10-1108 Eb054287
10-1108 Eb054287
Competitive Advantage
By Michael E. Porter
The
Home Base
Diamond
nation (and even on which region within that nation) will enjoy a large pool of dedicated, disciplined workers who
be the source of an innovation. still earn moderate wages. Yet firms lack sophisticated
Important innovations in Denmark, for example, have local demand and must import many parts and most
occurred in enzymes for food processing, in natural machinery because domestic suppliers are poorly
vitamins, in measuring instruments related to food developed. American medical equipment firms face
processing, and in drugs isolated from animal organs relatively high wages as well as pressures to report high
(insulin and the anticoagulant, heparin). These are hardly levels of profitability, yet they benefit from the world's
random in a nation whose exports are dominated by a most advanced buyers, rapid and specialized factor
large cluster of food-and-beverage-related industries. A creation both in medical science and human resources,
firm or individual has the best odds of succeeding in and a pull-through effect from medical personnel trained
innovation, or in creating a new business, where the in the United States who practice abroad.
national "diamond" provides the best environment. The national circumstances most significant for
A firm's home base defines, in part, its competitive competitive advantage depend on a firm's industry and
advantages and disadvantages in global industries. strategy. In a resource- or basic factor-driven industry,
Korean firms in the automobile and apparel industries the most important national attribute is a supply of
May/June 1990 11
superior or low-cost factors. In a fashion-sensitive focused ones that served as an initial entry point or
industry, the presence of advanced and cutting-edge reinforced an internal entry. Hewlett-Packard's acquisi
customers is paramount. In an industry heavily based on tion of Sanborn in patient monitoring equipment, for
scientific research, the quality of factor-creating example, was a springboard for applying HP's
mechanisms in human resources and technology, coupled marketing, technological, and international marketing
with access to sophisticated buyers and suppliers, are skills to a new industry. Whenever a firm began broad-
decisive. ranging diversification, it was generally a sign that
Cost-oriented strategies are more sensitive to factor competitive advantage was about to fade. Where the
costs, the size of home demand, and the conditions that diversification took place through a series of major
favor large-scale plant investments. Differentiation acquisitions, the sign was even more reliable.
strategies tend to depend more on specialized human The reasons for this track record in diversification are
resources, sophisticated local buyers, and world-class not hard to understand when viewed in light of my
local supplier industries. Focus strategies rest on the theory. Improvement and innovation are at the heart of
presence of unusual demand in particular segments or on competitive advantage. They grow out of focus, com
factor conditions or supplier access that benefit compet mitment, and sustained investment in an industry. Di
ing in a particular product range. versification within a cluster, or that extends the cluster,
As competition globalizes, and as developments such tends to stimulate new ways of competing as comple
as European trade liberalization and free trade between mentary skills and resources are brought to bear.
the United States and Canada promise to eliminate Internal diversification facilitates a transfer of skills
artificial distortions that have insulated domestic firms and resources that is quite difficult to accomplish when
from market forces, firms must increasingly compete in acquiring an independent company with its own history
industries and segments where they have real strengths. and way of operating. Internal entry tends to increase the
This must increasingly be guided by the national "dia overall rate of investment in factor creation. There is also
mond." an intense commitment to succeed in diversification into
A firm can raise the odds of success if it is competing closely related fields because of the benefits that accrue
in industries, and with strategies, where the nation to the base business and the effect on the overall cor
provides an unusually fertile environment for competitive porate image.
advantage. The questions in Exhibit 2 are designed to Unrelated diversification, particularly through acqui
expose such areas. Of major importance is a forward- sition, makes no contribution to innovation. Unrelated
looking view in answering these questions. The focus diversification almost inevitably detracts from focus,
must be on the nature of evolving competition, not the commitment, and sustained investment in the core
past requirements for success. industries, no matter how well intentioned management
is at the outset. Acquired companies, where there is no
Diversification link to existing businesses, often face short-term
While diversification is part of company strategy in financial pressures to justify their purchase price. It is
virtually every nation, its track record has been mixed at also difficult for corporate managers of a diversified firm
best. Widespread diversification into unrelated industries to be forward-looking in industries they do not know.
was rare among the international leaders we studied. The process of innovation and change is undermined. For
They tended instead to compete in one or two core example, in a number of U.S. industries we studied, the
industries or industry sectors, and their commitment to acquisition of competitors by widely diversified firms
these industries was absolute. For every widely diminished the rate of innovation and investment. Ex
diversified Hitachi or Siemens, there were several amples include syringes, patient monitoring equipment,
Boeings, Koenig & Bauers, FANUCs, Novo Industries, oil field equipment, and machine tools. This pattern is
and SKFs, who are global competitors but heavily widespread.
focused on their core industry. The nations in which unrelated diversification has been
Internal diversification, not acquisition, has to a strik the most popular and acquisitions are the easiest to make
ing degree been the motivation for achieving leading today are America and Britain. In both nations, diver
international market positions. Sandvik's move from sification seems to have contributed to competitive prob
specialty steel to rock drills, the diversification of Swiss lems. In continental Europe and Japan, many of the
pharmaceuticals companies from dyes, and Canon's strongest international companies are either not diversi
evolution from cameras to calculators to copiers to fied or have diversified into closely related businesses,
facsimile are just a few examples. often through internal development. There are disturbing
Where acquisitions were involved in international signs, however, that unrelated diversification is on the
success stories, the acquisitions were often modest or rise in both these areas.
12 Planning Review
In Korea, unrelated diversification has been consistent consumer—a very demanding client indeed.
with investment-driven competitive advantage. The abil He added that, once Benetton was successful in Paris,
ity of the chaebol to mobilize capital and management he realized "we could make it anywhere."
talent into new fields was a benefit as long as Korea was
a nation with scarce capital and limited technical and Foreign Sourcing and Technology
managerial resources tended to undermine further A firm must be willing to source products or
national progress. However, today, the major chaebol equipment from foreign firms if they are superior. At the
are moving into too many unrelated industries because same time, it must also work to upgrade local suppliers.
of misplaced self-confidence. Unfortunately, the Access to the world's best inputs is necessary to sustain
prospects for gaining competitive advantage in such competitive advantage. Loyalty to domestic suppliers,
disparate businesses are dim. for its own sake, is ultimately self-defeating. By not
The implications of my theory for diversification buying cheaper foreign steel, for example, U.S. auto
strategy are as follows: mobile companies did not really help the U.S. steel in
■ New industries for diversification should be selected dustry, and in the long run undermined their own
where a favorable national "diamond" is present or can competitive position.
be created. Diversification proposals should be screened The best form of loyalty to domestic suppliers is to
for the attractiveness of the home base. confront them in no uncertain terms with the need to
■ Diversification is most likely to succeed when it match their foreign competitors in quality and
follows or extends clusters in which the firm already productivity in order to retain the business. Domestic
competes. suppliers should be given some leeway to allow time for
■ Internal development of new businesses, supple adjustment, and be provided with active technical help
mented by small acquisitions, is more likely to create and and other assistance in upgrading. But domestic suppliers
sustain competitive advantage than the acquisition of cannot be guaranteed the business. Unless they are taking
large, established companies. aggressive action to upgrade quality, boost productivity,
■ Diversification into businesses lacking common and globalize their own strategies, supporting domestic
buyers, channels, suppliers, or close technological suppliers is no one's ultimate gain.
connections is not only likely to fail but will also A firm aspiring to competitive advantage must be
undermine the prospects for sustaining advantage in the aware of, and ideally have some access to, all the im
core businesses. portant scientific work going on in the world that is
related to its industry. No matter how favorable the home
Serving Sophisticated Buyers and Markets base, useful research is likely to be taking place outside
To sustain competitive advantage in global industries, the home country. Today, a firm seeking competitive
a firm must sell to all significant country markets. advantage should question its strategy if it does not have
Particularly important are nations that contain advanced at least one foreign site for technology monitoring or
and demanding buyers. All of the most advanced and research. Such sites should be in nations with the best
sophisticated buyers are rarely located at home, even national "diamond," not just the ones with a top
under the best of circumstances. Identifying such buyers laboratory.
in other nations will help a firm understand the most
Meeting the Best Foreign Competitors
important new needs, which in turn create pressures that
stimulate rapid progress in products and services. A firm must meet the best rivals in the marketplace in
Nations with sophisticated buyers may well be where order to sustain and upgrade its advantage. Capable rivals
leading international competitors are based, making it all provide the benchmark for measuring competitive
the more challenging to penetrate them. advantage. They are also the best stimulus for innovation
Benetton, the leading Italian apparel producer, fol and change. Ultimately, a firm must find a way to gain
lowed this principle very early in its development as an advantage over the best rivals in order to assure its
international company. The words of the chief executive, market position. Another reason to meet the best rivals
Luciano Benetton, describe the process: in all the important markets is to deny them profits in
We have always thought it essential, since 1969 in safe markets that can be used to cross-subsidize low
fact, that we expand our activities outside Italy. We profits in contested markets.
opened our first shop in Paris in 1969 and that was a Ideally, the most capable rivals are at home. Competing
major challenge for us. It was not easy to go into the with them will lead to many self-reinforcing benefits for
French market. I felt like a schoolboy taking a tough the entire national industry. However, a firm must meet
exam when I decided to try and bring Italian fashion to the best rivals in other nations as well.
