Scribd
Upload
6 views2 pages

The Pluto Enigma

Pluto was classified as a planet upon its discovery in 1930, but its small size and unusual orbit led to debates about its status. The International Astronomical Union established criteria in 2006 that defined planets and dwarf planets, with Pluto ultimately being reclassified as a dwarf planet due to its inability to clear its orbital neighborhood. This reclassification was influenced by the discovery of similar objects in the Kuiper Belt, including Eris, which prompted the need for a formal definition of a planet.

Uploaded by

ivyjaneevangelista9
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views2 pages

The Pluto Enigma

Pluto was classified as a planet upon its discovery in 1930, but its small size and unusual orbit led to debates about its status. The International Astronomical Union established criteria in 2006 that defined planets and dwarf planets, with Pluto ultimately being reclassified as a dwarf planet due to its inability to clear its orbital neighborhood. This reclassification was influenced by the discovery of similar objects in the Kuiper Belt, including Eris, which prompted the need for a formal definition of a planet.

Uploaded by

ivyjaneevangelista9
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

The Pluto Enigma: From Planet to Dwarf Planet, Exploring

the Unknown

Pluto's classification as a planet began with its discovery in 1930 by Clyde Tombaugh at the Lowell
Observatory. At that time, astronomers were engaged in a search for a hypothetical "Planet X" that
could explain the irregularities observed in Uranus's orbit. When Tombaugh identified a small celestial
body beyond Neptune, it was initially celebrated as the ninth planet in our Solar System. The primary
reasons for this classification were that Pluto orbited the Sun and appeared unique compared to
other known celestial objects.

However, it soon became apparent that Pluto was much smaller than anticipated—smaller even than
Earth's Moon—and its orbit was highly elliptical and tilted relative to the other planets. Despite these
unusual characteristics, Pluto retained its status as a planet for several decades. This was largely due
to the absence of a formal definition for what constitutes a planet. Without clear criteria, Pluto's
classification was based on its orbit and its perceived distinctiveness from other celestial bodies.

As time progressed and more objects similar to Pluto were discovered in the Kuiper Belt, particularly
from the early 1990s onwards, Pluto's status as a planet became increasingly debated. The discovery
of Eris in 2005, which was slightly larger and more massive than Pluto, further emphasized the need
for a precise definition of a planet.

Pluto was originally classified as a planet in 1930 following its discovery by Clyde Tombaugh at the
Lowell Observatory. At that time, astronomers were actively searching for a hypothetical "Planet X" to
explain discrepancies in Uranus's orbit. When Tombaugh identified a small celestial object beyond
Neptune, it was initially believed to be this missing planet, although it later became clear that Pluto
was not massive enough to account for these discrepancies. Pluto's classification as a planet was
primarily due to its orbit around the Sun and its perceived uniqueness. However, it was soon noted
that Pluto was much smaller than expected—smaller even than Earth's Moon—and its orbit was
highly elliptical and tilted compared to the other planets.

Despite these unusual characteristics, Pluto remained classified as a planet for several decades
because there was no formal definition of what constituted a planet. The lack of a clear definition
meant that Pluto's status as a planet was largely based on its orbit and its distinctiveness from other
known celestial bodies. Over time, as more objects similar to Pluto were discovered in the Kuiper Belt,
particularly from the early 1990s onwards, its status as a planet became increasingly controversial.
The discovery of Eris in 2005, which was slightly larger and more massive than Pluto, further
highlighted the need for a formal definition of a planet.
The Three Criteria Set by the IAU for Defining a Planet

In 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) decided to clarify what qualifies as a planet. They
established three criteria

A planet is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity
to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and
(c) has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit.
A 'dwarf planet' is a celestial body that (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-
gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round)
shape, (c) has not cleared the neighborhood around its orbit, and (d) is not a satellite.
All other objects, except satellites, orbiting the Sun shall be referred to collectively as 'Small Solar
System Bodies.'

For an object to be classified as a planet, it must meet all three criteria.


https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/planets/what-is-a-planet/#:~:text=A%20planet%20is%20a
%20celestial,the%20neighborhood%20around%20its%20orbit.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy