III Void Voidable Marraiges EDITED Copy 2
III Void Voidable Marraiges EDITED Copy 2
AND
FAMILY RELATIONS
VOID & VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
VOID MARRIAGES
EXCEPTION: ARTICLE 41
Valid Bigamous Marriage under Article 41
Art. 41. A marriage contracted by any person during subsistence of a previous marriage
shall be null and void, unless before the celebration of the subsequent marriage, the prior
spouse had been absent for four consecutive years and the spouse present has a well-
founded belief that the absent spouse was already dead. In case of disappearance where
there is danger of death under the circumstances set forth in the provisions of Article 391
of the Civil Code, an absence of only two years shall be suff icient. For the purpose of
contracting the subsequent marriage under the preceding paragraph the spouse present
must institute a summary proceeding as provided in this Code for the declaration of
presumptive death of the absentee, without prejudice to the effect of reappearance of the
absent spouse.
For the purpose of contracting the subsequent marriage under the preceding paragraph the
spouse present must institute a summary proceeding as provided in this Code for the
declaration of presumptive death of the absentee, without prejudice to the effect of
reappearance of the absent spouse.
VOID & VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
VOID MARRIAGES
EXCEPTION: ARTICLE 41
Valid Bigamous Marriage under Article 41
APPLICABLE LAW:
• If the subsequent marriage took place prior to the effectivity of the Family Code (August 3,
1988), apply the provisions of the Civil Code which does not require a judicial declaration of
presumptive death in order for the marriage to be valid [Armas vs Calesterio [330 SCRA 201
(2001)
• If the subsequent marriage is celebrated during the effectivity of the Family Code which now
requires a judicial declaration of presumptive death, the absence of a judicial declaration shall
render the marriage void for being bigamous (Art 41 in rel. to Art 35 FC)
• Otherwise stated under existing laws & jurisprudence , in a case where a spouse is absent for
the requisite period, the present spouse may contract a subsequent marriage only after
securing a judgment declaring the presumptive death of the absent wife.
• Note that the petition must be based on a well founded belief that the absent wife is already
dead.
VOID & VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
LEGAL SEPARATION
CONCEPT:
The remedy available to parties in a valid but failed marriage for the purpose of
obtaining a decree from court entitling him or her to certain reliefs such as:
a] the right to live separately from each other without affecting the marital bond;
b] the dissolution & liquidation of their absolute community or conjugal partnership
property regime; &
c] the custody of their minor children
DISTINCTION WITH ANNULMENT & ABSOLUTE DIVORCE:
A] In legal separation the marriage bond is not severed, in the latter it is severed &
terminated;
B] In legal separation & in absolute divorce the cause/ground exists after the celebration of
marriage; In annulment the ground must exist at the time of the marriage
VOID & VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
LEGAL SEPARATION
Article 56. The petition for legal separation shall be denied on any of the following grounds:
[4C-M: Condone, Consent, Connivance, Collusion, Mutual guilt]
1] Where the aggrieved party has condoned the offense or act complained of.
2] Where the offended party has consented to the commission of the offense or act complained of;
3] Where there is connivance between the parties in the commission of the offense or act
constituting the ground for legal separation;
4] Where both parties have given ground for legal separation .
5] Where there is collusion between the parties to obtain the decree of legal separation.
Article 57. An action for legal separation shall be filed within five years from the time the
occurrence of the cause
VOID & VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
LEGAL SEPARATION
EFFECTS OF RECONCILIATION
1. Proceedings for legal separation shall be terminated at whatever stage [Art. 66 (1),
Family Code].
2. If there is a final decree of legal separation, it shall be set aside [Art. 66 (2), Family
Code].
3. The separation of property and forfeiture of share of the guilty spouse shall subsist
unless the spouses agree to revive their former property regime or institute another
property regime [Arts. 66-67, FC].
4. Joint custody of children is restored.
5. The right to intestate succession by the guilty spouse from the innocent spouse is
restored.
6. The right to testamentary succession depends on the will of the innocent Spouse
NOTE: Articles 65 and 66 always allow reconciliation even after the decree.
VOID & VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
LEGAL SEPARATION
EFFECTS OF RECONCILIATION
Art. 65. If the spouses should reconcile, a corresponding joint manifestation under
oath duly signed by them shall be filed with the court in the same proceeding for
legal separation.
Art. 66. The reconciliation referred to in the preceding Articles shall have the
following consequences:
(1) The legal separation proceedings, if still pending, shall thereby be terminated
at whatever stage; and
(2) The final decree of legal separation shall be set aside, but the separation of
property and any forfeiture of the share of the guilty spouse already effected
shall subsist, unless the spouses agree to revive their former property regime.
The court's order containing the foregoing shall be recorded in the proper civil
registries.
VOID & VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
RA 9262 (ANTI-VAWC LAW)
(9) Attempting to compel or compelling the woman or her child to engage in conduct which
the woman or her child has the right to desist from or desist from conduct which the
woman or her child has the right to engage in, or attempting to restrict or restricting the
woman's or her child's freedom of movement or conduct by force or threat of force, physical
or other harm or threat of physical or other harm, or intimidation directed against the
woman or child. This shall include, but not limited to, the following acts committed with the
purpose or effect of controlling or restricting the woman's or her child's movement or
conduct:
(a) Threatening to deprive or actually depriving the woman or her child of custody to her/his family;
(b) Depriving or threatening to deprive the woman or her children of financial support legally due
her or her family, or deliberately providing the woman's children insufficient financial support;
(c) Depriving or threatening to deprive the woman or her child of a legal right;
(d) Preventing the woman in engaging in any legitimate profession, occupation, business or activity
or controlling the victim's own money or properties, or solely controlling the conjugal or common
money, or properties;