0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views18 pages

Module 1 Introduction

The Lawctopus Moot Course introduces participants to the fundamentals of mooting, highlighting its differences from other co-curricular activities and emphasizing the importance of research, drafting, and advocacy skills. It outlines the structure of moot court competitions, including team composition, competition rules, and evaluation criteria. Additionally, the course discusses the benefits of mooting, such as enhancing critical skills, providing real-world courtroom experience, and offering networking opportunities.

Uploaded by

Aditi Soni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views18 pages

Module 1 Introduction

The Lawctopus Moot Course introduces participants to the fundamentals of mooting, highlighting its differences from other co-curricular activities and emphasizing the importance of research, drafting, and advocacy skills. It outlines the structure of moot court competitions, including team composition, competition rules, and evaluation criteria. Additionally, the course discusses the benefits of mooting, such as enhancing critical skills, providing real-world courtroom experience, and offering networking opportunities.

Uploaded by

Aditi Soni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Lawctopus Moot COURSE (& Competition)

Module 1: Introduction

Introduction
Understanding Mooting: A Brief Overview

Trial Advocacy vs. Mock trial

How is mooting different from other co-curricular activities 4

Structure of a Moot Court Competition 5

Why moot:8 Reasons


Types of Moot Court Competitions: Domestic and International moots 10

Choosing a Moot: 4 Ways to Think About This 12

A 4-step preliminary checklist for for mooting 14

Role of Team work 16

Role of the researcher in a moot competition 17

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.


Introduction

The fact that you have signed up for this course on mooting (which is a great decision
btw) signifies that you are already interested in the art and want to learn more about
it.

While this may also mean that most already have a basic idea of what mooting
is and what it entails, it's never a bad thing to spend some time on the building blocks,
for it is this foundation that would ensure that you stand tall and mighty in your
mooting journey ahead!

This foundational learning involves:

a. Understanding the concept ofa moot court and mock trial,

b. Structure of a moot court competition,

c. How Mooting diffters from any other co-curricular activity that you might have done

previously,

d. And the reasons, considerations, and motivations to take up mooting.

We will further discuss the process of choosing your moot team for a competition
and also the factors that play a role in selecting an appropriate moot court
competition to compete and be a part of.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.


Understanding Mooting: A Brief Overview

To an outsider, mooting might only seem to be an act of presenting/arguing your case

before the judge. In reality, however, oral arguments are just the tip of the iceberg. A
majority of work relating to research, drafting, and preparation of memorials is done
way before the oral rounds take place.

Keeping this in light, a moot court can be defined as an activity in which the
participants are given a hypothetical case upon which they are required to:

a. analyze the facts,


b. cull out the legal issues involved in it,

c. conduct research on the issues identified,


d. draft a memorial, and
e. finally argue the case on behalf of the client.

To sum up, mooting involves researching, drafting, and arguing on a hypothetical case
in a real courtroom-like environment. A moot court is an imitation of an actual court
proceeding, which essentially means that you will have to abide by the
well-established principles of research, drafting, court mannerisms, and etiquettes
while you present your case.

All these also form an important part of your advocacy skills. Moot courts are thus

often described as the nearest courtroom experience that a student can have.

The nature of the mooting as a co-curricular activity is such that it enhances a


participant's research, drafting, and speaking skils- all of them at the same time, and
which if combined can make a highly successful lawyer.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.

2
Trial Advocacy vs. Mock trial

Before delving deeper into the finer aspects of


mooting, it is crucial that you
understand the difference between moot
a court and a trial advocacy
competition.

In a moot court competition, the facts of the case as contained in the


problem/factsheet are taken to be final and undisputed, and the arguments are to be
made based on these facts. There is no examination of witnesses in a moot court and,
in real life, the
proceedings therein can be compared to a final arguments stage at an
appellate court.

On the other hand, in trial


a
advocacy competition, the
participants are expected to
conduct a "trial"
establish the facts given in the
i.e.
problem first by conducting the
examination-in-chief and cross-examination of the witnesses.

The facts given in the trial problem can even be disputed by a tactful use of
examination in chief and cross-examination by the counsels. Only once this stage of
examination concludes, the counsel is required to make oral arguments on the basis of
the facts proved/disproved in the earlier stage. A Mock trial bears resemblance to the
proceedings undertaken at a trial court.

Note: The key difference between moot court and trial


a a
advocacy competition is
that; in a moot court we have to
argue on questions of law, whereas in trial
a
advocacy
competition, we have to argue on questions of fact.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.