Paris. We started out by trying to satisfy the Parisian Korean companies, for example, view Japanese rivals as
May/June 1990 13
their prime competitors both for strategic and historical rea independence or requiring an expensive merger. They are
sons. The result is that there is little danger that Korean particularly common in industries undergoing structural
firms will fall into the classic trap of firms in low labor cost change, especially ones in which many firms feel
countries, that of resting on labor costs as their sole threatened.
advantage. They are setting out to challenge their Japanese Alliances are a tempting solution to the dilemma of a
rivals in terms of product sophistication, process firm seeking the home-base advantages of another nation
technology, and foreign marketing presence. This is without giving up its own. Unfortunately, alliances are
another example of how sustaining competitive advantage rarely a solution. They can achieve selective benefits, but
requires that a firm create pressure, not avoid it. they always involve significant costs in terms of
coordination, reconciling goals with an independent
Locating Regional Headquarters entity, creating a competitor, and giving up profits.
The principles I have described carry implications for These costs make many alliances temporary and destined
the choice of where to locate the regional headquarters to fail. They are often transitional devices rather than
responsible for managing a firm's activities in a group of stable arrangements.
nations. Regional headquarters are best placed not for No firm can depend on another independent firm for
administrative convenience but in the nation with the skills and assets that are central to its competitive
most favorable national "diamond." Of special impor advantage. If it does, the firm runs a grave risk of losing
tance is choosing a location that will expose the firm to its competitive advantage in the long run. Alliances tend
significant needs and pressures lacking at home. The to ensure mediocrity, not create world leadership. The
purpose is to learn as well as raise the odds that most serious risk of alliances is that they deter the firm's
information passes credibly back to the home base. own efforts at upgrading. This may occur because
DuPont, for example, moved its European headquarters management is content to rely on the partner. It may also
in agricultural chemicals from Geneva to Paris to take occur because the alliance has eliminated a threatening
advantage of a better developed national cluster. France competitor.
is the world's second-largest market for crop protection
after the United States, and is a highly sophisticated one. The Role of Leadership
Real corporate leaders believe in change. They possess
Selective Foreign Acquisitions
an insight into how to alter competition, and do not
Foreign acquisitions can serve two purposes. One is to accept constraints in carrying it out. Leaders energize
gain access to a foreign market or to selective skills. Here their organizations to meet competitive challenges, to
the challenge of integrating the acquisition into the global serve demanding needs, and above all, to keep
strategy is significant but raises few unusual issues. The progressing. They find ways of overcoming the filters
other reason for a foreign acquisition is to gain access to that limit information and prevent innovation. They
a highly favorable national "diamond." Sometimes the harness and even create external pressures to motivate
only feasible way to tap into the advantages of another change.
nation is to acquire a local firm because an outsider is Leaders have a broad view of competition in which
hard-pressed to penetrate such broad, systemic advan their national environment is integral to competitive
tages. The challenge in this latter type of acquisition is success. They work hard to improve that environment
to preserve the ability of the acquired firm to benefit from and to encourage appropriate (though sometimes painful)
its national environment at the same time as it is government policies. As a result, leaders are often seen
integrated into the company's global strategy. as statesmen, though few would describe their own
actions that way. Leaders also think in international
The Role of Alliances terms, not only in measuring their true competitive
Alliances, or coalitions, are a final mechanism by advantage but in setting strategy to enhance and extend
which a firm can seek to tap national advantages in other it.
nations. Alliances are long-term agreements between This concept of leadership has been lost in many
firms from different nations that go beyond normal companies. Too many companies and too many
market transactions but stop short of merger. They take managers misperceive the true basis of competitive
many forms, including joint ventures, licenses, sales advantage. They become preoccupied with improving
agreements, and supply agreements. They have become financial performance, soliciting government assistance,
prominent in international competition because they can and seeking stability through forming alliances and
speed the process of globalizing strategy, reap economies merging with competitors. These sorts of steps are not
of scale, gain access to technology or markets, and good for companies or for nations. Today's competitive
achieve other benefits without giving up corporate realities demand more. □
14 Planning Review