Ad 0404040
Ad 0404040
404 04,0
Final Report Covering the Period 30 September to 31 December 1962 in Detail,
with a Summary from 1 January 1961 to 31 December 1962
Prepared for:
U.S. ARMY ELECTRONICS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
FORT MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY CONTRACT DA 36-039 SC 87398
DA PROJECT 3A99-15-002-02-06
M AE N L0
QUALIFIED REQUESTORS MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THIS REPORT FROM ASTIA.
ASTIA RELEASE TO OTS NOT AUTHORIZED.
*SR
February I9ýS3
Prepared for:
U.S. ARMY ELECTRONICS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
FORT MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY CONTRACT DA 36-039 SC 87398
FILE NO. 40553.PM-61-93-93
DA PROJECT 3A99-15-002-02-06
SCL-2101N (14 JULY 1961)
Approved:
(...............
....
...............
G. L. MATTHAEI, MANAGER ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNIQUES LABORATORY
Copy N16.......
N
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. v
LIST OF TABLES ... .......... . .............. ....................... .... ix
PURPOSE OF ThE CONTRACT ....................... ........................... xi
ABSTRACT ............................. .................................... xiii
CONFERENCES AND TECHNICAL PAPERS DURING LAST QUARTER .......... ............. xv
iii
CONTENTS
V MULTIPLEXERS . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 57
A. General .... . ......... .................. . ....... .............. 57
B. Three-Channel Comb-Line Multiplexer Response . ........................ 57
C. Construction of the Three-Channel Comb-Line Multiplexer .......... .. 62
D. Tuning the Multiplexer ................. ......................... 65
E. Multiplexers with Guard-Bands Between Channels ... ............ .. 69
F. Susceptance Formula for an Ideal Multiplexer with Guard Bands ..... .. 73
iLv
ILLUSTRATIONS
Fig. III B-2 Photograph of the Filter in Figs. III B-l(a) and (b) .. ......... .. 21
Fig. III C-1 A Four-Section, 50:1., Tchebyscheff, Waveguide Impedance Transformer . . 24
Fig. IV C-2 Three Possible Ways of Converting a Series Stub Filter (Dual of the
Basic Filter) to a Spur-Line Filter ............ ................... 48
Fig. IV C-3 A Spur-Line Band-Stop Filter with Cover Plate Removed ... ......... ... 49
Fig. IV C-4 Sketch of a Spur-Line Band-Stop Filter with Cover Plate Removed,
Showing Dimensions ................. .......................... ... 49
Fig. IV C-5 Measured and Computed VSWH and Attenuation of Filter of Fig. IV C-3 . . 50
Fig. IV D-1 Schematic Diagram of Capacitively Coupled Filter, and Its
Measured and Computed Response ......... ..................... ... 52
Fig. IV D-2 Capacitively Coupled Narrow-Band Filter with Cover Plate Removed . . . 53
V
ILLUSTRATIONS
,i
ILLUSTRATIONS
Fig. VI F-4 The Circuit of Fig. VI F-3 Split into Symmetrical Interior Sections,
and the Transformer Removed .......... ...................... ... 103
Fig. VI F-S Modified Prototype for Deriving Design Equations for Capacitively
Loaded Interdigital Filters ........... ....................... ... 104
vii
TABLES
Table III D-1 Measured Performance of the Magnetically Tunable Waveguide Filter . . . 29
Table III E-i Measured Performance of the Two-Resonator Strip-Line Filter in
Figs. III E-1 and III E-2 ............. ........................ ... 35
Table V C-1 Data for Three-Channel Comb-Line Multiplexer ...... .............. ... 64
Table VI D-1 Design Equations for Interdigital Filters of the Form
in Fig. VI A-1 ...................... ............................... 86
Table VI E-1 Line-Element Parameters for an Octave-Bandwidth, Capacitively
Loaded Interdigital Filter with Admittance-Scaling Parameter d - 0.25 91
Table VI E-2 Liiie-Element Parameters for an Octave-Bandwidth, Capacitively
Loaded Interdigital Filter with Admittance-Scaling Parameter d = 0.50 91
Table VI E-3 Line-Element Parameters for an Octave-Bandwidth, Capacitively
Loaded Interdigital Filter with Admittance-Scaling Parameter d a 0.65 91
Table VI E-4 Line-Element Parameters for an Octave-Bandwidth, Capacitively
Loaded Interdigital Filter with Admittance-Scaling Parameter d - 1.00 . 92
ix
PURPOSE OF TIlE COMNACT
xi
ABSTRACT
xiii
CONFERENCES AND TECHNICAL PAPERS DURING LAST QUARTER
Conferences,
None
Technical Papers
Y. Sato and P. S. Carter, "A Device for Rapidly Aligning and Mounting
Ferromagnetic Single Crystals Along Any Desired Axis," IRE Trans.
PGMTT-1O, pp. 611-612 (November 1962).
xv
I IMrD IO!U
Various means for electronic tuning have been studied on this project,
including tuning by use of electronically tunable up-converters, and by
use of filters having ferrimagnetic resonators which are tuned by varying
a biasing magnetic field. Our latest results on magnetically tunable
filters will be found in Sec. III of this report. Our previous work on
band-stop filters is extended in Sec. IV, where some new configurations
for band-stop filters are described, and the results of some trial designs
are presented. In Quarterly Progress Report 7 on this contract an anal-
ysis of a method for multiplexer design was made, and the performance of
some trial designs was computed. In Sec. V. of this report the results
obtained from a three-channel multiplexer which was constructed, are
given. This multiplexer has contiguous pass-bands. Analysis of the case
where there are guard bands between the pass-bands is also presented. In
Sec. VI of this report our previous work on interdigital filters is ex.-
tended to cover the case of interdigital filters with capacitively loaded
resonators. The addition of capacitive loading makes possible a much
broader upper stop-band, and yields an even more compact structure.
II A BRIEF REVIEW OF PRIOR WORK ON THIS CONTRACT
A. GENERAL
Abstract
Reference@ are listed at the end of each major section of the report.
I
characteristics (such as a Tchehyscheff attenuation ripples
in the pass-band) from their prototype. Tabulated prototype
filter designs are given as well as data relevant to the use
of prototype filters as a basis for the design of impedance-
matching networks and time-delay networks. Data for step-
transformer prototypes are also given.
4
The results of this research were described in Sec. II of Quarterly
Progress Report 2 on this contract. 2 They have also been published in
the IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques; 3
and the design
charts also appear in Sec. 5.05 of the book prepared on this contract.1
5
potential interest for use as band-pass filter structures. The study
described in Sec. II-D above was largely a performance analysis study,
and further research was conducted to find a practical synthesis pro-
cedure for interdigital filters. By use of certain approximations,
easy-to-use and reasonably accurate synthesis procedures were obtained.
(4) The rates of cutoff and the streng-th 'of the stop-bands
are enhanced by multiple-order poles of attenuation at
dc and at even multiples of the center frequency of the
first pass-band.
6
Symposium at Boulder, Colorado,7 and in a written version published in
8
the IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques. Interdigital
filters are also discussed in Secs. 10.06, 10.07 and 10.09 of the book
prepared on this contract.' The design of interdigital filters with
capacitive loading is discussed in Sec. VI of this report.
The study discussed in Sec. II-D above also indicated that comb-line
structures should be of special interest as potential band-pass filter
structures. That study showed that comb-line filters must use capacitive*
loading on the resonators if a pass-band is to be achieved, and if suf--
ficiently heavy capacitive loading is used, relatively large coupling
can be obtained between resonator lines for given spacing between the
resonator line elements. A study of the design of comb-line filter
structures was made, and a design procedure was obtained which is suit-
able for the design of comb-line filters of narrow to moderate bandwidth.
(2) They have strong stop-bands and the stop-band abov-e the
primary pass-band can be made to be very broad (in our
exper-imental model the first spurious pass-band was at
4.2 times the frequency of the primary pass-band).
7
(4) Adequate coupling can be maintained between resonator
elements with sizeable spacings between resonator lines.
(This feature means that the proper couplings can be
ma intained in manufactured filters without unreasonable
tolerance requirements.)
The last section shows how to calculate the dissipation loss and
the group delay at center frequency in terms of the transmission-line
filter parameters. A formula connecting dissipation loss and group
delay in the pass-band is given.
8
In addition to the discussion of the above topics in Quarterly
Progress Report 4,6 a similar discussion will also be found in Chapter 6
of Ref. 1. Some of this material has also been published in the IRE
Trans. PGMTT,n the Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1 and The
Microwave Journal. 13
9
The effec.t of repeating the central elements of an eight-resonator
filter is shown for a pseudo-high-pass filter. Formulas for calculating
the gap capacitance in a circular coaxial line for this type of filter
are also given.
I. BAND-STOP FILTERS
10
In Sec. II of Quarterly Progress Report 717 an exact method is pre-
sented for the design of band-stop filters consisting of stubs and
quarter-wavelength connecting lines. Using this method, a low-pass
prototype circuit is chosen, and the transmission-line band-stop filter
derived from the prototype will have a response that is an exact mapping
of the prototype response. In theory the stop-band can have any width,
but if the stop-band is very narrow the stub impedances become unreason-
able. In such cases it is found to be desirable to replace the stubs
by capacitively or inductively coupled resonators of reasonable impedance.
This introduces an approximation but gives very good results. The design
of filters having three-quarter-wavelength spacings between resonators
is also discussed. This latter case is of interest for the design of
waveguide band-stop filters where it has been found desirable to separate
the resonators by three quarter-wavelengths in order to avoid interactions
between the fringing fields at the coupling irises.
J. MULTIPLEXEBS
10
In, Sec. III of Quarterly Pirogress Report 6 a study of the design
of multiplexers having contiguous pass-bands is presented. In the design
procedure discussed, the individual filters are designed from Tchebyschef~f
low-pass prototype filters havi~ng a resistor termination at one end only.