How is mooting different from other co-curricular

activities

Let's get it straight: Mooting is unlike any other activity that you may have done
previously. In your academic life till now, you might have come across various

co-curricular activities like debates, MUN's, elocution, research paper, essay writing
etc. However, mooting stands in an altogether different league due to its unique and
all encompassing nature.

Research Oriented: Research forms the backbone of Mooting. Every argument that
you make before the court has to be backed by some basis in law. This basis may be
found in precedents, statutes or commentaries. To find these appropriate authorities,
a participant is required to carry out a thorough research. Other co-curricular
activities like debates, elocution, MUN's may not require any research at all or mayy

only require only preliminary research on a topic.

Oratory skills vs Advocacy skills: Whereas some curricular activities like essays or
research paper writing may not involve any aspect of speaking skills, others like
debating, MUNs focus largely on the oratory skills of the participant which mostly
weigh in factors like the ability of the participant to make an impassioned, fluent
speech coupled with use of rhetoric. A moot court, on the other hand, is all about
making the most compelling arguments in the most persuasive and gentle manner.
The participants are expected to follow the courtroom etiquettes and mannerisms
while presenting their arguments. The style of advancing your arguments has to be
different than in a debate, elocution.

Law centric activity: Mooting as an activity has everything to do with law. Moot
courts are organized exclusively by law schools, and for the exclusive participation of
the law schools. Mooting focuses on issues of law and expects legal arguments from
the participants. On the other hand, other co-curricular activities like debates,MUN's,

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.


4
extempore, elocution are generic in nature and students from any discipline can

participate in them.

Structure ofa Moot Court Competition

Team Composition: Typically a team for a moot court competition would consist of 3
members, of whom two members are the speakers and the remaining one member is
the researcher. Additionally, there are competitions which allow the presence of

additional members as a researcher or speaker in the team. In such cases, reference is


to be made to the rules of the competition which would clearly state the maximum no.

of people allowed to make up a team.

Competition Rules While rules of moot court competitions are mostly standard,

need be read thoroughly. Careful consideration must be given to rules


they to once

the number of members allowed in the team, formatting of the memorial,


relating to

page limit for the memorial, no. of rounds in the competition, the deadlines for the

competition and penalties on late submission of the memorials etc. A sample of Moot
court Competition rule can be accessed here.

round While this is not the norm, there may be a memo


Memo Qualification -

in which the teams are shortlisted on the basis


qualifier round in some competitions
become criterion whether a team
of their memorials. In other words, the memorials
a

rounds This is done to ensure


would even get a chance to compete in the oral or not.

that serious, committed teams with sound research on the problem get an
only
rounds.
opportunity to compete in the oral
have memorial
Preliminary rounds
-

Except for some moot competitions which a

competitions have a direct


rounds as detailed above, most moot court
qualification
other for the
in which the teams compete with each
preliminary oral round

berth. In this very first round of the competition, every team gets an
quarter-final

reserved.
Lawctopus. All rights
opportunity to argue from both the
the respondent's/defendant's side.
petitioner's/plaintiff's/appellant's side as well as

Subsequent Rounds -

In accordance with the rules of moot court


a
competition,
after the conclusion of the
prelims round, the successful teams may progress to the
best of 16 rounds or a
quarter-finals round, as the case may be. Teams shortlisted in
this round progress to the semifinals and then
consequently to the final rounds of the
competition.

In all these rounds, team


a
gets to argue from any one side only i.e. they represent
either the plaintiff/appellant the
or
respondent/defendant.
The decision of which side team would represent is
a
generally taken by a draw of lots.

What are you judged on For evaluation of the memorial the Application and
-

Appreciation of Facts, Identification of Issues, Structuring and Presentation of Issues,

Application of Legal Principles, Authorities and Precedents, Ingenuity and Logical


Reasoning. Lucidity and Writing Skills, Proper Footnoting and Formatting.

You'll be learning all about this in the future modules. For now, we are just laying out
the basics.

For Evaluation of oral round Structure, Articulation & Clarity, Application of Legal
-

Principles and Use of Authorities, Knowledge and Marshalling of Facts,


Persuasiveness, Ingenuity & Response to Questions, Court Etiquette, Presentation
Style and Time Management.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.

6
Why moot: 8 Reasons

Since mooting as an activity requires a lot of time, hard work and efforts from all the

team members, it is only fair that you have sound reasons to take up mooting. ODf

course, everybody has a different motivation to moot, but understanding the most
common reasons as to why people take up mooting can provide succor to your own

belief to take up mooting.

