Session 16-17. Capital Budgeting - Risk Analysis
Session 16-17. Capital Budgeting - Risk Analysis
BITS Pilani
Work Integrated Learning
Programmes Division
BITS Pilani
Work Integrated Learning
Programmes Division
1. Sensitivity Analysis
2. Scenario Analysis
3. Break-even Analysis
4. Decision Tree Analysis
The financial manager of a food processing company is considering the installation of a plant
cost Rs. 1 crore to increase its processing capacity. The expected values of the underlying
variables are given as follow. Life of project is 7 yrs.
Net Cash flow -10000 3638 3419 3255 3132 3039 2970 2918
The project’s NPV at 12% is
NPV = 4829 >0
Accept the project
5/21/2025 8 BITS Pilani, WILPD
Sensitivity Analysis: Illustration
Forecast under different assumptions
Variables Pessimistic Expected Optimistic % Change
1 Sales Volume (unit'000) 750 1000 1250 25%
2 Units selling price 12.75 15 16.5 15%
3 Units variable cost 7.425 6.75 6.075 10%
4 Annual fixed cost (Rs.'000) 4800 4000 3200 20%
Now, project’s NPV are recalculated as below (We are changing one value at a
time, not all). This table has done CF calculation 8 times for 8 results here.
Variables Pessimistic Expected Optimistic
1Sales Volume (unit'000) -1289 4829 10948
2Units selling price -1845 4829 9279
3Units variable cost 2827 4829 6832
4Annual fixed cost (Rs.'000) 2456 4829 7203
Demerits:
• It merely shows what happens to NPV when there is a change in some variables, without
providing any idea of how likely (probability) that change will be.
• Typically, in sensitivity analysis only on variable is changed at a time. in the real world, however,
variables tend to move together.
• It is inherently a very subjective analysis. The same sensitivity analysis may lead one decision
maker to accept the project while another may reject it.
• Optimistic scenario: High demand, high selling price, low variable cost, and
so on.
• Normal scenario: Average demand, average selling price, average variable
cost, and so on.
• Pessimistic scenario: Low demand, low selling price, high variable cost,
and so on.
i) The NPV of the project under different scenarios of poor, average, good
and excellent.
ii) The expected NPV of the project.
iii) Risk as assessed from standard deviation and co-efficient of variation.
iv) Find out the probabilities of NPV being
a) negative b) 80%, c) 90%, d) 100%, e) 110% and f) 120% of the
expected NPV.
v) The management does not accept any proposal that has more than 20%
chance of providing negative NPV. Under such condition what is your
recommendation regarding acceptance of the project?
• How much should be produced and sold at a minimum to ensure that the project
does not lose money.
• This is called break-even analysis and the minimum quantity at which loss is
avoided is called the break-even point.
• Most popular way is financial break-even analysis
• For example, imagine a project that has a fixed cost of $100,000 and earns on net
$4 (contribution) per unit sold. You expect to sell 35,000 units, which generates a
profit of $40,000 (35,000*$4 - $100,000 = $40,000). The break even-point is 25,000
units (25,000*4 - $100,000=0).
• You might be wrong about selling 35,000 units, but if you know that the project will
sell at least 25,000 units then you know you won’t lose money, and would feel more
confident about going ahead with the project.
• The upfront cost of a project is $100,000. Sales are for five years, starting next year.
The company earns $0.50 per sale, and expects to sell 60,000 units per year.
• If the interest rate (cost of capital) is 5%, the NPV is -100,000 +129,884 = 29,884
(Refer to Excel).
• At what level of sales does the project break even in terms of NPV?
• Set PV = -100,000 (so that NPV = 0) and find the amount of sales per year (Use
Goal seek in Excel). Explain in detail
• The answer is sales in dollars = 23,097 so that sales in units = 46,194 (23097/0.5).