DT 1 Question Paper
DT 1 Question Paper
This question paper comprises two parts, Part I and Part II.
Part I comprises MCQ & Part II comprises questions which require descriptive answers.
All questions relate to A.Y. 2024-25 unless stated otherwise in the question.
PART – I (MCQs)
All MCQs are compulsory
In the light of above facts, you are required to answer the following:
6. What would be the residential status of Mr. Jonny in A.Y. 2024-25 -
(a) Resident and Ordinary Resident
(b) Resident but Not Ordinary Resident
(c) Non-Resident
(d) Non-Resident Indian
7. Compute Total Income of Mr. Jonny for the A.Y. 2024-25 -
(a) ₹ 4,79,700
(b) ₹ 3,84,200
(c) ₹ 2,82,200
(d) ₹ 2,97,700
8. Compute the Tax Liability (Before providing relief u/s 87A) of Mr. Jonny for the A.Y.
2024-25 -
(a) ₹ 1,674
(b) ₹ 4,378
(c) ₹ 9,344
(d) Nil
9. Compute the relief available to Mr. Jonny for the A.Y. 2024-25 u/s 91 -
(a) ₹ 4,378
(b) Nil
(c) ₹ 1,674
(d) ₹ 9,344
10. Fees for technical service earned by Mr. Jonny in India is taxable at _____ rate in A.Y. 2024-
25 -
(a) 10%
(b) 20%
(c) Slab Rate
(d) Not Taxable
11. Assume there is Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and US, then as
per Article 4 of DTAA, Mr. Jonny will be treated as Resident of which country in A.Y.
2024-25 -
(a) US
(b) India
(c) Both US and India
(d) Neither India nor US
2 (a) M/s ABC LLP is engaged in export of computer software from a Special Economic 8
Zone. The net profit of the firm as per its Profit & Loss Account for the year ended
31.3.2024 was ₹ 250 lakhs after debit/credit of the following items:
(1) Depreciation ₹ 20 lakhs
(2) Remuneration to its working partners ₹ 200 lakhs
(3) Interest provided on the current account balance of the partners @ 15% p.a.
₹ 15 lakhs
(4) Advertisement in a souvenir published by a political party ₹ 2 lakhs
Additional Information:
(1) The firm commenced business on 1.4.2019.
(2) Depreciation allowable as per Income-tax Rules is ₹ 25 lakhs.
(3) Payment of remuneration to working partners is authorized by the
Partnership Deed. However Interest is not authorised by Deed.
(4) Brought forward business loss and depreciation from Assessment Year
2023-24 was ₹ 50 lakhs and ₹ 30 lakhs respectively.
(5) The total & export turnover of the firm was ₹ 25 crores. Amount of export
turnover realized within six months was ₹ 25 crores.
Compute the tax payable by the firm under section 115JC and the amount of tax
credit allowed to be carried forward. Give working notes for your answer.
2 (b) Mr. S is a performing musician, resident of India. He has following income for year 6
ended 31.3.2024.
(1) Income from music performances in India ₹ 5,00,000.
(2) Income from Country A with which India does not have any Double
Taxation Avoidance Agreement ₹ 5,00,000. Tax deducted from this income
was at 20%.
(3) Income from Country B during January 2023 ₹ 1,00,000, July 2023 ₹
1,00,000 and January 2024 ₹ 3,00,000.
Tax withheld by Country B is at 10%.
Country B follows Calendar Year for its tax purposes. India has entered into
a Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement with Country B.
3 (a) Mathi Charitable Trust registered under section 12AB, following cash system of 8
accounting, furnishes you the following information:
(i) Gross receipts from hospital by name "Full Cure" ₹ 400 lakhs.
(ii) Gross receipts from college by name "India Arts College ₹ 180 lakhs.
(iii) Corpus donations by way of cheque ₹ 30 lakhs and by way of cash ₹ 5 lakhs.
The corpus donation is invested in modes specified under section 11(5).
(iv) Anonymous donations by cash ₹ 10 lakhs.
(v) Administrative expenses for hospital ₹ 220 lakhs and for college ₹ 100
lakhs.
(vi) Fees not realized from patients ₹ 20,60,000 and from students of the college
₹ 6,50,000 as on 31st March, 2024.