1. Critical and analytical skills -The inherent nature of Mooting is such that it
involves analysis of facts, sifting of the material facts from immaterial ones, carving
out the contentious issues, and conducting researchthem. This whole process
on

helps a participant achieve the analytical skills as he/she learns to raise perplexing

questions and seeks to find an answer to them, all by her own efforts.

2. Appreciate diverse perspectives - Mooting teaches you to have a holistic view of

a problem in hand and evaluate both the strengths and weaknesses of a case. Since a

moot court requires preparation from both sides to be made, it requires interpretation

and re-interpretation of the same provisions of law to suit both sides in a case.

3. Enhances public speaking -In a profession like law, public speaking is a good to
have skill. Mooting provides a participant with an excellent platform to polish one's
speaking skills before they enter into the profession. (Note: Advocacy skills are more
than just being a good public speaker. Introverts, rejoice!).

4. Learning beyond the classroom - Let's face it, the real practice of law cannot be

served only by bare provisions of law and the plethora of case laws that are taught in
the confines of the classroom. (Note: The Bare Act and the Case Law still are crucial
readings for both the law student and the lawyer). A diligent student must take part in
activities that bridge the gap between classroom learning and real-world application.

Mooting helps in bridging this gap by introducing the participants to an


application-based learning of law.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.


1
Irrespective of the outcome of a moot competition, a
5. Industry knowledge
be assured that the mooting experience will help him in gaining a vast
participant can

of subject matter of the moot. The experience will broaden his knowledge
knowledge
of subject matter involved in the moot and help him in getting an edge over other

peers in that particular area of law.

6. CV Building -Since skills like research, drafting and advocacy are indispensable for

any practice of law, a good track record in mooting sort of ticks all the boxes that

look for in prospective candidate.


lawyers/law firms out a

A prior mooting history further reflects a participant's inclination towards academic

pursuits and demonstrates that he has spent his time fruitfully in the college. Further,
a student can build a great CV by strategically choosing moots\competitions in the

area of law she wishes to work in future. The choice of his moot court competitions

will provide a fillip to his professional endeavours in the field.

7. Litigation experience Mooting is the closest real-world courtroom experience


that you can have as a student. It equips you with crucial advocacy skills which can

help you not just in your endeavors in a competition, but also in your lawyering life.
Research, drafting, and speaking skills, if diligentiy worked upon, can make you a

great mooter. Carry these skills into your professional life and you could end up being

an equally great litigator!

Imagine the opportunity to argue your case before a bench comprising sitting and

retired judges of the High courts and Supreme courts. And all of this when you have

not even graduated from your college!

While litigation internships may allow you to research, or even draft a real ongoing

case as a student, they can never give you an experience and thrill of arguing your own

case. With the help of mooting. you can also evaluate if you want to be a litigator, and

if arguing a case is something that you enjoy truly.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.


8
8. Networking and Internship Opportunities- Many moot court competitions are

organized by law firms, or have good litigators, judges, corporate lawyers as their
judges. If you do well in a moot court competitions, your performance can translate
into internship offers. Go up to a judge, introduce yourself formally, and get into an
intelligent conversation.

Many students tend to think "Why would a senior lawyer talk to me"? There could be
many reasons for that. Many lawyers love to give back to the young generation.

Helping others is an immensely satisfying experience and they get that satisfaction by
helping you. Just like senior lawyers bring experience and gravitas to a conversation,
young people like yourself bring fun and enthusiasm into a talk. It can be energising
and uplifting for any senior professional to talk to a smart young law student!

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.

9
Types of Moot Court Competitions: Domestic and
International moots

Depending on the area of law involved, Moot Court Competitions may broadly be
divided into two categories:

i. Domestic moots, and

ii. International moots

Domestic or National moots, as the name suggests, are competitions where the
issues involved pertain to the Municipal laws of a particular country. For. Eg. A Moot
Competition having issues of Constitutional law, Contract law, Criminal law,
insolvency and bankruptcy law etc. fall within the category of a domestic moot.

B.R. Sawhney National moot Court competition organised by NALSAR, Hyderabad,


NLS's KK Luthra National moot court competitions, NUJS Herbert Smith Corporate
Law Moot, Inter-University Moot Court Competition organised by the Bar Council of
India are some prominent examples in this field.

International moots, on the other hand, are competitions which focus on


international law. They generally involve facts that transcend the national boundaries
and involve issues pertaining to Public International Law, Maritime Law, Space Law,
International Environmental Law, International Commercial Arbitration etc.

Some international moot court competitions, for e.g Stetson and Oxford Price media,
FDI etc. shortlist the teams by conducting a National or regional rounds first and

teams qualified thus get an opportunity to participate in the main international


rounds.