This approach can be used for the design of either series-connected or
shunt-connected multiplexers. In either case an additional reactance-
or susceptance-annulling network is required in order to obtain optimum
S~11
performance. A four-channel, lumped-element design is worked out, and
its response is computed. Also, a three-channel design using comb-line
filters is worked out, and its response computed. In both casaes very
low-loss performance is achieved.
Design formulas and curves for this type of tunable filter are
given in Quarterly Prog.ress Heport 3.16 Test results on the experimental
filter, mentioned above, are presented, including the following:
12
(3) Curves showing center frequency as a function of
dc magnetic bias field
9
In Quarterly Progress Report 5 on this contract, the design, con-
struction, and testing of a magnetically tunable filter that uses an
arrangement of spherical YIG resonators lying in a plane perpendicular
to the direction of the dc magnetic biasing field is described. A mini-
mum dc magnetic air-gap spacing is required for this type of filter.
Measurements of attenuation loss, bandwidth, and tuning fields of the
two-resonator prototype are discussed. The attenuation loss varies from
4.0 db at a center frequency of 2.1 Gc, to 1.65 db at 3.9 Gc. The 3-db
bandwidth is about 32 Mc and is nearly constant over this tuning range.
Tuning requirements, for the filters with three or more resonators are
discussed. A new device by mean-s of which ferrimagnetic crystals can
be quickly aligned along any desired axis is described. The results of
anisotropy measurements made on crystals of YIG and Ga-YIG using this
device are presented.
13
The results are compared with a previous version of the two-resonator
side-wall-coupled filter and with a previously developed overlapping
line version. As expected, the three-resonator design was found to give
"asteeper rate of cutoff, and very high off-resonance attenuation.
21
Some of this work was also discussed in a technical paper and in
"aletter to the editor, in the IRE Transactions on Microwave Theory and
Techniques. An extensive discussion on this subject also appears in
1
Chapter 17 of the book prepared on this contract.
P - fP - f (II L-1)
S f- P + f (II L-2)
14
for the case of lower-sideband up-converters, and by
f P f= - f, (II L-4)
15
Besides the discussions described above, additional discussions were
presented in a paper presented at the 1961 PGMTT National Symposium in
a paper published in the IRE Transactions on Micro-
Washington, D.C.,24 in
a letter to the editors of the
wave Theory and Techniques,25 and in
RPEFEMMM
2. W. J. Getainger and G. L. Matthaei, "Microwave Filters and Coupling Structures, " Quarterly
Progress Report 2, SRI Project 3527, Contract DA 36-039 SC-87-398, Stanford Research
Institute, Menlo Park, California (July 1961).
3. W. J. Getsinger, "Coupled Rectangular Bars Between Parallel Plates," IRE Trans. iGfl7-10,
pp. 65-72 (January 1962).
5. J. T. Bolljahn and G. L. Matt haei, "A Study of the Phase and Filter Properties of Arrays
of Parallel Conductors Between Ground Planes," Proc. IRE S0, pp. 299-311 (March 1962).
6. Leo Young and G. L. Matthaei, "Microwave Filters and Coupling Structures," Quarterly
Progress Report 4, SRI Project 3527, Contract DA 36-039 SC-87398, Stanford Research
Institute, Menlo Park, California (January 1962).
10. W. J. Getninger, E. G. Cristal and G. L. Matthaei, "Microwave Filters and Coupling Struc-
tures, " Quarterly Progress Report 6, SRI Project 3527, Contract DA 36-039 SC-87398,
Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California (August 1962).
11. Leo Young, "Stepped-Impedance Transformers and Filter Prototypes," IRE Trans. RVfl-10,
pp. 339-359 (September 1962).
12. Leo Young, "Prediction of Absorption Loss i-i Multi-layer Interference Filters, " J. Opt. Soc.
An., 52, pp. 753-761 (July 1962).
13. Leo Young, "Inhomogeneous QUarter-Wave Transformers, " The Microwave Journal, 5, pp. 84-89
(February 1962).
14. Leo Young, "The Practical Realization of Series-Capacitive Couplings for Microwave Filters,"
The Microwave Journal, 5, pp. 79-81 (December 1962).
15. Leo Young and B. M. Schiffman, "A Useful High-Pass Filter Design," to be published in
The Microwave Journal.
16
16. P. S. Carter, Jr., Leo Young, G. L. Matthaei and E. M. T. Jones, "Microwave Filters and
Coupling Structures," Ouarterly Progress Report 3, SRI Project 3527, Contract -
DA 36-039 SC-87398, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California (October 1961).
17. B. M. Schiffmmn, P. S. Carter, Jr. , and G. L. Matthaei, "Microwave Filters and Coupling
Structures," Qiarterly Progress Report 7, SRI Project 3527, Contract DA 36-039 SC-87398,
Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California (October 1962).
18. Leo Young, G. L. Matthaei and E. M. T. Jones, "Microwave Bandatop Filters with Narrow
Stop Bands," a paper presented on May 23, 1962 at the 1962 PGM7T National Sysposium in
Boulder, Colorado.
19. Leo Young, G. L. Matthaei and E. M. T. Jones, "Microwave Bandstop Filters with Narrow
Stop Bands," IRE Trans. PGTMT-1O, pp. 416-427 (November 1962).
20. G. L. Matthaei, et al., "Design Criteria for Microwave Filters and Coupling Structures,"
Final Report, Chapter 28, SRI Project 2326, Contract DA 36-039 SC-74862, Stanford Research
Institute, Menlo Park, California (January 1961).
21. P. S. Carter, Jr.,"Magnetically-Tunable Microwave Filters Using Single-Crystal Yttrium-
Iron-Garret Resonators, " IRE Trans. /CAW-9, pp. 252-260 (May 1961).
22. Y. Sato and P. S. Carter, Jr., "A D)evice for Riapidly Aligning and Mounting Ferromagnetic
Single Crystals Along Any Desired Axis," IRE Trans. PGFHFT-I0, pp. 611-612 (November 1962).
17
III A NOVEL MAGNETICALLY TUNABLE WAVEGUIDE FILTER,
AND A REFINED VERSION OF A PREVIOUS STRIP-LINE
MAGNETICALLY TUNABLE FILTER DESIGN
A. GENERAL
19
Ho
.2500 2 .9
4E-'74
0.025-
INLL DIAMTR M ENSIONAOSINNCE
3. FLTERINPTE
ANIOTPU TWO
MAEITH RESONATWAVOUR D
4. SESTWV0.05-ICH
IA YI SPERE ATCENER F ITER STRUCTURREXOIEPS
200
FIG. III B-2 PHOTOGRAPH OF THE FILTER IN FIGS. III B-1:(o) AND (b)
21
inside dimensions of 0.400 inch by 0.900 inch), and the width of the
structure shown is 0.900 inch throughout, except for the 0.080-inch-by-
0.020-inch coupling slot between the resonator spheres. The coupling
slot is oriented with its length parallel to the longitudinal axis of
the guide. This causes the slot to disturb the current in the guide
very little, and causes the circuit to have very high attenuation (in
excess of 60 db) when the spheres are off ferrimagnetic resonance.
However, when the signal frequency and applied biasing magnetic field
are of the proper values to excite ferrimagnetic resonance, a component
of RF magnetic dipole moment in the spheres is parallel to the length
of the slot1''2 and good coupling between the spheres is obtained, so as
to give two-resonator filter performance.
22
height of 0.400 inch, and by decreasing this height it is possible to
reduce the external Q in direct proportion to the guide height.1,2 How-
ever, the guide height must not be reduced too far or the metal top end
bottom walls will be very close to the spheres and cause their operation
to be disrupted as a result of currents induced in the adjacent metal
surfaces.1,2 From our past experience it appears that the guide height
should be at least 1.3 times the diameter of the spheres, and larger if
possible. In this case it was decided to make the guide 0.040-inch high
in the region of the spheres, which is 1.6 times 'the diameter of the
sph-eres. In this reduced-height guide the external Q will be about
[(0.040)/(0.400)] (11,600) = 1,160.
Zo
QQ:
= Q. yo
z~o (III C-i)
Thus, we could lower the external Q further (i.e., increase the coupling
between the resonator and the external load) if we could lower the ef-
fective impedance of the terminating guide. Since the guide impedance
is directly proportional to the guide height, and since we do not wish
to use a guide height less than 0.040 inch in the vicinity of the sphere,
our problem resolves to this question: With a YIG sphere in a 0.040-inch-
high guide, can we obtain an effective terminating impedance like that of
a guide whose height is considerably less than 0.040 inch? As we shall
see, at least as an approximation, the answer is yes.
23
V - b (III C-2)
Q.
or
232
V - (0.•040) - 0.008 inch
1,160
Zx,
XX
b-o.oo
0.0 11o.o012 b2.O.032 go
be.o10o b,-0.260 b=o.4oo INCH
ALL STEPS ;F LONG EXCEPT FOR FRINGING CAPACITANCE CORRECTIONS
(for guide width of a - 0.900 inch, and f- 10.1 Gc, L-• 0.383 inch)
IMPEDANCE TRANSFORMER
24
The next step in the design was to modify the first section (having
61 0.012 inch) of the transformer so as to replace it with a short
section of line having bA ' 0.040 inch, plus another section of line
having a height and length such that the performance of the new line
sections will be similar to that of the original uniform bI -0.012-inch-
high line section.
10-0.00 51-0.012
(a)
ORIGINAL SECTION ZI
•MMODIFIED
SECTION
r .. . • .-//////••////• b2 Z2
(b)
MODIFIED SECTION Zt-s
Figure III C-2(a) shows the original first section of the trans-
former. At midband the length of this Z 1, section is X.0/4, and the
impedance Z. normalized with respect to Z0 is
(z\ 2
ZSN
(III C-3)
25
by two line sections, one being of impedance ZA (corresponding to a
,height of bA - 0.040 inch) and of length tA, and the other being of
impedance Z. and of length t., as is indicated by the solid line in
Fig. III C-2(b). The length 'tA was chosen to be 0.050 inch, in order
to provide sufficient room in the longitudinal direction so that the
metal walls will not unduly disturb the resonance of the sphere. The
height bB and length tB were chosen so that the normalized impedance
Z./Z0 in Fig. III C-2(b) at the midband frequency will be the same as
Z./Z0 for the original structure in Fig. III C-2(a).
