Scribd
Upload
24 views2 pages

Review

The document is a mid-term course feedback form for CE3024 Infrastructure Resilience and Socio-economic Dynamics at Delhi Technological University. It includes sections for evaluating course organization, presentation, interaction, and assignments, along with space for additional comments. The feedback indicates a generally positive experience, with the instructor being approachable and the course workload deemed appropriate.

Uploaded by

Vishwa Pratap Singh Jamwal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
24 views2 pages

Review

The document is a mid-term course feedback form for CE3024 Infrastructure Resilience and Socio-economic Dynamics at Delhi Technological University. It includes sections for evaluating course organization, presentation, interaction, and assignments, along with space for additional comments. The feedback indicates a generally positive experience, with the instructor being approachable and the course workload deemed appropriate.

Uploaded by

Vishwa Pratap Singh Jamwal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, DELHI

INTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE CELL


MID-TERM COURSE FEEDBACK FORM

This form is designed to take mid-term course feedback with an objective to improve the course delivery.
Presentation and interaction and evaluation.

Course No. and Title: - CE3024 Infrastructure Resilience and Socio-economic Dynamics
Instructor’s Name: - Prof. Raju Sarkar Date: - 12th of May 2025
Discipline: - Civil Engineering
Name (optional): - Vishwa Pratap Singh Jamwal 2K22/CE/148
Your Performance in the course so far (please circle one): - Top 25%/Next 25% /Below 50%

Please mark ‘√’ in the appropriate box.


Course Organization Range 5 4 3 2 1

1. Objectives and plan of the course were Very Very


specified clearly poorly

2. Was the criteria for continuous evaluation Very Very


of course declared by the course instructor clearly poorly
in the very first week of commencement of
the classes?
3. Did the Instructor explain all the Very Very
examination tools along with the clearly poorly
distribution of marks for Class work
Sessional (CWS), Practical Sessional (PRS),
Mid Term Evaluation (MTE), and End Term
Evaluation (ETE)?
4. Does the CWS being done in consistent and Mostly Hardly
regular basis?
5. The topics provided new knowledge Mostly Hardly
6. Prescribed reading material was available Mostly Hardly
Additional Comments:

Presentation and Interaction Range 5 4 3 2 1


1. In term of organisation clarify and Excellent Poor
presentation of fundamental concepts, the
lectures were
2. Instructor’s oral presentation in term of Excellent Poor
audibility and articulation was
3. Instructor’s blackboard (or overhead) Excellent Poor
presentation in terms of organisation and
legibility was
4. Encouragement given by the Instructor to Excellent Poor
think and reason, logically and objectively
was
5. Instructor’s response to the questions Clear Vague
asked in the class hours were
6. The availability and approachability of the Excellent Poor
Instructor outside class hours were
Additional Comments:

Test/Assignments Range 5 4 3 2 1
1. The test/assignments reflected the Very Poorly
course plan closely
2 Rather than rote learning, understanding Thoroughly Hardly
was tested
3. The evaluations helped in understanding Always Rarely
the subject better
Additional Comments:

General comments:

• In additional to the class hours, how many hours did you put in for this course? 5 more hours weekly
• The work load in this course in comparison to other course of this semester was very little/just
right/too heavy Was Just right
• Were the lectures held regularly and on time? Yes they were Regular
• If the course had a self-study component (such as assignment, seminars, small projects, and
literature survey), comment on how it helped/inspired you to learn/probe further. It deepend
curiosity
• Did the Instructor notify one-hour time slot per week to sort out learning difficulties of the students? Yes
• Did you approach the instructor to solve the difficulties in the intimated slot and your difficulties are
suitably answered? Yes

If you have any other comments not covered by this questionnaire, please write below:

This Course was a great learning experience

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy