Chapter 4 - Employee Motivation in The Workplace
Chapter 4 - Employee Motivation in The Workplace
WORKPLACE
CHAPTER 4
LEARNING OUTCOMES
TOPICS
Employee Motivation in the Workplace (Page 64-79)
3. Motivated individual are risk-takers and are always willing to try new
things. They understand that filures in achieving new things are actually
apportunities to do something new.
REASONS OF HAVING MOTIVATED EMPLOYEES
https://youtu.be/mLXpJmtzqTI
McCLELLAND’S THEORY OF NEEDS
(ACQUIRED-NEEDS MODEL)
Proposed by David McClelland in 1961,
McClelland Theory states that human
behaviour is affected by three needs:
1. Need for Power
2. Need for Achievement
3. Need for Affiliation
McClelland’s Theory of Needs (Acquired-Needs Model)
Need for Achievement Need for Power Need for Affiliation
(n-ach) (n-pow) (n-aff)
• N-ach is the urge to • N-pow is the desire to • N-aff is a need for open
excel, to accomplish in influence other and sociable
relation to a set of individual’s behaviour. In interpersonal
standards, to struggle to other words, it is the relationships. In other
achieve success. It is the desire to have control words, it is a desire for
desire to complete a task over others and to be relationship based on
more effectively than influential. cooperation and mutual
before. understanding.
McCLELLAND’S THEORY OF NEEDS
(ACQUIRED-NEEDS MODEL)
Need for Need for
Need for Power
Achievement Affiliation
• Drive to excel • To control • Friendship
• Achieve in others • Good
relationto a • To get desired relationship
set of things done
standards
• Strive to
succeed
Expectancy Theory of Motivation
• The theory states that the intensity of a
tendency to perform in a particular
manner is dependent on the intensity of
an expectation that the performance will
be followed by a desired outcome and on
the attractiveness of the outcome to the
individual.
• Proposed by Victor Vroom of Yale School
of Management in 1964.
• Vroom stresses and focus on outcomes,
not on needs.
Effort-performance relationship (Expectancy)
• Amount of effort will lead to some degree of performance.
• Cognitive evaluation is heavily weighted by an Individual’s past
experiences, personality, self confidence and emotional state.
MEASURABLE
• The goal must be measurable such as in Ringgit Malaysia, US Dollar
• 10% increase in profitability can be measured in monetary value.
ACTION-ORIENTED
• Determine actions to be taken to achieve the goal. Good action are able to produce good
outcome.
• To achieve 10% increase profitability, employees can choose to produce a variety of products,
improve services to customers
GOAL-SETTING CRITERIA
REALISTIC
• Goals are relevant to organizational success
• A 10% increase in profitability is relevant and realistic for the
success of an organization.
TIME
• There must be a time range set to achieve the goal.
• Time has been set to increase 10% profit by December year
2012.
EQUITY THEORY
• Equity theory is defined as “a theory of
motivation that focuses on people’s
perceptions of the fairness of their work
outcomes relative to their work inputs.
• Inputs – resource contributed in performing
the job such as time, effort, skill, experience,
etc.
• Outcome – rewards, benefits, recognition,
career opportunities and other items which
the individual receives from the organization.
EQUITY THEORY
• The individual compares his own outcome–input ratio
with a referent’s outcome–input ratio.
• A referent could be another person, a group of people
similar to oneself, oneself in a previous job, or one’s
own expectation of what the outcome–input should be.
REFERENT COMPARISON
• 4 types of referent a person can make a comparison with:
1. Self-inside- an employee is comparing himself with his own self in the
same organization.
2. Self-outside- an employee compares himself with his own self if he were
in other organization.
3. Other-inside- an employee compares his input and outcome with
another person in the same organization.
4. Other-outside- an employee compares his input and outcome with
another person in a different organization.
REFERENT COMPARISON
• The comparison later would lead to 3 probabilities of outcome:
1. Feeling Under Rewarded (Inequity)- under rewarded is the feeling of inequity
which exists when a person believes that his input-output ration is less or lower
than the referent. When he feels that he is under reward, he may feel unhappy,
unmotivated and dissatisfied.
2. Feeling equal or Equity – Equity is the justice, impartiality and fairness to which
all organizational members are entitled. This is a feeling where the individual
feels that the output which he receives from the organization is worth the input
which the individual contributes to the organization.
3. Feeling Over Rewarded (Inequity) – Over rewarded is the inequity that exists
when a person perceives that his or her own outcome-input ration is greater than
the ratio of a referent. He is being paid more or getting more than what the
referent are getting.
RESPOND TO INEQUITY
1. Change in input such as contribute and work less than usual.
2. Change in outcome. If over-reward, then a person may
increase input to ensure that it matches output and if under-
reward, then a person may request for al higher pay cheque
and other rewards from the bosses.
3. Choose a different referent. The individual may choose a
different referent just to have a different feeling. He compares
himself to a person who is getting much more than what he is
receiving.
4. Quit the job or exit from the organization.
5. Change self-perception. E.g. I know that I have performed
better and harder than any hone else.
6. Change perception of others. E.g. Jack’s job is not as
desirable as I earlier thought it was.
END OF
CHAPTER 4
ONLINE CLASS PRESENTATION:
Students are divided into 4 groups, required to find any articles about the
following topic in the Internet as well as referring to the Text Book and present
it in the online class. You need to summarize the article and share the topic into
5 slides of PowerPoint. You can apply your creativity in delivering the topic.
You are given 15 minutes to present the topic in 1 hour online class.