Lawctopus, All rights reserved.

10
competitions are held out of India, a
While most of the renowned international moot

are now also conducted in India. For


sizable number of international competitions
etc. conduct their own
example, GLC Mumbai, NLS, NUALS Kochi,
NLIU Bhopal
international moot court Competitions.

application and the


So, if you're someone who's interested in international law, its
international moot courts are the way to go forward.
issues surrounding it,
and participate in a
subject matter involved, the time taken to prepare
Apart from the
differs substantially. Whereas a Domestic
domestic moot and international moot

preparation of 1-2 months, most international


Moot Court Competition requires a

moots require an extended period of preparation which may range from 3-6 months.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.

11
Choosinga Moot: 4 Ways to Think About This

Now that you have decided to take a plunge and enter into the world of mooting, the

first step would involve some brainstorming about which moot to compete in. The
ever growing mooting scene in India and the large no. of moot courts being organized
these days can leave you perplexed as to which moot you should participate in. Here,
it is to be noted that there are certain the factors that should be considered before
signing up for any moot court competition.

L. Initial mooting journey - In the initial stage of your mooting journey, the focus

must be on imbibing the art of mooting and making the most of your mooting

experience. Generally, students in the initial couple of years at the law school may not
have a wel-defined interest or inclination towards any specific subjects of law. They
may also be not adequately exposed to any niche areas of law at this stage of their
education. In such cases, it is advisable that a student starts his mooting journey with
subjects in which he has some basic knowledge. Contracts, Constitution, Torts or
Criminal law moot competitions serve as a good starting point for mooting. Make sure
that you don't sign up for the first moot on a subject completely alien to you. Just
imagine the plight of a first year law student thrown upon a barrage of questions on
securities law!

Of course, once you have some sort of mooting experience, you can always try out new
and different areas of law. Infact, as you spend time with any particular area or issue of
law, you begin to develop an interest in that subject matter.

2. Mooting based on Interests As you gradually progress in your law school


journey, you tend to identify areas of law which interest you. You also realize that
there are certain subjects that you absolutely dislike. This "liking" and "dislike" for
particular subjects is what we generally categorize as "interest". If there's an area of
law which you feel passionate ab orare curious tool ow more about, it makes all
the sense to opt for moots on that particular subject matter.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.


12
3. Aligning your moots with your future endeavors- Your choices of moots can
work to your advantage as they can reflect prior experience in a particular field of law.
If you desire to build a career in any specific area of law, you must opt for moots

conducted on that particular subject matter. For eg. For a person who is interested in
say, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law, would do well to participate in related moots.
This can turn out to be favorable for their professional advancement.

4. Checking with the availability of resources: The research for a moot largely
depends on the availability of resources. Resources in this context would mean the
relevant database, books, access to online research engines etc. In law school, the
libraries are sufficiently equipped to provide you with the relevant resources. It is only
on the basis of these available resources that we can conduct our research for the

moot.

For example, if there is a moot on constitutional law, we should check with our library
for the availability of books. Further, we even tend to find publicly accessible resources
on subjects of municipal law. However, for some students who are willing to take part

in a moot court competition on International Air Law, they should first check for the
availability of the relevant resources on International Air Law.

Checking for the availability of resources does not only mean to check with the law
school library, but it also means to connect with the people who have already
participated in such a moot court competition. After all, people are generally willing to
help (Mooters Unite!) and offer substantial assistance in procurement of resource
material. Therefore, the availability of resources is an important consideration while
students decide to participate in a moot court competition.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.


A 4-step preliminary checklist for for mooting

towards the modules explaining the meat of the


Before we proceed subsequent
mooting process i.e. researching, drafting, speaking before a judge etc., it is important

that we go through a small pre-moot checklist.

A. Choosing a team:

It takes collective effort of all the teammates to achieve


Mooting is a team activity. a

success in your mooting endeavors. Finding the "right"' team members, therefore, is

the first task that a participant has to undertake in order to compete in a moot court

of team cannot be stressed enough. Your


competition. The importance a right
teammates can make or break the efforts that you have put in for the past few months.

Here are a few pointers that can help you build a great mooting team:

Qualities to look for in a potential teammate Make


sure you choose team
members who are motivated, hardworking, sincere and committed to the purpose.

Even a single member having a casual or carefree attitude towards the moot can

demotivate the whole team.

Pro-tip Team up with a person who has an analytical bent of mind, has good

communication and research skills, and is competitive. Learn to trust your hunch.
Also learn to inspect and test your hunch.