Z20 b/ 2.25
Within the accuracy of the above calculations, the two lines ZA and
Zs in Fig. III C-2(b) give exactly the same midband performance as does
the single line of impedance Z, in Fig. III C-2(a). Note that the
extra-high impedance of the ZA line section is compensated for by an
extra-low impedance in the Z5 line section. Though the circuit shown
at (b) can be expected to deviate in performance from that at (a) as
the frequency deviates from the midband. value, the circuit at (b) should
be reasonably broadband in its performance. This point is verified by
26
0Gc 12.5 Gc
1.4
1.2 ___
0.5 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 L3 1.4 1.5
FIG. III C-3 COMPUTED VSWR OF THE 50:1 TRANSFORMER IN FIG. III C-1 WITH SECTION Z,
REPLACED BY SECTIONS ZA AND Z8 IN FIG. III C-2(b)
the computed response in Fig. III C-3, which shows the computed VSWR of
the 50:1 impedance transformer in Fig. III C-1 with its Z, line section
replaced by line sections ZA and Z shown in Fig. III C-2(b). Note that
the maximum VSWR in the band of interest is about 1.55 which, though
larger than the 1.1 maximum VSWR value for the original transformer, is
reasonably good. However, this design is obviously not optimum, and
further s:tudy to provide techni-ques for optimum des-ign of imped'ance
transforming and coupling circuits of this type is contemplated.
27
this reactance should be small enough to be ignored without serious con-
sequences. After corrections for fringing capacitances (as discussed in
Refs. 4 and 5), the final dimensions of the input and output impedance
transforming sections were as shown in Figs. III B-l(a), (b).
The dividing wall between the two spheres was made to be 0.020 inch
thick, which resulted in a separation between the centers of the spheres
of approximately 2.4 diameters. From past experience, this separation
is believed to be adequate so that the spheres will not greatly distort
each other's biasing fl-field. Using the results of previous designs as
a guide, trial values of 0.020 inch by 0.080 inch were estimated for the
dimensions of the coupling slot between the spheres. It was expected
that this slot would later be widened a little until the desired degree
of coupling between spheres was obtained. However, initial tests indi-
cated that the degree of coupling was about right with the dimensions as
they were.
In working out the mechanical design of the filter, many of the con-
tact surfaces of the joints in the device were partially recessed [not
shown in Figs. III B-I(a), (b)] so as to leave a pressure lip along the
edge of joints where good contact was important. In addition, at the
joints in the short-circuit walls beside the YIG spheres a little silver
paint was used in assembly to further insure a good contact.
The measured performance of the filter bore out quite well the
validity of the design principles described above. Table III D-1 shows
the measured values of midband attenuation, 3-db bandwidth, 30-db band-
width, midband VSWR, and the required biasing magnetic field strength
for different pass-band frequencies. Assuming that the response of this
filter at 10 Gc corresponds to that of a two-resonator filter designed
from an equal-element prototype, 6 for a midband attenuation of 2.4 db
and a 30-db bandwidth of 276 Mc (as is indicated in Table III D-1 for
f0 - 10 Gc), then the computed unloaded Q of the resonators is Q.= 1,040,
while the external Q of the resonators is Q. - 289. This value of Q, is
seen to agree reasonably well with the design value which was Q, = 232,
especially since it is known that the presence of the adjacent coupling
slot will cause the Q, value to be raised typically by about 20 percent
28
or somewhat more. 1,2 The estimated 1,040 value of unloaded Q for the
spheres was lower than was hoped for. Because of a shortage of time,
the linewidth of these spheres was not measured before inserting them
in the filter, and it is probable that spheres with better unloaded Q's
could be obtained.
f O Tuning frequency
Le Minimum attenuation at tuning frequency
'29
TO 70 I ' I I I: 7 1 -, i•
7o I w I ' I I
60 OF601
.I,.MI.T O.DETECTIOLIMIT 6- OF DETECTION
150- 50
z 40 - ,o- 5s - _40o- 1,0- .Oec
2 S30 ~30,- X
z
W WI 2 0
1-20
I-
- t--
10 2.:db - 0- f 2.4 db
0 1000 2000
II3000 4000 5000
0 1o
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
BIASING FIELD STRENGTH-osrstods BIASING FIELD STRENGTH -orsteds
70 1 I I I I I I I
60 LIMIT OF DETECTION
50-
5400
130K
S I
0-20 F
10 2.6 db
o BIASIN I
0 1000 2000 3000 400 5000
BIASING FIELD STRENGTH-oersteds
30
These can be seen from the responses shown in Fig. III D-2 which were
taken using, a sweeping magnet power supply, along with a recorder. These
spurious responses are quite different in character from those that we
have observed in our strip-line S-band filters. 1,2 In our S-band filters
the stop-band spurious responses were generally more prominent than those
in this present filter, and there were no spurious responses observable
30
20
I0
I 00I --- II
z
0
30
IO-
2O
20
BIASING H-FIELD
FIG. III D-2 PASS-BAND ATTENUATION vs. SWEPT BIASING FIELD STRENGTH
FOR THE MAGNETICALLY TUNABLE WAVEGUIDE FILTER
Those curves wore obtained using a sweeping magnet power supply
and a recorder
31
•m •' . -_-_••• .=. .=••: m . . . M .=: -__. .. .
in the pass-band except for typically around 4.5 Gc where one of the
stop-band spurious responses would tend to merge with the pass-band
response. In the case of the data in Figs. III D-1 and III D-2 the
stop-band spurious response never merges with the pass-band, and though
there is movement of the pass-band spurious responses, as they move out
of the pass-band. they never grow into stop-band spurious responses, or
at least not into stop-band spurious responses of any magnitude.
32
3:
0 I 2 3
strip 1lies were soldered in place in one half of the structure, while
the YIG spheres were mounted in the other half. Dielectric was used
along the part of the strip lines in the regions next to the connectors
in order to prevent possible flexing of the strip lines by forces in the
connectors. Using this construction the magnet air gap required is only
0.260 inch. The housing structures for this filter could probably be
made quite cheaply by die-casting methods. Figure III E-2 shows a close-
up view of this filter mounted in an electromagnet purchased from a local
manufacturer. Of course, by using a combination electromagnet and per-
33
FIG.. III E-2 CLOSE-UP VIEW OF FILTER IN FIG. III E-1 MOUNTED IN AN ELECTROMAGNET
34
The measured performance of this filter is much like that of the
earlier experimental model 1 ' 2 so the performance curves will not be re-
peated here. However, Table III E-1 shows the measured values of midband
attenuation, 3-db bandwidth, 30-db bandwidth, midband VSWR, and biasing
H-field required for resonance.
REFERENCES
4. Leo Young, and G. L. Matthaei, "Microwave Filters and Coupling Structures," Quarterly
Progress Report 4, Sec. IV, SRI Project 3527, Contract DA 36-039 SC-87398, Stanford Research
Institute, Menlo Park, California (January 1962).
5. G. L. Matthaei, Leo Young, and E. M. T. Jones, Op. cit., Chapter 6.
35
IV RAM}-STOP FILTERS
A. GENERAL
An exact method for the design of band-stop filters has been given
in some detail in Quarterly Progress Report 7.1 The main feature de-
scribed there is a table of formulas (derived with the aid of aprocedure
given by Ozaki and Ishii 2 ) for directly transforming a low-pass lumped-
element prototype filter into a band-stop transmission-line filter that
consists of alternating sections of quarter-wavelength connecting lines
and stubs. The stubs are in shunt with the main line and are open-circuited
at their outer ends, yielding a configuration that is here called the basic
band-stop filter. Although this basic form is conceptually simple and
easy to design it is not suitable for filters requiring very narrow stop-
bands. The reason for this limitation is the difficulty of constructing
stub lines with the high value of characteristic impedance required in
such a filter. To overcome this difficulty, and also to allow greater
freedom to the designer in general, other configurations of the band-stop,
filter are described here, together with design equations for converting
the basic configuration to one of the newer types. Since the method of
designing the basic filter (and other associated forms of band-stop
filters) has been fully covered in Quarterly Progress Report 7,2 it will
not be reviewed here.
37
of the stub. Exact design equations and test result-s on filters designed
by both the above methods are given herein.
Y12 " Z
12
1 b - I 2
2 r
WYUCASE~ 16-
, . . Zoo
,,2
2
2
.2•
38
there, are the corresponding portion of the basic filter and design
equations that enable the basic filter to be converted, section by sec-
tion, into the parallel-coupled type. The coupled lines are completely
specified by their even- and odd-mode impedances Z%, Zb.., Z%, and Z0b
67
(or their odd- and even-mode admittances). - The superscripts a and b
pertain to lines a and b in Fig. IV B-i.
39
2
/,.-I,II n Z,
•I
-AO
-v/o
v I IIi
I
L
II
I I I
i
LINE V TLINE b
C.Cb
A-SU7-273
4,
ELECTRIC WALL FOR OOD MODE
MAGNETIC WALL FOR EVEN MODE
L a cb Cb I L N
cap
T, cf 0 ,f Cfo c c.
A-3527-274
8
Getsinger has derived equations for the fringing capacitances Ce,
C;0, and C;, of rectangular bars shown in Fig. IV B-4, and has prepared
convenient charts which relate C;e/E, C. 0/E, and Cý1e to rectangular-bar
strip-line dimensions. Here E is the dielectric constant of the medium
of propagation, so that the above ratios are dimensionless and of mod-
erate size. Getsinger gives equations for the design of symmetrical,
parallel-coupled, rectangular strip-lines, and here we adapt his equations
6
to fit the unsymmetrical as well as the symmetrical case.