(vii) Depreciation on assets of the trust ₹ 18,00,000. The entire cost of assets ₹
300 lakhs claimed as application in the earlier years.
(viii) Acquired a building for ₹ 120 lakhs for expansion of hospital (cost of land
included therein ₹ 100 lakhs). Stamp duty value of the land and building on
the date of registration of sale deed ₹ 140 lakhs.
(ix) The trust gave donation of ₹ 25 lakhs to Gandhiji Trust having objects of
charitable nature registered under section 12AB but not similar to the
objects of the donor trust.
You are required to compute the total income of the trust and its income-tax
liability in such a manner that it can avail the optimal benefit within the four
corners of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 assuming trust has not opted for Section
115BAC.
Note: The trust does not want to seek accumulation of income by virtue of section
11(2) of the Act.
3 (b) State with brief reasons, which method of determination of ALP will be most 6
appropriate in the following cases:
(i) A Co. Ltd., Mumbai is engaged in manufacture of garments. It manufactured
and supplied as per the variation and customization in finishing of products
to its associated enterprises Xylo Inc. UK as compared to the goods regularly
sold to third parties.
(ii) DEF Co. Ltd., is engaged in manufacture of medicines. It manufactured semi-
finished drugs in bulk and sold to related parties located in India and
outside India. It adds gross profit mark up on direct and indirect costs of
production.
(iii) ZY Ltd., Bengaluru provided identical call centre services to both related
and unrelated parties.
4 (b) Simran (P) Ltd. holds 55% of shares in Al Kuber Ltd., a Company incorporated in 6
Dubai. Al Kuber Ltd. has its offices in India also.
Details relating to Al Kuber Ltd. for year ended March 2024 are as stated below: (₹ in crores)
Particulars India Dubai
• Fixed Assets after considering Depreciation for tax 1500 650
purposes
• Intangible Assets 225 1075
• Other Assets (value as per books of A/c) 800 1900
• Income from trading operations. The above figure 730 1370
includes:
a. Income from transactions where sales are to AE 20 40
b. Income from transactions where purchases are 30 55
from AE
c. Income from transactions where 45 80
sales/purchases are to/from AE
• Interest & Dividend from investments 560 320
• No. of employees 70 90
Unskilled employees out of the above mentioned 5 30
5 (a) (i) Mr. Sanskar is engaged in the business of retail trade and has been 8
declaring income of ₹ 10 lakhs to ₹ 15 lakhs every year in the last 10 years.
A search was conducted under section 132 in the business premises of
Sanskar on 5th December, 2023. The search was concluded by executing last
of authorisation for search on 21st December, 2023. The A.O. has in his
possession documents which revealed that Mr. Sanskar has incurred ₹ 5
crores in May 2017 for the marriage of his daughter. The A.O intends to
issue notice under section 148 to Sanskar for the Assessment Year relevant
to the previous year 2017-18. Can he do so?
(ii) “The arm’s length price (ALP) determined by the Tribunal, which is the final
fact-finding authority, is final and cannot be the subject matter of scrutiny
by the High Court as it does not give rise to a substantial question of law;
accordingly, in an appeal u/s 260A, the High Court is precluded from
examining the correctness of determination of the ALP” – Examine the
correctness of this statement.
5 (b) Spacecraft Ltd., an Indian company, has entered into a contract for ₹ 4.5 crores 6
with DOT Inc., Country X for the Financial Year 2023-24. DOT Inc. maintains an
online web-platform through which it provides end user computer software
through an End-user Licence Agreement (EULA) as per the contract. The broad
terms of the EULA between the two companies are as follows-
Grant of licence. DOT Inc. grants Spacecraft Ltd. a limited non-exclusive licence to
install, use, access, display and run the click wrap web-based Computer Software
(CWCS) on a single local hard disk(s) or other permanent storage media of one
computer. Spacecraft Ltd. should not make CWCS available over a network where
it could be used by multiple computers at the same time.
Reservation of rights and ownership. DOT Inc. reserves all rights not expressly
granted to Spacecraft Ltd. in this EULA. The CWCS is protected by copyright and
other intellectual property laws and treaties. DOT Inc. owns the title, copyright
and other intellectual property rights in the CWCS. The CWCS is licenced (only for
use and not any other purpose), not sold.
DOT Inc. does not have any offices outside Country X.
Discuss the tax implications/TDS implications of such receipt in the hands of DOT
Inc., Country X and payment by Spacecraft Ltd., India under Chapter VIII of the
Finance Act, 2016 and Income-tax Act, 1961, considering the India-Country X
DTAA also, the relevant extract of which is given hereunder:
6 (a) Siddharth Garments Ltd, a company incorporated under The Companies Act, 2013 6
having factory and registered office in Mumbai engaged in the manufacturing of
Men’s wear, and selling various kinds of garment products according to the
requirement of the buyers across the world. The company sold different garment
products in the financial year 2023-24 different vendors as detailed under:
Product Type Trouser T-Shirt Office Wear Formal
Shirt Shirt
Sold to the Vendor Polo Inc. Oxfam Pty. John Miller John Player
Pty (US UK
based Co.) (Subsidiary of
the Indian
Co.)
Price Charged ₹ 1,400 ₹ 1,000 ₹ 1,200 ₹ 1,500
Quantity Sold 200,000 250, 000 pcs. 150, 000 pcs. 190, 000 pcs.
pcs.
Siddharth Garments Ltd. maintains a gross profit margin of 30% on the selling
price. Siddharth Garments Ltd has purchased the T-Shirts sold to its UK based
subsidiary Oxfam Pty of UK from Mudra Garments Ltd, of Ahmedabad at per piece
price of ₹ 840/-.
Following functional differences were noticed between the transactions with
Oxfam Pty of UK and other parties:
(i) Sales to non-associated party have been made with a specialized packaging
for which 3% margin is included in the selling price.
(ii) Tagging on the product purchased is being required by the other clients of
which cost was ₹ 3 per piece whereas in case of sales made to Oxfam Pty of
UK no tagging is to be done.
6 (b) Deepak, aged 45 (an Indian citizen) has settled in California, USA since 2015. Prior 4
to that, he has always been in India. He had acquired a residential property in
California on 25.06.2009 for USD 20,000. He kept bank deposit of USD 10,000 in a
bank account in New York since 15.04.2010.
Notice under Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and
Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 was issued on 20.10.2023. The fair market value of
residential property as on 01.04.2023 was USD 25,000; on 01.04.2024 USD 32,000
and 20.10.2023 USD 30,000. The bank deposit with accrued interest thereon was
USD 12,500 on 01.04.2023; USD 12,800 on 01.04.2024 and USD 12,700 on
20.10.2023.
Note: USD = United States Dollar
The exchange rate of Indian currency per 1 USD as per the reference rate of the
RBI on the various dates are:
01.04.2023 = ₹ 71
20.10.2023 = ₹ 72
01.04.2024 = ₹ 73
Compute the value of undisclosed foreign asset chargeable to tax in the hands of
Deepak as per Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and
Imposition of Tax Act, 2015.
6 (c) XYZ & Co, a firm engaged in interior decoration business, employed 20 new 4
employees on 1.4.2023 on a monthly salary of ₹ 25,000 to be paid by account
payee cheque. In addition, each employee was entitled to 10% employer
contribution to recognised provident fund. The employees were also entitled to
transport allowance of ₹ 3,000 p.m. paid in cash. The gross total income of XYZ &
Co. included profits and gains from business of ₹ 62 lakh.
The firm claimed deduction under section 80JJAA of ₹ 18 lakh, being 30% of 60
lakh (20 new employees x ₹ 25,000 p.m. x 12) on the basis of the report of the
chartered accountant issued in Form 10DA. The same chartered accountant was
also the tax auditor of the firm. The chartered accountant contended that
“emoluments” do not include employer contribution to PF. Also, cash payments
were not to be considered as “additional employee cost” for the purpose of section
80JJAA. Hence, only ₹ 25,000 p.m. per employee paid by account payee cheque has
to be treated as additional employee cost. Since the same does not exceed the limit
of ₹ 25,000 p.m. and the employees have been employed for more than 240 days
in the P.Y.2023-24, the employees would qualify as “additional employees” for the
purpose of deduction under section 80JJAA for A.Y.2024-25.
Is his contention correct? Examine the ethical implications in this case.