to both groups ‘to keep the commandments
(of the Law/Torah) if he’s just said that the Gentile must not be circumcised, a major commandment of
the Torah? He’s able to do that because physical, covenant circumcision has given way to the New
Covenant’s sign of water/Spirit baptism in the name of Yeshua. The Jew continues to physically circum-
cise his sons because he is still literally a part of the covenant that God gave to Abraham (Gen. 17:9-10f.).
The Gentile isn’t.20 The Gentile, although Seed of Abraham, was never part of the Abrahamic Covenant.
The Gentile believer remains a Gentile.
19
Paul isn’t speaking figuratively to the physically circumcised Jewish believer. There was in the days of Paul an
operation that would re-attach foreskin to make the Jew look uncircumcised. Jews had been doing that since the
days of the Maccabees, in order to fit into Greek and Roman society. For more on this ask for the PDF, 1st
Corinthians 7:18—Removing the Mark of Circumcision.
20
Certain commandments of Torah shift or are revised in the New Testament. For instance, Torah speaks of only
the Sons of Aaron, from the Tribe of Levi, were to become high priests after their father (Ex. 6:18, 20; 28:1;
Num. 20:28; 25:13), but the New Covenant declares that Yeshua, from the Tribe of Judah, not the Tribe of Levi,
is our High Priest (Heb. 5:1–7:28). This doesn’t do away with the earthly High Priest from Levi, but it highlights
the temporal and eternal Kingdoms of Israel, in Canaan, and in the New Jerusalem, respectively. The (High)
Priest Melchizedek is seen in Gen. 14:18-20 (and God swears that Messiah will be a [High] Priest like Mel-
chizedek in Psalm 110:1, 4), so this shift is there in seminal form in Torah. In another example, circumcision of
the heart is also seen in Torah: “Moreover Yahveh your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your de-
scendants, to love Yahveh your God with all your heart and with all your soul, in order that you may live.” (Dt.
30:6)
6
THE SPIRITUAL JEW
Paul writes in Romans of the spiritual Jew. Some Gentiles take this passage, which speaks of a ‘true Jew’
being one inwardly, and having the circumcision of the heart, to mean that they are now spiritual Jews:
28
‘For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in
the flesh, 29but he is a Jew who is one inwardly, and circumcision is that which is of the
heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter, and his praise is not from men, but from God.’ (Ro-
mans 2:28-29)
It’s obvious that the term Jew in Rom. 2:28 is not a Gentile. Does Paul’s focus change for the next verse?
Excluding v. 29 for a moment, the term Jew or Jews occurs 190 times in the New Testament,21 and in
every instance it speaks of literal Jews. Are we to now understand that Romans 2:29 is an exception,
speaking of the Gentile as a spiritual Jew?22 Of course not.
Paul is using two male Jews as an illustration. Both of them, obviously, are circumcised in their flesh, but
only the Jew who believes in Yeshua is ‘a Jew who is one inwardly,’ whose (true) circumcision is of the
heart, by the Holy Spirit. In other words, the real Jew is the one who believes in Yeshua. Paul is not
making all Gentile believers into spiritual Jews.
Paul immediately turns around to those who would put down the circumcised in the flesh only Jew, and
writes in Romans 3:1-4a:
‘Then what advantage has the Jew?! Or what is the benefit of circumcision?! Great in
every respect! First of all, that they were entrusted with the Word of God. What then? If
some did not believe, their unbelief will not nullify the faithfulness of God, will it?23 May
it never be!’
Spiritually the Gentile is part of the Seed of Abraham, but just not the Jewish part. Father Abraham is just
as much the Father of the believing Gentile, though, as he is the Father of the believing Jew.
“As for Me, behold, My covenant is with you, and you shall be a Father of many nations.
No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham, for I have
made you a Father of many nations.” (Genesis 17:4-5)
“After these things I looked, and behold! A great multitude, which no one could number,
of all nations, tribes, peoples, and tongues, standing before the Throne and before the
Lamb, clothed with white robes, with palm branches in their hands and crying out with a
loud voice, saying, ‘Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the Throne and to the
Lamb!’” (Revelation 7:9-10)
The Gentile believer is part of the Seed that Father Abraham was promised, and the Commonwealth of Is-
rael. He has the same King that the Jewish believer has and he should keep everything in Torah that the
Jewish believer keeps, except for physical, covenantal circumcision.24
21
Accordance Bible Software (Altamonte Springs, FL: OakTree Software, 2011).
22
Some Gentile believers also say that because Jesus is a Jew, they are (spiritual) Jews, too, but this finds no scrip-
tural support in either Covenant.
23
The faithfulness of God means that even though the majority of the Jews haven’t believed in Yeshua yet, God
will still keep His promise to Abraham that his Seed would have Him for their God (Gen. 17:7-8; Ex. 6:6-8).
This is powerfully brought out in Rom. 11:25-31.
24
See Gentile Circumcision? at http://seedofabraham.net/Gentile-Circumcision.pdf for why the Gentile believer
must not be physically, covenantally circumcised ‘in order to keep Torah.’
7
DR. LUKE
Paul’s sense of ‘Jew and Gentile’ is also seen when he begins to close his letter in Colossians four. He
speaks of Onesimus (Col. 4:9) as ‘one of you,’ which means that he was either a Gentile, like them, or
had been/was a part of their congregation.
In 4:10-11, Paul writes of Aristarchus, (John) Mark and a certain Jesus who was also known as Justus,
being the only Jews with him that ‘send their greetings,’ with the obvious inference that the rest are
Gentiles:
10
“My fellow prisoner Aristarchus sends you his greetings, as does Mark, the cousin of
Barnabas. (You have received instructions about him; if he comes to you, welcome him.)
11
Jesus, who is called Justus, also sends greetings. These are the only Jews among my fel-
low workers for the kingdom of God, and they have proved a comfort to me.” (Colos-
sians 4:11 NIV)
Paul then goes on to mention Epaphras and ‘Luke, the beloved physician,’ as well as Demas (vv. 12-14).
How could Paul even think about making such a distinction if all the Gentiles were now Jews?
How long had Luke been a believer? According to Luke he had ‘perfect understanding from the very first’
(Lk. 1:3), which seems to imply that he was one of the first Gentiles to come to Christ in Antioch (Acts
11:19-20), which is dated about 41 AD.25 How many years had Dr. Luke been with Paul when he wrote
Colossians? Luke first ‘appears’ in Acts 16, with the beginning of his ‘we’ passages that speak of Luke
writing of Paul’s events first hand.26 Acts 16 is seen to have taken place about 48-49 AD. The letter to the
Colossians is said to have been written from Rome about 58-62 AD.27 Luke had been with Paul for at
least nine years, and had been a believer for at least 17 years. Why hadn’t this Gentile man ‘become a
Jew’ in all that time, if Gentiles coming to Christ were no longer Gentiles, but now Jews?28
CONCLUSION
Racial identity doesn’t change when a woman comes into a marriage, and it doesn’t change when a Gen-
tile becomes part of Israel after the Spirit.
The term Gentile, although able to have a negative connotation of ‘pagan,’ is never used that way of non-
Jewish believers in the New Testament, and nowhere does the New Testament call them Jews or He-
brews. They are one in the Body of Messiah, the Commonwealth of Israel, with their Jewish counterparts
and as such, they should observe the same laws as their Jewish brothers and sisters, except physical,
covenant circumcision for the male Gentile, which is only for the Jew who has lineage back to Fathers
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Gentiles remain Gentiles. Dr. Luke is an excellent example of this. After many years of traveling with
Paul, the Apostle doesn’t speak of Luke as a Jew, but includes him with other Gentiles.
30
Hebrew to English Dictionary and Index to the NIV Old Testament, n.p. 3366 [3054] יָהַדyahad…[3374; cf.
3373].
9
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Accordance Bible Software (Altamonte Springs, FL: OakTree Software, 2011).
Bauer, Walter. Augmented by William F. Arndt, F. W. Gingrich and Frederick Danker. A Greek-English
Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (London: The University of
Chicago Press, 1979).
Bromiley, Geoffrey W., general editor, Everett F. Harrison, Roland K. Harrison and William Sanford La-
Sor, associate editors. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (Grand Rapids, MI: William B.
Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1979).
Brown, Dr. Francis, Dr. S. R. Driver and Dr. Charles A. Briggs, based on the lexicon of Professor Wil-
helm Gesenius. Edward Robinson, translator. E. Rodiger, editor. Hebrew and English Lexicon
(Lafayette, IN: Associated Publishers and Authors, 1978).
Douglas, J. D., M.A., B.D., S.T.M., Ph.D., Organizing editor. The Illustrated Bible Dictionary (Leices-
ter, England: Inter-Varsity Press, 1998).
Harris, R. L., editor. Gleason Archer, Jr. and Bruce Waltke, associate editors. Theological Wordbook of
the Old Testament (Chicago: Moody Press, 1980).
Hebrew to English Dictionary and Index to the NIV Old Testament (derived from the Zondervan NIV
Exhaustive Concordance). Accordance Bible Software (Altamonte Springs, FL: OakTree software, 2012).
Koehler, Ludwig, Walter Baumgartner, and J. J. Stamm, authors; M. Richardson, editor, translator. The
Hebrew-Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament (Boston, MA USA: Brill Academic Publishers, 2002).
Accordance Bible Software (Altamonte Springs, FL: OakTree software, 2012).
Unger, Merrill F. Unger’s Bible Dictionary (Chicago: Moody Press, 1976).
Yehoshua, Avram. The Lifting of the Veil: Acts 15:20-21 (USA: Trafford Publishing, third edition,
March 2011).
Articles Cited
Ask for any PDF article listed below. An article with an Internet address can be read on The Seed of Abra-
ham’s website at SeedofAbraham.net:
1st Corinthians 7:18—Removing the Mark of Circumcision in PDF.
Gentile Circumcision? at http://seedofabraham.net/Gentile-Circumcision.pdf.
Luke the Jew? at http://seedofabraham.net/Luke-the-Jew.pdf.
The Lifting of the Veil: Acts 15:20-21 can be read and/or downloaded at http://seedofab-
raham.net/The-Lifting-of-the-Veil.pdf. These two chapters are in the book:
Acts 21:25–Observe No Such Thing!
Two Different Kingdoms? The Stranger and the Native-Born.31
31
This article was revised on 7 May 2016.
10