INS2023 - OM Final Exam - Official & Instructions (2025SP)
INS2023 - OM Final Exam - Official & Instructions (2025SP)
FINAL EXAMINATION
Final Examination Instruction: Case Study Analysis
The final exam is a group essay on case analysis, 02 - 04 students each group. The essay should follow an
argumentative format, addressing the critical managerial issue of the selected case study. In the essay, you
should situate, construct, and clarify your point of view with sound arguments. You might use the Toulmin
argument structure as a scaffold to construct strong and persuasive arguments. Please note that an essay
merely presenting facts, data, or information without demonstrating competence in analyzing, evaluating,
and interpreting these inputs will not be appreciated due to lacking critical thinking and originality. Please
refer to the specific requirements outlined in the following section.
Requirements:
Theoretical relevance: appropriate theories, comprehensive undearstanding of theoretical
frameworks and lexicon;
Organization: good connection of ideas, appropriate use of variety of cohesive devices
Language: accurate and appropriate use of vocabulary, structures, and register; concise and clear
expression of ideas
Writing style: objective, concrete and organized facts; appropriate use of reference conventions;
Layout and presentation: attractive and appropriate use of paragraphing, headings, numberings,
spacing and illustrations
Your answer will be graded based on content, correct spelling, and mechanics. The most important
criterion is 'theoretical relevance”.
Your group are allowed to research the internet or other sources for writing up the case analysis; however,
please be careful: (1) stick closely to provided information or data in the case study – its situation and
timing; (2) acknowledge information source from internet or database properly, following the APA
referencing style to avoid plagiarism.
Format:
Words: in total 4.500 – 6.000 words, including everything: title page, body text, references,
table, and so on; not include report team members contribution section.
Font: Arial or Time New Roman, size 12, 1.15 spacing
Don’t cheat, don’t steal, don’t lie, and don’t let others do that.
Submission information:
Deadline: TBA (usually 2-3 weeks, after the last lecture)
File format: *docx or *pdf (preferred);
File name: INS2023-{Class Code} – Final Exam – Group {Your group number}
Via email: anhngocnguyen@vnu.edu.vn (C/c all your team members)
Subject title: INS2023-XX – Final Exam – Group XX; Example: INS2023-01 – Final Exam –
Group 08
(Big Assignment)
#01 | LEGO (A): The Crisis (Product #: 9-713-478, Harvard Business School, Harvard
University, Boston, USA)
Discussion Questions:
1. What has led the LEGO Group to the edge of bankruptcy?
2. What is your assessment of management moves during “the growth period that
wasn’t” (1993-98) and “the fix that wasn’t” (1999-2004)?
3. As Jørgen Knudstorp, what would you do throughout the LEGO Group in order to
turn the company around? Be specific.
#03 | Apple INC.: Should it diversify its supply chain outside of China? (Product #:
W31842, Ivey Business School, University of Western Ontario, Canada)
Discussion Questions:
1. What demand and supply factors are impacting the market share of Apple in the
Chinese smartphone market? List demand and supply factors separately.
2. Identify the market structure for Apple in the Chinese smartphone market. Provide an
economic rationale for your answer.
3. Should Apple exit the Chinese smartphone market? Provide an economic rationale for
your answer and support your rationale with a diagrammatic presentation of Apple’s
cost and demand conditions.
4. Should Apple pursue a major shift in its supply chain location? If yes, which country
should it select for geographic diversification?
#04 | Porcini’s Pronto: “Great Italian cuisine without the wait!” (Product #: 4277,
Harvard Business School, Harvard University, US)
Discussion Questions:
1. How has Porcini’s maintained high product and service quality, and how does it plan
to do so for its new Pronto concept?
#06 | New Balance Athletic Shoes (Product #: 9-680-110, Harvard Business School,
Harvard University, Boston, US)
Discussion Questions:
1. What are goals of New Balance (NB)? How does NB compete? How will NB compete
in the future?
2. What is the problem NB face? What does NB need in short-term? And in the long
term?
#10 | The Boeing 767: From Concept to Production (A) (Product #: 9-688-040, Harvard
Business School, Harvard University, Boston, USA)
Discussion Questions:
#12 | Piaggio (A) (Product #: UV1607, Darden School of Business, University of Virginia,
Virginia, US)
Discussion Questions:
1. Do you think Piaggio should build the engine plant? Why or why not?
2. Is the decision to build the plant strategic?
3. Does the decision to build the plant affect Piaggio’s ability to compete globally?
4. How do the players in the market compete with each other and how do their business
models differ?
5. Describe how the decision relates to Piaggio’s strategy/business model.
#13 | Marks & Spencer and Zara: Process Competition in the Textile Apparel Industry
(Product #: INS849, INSEAD - Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires,
Fontainebleau, France)
Discussion Questions:
#15 | The Walt Disney Company: Mickey Mouse Visits Shanghai (Product #: UVA-OM-
1545, Darden Business School, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA)
Discussion Questions:
1. How does the Walt Disney Company (DIS) compete? What are its advantages relative
to other theme parks?
2. What challenges does DIS face as it grows in the global market? How are the
operational challenges different for different Disneyland locations? What factors are
“flat”? What factors are “lumpy”?
3. Are DIS’s customers around the world alike or different? How has DIS dealt with
this?
4. What are the employee management issues facing Shanghai Disneyland (SDL)? How
can it address these issues?
5. What are the customer management issues facing SDL? How can it address these
issues?
10
11