Note that the shape of the strip lines in Fig. IV B-4 is specified
in terms of the dimensions t, b, s, w., and w.. To design a pair of lines
such as those in Fig. IV B-4, to have odd- and even-mode admittances-or
impedances as determined implicitly by the calculated values of C IE,
C., E, and Cb/e, first select a convenient value for t/b. Then, noting that
SiC C
AC
(IV B-l)
8
use Getsinger's chart of AC/e and C;. vs. s/b to determine s/b, and also
C;./6. Using t/b and Getsinger's chart of C. vs. t/b, determine C /E,
and then compute
b 2 L2
'41
b *
2 - b { 2ic) : a3
(IV'B3
When the ground plane spacing b is specified, the required bar widths,
w and w,, are determined. This procedure also works for the thin-strip
case where t/b - 0. If either w./b or w,/b is less. than 0.35 (1 - t/b),
the width of the bar should be corrected using the approximate formulas
, 0.07 1 - t + b
0.07- ( i b) , (IV B-4)
b 1.20
providing that 0.1 < (w'/b)/(1 - t/b) < 0.35. In Eq. (IV B-4), w is the
uncorrected bar width and w' is the corrected width. The need for this
correction arises because of the interaction of the fringing fields at
opposite sides of a bar, which will occur when abar is relatively narrow.
"42
N3
P-352-6
43
COAX-TO-STRIPLINE ADAPTER AIR SUPPORT AND GROUND CONNECTION
AND GROUND PLANE SPACER DIELECTRIC FOR PARALLEL STUB.
very wide frequency range, even including the second stop-band at 3f0.
44
40
*MEASURED RESPONSE
30 - COMPUTED RESPONSE
f 0. j~01.64k
I 20
J
10
0
0 2 3 4
WO
(a)
STOP SAND
• : o
1.0 1 o 0
0.4 0.6 0.8: 1.0 1.2 IA Is 1. 2.0
'At.
50 I I I
404
30 - MEASURED RESPONSE
0COMPUTED RESPONSE
VA 1.6 Ge
I 20-
0
0.04 0.94 0.96 1.0 1.02 104 lOGS I.0o 10
WO
(b) K.M,.,
45
C. SPUR-LINE TYPE OF FILTER
Zoo , .zo* 1
Yg
] -y22 yo o
r 2V '4-C7-
MA-55Z7-686
FIG. IV C-1 SPUR-LINE STUB RESONATOR AND EQUIVALENT SECTION OF BASIC FILTER
'46
A two-resonator spur-line-type band-stop filter was designed with
the aid of the formulas of Fig. IV C-1 for 60-percent stop-band bandwidth
and 1.6-Gc stop-band center frequency. Here again, as for the narrow
band filter described in Sec. IV-B, symmetrical coup.led lines we-re used.
The: prototype circuit was chosen to have maximally flat response and its
element values are, as before, go = g 3 - 1, g1 - g 2 - 1.414.
z20
ZD - Z (IV C-l)
47
type filter in which the stubs are separated 3k 0 /4. This latter circuit
can be derived by applying Kuroda's transformation to the separate parts
of the original shunt-stub basic circuit.) A sketch of the spur-line type
filter with essential dimensions is given in Fig. IV C-4. The coupled
lines were designed by the method described in Sec.. IV-B.
ZOl
ZA
50O
Z
1
2 .66.I
.Z
119.3 Z269'.3
(a)
Z,z 0Z SO-5
8
6e.
12 -
ZZ
Z, - 19.3 /Z 2 .69.3
(b)
Z12- 70.9 Z2 3 .-a2.1 Z3 4 'S66'
Z, - 169.3 Z4 * 119. 3
AA-35Z?-"l
'48
00
P-3527-678
9
COAX-TO-STRIP-LINE ARDIELECTRIC
TRNIT IONAR
MODFIED [
UG 17UI
CONNECTOR 1.4 1.oo~
.845 0.209
49
The lengths of the spurs were individually adjusted to resonate
at stop-band center as follows: The gap between the end of one spur
and the center section of the main line was bridged with adhesive alu-
minum foil, thereby making that spur-line section non-resonant. The
frequency of maximum attenuation of the remaining resonant spur line
was then measured, and the unbridged spur was reduced in length about
half the amount calculated to bring it to resonance at fo when considered
to be a simple open-circuited shunt stub. (Half. the calculated reduc-
tion in length was used as a safety precaution because the capacitance
of the spur end to main line is reduced at the same time, and this latter
value is not included in the calculation.) A few attempts brought the
spur to resonance at the d'esired frequency and the same process was
repeated for the other spur.
The measured values of attenuation ltoss and VSWR are shown to agree
fairly well with the computed v-slues, in Fig. IV C-5. The anomalous
departure of measured values from computed values that does occur, mainly
near the upper edge of the first stop-band and the lower edge of the
5.0
0
40
S3.0 0
2.0 %
o 0
°... "00 00
4C ,75
-L 5 db i
20
2
gO 0 0
0 o, 0 0 0
s5
second stop-band, may be due to the remaining discontinuities between
sections, which could not be eliminated entirely.
D. CAPACITIVELY-COUPLED-STUB FILTER
51
so
LA (MEASURED) • 71 db LA(MEASURED)
AT w/w0 - 1.00 59db AT PEAK
25 0- MEASURED RESPONSE
- COMPUTED RESPONSE
fo" -" 1.6l Gc
20
0D
* 52.8
15 - 50 SOohms
801z-73.3 =573.71
5)
0 -
0 1.0 .0. 3.0
wo
3.00
o MEASURED
COMPUTED FROM' NETWORK
2.50 INSERTION LOSS FUNCTION
fo 2.1.6 GC
~,2.00
1.50
00
52
0 0
S~~P-357-9
53
was the setting of the capacitive gaps of the two resonators for the
proper loaded Q, and the second step was the tuning of each resonator
to center frequency. This procedure, described more fully in Quarterly
Progress Report 3,5 p. 57, for a similar filter, was facilitated by the
split-block construction of the resonator support that allowed Separate
adjustment of resonator length and capacitive gap. The measured response
of the filter is seen to be very close to the computed response in
Fig. IV D-](a), (b), wh-ich shows attenuation and VSWH respectively.
Figure IV D-3 gives the essential dimensions of this filter and reflects
the final adjustments.
oT
0o o 0 COPPER
COAX-TO- STRIP-LINE 0TI
TRANSITION
- J
6r
6ALUM.CENTER CONDUCTOR
0,200 THICK -
54
terminal conditions to the general four-port consisting of two coupled
transmission lines, and then solving the set of simultaneous equations
obtained by expanding the matrix equation V a 'IZ based on the 4 x 4 im-
2
pedance matrix Z. The general solution for the spur-line type filter
was obtained in a similar way.
REFERENCES
4. Leo Young, G. L. Matthaei, and E. M. T. Jones, "Microwave Band-Stop Filters with Narrow
Stop Bands," IRE Trans. PGIfl-lO, 6, pp. 416-427 (November 1962).
5. P. S. Carter, Jr., Leo Young, G. L. Matthaei, and E. M. T. Jones, "Microwave Filters and
Coupling Structures," Quarterly Progress Report 3, SRI Project 3527, Contract DA 36-039
SC 87398, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California (October 1961).
6. Leo Young and G. L. Matthaei, "Microwave Filters and Coupling Structures," Quarterly Progress
Report 4, SRI Project 3527, Contract DA 36-039 SC-87398, Stanford Research Institute,
Menlo Park, California (January 1962).
7. G. L. Matthaei, Leo Young, and E. M. T. Jones, Design of Microwave Filters, Impedance Matching
Networks, and Coupling Structures, Vol. 1, pp. 170-193, a book prepared on SRI Project 3527,
Contract DA 16-039 SC 87398, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California (January 1963).
8. W. J. Geteinger, "Coupled Rictangular Bars Between Parallel Plates," IRE Tranm. iPaIUT-O,
pp. 6S-72 (January 1962).
55
V NULTIPLEMS
A. GENERAL
57
FIG. V B-I PHOTOGRAPH OF THE THREE-CHANNEL COMB-LINE MULTIPLEXER
58
35I II , II
30
25
20
Is
10-
5 1
• x
, X--X -/
0 . .
1.2 1.3 1.4 5 1.6
1.1
.. 1:.? 1.6 1.9 2.0 2.1
FREQUENCY- 6c
59
3.53I II
6 0 X0 MEASURED VALOIS
3.0 -
2.5
2.0
I .
-l 1.34 1.60.4
.0 L
.0.
0 I I I I I I I I-
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 ,.6 L.? 1. i.9 2.0 2.1
FREQUENCY - Gc
60
•*I I
3.2
0 MEASURED VALUES
3.0
2.6
2.6
2.4
a.2
2.0,
1.0
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
12 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 I.? I.$ .9 2,0
FREQUENCY-Ge
A-3S2lT-,
61
The 3-db percentage bandwidths of each channel, defined as the differ-
ence of the frequencies at which the attenuation is 3 db, divided by the
arithemetic mean of those frequencies, were determined and found to be 17,
16, and 13 percent for the lowest-, middle-, and highest-frequency channels,
respectively. These percentages are larger than the corresponding values
of the prototype multiplexer whose channel 3-db percentage bandwidths were
found to be each 11 percent. Bandwidth spreading in actual filters relative,
to the design prototype has been noted before. 2 However, in the case of a
comb-line filter having a design bandwidth of 10 percent, the bandwidth
spreading was less than in the present cases. Bandwidth spreading is
believed to be due to coupling effects beyond nearest neighboring line
elements, which were neglected in the derivation of the design equations
for comb-line filters.
62
T LARGE-Z,0
CUPLIN& WIRE
IMPEDANCE
r FROM BELOW -
4 PLACES
TO COTROL0.440
CAAPACIIVANCES
0.806 0.394
C0.37
CISD UG-1167/U
0.565 MODIFIED
0.112 -- E1Z
0.345
L
NOTE:
1. Dissni on Iniches
. etable V-I I fo olfimefsl..s of L, -e, 3.dA ,.
63
Table V C-1
DATA FOR THREE-CHANNEL COMB-LINE MULTIPLEXER
The meassuredcenter frequencies differ from the design center frequencies because of bandwidth spreading,
which is discussed in See. V.B.,
SHOINGONEOF
HE OM-LIE FLTESWTHTSCOVBLIER PILATE REMOVED
64REZoCULIGWR
ground plane (visible in Figs. V B-1 and V C-2). Use of the triangular
plate permits the removal of any filter cover plate without disturbing the
common junction or the other filters. Three small, circular cylindrical
rods: connect the triangular section of ground plane to the bottom ground
plane.
The filters of the multiplexer were tuned using the alternating short-
circuit and open-circuit procedure discussed by Dishal4 and described in
its application to the comb-line filter in Ref. 2. First, the large-Z0
coupling wires of the lowest- and middle-frequency channels were discon-
nected from the common input while the highest-frequency channel of the
multiplexer was tuned. During the tuning the inner conductor of the annul-
!ling stub was removed from the common junction. However, the outer conduc-
'tor of the annulling stub was left intact in order to provide a minimum-
distance path to the bottom ground plane for currents on the inner surface
of the outer conductor of the common coaxial line input.
65
TRIANGULAR SECT-ION SA O
OF CVEN LATEUG-1I07lU MODIFIED
LARGE 2IMPEDANCE
COUPLNG WIRE
LARGE Z0 IMPEDANCETWE
CULNWIEPLANES SECTION A-A
OUTER CONDUCTOR OF
ANNULLING STUB
OUTER CONDUCTOR OF
INNE
OFANNULLING
CONUCTO STUB
66
C
120*
/ No•o _
- 0.5000
4.- - 0.4160
•--4- 0.175
.29101
0.100
RAO. FROM
REAMER
7 RAO.
0.400 REQ.
] 0.100
3.175 T-
I
;I.
I I
DIMENSIONS IN INCHES SE T O- C
SECTION C-C
67
After the highest-frequency channel was tuned, a load was placed on
the output of that channel (the other channels remained decoupled during
this time) and the reflection coefficient was obierved on an oscilloscope
using a reflectometer and an electronically swept signal generator. The
reflection-coefficient trace on the oscilloscope was adjusted to the proper
shape by varying only the tuning screws of the resonator to which the
large-Z 0 coupling wire was attached. In this case the coupling of the end
resonator was much different from the other resonators, and the bandwidth
of the filter was sufficiently large so that the alternating short-circuit
and open-circuit procedure did not give entirely satisfactory results in
the pass-band response. However, it was known from the experience of
tuning the comb-line filter described in Ref. 2 that this could be correc-
ted by readjusting the tuning screws of the end resonator. Next, the at-
tenuation of the highest-frequency channel was recorded using a pen
recorder and a mechnically swept signal generator. Several frequencies
at various points on the attenuation curve were then determined using a
wave meter. From this data the band spreading and percentage ba-ndwidth
were calculated.
After the highest-frequency channel was tuned, its coupling wire was
disconnected and then the middle-frequency channel was tuned using the same
procedure. The center frequency of the middle-frequency channel had to be
shifted and the filter retuned several times in order to obtain the proper
crossover point in the attenuation curves. It was found that the middle-
frequency channel had slightly more bandwidth spreading than the highest-
frequency channel, so that the center frequency of the middle-frequency
channel had to be decreased from the original calculated value.
68
During the testing of the three channels for VSWR and attenuation,.
several changes were made in the sizes of the various coupling wires in
order to adjust the impedance levels of the three filters. The. final
values for the sizes of the large:-Z 0 couplingwires are given in
Table V C-1.
Next, the center conductor of the annulling stub was added, loads
were placed on all channels, and all coupling wires were connected to the
common coaxial-line input. A reflectometer was connected to the common
input and the reflection coefficient was observed on an oscilloscope using
an electronically swept signal generator whose sweep-width exceeded the
multiplexer bandwidth. The sliding short-circuit of the annulling stub
was positioned for an optimum response, and final adjustments of the tuning
screws of the resonators to which the coupling wires were attached were made.
Several times during the final adjustments the diameter of the inner con-
ductor of the annulling stub was decreased slightly to further reduce the
multiplexer susceptance. The fine tuning and susceptance annulling adjust-
ments were stopped upon obtaining the response given in Figs. V B-2 and
V B-3.
69
. .. . ...... . . S.. . . . . . . . .. . .. . I III I I III , i ,
-I. [i'j
.II I
S~II
II
SI I
S.
I I
I I
I €I
value of its real part in the pass-band is 1.0. The multiplexer channels
each have normalized bandwidths of W = 0.1, where W is the bandwidth in
radiasn per second normalized with respect to the center frequency of the
lowest-frequency channel. The normalized guard-bands are each 0.1. The
71
In the example of Fig. V E-1 the susceptance may be reduced by using
an open-circuit transmission line as the annulling network. Because of the
guard-bands, it is necessary to use a transmission line several wavelengths
One reason for this result is the fact that the contributions of sus-
ceptance from other channels have shifted the zeros of the susceptance of
the three channels. Note that in Fig. V E-1 there are susceptance zeros
a.. I - I .
1 IA 1.4 1 .5
El I II 111.1LIE EQU[TT, --
II | I ,•
71
at 1.02, 1.185, and 1.378 rather that at 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4, which would
be their locations had there been no susceptance contributions from other
channels. Important, also, is that the frequency difference between aus-
ceptance zeros is 0.165 and 0.193 rather than 0.2. Thus, because the
poles of the annulling stub repeat at a fixed frequency interval (0.2 in
our example), it should be expected that the annulling of the multiplexer
susceptance in its pass-bands will not be completely satisfactory.
41
s S
10
h. 1.1 1.2 I.) .4 I.E
UORNALIZEO (, -)
FRIEUENCY.
72
F. SUSCEPTANCE FORMULA FOR AN IDEAL MULTIPLEXER WITH GUAID-BANDS
(V-F-I)
73
W
U
z
I-
U)
h-
I- 1.
,-I
-J
L4 MCHANNELEXER WI. GURDBAD CHANNEL
SI 2 3 N/2
IhJ
N
WI wZ 4*3 W4 W5 W•
6 "N-I "''N '4
FREQUENCY
REFERENCES
74
VI WIDEBE•ID INTEIDIGITAL FILTERS WITH CAPACITIVELY
LOADED ISOONAtS
A. GENERAL
CS C CS
TERMINATING TERM
LINENE
OI"TNCE ADMITTANCE
ADMITTANCE
vA YI
75
(1) They are very compact. They are even more compact in the
dimension parallel to the coupled-line length than are the
interdigital filters without capacitive loading. The cal-
culated frequency response curves presented in Sec. VI-F
demonstrate that capacitive loading can reduce the length
of the coupled-lines by a factor of at least two.
(5) The rates o-f dutoff and the strength of the stop-bands are
enhanced by multiple-order poles of attenuation at zero
frequency, and within the stop-bands above the first pass-band.
76
For the benefit of readers who have filter design requirements but
who are not particularly interested in filter theory as such, the design
equations for capacitively loaded interdigital filters, and some calcu-
lated frequency responses, will be presented first. Readers who are also
interested in the source of the design equations will find a discussion
of their derivation in Sec. VI-F, and a discussion of the method of cal-
culating frequency response in Sec. VI-G.
(a)
ILfgl L3*g 3 nI
(b)
77
PROTOTYPE RESPONSE $ANO-PASS FILTER RESPONSE
LA LAO
- * ---- "
Gu L~r IL~r~
4
W,. .W %iI
Wo W2W
where where
a
-ntilog,, I- Co -
Wo2 + W
oo I
2
and
'2 -W
' as
Wo0
lo
01 [antilog, 0(LA)]-
01
where
I __I
___________
lol
FIG. VI B.2 EQUATIONS AND PARAMETERS FOR MAXIMALLY FLAT RESPONSE
75
PROTOTYPE RESPONSE BAND-PASS FILTER RESPONSE
* z
0 fo0 hWoW b
&8--
#w
-w 2w, w
for .. where
db W
LA(w')- 10 log, 0 fl+C cosh 2 n cosh"1
To determine n required for give2 values of A)1160 LAr W,/o and LA.
CantilOg a
l#O W~
I W1 I
cosh-1 - -
cosh• •
where
{[nioj(grJ-i ,o
79
and that, including the resistor terminations, the element values range
from g0 to 9.+1' A low-pass prototype with n react-ive elements leads to
a band-pass filter with n resonators.
The right sides of Figs. VI B-2 and VI B-3 show band-pass filter
responses which correspond to the given low-pass- prototype responses.
The band-pass filter response will have the same type of pass-band char-
acteristic as the prototype, but the width of the band-pass filter pass-
band can be specified arbitrarily. Filters constructed with distributed-
cons:tant elements will also have other pass-bands centered at frequencies
above w0" On the left sides of Figs. VI B-2 and VI B-3 will be found
equa-tions for determining the attenuation characteristic of the low-pass
prototype as a function of the radian frequency variable w', for specified
a) and n. On the right side of Figs. VI B-2 and VI B-3 will be found an
approximate low-pass-to-band-pass transformation from which the attenuation
characteristic of the low-pass prototype as a function of co' can be mapped
to the band-pass filter attenuation chatacteristic (centered at wo) as a
function of the band-pass filter radian frequency variable W. Since the
attenuation is the same for both the low-pass and band-pass filters at
frequencies w' and, n), respectively, which are related as given by the
mapping, the band-pass filter attenuation characteristic can be predicted
by use of these data. At the bottom of Figs. VI 8-2 and VI B-3 are equa-
tions for determining the value of n required in order to achieve a given
amount of attenuation, LAa db, at a given frequency, w..
80
Thus, to allow for this shrinkage in bandwidth, it is suggested that a
value of w whic~h is about 6 to 10 percent larger than is actually desired
be used in the design. equations in Secs. VI-E. However, the actual de-
sired value of w should be used. in the mapping in Figs. VI B-2 and VI B-3.
C. PARALLEL-COUPLED LINES
CCIO Cf C
PARALLEL-COUPI ED LINES
capacitances per unit length at the inner corners of each strip are des-
ignated Cf'
1 when the strips are excited in the even mode (i.e., with
equal voltages of the same phase); they are designated C; when the strips
are excited in the odd mode (i.e., with voltages having equal amplitudes
'and opposite phases). Both bars have the same height, and both are as-
sumed to be wide enough so that the interactions between the fringing
fields at the right and left sides of each bar are negligible, or at least
small enough to be easily corrected for. On this basis the fringing
fields are the same for both bars, and their different total capacitances
C. and C. to ground are due entirely to different parallel-plate capac-
itances CA and C6, For the structure shown in Fig. VI C-1,
p P
C, = 2(C; + C; + c' )
C (C' - C.,)
10
Note that the shape of the lines in Fig. VI C-1 is fixed in terms of
the dimensions t,b,s,w. and w,. To design a pair of lines such as those
in Fig. VI C-1 so as to have specified odd- and even-mode admittances or
impedances, first use equations such as those in Table VI D-1 to compute
C/' 6 , Ca 4 /e, and C,/E. Select a convenient value for line thickness t
and plate spacing b, which fixes the ratio t/b. Then, noting that
tAd Co
A = -
(VI C-2)
E E
use Getainger's charts of AC/c and C' vs. s/b to determine s/b, and also
C;./I. Using t/b and Getainger's chart of Cus. tb, determine
12
and then compute
. ( ) ) (VI C-3)
When the ground plane spacing b is specified, the required bar widths,
. and wv, are determined. If either w0 /b or v4 /b is less than
0.35(1 - tib), the width of the bar should be corrected using the approxi-
5
mate-formula
' 0.07 -- +
b 1.20 '(VI C-5)
provided that 0.1 < (w'/b)/(l - t/b) < 0.35. In Eq. (VI C-5) w is the
uncorrected bar width and w' is the corrected width. The need for this
correction arises becausc of the interaction of the fringing fields at
opposite sides of a har, which will occur when a bar is relatively narrow.
k , -.C2
83
"In the structure in Fig. VI C-2 the electrical properties of the struc-
ture are characterized in terms of the self-capacitances, C,, per unit
'length of each bar with respect to ground, and the mutual capacitances,
per unit length between adjacent bars k and k + 1. This repre-
sentation is not necessarily always highly accurate; it is conceivable
that a significant amount of fringing capacitance could exist between a
giv-en line element and, say, the line element beyond the nearest .neighbor.
However, a-t l-east for geometries such as that shown, experience has shown
this representation to have satisfactory accuracy.
C= 1 (VI C-6)
E C
spacings sk,k 4 1 between all the bars are obtained. Also, using Getsinger's
charts, the normalized fringing capacitance (CGe ,),k.i/E associated with
the gaps sk,,, 1 between bars are obtained. Then the normalized width of
the kth bar is
In the case of the bar at the end of the array (the bar at the far left
in Fig. VI C-2), C;e/E for the edge of the bar that has no neighbor must
be replaced by C;/e, which is also obtalned from Getainger's charts. Thus,
for example,, for Bar I in Fig. VI C-'2:,
1 --
1~ --c (C (VI C-8)
b 2 7 [\ -l2(CI)
If %/b < 0.35 (1 - t/b) for any of the bars, the width correction given
in Eq. (VI C-5) should be applied to the affected bars.
84
D. DESIGN EQUATIONS
A network is antimstrical if the impedance-vs. -freqaency function looking into, one end of the network
in the reciprocal of that looking into the other end of the network. Prototypes with reeistor termi*
nations at both aede. having either maximally flat- or Tchebyetheff renponsesn with one or more frequenciea
w where zero tranducer losn occurs, are either symmetrical or antinetrical.
85
Table VI D-1
DESIGN' EQUATIONS FOR INTEBDIGITAL FILTERS OF THE FOIR IN FIG. VI A-i
Use the equations in Fig. VI B-2 or VI B-3 to select a low-pass prototype with the re-
quired value of n Z 4. The input and output elements in this filter count as resonators, ad
that there are n elements for an n-reactive-eleaent prototype. Choose 0, 2=i 0Xo - the elec-
trical length of the elements at the resonance wavelength 0 in the medium surrounding the
line elements. Compute:
8. 0 Wo '9 (1)
i d~
tA 90 1 9 A (2)
N0 h-,
A - gd)S tan (o-92,o 8,1 (5)
Y• 121-d~
jf M'"tan 01 J2.3
k[3 t o )m-21
(9)
86
_______________ ______
Table VI D-1 (continued)
Z t.8/
(10)
The normalized aelf-capacitancea per unit length for the coupled-line elements
are:
C 1-v7E
376.7_• • A 1)
" " A (ZIZA.)'
37 6 7
.L2 _ .
o o,
CC
- A(15)
where e and (p are the absolute and relatie dielectric constants, respectively, of
the medium surrounding the reaonator line elements. The d, hA, and A8 are dimension-
lea. admittance scale factors whose values should be chosen to give a convenient ad-
mittance level in the filter (see text).
The normalized nutual capacitances per unit length between adjacent coupled-line
elements are:
C- 376.7
67
Table VI D-1 (cosnclud)
YACL
ao. 9 (20)
'YA ot 6 (0 Y Y
2 WOo_ A A(21)
A - ..- (2
1 t M/2
n , cot0
Csn Cot
WO(Z4/ZA) (24)
where the resonance frequency. W00is in radians per second, admittances are in mhos, and im-
pedances are in ohms to give capacitances in farads.
:For the design equations presented in Table III E-1 of Quarterly Progress Report 4,1 d has been set equal
to 0.5. A single parameter h = hA = hB appears in Quarterly Progress Report 4, since equal terminatinag
'admittances were assumed in that report. The h-parameter was also introduced in Quarterly Progress
Report 4 at a different stage in the derivation of the equations. Except for theme, differences, the
dasign equations presented here in Table VI D-1 reduce to those is Table Ill E-1 of Quartatiry Progress
Report 4 for the case of so capacitive loading.
88
The prime consideration in the choice of the admittance scale factors
';hA and h. is that the dimensions of the coupled lines be such that the res-
0onators have high unloaded Q in order that dissipation loss be low. The
dimensions that optimize the unloaded Q of interdigital filters are not
known. For air-filled coaxial-line resonators, however, it is known that
a characteristic impedance of 76 ohms gives the highest unloaded Q.
Various approximate studies suggest that the optimum impedance for strip-
line resonators of nearly square cross section, such as are shown in
Fig. VI C-2, is not greatly different than 76 ohms. Thus, it is suggested
that hA and h. be chosen such that Eq. (VI DVI) is satisfiýed (at least when
air dielectric is used):
Once values for d, hA, and hB have been determined, the remaining cal-
culations to determine the capacitances per unit length of the line elements,
C,/e and Ci k../E are straightforward. From these capacitances, the line
dimensions are determined as discussed in Sec. VI-C. The lumped loading
capacitances at the ends of the resonators can be constructed in many con-
figurations, such as those in Fig. VI D-1. Each configuration would require
estimates of the fringing fields in order to determine the dimensions for
the loading capacitances. Data for estimating.the fringing fields associated
with the loading capacitances are available 5 7 11
in other works., Since the
estimates of fringing capacitances will be approximate, tuning screws should
be incorporated into the first model of a given filter to trim the loading
capacitances. It is anticipated that the fringing capacitances associated
with Fig. VI D-l(c) will be discussed in a.Ufture report on
'Contract DA 36-039-AMC-00084(E), after a capacitively loaded filter is
constructed and tested.
I9
(1a,NARROW GAP AT END OF LINE (b) TAB THAT IS LARGER THAN CROSS
ELEMENT SECTION OF LINE ELEMENT
(C) LINE ELEMENT PROJECTING INTO (d) COAXIA, CYLINDER AT END OF LINE
GROOVE ELEMEI1'1' RA-352T-667
90
- - -
Table VI E-1
LINE-ELEMENT PARAMETERS FOR AN OCTAVE-BANDWIDTH, CAPACITIVELY LOADED
INTERDIGITAL FILTER WITH ADMITTANCE-SCALING PARAMETER d = 0.25
cb h + 1 y ., k+1 c OCr y
e sho *A_.h
I and 7 1.412 --- 1 and 8 1,:916 0.00884 ---
2 and 6 0.558 0.0740 2 and 7 0.758 0.00565 0.2085
Table VI E-2
LINE-ELEMENT PARAMETERS FOR AN OCTAVE-BANDWIDTH, CAPACITIVELY LOADED
INTERDIGITAL FILTER WITH ADMITTANCE-SCALING PARAMETER d = 0. 50
g
z 376.7/lve'
4L= ='A 2.264 2 - . = 93 ohms
A A 2 :.ýW -+ 2 ,
Table VI E-3
LINE-ELEMENT PARAMETERS FOR AN OCTAVE-BANDWIDTH, CAPACITIVELY LOADED
INTERDIGITAL FILTER WITH ADMITrANCE-SCALING PARAMETER d - 0._65
k S• 111
II
k___ •Rho
k'~k. ) k
-7-A
1 and 7 1.412 --- 1 and 8 1.916 0.00884
2 and 6 0.899 0.1194 2 and 7 0.504 0.00588 0.1748
3 and 5 0.971 0.1289 3 and 6 1.431 0,00876 0.1900
4 0.960 0.1274 4 and 5 1.429 0.00892 0.1896
z
-=
z
2.264 ,
~376.71- , a 71 ohms
2 C.4 *4 2 4.S
91 -7 -,
I
Table VI E-4
LINE-ELEMENT PARAMETERS FOR AN OCrAVE..ANBIIDTH, CAPACITIVELY*.UMD
INTERDIGITAL FILTER WITH ADMIITrAN.-SCALING PARAITER. d * 1.00
For each of the filter designs presented in the paragraph above, the
transducer loss has been calculated as a function of frequency. These
calculations are based on open-wire-line equivalent circuits of the filters,
as is discussed in Sec. VI-G. Dissipation loss was neglected.
Figures VI E-1 through VI E-4 show the frequ.ency response for d = 0.25,
0.50, 0.65, and 1.0, respectively. Taking d - 0.65 seems about the best
choice, since this value keeps all the ripples below 0.35 db. However,
the value of d is not critical; the highest ripp-les for d = 0.50 and 1.0
are 0.4 db and 0.5 db, respectively.
92
V• I
70 •O"-"-" -
60
J ~SPECIFIED
0
w
EDGE
ItSBAND
30 •it
5-J
30C
2c
'C0
SEE ENLARGED
PLOT ABOVE
0 1 I 1- W I
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.$ 2.0
SNORMALIZED FREQUENCY
OC-352?-14
93
!Do Tm------ _ _
I .i I
sO 1.0 -
To- 0.- :
S600
0 -
0 61 , 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
SPECIFIE[D
BAND EDGE o
u 50 _
z
,0
S0'
• SEE ENLARGED
20o-- ~PLOT ABOVE-
94
so A1.0I
-- TO 0.5 - - -|
50.
04 07-.-. . . L . . . .
4W
-67 *CC--
U SO
0.2 TE
0.4 io
NDWTHAMTACESAIGPAAEEi 0.6501
95
90 1.5 I I T T1 I - _ _
s0
4
1.0-
I
70 0.5 9
. 10.7
0.66 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
U,
i SPECIFIED W0
,t BAND EDGE
ui
50
40-
30•
20
SEE
SEENLARGED
IPLOT ABOVE
o W W I W . W i W
O' 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.@ 2.0
-G , NORMALIZED :FHEQUENCY
c -3S27-671
96
symmetry about on, the upper edge of the pass-band would be at 1.35 o0"
* The close correspondence between this calculated frequency response end the measured date presented in
Quarterly Progress Report 4 also demonstrates the validity of the method described in Sec. VI- of this
report for calculating frequescy response. The calculated bandwidth was 2.06:1 as compared with the
measured 1.95:1. and as compared to the design goal of 2.0:1. The calculated freqsency response had
eight frequescies of perfect input match, which is the maximum possible mamber for am bight-resometor
filter. The measered frequency response, however, had only six frequencioe of beat input match.
97
180
120
,.J
U
0
W' C -loo_,_"
I,---
20__
WO ,NRAIE RQEC
This can he sees, for exmple, by the fact that the image impadses for filter 2 in Fig. 2(a) of ef. 12
goes to infinity when the lime elements are X/2. long (01- i,).
'9
filter are made equal to the image admittance and image phase of corre-
sponding sections ofthe prototype at certain important frequencies.
Splitting the low-pass prototype into sections involves modifying the
prototype from a ladder network of alternating series reactances and shunt
ausceptances, to a network of shunt capacitances separated by ideal admit-
tance inverters. This modification of the prototype is similar to a con-
cept introduced by Cohn, 6 and enlarged upon by Matthaei. 1 3 The image
admittance and image phase of the filter sections are found by means of
open-wire-line equivalent circuits for the coupled-line elements forming
interdigital filter.
The end pair of coupled lines in Fig. VI A-1 are of the same config-
uration as the two lines, and have the open-wire-line equivalent circuit,
shown in Fig. VI F-2. Figure VI F-2 is an extension of Fig. III F-7 of
Quarterly Progress Report 4.1 In this equivalent circuit, the location
of the tuning capacitance was not considered as obvious as for the circuit
in Fig. VI F-1. Therefore, the open-wire-line equivalent circuit of
Fig. VI F-2 was derived directly from the open-circuit impedance and short-
circuit admittance matrices that apply in general to any two parallel-coupled
transmission lines. The elements of these matrices are given by Jones and
Bolljahn 1 2 for the case of equal-size coupled lines, and their results can
readily be generalized to the case of unequal coupled lines.*
N B. The1diuttaoMC-matrix elements givo by Eq. (9) of: Jones @EdBellja l1 have inmorreet algebraic
alga to Yl Y l. Y34' Y ' Y14' X4t' Y3 ad1Y32'
100
0
a ~ I v8 Y0
0
4-. b 0A2 I I- b
Y~b.Ybe lb Y04voYO.-vCb
Cob+~b
cl.
+ Y e0 v(Co+Cab)
Clz::oco
I N.TURNS RATIO
Co"
2l 'CoT li
101
is as shown in Fig. VI F-3. To relate this equivalent circuit to the
prototype, Fig. VI F-3 is broken into sections as in Fig. VI F-4, the
interior sections S, 3 through S.,_ 1 being made symmetrical. The
cot 60
Ct kkLk2 to
R
n-2
c h 0 (*
W 0h A -_
1 + Yk' . 4
l k~
) (VI F-1)
S k. cSC9 Y- . t k.kl
h tan9
-
(Ys)
lb..!L
to a-2 Aco, /A \k
tto .-
tan 00/co
Co
(VI F-2)
* A worthwhile reduction in the complexity of the allehraiec maitlatioes reesults from teking advantee of
the eyumatry of the settimes. ach eaction cam be divided in half. nd the open-cireuit and the short.
circuit placed at the midplame.
102
c" c"
CII i
S ~-Cn hC
A
: 4 (. - Zn.
t I h\
hAý ha h# Ah
FIG. VI F-4 THE CIRCUIT OF FIG. VI F-3 SPLIT INTO SYMMETRICAL INTERIOR
SECTIONS, AND THE TRANSFORMERS REMOVED
103
Consideration will now be given to the modified prototype shown in
Fig. VI F-5. Modification of the prototype in the forms shown in
Fig. VI B-1 to obtain Fig. VI F-5 in which admittance inverters" appear
has been described by Matthaei. 13 Figure VI F-5 is slightly more general
than Fig. i9 of Matthaeil3 in that unequal terminating admittances are
permitted, but slightly less general in that all the element values have
been renormalized so that the terminating admittances are the same as in
- Is
g,.
,A C2 2., heye
S• ----
SZ$ s'5 , 4 s- 2 ,.-,
JhCe.I T GoC
________
2 i
Jk * ,lag,,,I I 5 ____ __
.A JIs
n-2,n-I I t og -,L - /
,The other shunt capacitances have been chosen such that each interior sec-
tion, s;, 3 through S,' ,is symmetrical. The parameter d specifies
what fraction of C 2 is split int~o C.2 to be part of $2,3 and similarly
for C,_. These choices completely specify' 3 the valuesL f-or the edmittance-
inverter parameters, Js,, , as is shown at the bottom of Fig. VI F-5.
1-04
The image admittance of each of the interior sections of the modified
prototype is readily found to be::
: ., / 'w'dg~h'Y' 2
which is Eq. (11) in Table VI D-1. Equations (VI F-I) and (VI F-4) are
sufficient to also ensure that the image phase shift of each interior
section in Fig. VI F-4 is the same at co - co0 as the image phase shift of
the co~rresponding prototype section at co' = 0.
105
where we define
( -- cot 80 tan 6
The parameters S and N,.,- are introduced only to shorten the form of
some of the design equations, and have no particular physical significance.
Combining Eq. (VI F-5) with the relationship at the lower left-hand corner
of Fig. VI F-4, the characteristic admittances of some of the shunt stubs
in Fig., VI F-3 are found' to be:
cot 0
G1 = (VI F-7)
106
be the same as the reactance of the inductance LI, evaluated at w' *-w
which gives.:
where T is defined as
Equations (VI F-7) and (VI F-8). appear in Table VI D-1 as Eqs. (20-Y and
(6), respectively.
For the shunt stub at the left-hand end of Fig. VI F-4, its auscep-
tance in parallel with the tuning capacitance C,1.2' evaluated at o - (01
is required to be the same as the susceptance of the capacitance Cs in
Fig. VI F-5 at w' a 0-that is, zero shunt susceptance. Therefore:
C'
-1.
Y,1.2 cot 0(VI F-9)
hAW 0
Substituting Eq. (VI F-9) along with Eq. (VI F-l) evaluated for k w 2
into the relationships at the bottom. of Fig. VI F-4, we have:
Y, cot 00 Y2 Y ,2 3 )
C 2 Ws
0o - + LIYAI (VI F-10)
which is the same as Eq. (21) of Table VI D-1. The shunt susceptance of
stub Y1. 2 in Fig. VI F-4 in parallel with C.I2 evaluated at w - a) is now
made equal to the susceptance of C; of Fig. VI F-5 evaluated at w0 =-co.
This condition, along with Eq. (VI F-9), gives the stub characteristic
admittance:
107
Equation (7) of Table VI D-l results from taking the sum of Eq. (VI F-i1)
and Eq. (VI F-5) evaluated for k = 2.
Equations (12) through (19) of Table VI D-I follow directly from the
definitions of the characteristic admittances and charateristic impedances
of the open-wire transmission lines in Fig. VI F-3. Use is made of the fact
that the velocity of propagation in the medium surrounding the coupled-line
elements can be written:
where
Equation (VI F-12) applies for the usual case where, in order to minimize
dissipation loss, only nonmagnetic materials would be used in constructing
the filter.
108
to obtain a valid equivalent circuit for an entire filter by cascading
several of the equivalent circuits as in Figs. VI F-I and VI F-2, the
coupling beyond adjacent coupled-line elements of the filter must be
negligible. That coupling beyond nearest neighbor is insignificant for
coupled-line proportions similar to Fig. VI C-2 is demonstrated by the
expe-ime'ntal results obtained with the interdigital filter of Sec. III in
Quarterly Progress Report 4,1 with the comb.-l-i-ne filter- of-Sec- -I1in
Quarterly Progress Report 5,2 and with comb-line filters used in the multi-
plexe:r of Sec. III in this report.
VB IjX
[TAi0
(VI G-1 continued)
109
n-2 0coo 69 V. .
4-2jo C.-
1 0 Yj. 0
[: :j
L we -1 L(V .IG2
O o • -( VI G- 2 )
I ) A A V0-)
z YA coto
1Z ZA (-cI/o 0)(o C0•)
ZA (-/Wi0) OWC81)
Comparing the matrices with the parts of Fig. VI F-3, it can be seen that
the first matrix in Eq. (VI G-1) represenLs the input reactance of the
left-hand series stub, which has characteristic impedance Z and is loaded
1
at one end by capacitance C1. the second matrix in Eq. (VI G-1) represents
ther left-hand transformer. The first matrix within the continued-product
11e
sign in Eq. (VI G-1)represents the shunt stub of characteristic admit-
tence in parallel with the loading capacitance C;. The second matrix
Within the continued-product sign in Eq. (VI G-1) represents the con-
necting line of characteristic admittance Y2 , 3' and so on throughout
Eq. (VI G-1). The digital computer-a Burroughs 220--was programmed to
carry out the matrix multiplication of Eq. (VI G-J) for n < 15.
Using the general-circuit parameters obtained from Eq. (VI G-1), the
computer was also programmed to find the ratio of power available from the
generator, P .. i., to the power P2 actually delivered to the conductance
Y when. the filter is inserted between the generator and Y'. This ratio
is:
Pe~i Y / \ / i
[(F[A ++D)y +
+A (VYA + 2] (VI G-5):
P A YB B
where use has been made of the fact that for a lossless network B and C
are purely imaginary, by setting B = jb and C = jc, j = V-l. (Also, A
and D are purely real.) Finally, the. transducer loss LA was calculated by
the computer using:
LA 10 1og10
1 Pa decibels (VI G-6)
Ul1
REFICES
1. Leo Young and G. L. Matthaei, "Microwave Filters and Coupling Structure,." auarterly
Pro6ress Repart 4, SRI Pro4 ect 3527, Contract DA 36-039 SC-87398, Stanford asearch
Institute, Menlo Park, California (January 1962).
2., G. L. Matthaei, Leo Young, and P. S. Carter, Jr., "Microwave Filters and Coupling
Structures," Quarterly Progreas Report 5, SRI Project 3527, Contract DA 36-039 SC-87398,
Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California (May 1962).
3. L. Weinberg, "Additional Tables for Design of Optimum Ladder Networks," JI. Franklin
Institute 246. pp. 7-23 and 127-138 (July and August 1957).
4. G. L. Matthaei, et aL:, "Design Criteria for Microwave Filters and Coupling Structures,"
Final Report, SRI Project 2326, Contract DA 36-039 SC-74862, Stanford Research Institute,
Menlo Park, California (January 1961).
5. W. J. Getainger, "Coupled Rectangular Bars Between Parallel Plates," IRE Trans.
PFGMT-10, pp. 65-72 (January 1962).
11. J. F. Cline, et al., "Design Data for Antenna-Multicoupler Systems," Final Report,
SRI Project 2183, Contract AF 19(604)-2247, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park,
California (September 1959).
112
S
VII CONCLUSIONS
B. BAND-STOP FILTERS
The procedure for the exact design of the basic shunt-stub type of
band-stop filter that was described in Quarterly Progress Report 7 has
been extended to cover two types of filters that employ parallel-coupled
lines, with no loss of exactness in the designs. One of these types was
shown to yield a practical filter where the basic shunt--stub type would
have been impractical (namely, for the design of narrow-stop-band filters).
C. MULTIPLEXEBS
113
.~..-.--~---.--.------
pass-band to be larger than the design prototype. It is recommended that
in future designs the percentage bandwidth be understated to account for
bandwidth spreading. Tuning of the multiplexer is facilitated by using
an electronically swept frequency oscillator. Without the sweeper, tuning
is difficult and tedious.
114
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Mr. York Sato worked out many of the details of the mechanical
design of the two magnetically tunable filters discussed in Sec. III,
and made the laboratory tests on the filters.
115
IDENTIFICATION OF KEY TEClINICAL PERSONNEL
HOURS CHARGED
TO PROJECT
DMIING QUARTER
116
DISTRIBUrION LIST
NO. or NO. or
ORGANIZATION COPIES ORGANIZATION COPIE
OASD (IME) Corps of Engineers Liaison Office
AMTT: Technical Library U.S. Army Electronics Research and-
Room 3E1065 Development Laboratory
The Pentagon Fort Monmouth, New Jersey'
Washington 25, D.C."
AFSC Scientific/Technical Liaison
Chief of Nesearch and Development I Office
OCS, Department of the Army' U.S. Naval Air Development Center
Washington 25, D.C. Johnsville, Pennsylvania
Commanding General USAELHD Liaison Office
U.S. Army Materiel Cmemasnd Rome Air Development Center
ATIN: R&D Directorate ATIN: IW)L
Washington 25, DC. Griffiss Air Force Base, New York
Commanding General 1 Commending Officer
U.S. Army Electronics Command U.S. Army Electronics Material
ATIN: AMSEL-AD Support Agency
Fort Monmouth, New Jersey ATTN: SEIMS-AI)
Fort Monmouth, New Jersey
Director, U.S. Naval Research I
Laboratory Marine Corps Liaison Office
ATIN: Code 2027 U.S. Army Electronics Research and
Washington 25, D.C. Development Laboratory
ATIN: S•ILRA/!LN R
Commander, Aeronautical Systems I Fort Monmouth, New Jersey
Division
ATIN: ASAPHL Commanding Officer
Wright-Patterson Air Force Baas, Ohio U.S. Army Electronics Research and
SDeveloment Laboratory
H Electronic Systems DiviioATIN: Director of Research or
L.N: HSco Engineering
L.G. Haenscom Field Fort Monmouth, New Jersey
Bedford, Massachusetts
Commanding Officer
Commander, Air Force Cambridge 1 U.S. Army Electronics Research and
Research Laboratories Development Laboratory
ATIN: CHO ATI" : Technical Documents Center
L.G. Hanscom Field Fort Monmouth, New Jersey
Bedford, Massachusetts
Coimmanding Officer
Commander, Air Force Command & U.S. Army Electronics Research and
Control Development Division Development Laboratory
ATIN: C11C ATTN: SEIWA/ADJ (FU No. 1)
L.G. Hanscom Field Fort Monmouth, New Jersey
-Bedford, Massachusetts
Advisory Group on Electron
Devices 2
Commander, Rome Air Development Center 1 346 Broadway
ATIN: RAALD New York 13, New York
Griffisa Air Force Base, New York
Commanding Officer 3
Commander, Armed Services Technical 10 U.S. Army Electronics Research and
Information Agency Development Laborstory
ATIN: TISIA ATIN: SLIDA/TNH
Arlington Hall Station Fort Monmouth, New Jersey
Arlington 12, Virginia ('FOR RETRANSmITTAL TO ACCREDITED BRITISH
AND CANADIAN GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES)
Chief, U.S. Army Security Agency 2
Arlington Hall Station Commanding General
Arlington 12, Virginia U.S. Ar Cobat Developments Command
ATTN : C&};-E
Deputy President I Fort Belvoir, Virginia
US. Army Security Agency Board
Arlington Hall Station Commanding Officer
Arlington 12, Virginia U.S. Army Communications-Eleetronics
Combat Development Agency
Commanding Officer I Fort Huachuca, Arisons
Harry Diamond Laboratories
ATIN: Library, Room 211. Building 92
Washington 25, D.C.
/
DISTRIBUTION LIST
NO. OF NO. OF
ORGANIZATION COPIts ORGANIZATION COPIIn
Director, Fort Monmouth Office 1 General Electric Microwave I
U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Laboratory
Combat Development Agency ATIN: Technical Library
Building 410 601 California Avenue
Fort Monmouth, New Jersey Palo Alto, California
AFSC Scientific/Technical Liaison I Dr. K. L. Kotzebue
Office Watkins-Johnson Company
U.S. Army Electronics Research and 3333 Hillview Avenue
Development Laboratory Stanford Industrial Park
Fort Monmouth, New Jersey Palo Alto, California
Commanding Officer and Director 1 Dr. Griemmuman
U.S. Navy Electronics Laboratory Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn
San Diego 52, California Route 110
ELAIBS Library I Farmingdale, Long Island; New York
Stanford Industrial Park National Bureau of Standards 1
3300 Hillview Avenue Engineering Electronics Section
Palo Alto, California ATIN: Mr. Gustave Shapiro, Chief
Airborne Instruments Laboratory I Washington 25, D.C.
ATIN: Mr. R. Sleven Chief
Deer Park, Long Island, New York Bureau of Ships
ATIN: Mr. Gumina, Code 68182
Commanding Officer Department of the Navy
U.S. Arm Sinal Reearch Unit Washington 25, D.C.
ATIN : SIGIJU-3
Mountain View, California Physical Electronics Laboratory
ATIN: Philip Carter
Stanford Electronics Laboratory 1 2493 Pulgas Avenue
Stanford University E. Palo Alto, California
ATIN: Applied Electronics Laboratory
Stanford, California Loral Electronics Corporation
ATIN: Mr. Magid
Convair 1 825 Bronx River Drive
Pomona, California New York 72, New York
Commander, Pome Air Dovel bmet Catr 1 Commanding Officer
ATIN: WIiM-2, Mr. Patsy A."Pomenelli U.S.A. Electronics Research &
Griffiss Air Force Base Development Laboratory
Rome, New York Fort Monmouth, New Jersey
ATIN: SELItA/SiJ I
Rantec Corporation 1 ATIN: SWIJA/PIU (Mr. Reingold) 1
ATIN: S. B. Cohn, Technical Director ATIN: SELAA/SEA (B. Ellis) 1
Calabasas, California ATIM: SEILA/PE (Dr. E. Both) 1
ATIN: SEUA/PE (Division Director) I
U.S. Naval Ordnance Test Station 1 ATIN: SB/SIE (Mr. I. Dattilo, 10
ATIN: Code 4021, Mr. Hobert Corzies
China Lake, California