Friends as teammates- A lot of people, without considering the dynamics ofa moot
court competition, team up with their close friends for their mooting activities and

end up severely underperforming in the competitions. This common tendency to


consider our "buddies" as our natural mooting allies may go extremely wrong if your
friend is someone who's not interested in mooting (or process involved in it) and yet
just takes it up for the sake of friendship or having a good time.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.

14
It is to be remembered here that Mooting involves significant time and effort and
friendship is barely a reason for you to spoil your chances in a moot. Therefore, it is
advisable that you don't take "friendship" as a sole criterion for someone to be your
moot partner. Of course, if you have friends who are equally inclined and passionatee
about mooting as you are, then having your friends as your mooting partners may

actually be a greatly rewarding experience.

B. Dividing the responsibilities - Once you're done with forming your team for

the competition, the next immediate step would be to divide the roles of each
team member viz. a viz the speakers and the researcher. Identify the members
who will assume the role of the speaker and the one who will be the researcher
of the team.

The decision must be taken mutually after taking into account the personal

preferences of each of the team members. Factors such as communication


skills, research skills and previous experience of the members may also be
relevant aspects that may be considered before arriving at any decision.

C. Dividing the research - Once the members choose their roles as a speaker or

researcher, the next logical step would be to divide the issues and assign the
research to each of the members of the team. While the members would carry
out such specific research on their issues, it must also be highlighted that each
member of the team must prepare and research for the case holistically and not
disregard the other issues involved in the case.
D. Set deadlines Though some of us may absolutely hate them, the truth is that
deadlines can make you disciplined. Just Imagine about all your college projects
and fate they would face if there was no submission deadline for them! Most of
them would forever remain a "work in progress", never to be completed.

Therefore, while mooting, it is important that you set deadlines by which you
would complete the task in hand. Whether it be a research on some issue or
drafting of the memorial, a deadline is a must for all the tasks. Setting up the

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.


deadline and actually abiding by it would make you disciplined and also leave

you with enough time to get the task reviewed by the team members.

Role of Team work

As stated earlier, it takes a combined, concerted effort from the whole team to be
successful at mooting. Your achievement or a failure in a competition does not belong

to you individually, but to the whole team which has grappled along you for an

elongated period of time. The quest must be to work with team spirit and not focus

much on individual glory.

1. Discuss, debate, deliberate - always be open to discussions on every aspect of the

mooting process. Whether it be a question on a difficult research question/proposition

or something as easy as deciding the mode of travel to the competition venue, everyy

issue that arises in the team must be communicated and possibly sorted by mutual

discussion. Coordination is paramount for any team activity.

2. Supports your team members- The long process that it is, Mooting may

sometimes seem to get on your nerves and test your patience. Everybody goes through

a day where you may feel too dull and unmotivated to do anything. In such cases, it
really helps if you have supporting teamnmates to stand by you and understand you.

3. Avoid conflicts As far as possible, avoid conflicts with your team members. If
there's a difference of opinion amongst the team members which cannot be

reconciled, respect the personal opinion of the member and move on.

Important: you can disagree, and commit! There must not be any clash of egos

amongst the team members. Further, no blame games are to be played within the

team for any failure that might occur in a moot. Important: the non-emotional

response is usually the best. If tensions rise, sleep over it. Actually discuss it the next

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.


16
day. Failures part and parcel of the mooting process and
are a
must be taken so.
Remember, it's all about enjoying the process and as learning much as we can.

4. Re-check each other's work A


great example of playing by team spirit would be
-

to
periodically check the progress of each other's assigned role and see if the deadlines
set by team are
being followed. Important: have a daily, bi-weekly meeting at a fixed
time at a fixed slot can help in this.

Role of the researcher in a moot competition


It is a common
misconception amongst the students that a researcher's role is only to
conduct research the issues.
on
Nothing can
be farther from the truth. A researcher, in
reality, is a backbone of a successful mooting team and is as important part of the
team as the speakers, if not more. Apart from the research and drafting process, a
researcher can be
extremely useful resource in preparing
an the probable questions
that could be asked by the judges in the oral rounds.

Further, there cannot be a person more appropriate than researcher


a to
practice
your oral rounds since the researcher has seen the moot problem from closest

quarters and has spent considerable time dealing with the same issues. He's also
someone who knows all the strengths and weaknesses of the case and, also the

precedents on the point.

Therefore, to undermine the role of a researcher would be the biggest folly that the
participants can commit in the moot. The researcher is a wonderful resource for the
team and must be utilized accordingly.

Lawctopus. All rights reserved.

17

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy