Revision Class 3 Solution
Revision Class 3 Solution
2024-2025 Sem 2
Revision Class 3 Suggested Solution
1. Let
1 2 3 2 1 0 111 333 789
𝐴 = 3 2 1 , 𝐵 = 1 0 −1 , 𝐶 = 333 999 666 .
1 1 1 0 −1 −2 321 963 753
(a) Prove that 𝐴 and 𝐵 are row equivalent.
(b) Prove that 𝐴 and 𝐶 are not row equivalent.
Suggested solution:
1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 0 −1
− 4 𝒓2 →𝒓2
−𝒓1 +𝒓3 →𝒓3
𝒓2 +𝒓3 →𝒓3
𝐴 −−−−−−−−−→ 0 −4 −8 −−−−−−−→ 0 1 2 −−−−−−−−−→ 0 1 2
−3𝒓1 +𝒓2 →𝒓2 −2𝒓2 +𝒓1 →𝒓1
0 −1 −2 0 −1 −2 0 0 0
1
2. Find the value(s) of 𝑡 such that the system of linear equations
𝑥 + 𝑦 + 𝑡𝑧 = 1,
𝑥 + 𝑡𝑦 + 𝑧 = 1,
𝑡𝑥 + 𝑦 + 𝑧 = 1
Suggested solution:
1 1 𝑡 1
We first transform the augmented matrix 𝐴 = 1 𝑡 1 1 using EROs as follows.
𝑡 1 1 1
1 1 𝑡 1 1 1 𝑡 1
−𝑡𝒓 +𝒓 →𝒓
1 3 3
1 𝑡 1 1 −−−−−−−−−→ 0 𝑡 − 1 1 − 𝑡 0 (1)
−𝒓1 +𝒓2 →𝒓2
𝑡 1 1 1 0 1 − 𝑡 1 − 𝑡 2 1 − 𝑡
1 1 𝑡 1 1 1 1 𝑡 1 1 0 𝑡 + 1 1
1−𝑡 𝒓3 →𝒓3
−𝒓2 +𝒓3 →𝒓3
0 𝑡 − 1 1 − 𝑡 0 −−1−−−−−→ 0 1 −1 0 −−−−−−−−→ 0 1 −1 0 (2)
−𝒓2 +𝒓1 →𝒓1
0 1 − 𝑡 1 − 𝑡 2 1 − 𝑡 𝑡 −1 𝒓2 →𝒓2
0 1 1 + 𝑡 1 0 0 2 + 𝑡 1
(a) When 𝑡 = −2, the matrix in (2) has a leading one in the last column, there is no solution.
1 0 0 ∗
(b) When 𝑡 ≠ 1, −2, we can further reduce the matrix in (2) to the RREF 0 1 0 ∗ . There
0 0 1 ∗
is a unique solution.
(c) It is impossible to have exactly 3 solutions.
1 1 1 0
(d) When 𝑡 = 1, the matrix 𝐴 is row equivalent to 0 0 0 0 by (1). There are infinitely
0 0 0 0
many solutions.
3. Prove that we can use Type II and Type III EROs to interchange two rows. In other words, a Type
I elementary matrix can be represented as a product of Type II and Type III elementary matrices.
2
Suggested solution:
Suppose we want to interchange row 𝑖 and row 𝑗. To have more observations on the entries, we
focus on (𝑖, 1)th entry 𝑎 and ( 𝑗, 1)th entry 𝑏.
The two entries are interchanged. As the same holds for other columns, we have interchanged
row 𝑖 and row 𝑗 using this sequence of operations.
𝐴𝒖 = 𝐴(𝒗 + 𝒑) = 𝐴𝒗 + 𝐴 𝒑 = 0 + 𝒃 = 𝒃.
𝐴𝒗 = 𝐴(𝒖 − 𝒑) = 𝐴𝒖 − 𝐴 𝒑 = 𝒃 − 𝒃 = 0
3
Suggested solution:
1 −1 −2 1 1 0
2𝒓 +𝒓 →𝒓 1 −1 −2 1 1 0
𝒓2 +𝒓1 →𝒓1
1 3 3
( 𝐴|𝐼) −−−−−−−→ 4 1 −4 0 1 0 −−−−−−−−−→ 0 5 4 −4 −3 0
−4𝒓1 +𝒓2 →𝒓2
−2 3 5 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 2 1
1 −1 −2 1 1 0 1 0 −1 3 3 1
𝒓2 ↔𝒓3
−5𝒓2 +𝒓3 →𝒓3
−−−−−→ 0 1 1 2 2 1 −−−−−−−−−→ 0 1 1 2 2 1
𝒓1 +𝒓2 →𝒓1
0 5
4 −4 −3 0
0 0 −1 −14 −13 −5
1 0 −1 3 3 1 1 0 0 17 16 6
−𝒓3 →𝒓3
−𝒓 +𝒓 →𝒓
3 2 2
−−−−−−→ 0 1 1 2 2 1 −−−−−−−−→ 0 1 0 −12 −11 −4
𝒓1 +𝒓3 →𝒓1
0 0 1 14 13 5 0 0 1 14 13 5
17 16 6
Then 𝐴 −1 = −12 −11 −4 .
14 13 5
6. Determine whether each of the following is true or false and briefly explain the reasons.
(a) Let 𝐴, 𝐵," 𝐶 and#𝐷 be invertible matrices of the same size. Then the block matrix defined
𝐴 𝐵
by 𝑀 = is invertible.
𝐶 𝐷
(b) If 𝑆1 and 𝑆2 are finite subsets of R𝑛 such that 𝑆1 is contained in Span 𝑆2 , then Span 𝑆1 is
contained in Span 𝑆2 .
(c) Some systems of linear equations have exactly two solutions.
(d) If a system of linear equations has more variables than equations, then it must have infinitely
many solutions.
(e) If 𝑇 : R𝑛 → R𝑛 and 𝑈 : R𝑛 → R𝑛 are linear transformations such that 𝑇 ◦ 𝑈 is the identity
transformation, then 𝑈 is the inverse of 𝑇.
(f) If 𝑇 : R𝑛 → R𝑛 is an invertible linear transformation, then 𝑇 𝑘 is the identity transformation
for some positive integer 𝑘, where 𝑇 𝑘 = 𝑇 ◦ 𝑇 ◦ · · · ◦ 𝑇 .
| {z }
𝑘 times
Suggested solution:
4
(c) False. A linear system can only have no solution, unique solution, and infinitely many
solutions.
h i
(d) False. If the last row of the RREF of ( 𝐴|𝒃) is 0 · · · 0 1 , then the linear system has
no solution.
(e) True. Suppose 𝐴 and 𝐵 are standard matrix of 𝑇 and 𝑈 respectively. Then 𝑇 (𝒙) = 𝐴𝒙
and 𝑈 (𝒙) = 𝐵𝒙 for any 𝒙 ∈ R𝑛 . Given 𝑇 ◦ 𝑈 is the identity transformation, we have
𝑇 ◦ 𝑈 (𝒙) = 𝐴(𝐵𝒙) = 𝐴𝐵𝒙 = 𝒙 for any 𝒙 ∈ R𝑛 , then 𝐴𝐵 = 𝐼, 𝐵 = 𝐴 −1 . Then
𝑈 (𝒙) = 𝐵𝒙 = 𝐴 −1 𝒙 = 𝑇 −1 (𝒙), 𝑈 is the inverse of 𝑇. (Remark: From 𝐴𝐵 = 𝐼, we know
that 𝐴 and 𝐵 are invertible, so do 𝑇 and 𝑈, hence 𝑇 and 𝑈 have inverse.)
" #
𝑥+𝑦
(f) False. Consider an invertible linear transformation defined on R2
by 𝑇 (𝑥, 𝑦) = .
𝑦
" # " # " # " #
1 2 𝑘 0
Then 𝑇 (0, 1) = , 𝑇 2 (0, 1) = 𝑇 (1, 1) = , and inductively, 𝑇 𝑘 (0, 1) = ≠ for
1 1 1 1
any positive integer 𝑘. Therefore, 𝑇 𝑘 cannot be the identity transformation.
7. Let 𝐴 be an 𝑚 × 𝑛 matrix with 𝑚 > 𝑛, prove that there does not exist an 𝑛 × 𝑚 matrix 𝐵 such that
𝐴𝐵 = 𝐼𝑚 .
Suggested solution:
We prove by contradiction. If there exists 𝐵 such that 𝐴𝐵 = 𝐼𝑚 , then rank(𝐴𝐵) = 𝑚. Note
that rank( 𝐴) ≤ 𝑛 < 𝑚 and all columns of 𝐴𝐵 are linear combinations of columns of 𝐴, then
rank( 𝐴𝐵) ≤ rank( 𝐴) < 𝑚. We arrive at a contradiction, so such 𝐵 does not exist.
Remark: We can prove rank( 𝐴𝐵) ≤ rank( 𝐴) by consider the column space of 𝐴𝐵 is a subspace
of the column space 𝐴, so the dimension cannot be larger. Column space will be learned in
Chapter 7.
5
9. Compute the determinant of following matrices:
2 1 0 1
−2 −3 −1 −2
(a)
4
4 −8 0
3 −7 −2 4
2
9 −3 0
0
1 −4 0 2 0
(b) 3 −2
8 −4 5
−6 2 −7 3 0
0 20 0 0
1 1 1 1 1
1 2 3 4 5
(c) 1 3 5
7 9
1 4 7 10 13
1 5 9 13 17
2 1
1 · · · 1
1 2
1 · · · 1
(d) 𝐴 = 1 1
2 · · · 1 is an 𝑛 × 𝑛 matrix
. . .. . . .
.. ... . ..
1 1
1 · · · 2
1
𝑥1 𝑥 12 · · · 𝑥 1𝑛−1
𝑥 22 · · ·
1 𝑥2 𝑥 2𝑛−1
(e) Vandermonde matrix is defined by 𝑉 = 1
𝑥3 𝑥 32 · · · 𝑥 3𝑛−1
. .. .. . . ..
.. . . . .
𝑥 𝑛 𝑥 𝑛2 · · ·
1 𝑛−1
𝑥 𝑛
Suggested solution:
6
(a)
2 1 0 1 −2𝒄 4 + 𝒄 1 → 𝒄 1 0 0 0 1
2 −1 −1
−2 −3 −1 −2 −𝒄 4 + 𝒄 2 → 𝒄 2 2 −1 −1 −2
= =− 4 4 −8
4 4 −8 0 4 4 −8 0
−5 −11 −2
3 −7 −2 4 −5 −11 −2 4
2𝒄 2 + 𝒄 1 → 𝒄 1
0 −1 0
−𝒄 2 + 𝒄 3 → 𝒄 3 12 −12
= − 12 4 −12 = −
−27 9
−27 −11 9
1
12 𝒓 1 → 𝒓 1
1
9 𝒓2 → 𝒓2 1 −1
= −108 = 216.
−3 1
(b) Expanding along some column or row with some entries are 0, we have
2 9 0 −3 0
2 9 0 −3
1 −4 0 2 0 2 9 −3
1 −4 0 2 2 −3
3 −2 8 −4 5 = 5 = −35 1 −4 2 = 70 = 490.
−6 2 −7 3 1 2
−6 2 −7 3 0 0 2 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0 0
(c) We have
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
𝒓1 +𝒓3 →𝒓3 −2𝒓2 +𝒓3 →𝒓3
1 3 5 7 9 = 2 4 6 8 10 = 0 0 0 0 0 .
1 4 7 10 13 1 4 7 10 13 1 4 7 10 13
1 5 9 13 17 1 5 9 13 17 1 5 9 13 17
7
Next, we subtract the first row from each of the other rows. This implies
1 1 1 ··· 1
0 1 0 ··· 0
det 𝐴 = (𝑛 + 1) 0 0 1 · · · 0 = 𝑛 + 1,
.. .. .. . . ..
. . . . .
0 0 0 ··· 1
1
0 0 ··· 0
1 𝑥 2 − 𝑥 1 𝑥 22 − 𝑥 1 𝑥 2
··· 𝑥2 − 𝑥 1 𝑥 2
𝑛−1 𝑛−2
then
det 𝑉 = det 𝑉˜ = det 𝑉,
¯
where
𝑥2 − 𝑥1 𝑥 2 − 𝑥1 𝑥2 · · · 𝑥 2𝑛−1 − 𝑥 1 𝑥 2𝑛−2
2
𝑥 3 − 𝑥 1 𝑥32 − 𝑥 1 𝑥 3 · · · 𝑥 3𝑛−1 − 𝑥 1 𝑥 3𝑛−2
𝑉¯ = . .. .. .. .
..
. . .
𝑥 𝑛 − 𝑥 1 𝑥 2 − 𝑥 1 𝑥 𝑛 · · · 𝑥 𝑛 − 𝑥 1 𝑥 𝑛
𝑛−1 𝑛−2
𝑛
Note that
𝑛
Ö
det 𝑉¯ = (𝑥 𝑖 − 𝑥 1 ) · det 𝑉𝑛−1 ,
𝑖=2
where
1 𝑥 2 𝑥 2 · · · 𝑥2𝑛−2
2
1 𝑥 3 𝑥 32 · · · 𝑥3𝑛−2
𝑉𝑛−1 = . . .. . . .. .
.. .. . . .
1 𝑥 𝑛 𝑥 2 · · · 𝑛−2
𝑥 𝑛
𝑛
Similarly, we have
𝑛
Ö
det 𝑉𝑛−1 = (𝑥 𝑖 − 𝑥1 ) · det 𝑉𝑛−2 ,
𝑖=3
8
where
1 𝑥 3 𝑥 2 · · · 𝑥 3𝑛−3
3
1 𝑥 4 𝑥 42 · · · 𝑥 4𝑛−3
𝑉𝑛−2 = . . .. . . .. .
.. .. . . .
1 𝑥 𝑛 𝑥 2 · · · 𝑛−3
𝑥 𝑛
𝑛
Moreover,
det 𝑉2 = (𝑥 𝑛 − 𝑥 𝑛−1 ) · det 𝑉1
and
det 𝑉1 = 1.
Therefore, we have Ö
det 𝑉 = (𝑥 𝑗 − 𝑥 𝑖 ).
𝑎≤𝑖< 𝑗 ≤𝑛